main
Report a problem

Microsoft's Irish website defaced

Tom Warren   on 09 December 2008 - 12:25 · 48 comments & 18655 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft's Irish domain, Microsoft.ie, has been defaced by a group calling themselves the "terrorist crew".

The page is used as a re director to http://www.microsoft.com/en/ie/default.aspx. The group involved are believed to be Turkish hackers.

Microsoft has a history of having its websites defaced, in 2004 Microsoft.com was defaced and during 2007 Microsoft UK was defaced and hacked. Earlier this year it was revealed that thousands of sites that run Microsoft's web server IIS had been hacked due to a SQL server injection.

According to a netcraft report, Microsoft.ie runs on Windows Server 2003 and is hosted by Novara Shared Hosting.

Thanks to Robin Blandford whose Tweet made Neowin aware of this story.

At the time of writing the site was still sitting live and defaced but for those that might read this a little late here's a screenshot:


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 48 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 smooth_criminal1990 on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:29
Whoops! they might want to fix that flaw in IIS now... tho I must admit, I was expecting something more along the

lines of "make fecking Vista cheaper"...
#1.1 RealFduch on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:24
You are fooled by the anti-MS FUD. Look at the comments to the linked Neowin article or maybe even.... original source!
http://www.neowin.net/news/main/08/04/28/h...-servers-hacked
#1.2 GP007 on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:08
This has nothing to do with IIS. Even back then it was due to lazy SQL coding done by whoever at the time.
#1.3 MioTheGreat on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:51
IIS flaw?

IIS has had a virtually spotless security record since 2003. Only about 3 or 4 security vulnerabilities discovered since then.
#1.4 brent3000 on 09 Dec 2008 - 21:20
if its a redirect url it could be even just affecting that... I love it how its an instant jump to blame IIS... The day microsoft.com gets taken... is the day someone can start being proud...
#2 Ambroos on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:30
They took it down already.
(1 reply) #3 cold-peak on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:34
why even bother?
#3.1 creamhackered on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:34
Pretty pointless but there we are
(10 replies) #4 leesmithg on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:38
I bet their balls have grown those crackers, hackers is incorrect.

Telling all their on-line buds what they have done.

I know what tool I prefer to use.
#4.1 +TCLN Ryster on 09 Dec 2008 - 12:58
leesmithg said,
...those crackers, hackers is incorrect.

Are you sure?
Crackers = Those who remove copy protection from games, etc.
Hackers = Those who gain unauthorised entry to computer systems to cause damage or steal information.

Hackers seems the right term to me.
#4.2 +Frazell Thomas on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:29
TCLN Ryster said,
Are you sure?
Crackers = Those who remove copy protection from games, etc.
Hackers = Those who gain unauthorised entry to computer systems to cause damage or steal information.

Hackers seems the right term to me.


Actually you have it wrong, the original poster is accurate...

Crackers = People who maliciously gain access to computing systems or otherwise use technology to circumvent some protection (illegally accessing networks, cracking game copy protection, etc.)

http://www.answers.com/topic/cracker-technology

Hackers = Programmers. Any programmer is by definition a hacker.

http://www.answers.com/topic/hacker-technology
#4.3 jporter on 09 Dec 2008 - 14:56
Frazell Thomas said,
TCLN Ryster said,
Are you sure?
Crackers = Those who remove copy protection from games, etc.
Hackers = Those who gain unauthorised entry to computer systems to cause damage or steal information.

Hackers seems the right term to me.


Actually you have it wrong, the original poster is accurate...

Crackers = People who maliciously gain access to computing systems or otherwise use technology to circumvent some protection (illegally accessing networks, cracking game copy protection, etc.)

http://www.answers.com/topic/cracker-technology

Hackers = Programmers. Any programmer is by definition a hacker.

http://www.answers.com/topic/hacker-technology


Are you high?
#4.4 +Frazell Thomas on 09 Dec 2008 - 15:23
jporter said,
Frazell Thomas said,

TCLN Ryster said,
Are you sure?
Crackers = Those who remove copy protection from games, etc.
Hackers = Those who gain unauthorised entry to computer systems to cause damage or steal information.

Hackers seems the right term to me.


Actually you have it wrong, the original poster is accurate...

Crackers = People who maliciously gain access to computing systems or otherwise use technology to circumvent some protection (illegally accessing networks, cracking game copy protection, etc.)

http://www.answers.com/topic/cracker-technology

Hackers = Programmers. Any programmer is by definition a hacker.

http://www.answers.com/topic/hacker-technology


Are you high?


