Six reasons OSX will not go mainstream
By Brad Sams, 13 November 2008 - 04:02 184 comments
Apple has a great consumer OS on its hands. Its sleek, it's easy to use and it will not ever make it to mainstream America. There are 6 reasons why we will never see Apple take more than a third of the market share. For the sake of this article, mainstream will be referred to as greater than 33% of all computers.
Reason #6: The corporate world won't adopt OSX. Look around your office, more than likely you're looking at a Windows based environment. While it's true that not all companies run Windows, it is safe to say that the majority do in some form. Why wont corporations switch? Its simple, companies invest millions of dollars to keep up a Windows based infrastructure. The only thing costlier than maintaining thousands of computers is to replace them all, all with OSX.
If we can't convert our companies to OSX then we stand little chance in convincing institutions of higher education to do the same. The idea is based on a waterfall principle that we need a major change on one front to affect the rest. The problem is that the world revolves around money and it costs money to replace current infrastructures with OSX. While corporations are not the only user of computers they have a massive trickle down effect. The average person can pick up and use a Windows computer without a problem no matter what version they use; it's a 'comfortable' operating system. The same can not be said about OSX, while it may be easy to use, not nearly as many people have used OSX as compared to Windows. If our corporations use Windows our schools will teach upon it, how many people have taken a Windows based course before?
Reason #5: Software. Let's take a simple look at the available software titles out there for each platform. Regardless of the topic Windows based programs dwarf the OSX competition with ease. If your looking for a program to do a certain task you will, without a doubt, have more options on Windows PC. If you're a hardcore gamer there is no option but to have a copy of Windows at your disposal if you care to keep up on the most current titles.
If you're into business software the options for OSX are dismal at best. While it's unfortunate that Microsoft commands so much power, the latest versions of Microsoft Office always come out on Windows before OSX. While not a deal breaker for the home user it can be for reason #5.
Reason #4: Apples Image. Apple has built the image that it is modern and un-Microsoft. While this is working out great for Apple in the short term it also limits its user base. Take a look at any OSX vs Vista advertisement. It's always the cool kid making fun of the suit Vista. While this is great for the college student looking to get a computer it doesn't work so well with mom and dad who very well may see themselves as a 'suit' in that picture. Look around your dinner table and more than likely your father or mother is a suit at work. Professionalism is key to many adults and Apple has steered itself away from be the professional option. Good for poor college kids not so good for the hard working suit.
Reason #3: OSX is a closed platform. Want to build a custom computer with OSX; don't even try (legally). Apple has limited the configurations that OSX can be implemented on. This works well for Apple's business model but anyone who wants to construct a custom built computer is not able to use OSX (legally). If you're trying to build the ultimate computer with bleeding edge technology for your need, OSX is not an option. Lock the platform and you lock out consumers.
Reason #2: The Apple Tax. To get a computer running OSX you must buy a computer from Apple. Apple computers have a higher cost than a traditional PC from Dell or HP. Also it has to be mentioned that there is no low-cost option. The cheapest option is the Mac-mini which starts at $599.99. For someone looking to buy a budget PC, Apple is not an option.
Reason #1: Steve Jobs. To become a major competitor you must remain strong for the foreseeable future. Many people don't like to buy into a product that doesn't have a long life ahead of it. Regardless of how well OSX runs, how cool it looks, it can all be attributed back to Steve Jobs; he is the master of sales and marketing. Much of Apple's recent success can be attributed to his skills. Steve Jobs will not live nor want to work forever. When Steve passes the buck to the next person in line will his horde of followers accept this?

Comments (184)
Rudy - 13 November 2008 - 04:08
#6 is a good point, and #3 could be dealt with in time if they ever start being popular enough to be in major IT shops (they made the eMac for schools)
edit: edited my post because to article changed (wtf?)
