main
Report a problem

Wikipedia set for video explosion?

Horrocks   on 20 November 2008 - 22:22 · 12 comments & 4373 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Wikipedia's decision to increase its server capacity will herald a new era for the online encyclopaedia.

According to Sun Microsystems, Wikimedia – the company behind the likes of Wikipedia, Wikinews, Wikibooks – has bought in a lot of new servers.

This will bring about the end of a 100 MB upload cap for Wikipedia, enabling video hosting and better picture support.

According to CNet, this could include picture editing software and allow users to modify images and see past revisions in the same way as they can the text.

Wikipedia is one of the most visited internet sites on the globe, boasting 2.6 million entries in English alone.

Currently the vast majority of WIkipedia is text based, and thus takes up very little room in terms of server space - despite its breadth of material.

However, as media like video becomes more prevalent, the need for storage capacity rises. But that's progress for you.

View: TechRadar

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
#1 LTD on 20 Nov 2008 - 22:59
Ahh, WikiTube.
#2 Tantawi on 20 Nov 2008 - 23:28
I hope they take care of the bandwidth issues, as it'll multiply much faster than the storage expansions.
(1 reply) #3 +yurithedragon on 21 Nov 2008 - 00:00
Please use Divx's web player because i loved that as a web player because i find most flash players are useless at seeking
#3.1 peachey on 21 Nov 2008 - 02:27
yurithedragon said,
Please use Divx's web player because i loved that as a web player because i find most flash players are useless at seeking
Unless its open source i doubt it, And they are using the Theora (.ogv) codec for videos.

Eg: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:25...ing_a_blank.ogg and article inline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordnance_QF_25_pounderService and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corliss_steam...gine_mechanisms

Last edited by peachey on 21 Nov 2008 - 02:32
(2 replies) #4 Shiranui on 21 Nov 2008 - 00:19
All good things must come to an end I guess.
#4.1 Majesticmerc on 21 Nov 2008 - 01:09
I was thinking that
#4.2 skynetXrules on 21 Nov 2008 - 01:14
what is that matter

they are going for the better >>>>> expending there servers
#5 +Kirkburn on 21 Nov 2008 - 10:09
Since when does a 100MB upload cap have anything to do with preventing image or video uploads?
Do the people who wrote this realise how big most videos and images are?
#6 +Kirkburn on 21 Nov 2008 - 11:27
A much better news story about it - http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10103177-2.html

The 100MB cap is the new cap. Which makes faaaar more sense.
#7 Tikitiki on 24 Nov 2008 - 01:18
And how much more millions will it cost us in donations? They don't need this. What would be better is if they talked to google and asked them to partner up so they could use the YouTube servers for the wikipedia videos.
(1 reply) #8 shakey_snake on 24 Nov 2008 - 02:31
<video>Are_web_browsers_ready_for_it_yet.ogv</video>
#8.1 The2 on 26 Nov 2008 - 14:20
shakey_snake said,
<video>Are_web_browsers_ready_for_it_yet.ogv</video>

Theora uses Java

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)