What would send you to such a bizarre conclusion?
#4.5 Recon415 on 09 Dec 2008 - 18:13
So.....the terms are hereby reversed? I learned something new today, thanks!
#4.6 +dead.cell on 09 Dec 2008 - 19:36
F---k the terms, they're hackers.

Now everyone can stand in awe as the language of today changes right before their very eyes.
#4.7 Esvandiary on 09 Dec 2008 - 22:01
Ugh... The original poster is right, "hacker" is a term that's completely overused, and these guys don't qualify.
Black-hat hackers are, on the other hand, the people you want to be really afraid of. Not these guys.
#4.8 +TCLN Ryster on 09 Dec 2008 - 23:54
Frazell Thomas said,
Actually you have it wrong, the original poster is accurate...

Crackers = People who maliciously gain access to computing systems or otherwise use technology to circumvent some protection (illegally accessing networks, cracking game copy protection, etc.)

http://www.answers.com/topic/cracker-technology

Hackers = Programmers. Any programmer is by definition a hacker.

http://www.answers.com/topic/hacker-technology

You crack the copy protection software in games, therefore those that do that are crackers. You hack into a computer sytem, therefore the people that do that are hackers. It just common sense.

dictionary.com:
hack⋅er
   /ˈhækər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [hak-er] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a person or thing that hacks.
2. Slang. a person who engages in an activity without talent or skill: weekend hackers on the golf course.
3. Computer Slang.
a. a computer enthusiast.
b. a microcomputer user who attempts to gain unauthorized access to proprietary computer systems.

I think 3b enphasises my point quite nicely, although in fairness it does have a similar definition for crackers too.
#4.9 plastikaa on 10 Dec 2008 - 00:37
Words and language change depending how people use it... just because a site has a certain definition does not necessarily make it the right term for everyday use. In this case I think the term hackers is appropriate especially as the team self proclaim to of"hacked" the site.
#4.10 Glendi on 10 Dec 2008 - 12:56
The original definition is that hacker builds, cracker destroys.

But the media usage has made people think hackers means the other. But since Neowin is some sort of media, it is allowed to use the term hackers, or some people would be confused.
#5 mocax on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:11
don't Microsoft have their own bloody data centers?

cheapskates....
#6 bucko on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:12
I see they didn't dare deface the MS logo :p
(1 reply) #7 RealFduch on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:21
What's the difference between mistake an a lie?
If you correct someone and he still tells the same wrong thing, then he's a liar.

This "submission" says:
Earlier this year it was revealed that thousands of sites that run Microsoft's web server IIS had been hacked due to an undocumented flaw in IIS.

What's fun is that this passage is wrong by itself since it's clearly linking to the article titled "Hundreds of Thousands of Microsoft Web Servers Hacked". But it's not the only lie. Let's actually look at the linked neowin article and READ:
To begin with, our investigation has shown that there are no new or unknown vulnerabilities being exploited. This wave is not a result of a vulnerability in Internet Information Services or Microsoft SQL Server. We have also determined that these attacks are in no way related to Microsoft Security Advisory (951306).

The attacks are facilitated by SQL injection exploits and are not issues related to IIS 6.0, ASP, ASP.Net or Microsoft SQL technologies.

Anti-MS zombies are spreading. They want to take your brrrraaaaaiinss.
#7.1 creamhackered on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:46
Good point I didn't notice that from our article. I have edited the article to reflect that. Thanks
(6 replies) #8 LTD on 09 Dec 2008 - 13:32
Somehow this isn't surprising.
#8.1 Digitalfox on 09 Dec 2008 - 15:17
LTD said,
Somehow this isn't surprising.


Since you are reported to be an Apple fanboy, your answer Somehow isn't surprising
#8.2 C_Guy on 09 Dec 2008 - 15:38
Of course it isn't. If they went after Apple's website only a small fraction would have noticed.
#8.3 MioTheGreat on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:54
It's most likely that they got access to the host somehow.

It's odd that Microsoft didn't host it themselves. I bet they will be now.

Last edited by MioTheGreat on 09 Dec 2008 - 17:01
#8.4 Recon415 on 09 Dec 2008 - 18:20
Digitalfox said,
Since you are reported to be an Apple fanboy, your answer Somehow isn't surprising


Of course you steal my response before I say it >.>

Since Apple has long been "hack proof" because it is less of a target for hackers (or, crackers) due it its impopularity.