Brandon - 13 November 2008 - 04:14
#2 and #1 are the best reasons here. Why am I going to buy a $1000 MacBook that is less powerful then my current Dell? I have to spend $1300 in order to get the new MacBook to get something slightly more powerful (only because of the graphics card) then my current Dell..... which I paid $630 for last year
#1 is completely valid due to the image that Apple represents. Someone has to tell us that we need the overpriced hardware. The new nano isn't really innovative and a few friends and I who have the 3rd generation "fatty" nano don't really see any reason to upgrade
offroadaaron - 13 November 2008 - 05:40
#1 is completely valid due to the image that Apple represents. Someone has to tell us that we need the overpriced hardware. The new nano isn't really innovative and a few friends and I who have the 3rd generation "fatty" nano don't really see any reason to upgrade
companies can get major discounts I'm sure, and also schools aswell. So #2 isn't really valid.
Brandon - 13 November 2008 - 07:01
companies can get major discounts I'm sure, and also schools aswell. So #2 isn't really valid.
Students get $50-100 off. Whoopdee Doo. Thats still $1200 vs
Simon - 13 November 2008 - 10:49
Not if you buy directly from a university, instead of through apple.com. The local university here will save you about $300 iirc, on any Mac they sell. Apple's education store discounts are a farce, but the universities get good deals in their own stores.
coolvi - 13 November 2008 - 15:43
Exactly. Therefore, students population out of general population in percentage = Apple's market share.
offroadaaron - 13 November 2008 - 23:45
Students get $50-100 off. Whoopdee Doo. Thats still $1200 vs
Where did I say student discounts, and does any other company you know do student discounts anyways?
I mean companies get a huge reduction in price im sure!
+majortom1981 - 13 November 2008 - 04:15
One more point. For businesses group policy is a major major sticking point. Being able to use group policy to control the pc's is in valuable. Unless osx server has something like it (also as easy to configure) then it wont get too much business use.
Yvo - 14 November 2008 - 06:20
You obviously haven't googled for a product like Likewise Enterprise which allows Group Policy to be set with WGM and published in AD. Takes care of #6 pretty quickly....
http://www.likewisesoftware.com/products/l...prise/index.php
http://www.likewisesoftware.com/register/?...access_controls
HalfBrian - 14 November 2008 - 07:13
Yeah... Likewise may work (I don't know), but it costs quite a bit per-seat, plus installation, it doesn't seem worth it when Windows has it built-in to the operating system.
Likewise Enterprise prices:
Per server: $299 (not terrible)
Per client: $59
And you only get volume discounts on servers, not clients.
Digitalx - 13 November 2008 - 04:18
OS X could be bigger then it is they just choose not to so no point stating the obvious about a gated communities ideals :P
SBUX - 13 November 2008 - 04:22
Why would they choose not to? Don't they want people to use their OS? For me #5 and #2 are the biggest points. And is it just me or are there two number 4s...?
Oh and great article by the way. I'd like to see more of this Mac abuse... I mean content
Digitalx - 13 November 2008 - 04:53
Oh and great article by the way. I'd like to see more of this Mac abuse... I mean content :)
Start with #3 if you want people to use it let them use it. restricted platform is the beginning.
Marshalus - 13 November 2008 - 05:03
These are not the droids you're looking for.
:D
Sacha - 14 November 2008 - 03:30
They don't 'choose not to'. They choose anything that offers a larger profit. Otherwise their shareholders would not be happy. The same with any company.
Digitalx - 14 November 2008 - 05:19
I'd more then likely say they choose not to rather rely on their propaganda advertising and over enthusiastic users. What could be better then trapping users and making them pay more and more ?
+Berserk87 - 13 November 2008 - 04:33
every single mac vs pc argument will be linked to this page from here in. :P
bdsams - 13 November 2008 - 16:24
i hope so
Tech Star - 13 November 2008 - 04:37
I believe that if Apple releases OSX to be used on computers that are non-apple then they will get the market share that they deserve. If they don't then I don't think they will be beating Microsoft anytime soon.
Redestium - 13 November 2008 - 04:40
I could be wrong, but I don't think being totally mainstream is an Apple goal in terms of Macs. iPhones and iPods on the other hand are.