Recently that's changing but nowadays I see alot more about "Apple got hacked" or "exploit found in Apples and no updates yet" than "Microsoft got hacked" or "Various Vista security flaws go unpatched".

Plus the fact that I will assume that Apple servers run off of an Apple, and therefore are vulnerable to hackers even more than Microsoft.
#8.5 LTD on 09 Dec 2008 - 18:31
I'm not a reported Apple fanboy. I *admit* I'm an Apple fanboy. I come right out and say it, and give my reasons. If you want to know where I stand, hell - just ask. I don't feign impartiality just to get approval, which is incredibly common around here. Everyone's goal is to be "objective", but objectivity in any sphere is extremely hard to achieve, much less maintain. Biases can be very insidious, but as long as we know why they're there, they don't cause much harm.

Instead of asking me what I meant, one person makes an assumption and then it snowballs.

Microsoft is a big target, which is why it wasn't surprising. That's about it. I don't see what Apple has to do with any of this.
#8.6 +dead.cell on 09 Dec 2008 - 19:39
Sorry, but I've gotta say it: f---king owned.
(1 reply) #9 C_Guy on 09 Dec 2008 - 15:39
Well, what else are you gonna do in mom's basement all day long when not even McDonald's will hire you?
#9.1 +dead.cell on 09 Dec 2008 - 19:41
Play Counterstrike? lol
(1 reply) #10 Kushan on 09 Dec 2008 - 15:46
So um...why are turkish hackers claiming to be terrorists hacking an Irish portal?

And why does it say "finally"? Have they been working on this for some time?

As someone who actually is Irish, I really wouldn't have bothered with this and I'm always up for a lawl at the Irish's expensse =S
#10.1 ricknl on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:10
Hmm.. I guess this has nothing to the with Ireland - Turkey, as these two countries have little or no common history.
(1 reply) #11 Doli on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:07
Wow, get these hackers some flash/silverlight lessons so they can do somthing better then that. A nice intro with music, "We are the terrorist crew, the terrorist crew, the terrorist crew....".
#11.1 +dead.cell on 09 Dec 2008 - 19:42
Or just get a Rick Roll going...
#12 Browno on 09 Dec 2008 - 16:32
Why didn't they deface the logo or anythign would have looked alot better :L
(1 reply) #13 exotoxic on 09 Dec 2008 - 17:02
lol terrorists??
#13.1 +TCLN Ryster on 10 Dec 2008 - 00:00
exotoxic said,
lol terrorists??

Yeah, I'm trembling in terror!
#14 External HDD on 09 Dec 2008 - 17:11
They are Turks alright. The last sentence means "happy holiday" and we are celebrating one now. I can't understand why they keep hacking whatever they can
#15 lylesback2 on 09 Dec 2008 - 19:09
At least it wasn't that bad.. Looks like it is back up and fixed
#16 Glendi on 09 Dec 2008 - 23:26
Why do people keep doing this anyway? I don't think I'd ever admire someone who does this, it has no sense. Admiring nonsense o.O and they think their friends will like them for this?

Pure crap, I wish I could see these so called 'hackers' in real life...
#17 Izlude on 10 Dec 2008 - 01:34
they're gonna get sued for using microsoft's logo without permission
#18 chewitx on 10 Dec 2008 - 02:53
luckily i was on business trip in istanbul ( constantinapole ) right now and can't see any hackers around .

I' ve checked the latest Zone-H.org Top Attackers list Dec 2008*
No Attacker Single Def. Mass Def. Total Def. Country.
1 iskorpitx 25214 193817 219031 (Turkey)
2 Fatal Error 11265 23135 34400 (Brasil)
3 GHoST61 10501 10689 21190 (Turkey)
4 1923Turk 9146 23630 32776 (Turkey)
5 SPYKIDS 8717 21750 30467 (Turkey)
6 aLpTurkTegin 7636 18565 26201 (Turkey)
7 caprazates.org 7305 6830 14135 (Turkey)
8 BeLa 7280 5335 12615 (Turkey)
9 Secrethackers.org 7188 1425 (Turkey)
10 Thehacker 7097 35923 43020 (Turkey)

9 out of 10 Turks .are those guys printing hackes or smt????
#19 The Tjalian on 10 Dec 2008 - 10:09
Uhh... "Terrorist Crew"? How original!

They spent all that time hacking Microsoft's Website and all they do is leave their calling card? How boring.
(1 reply) #20 jingarelho on 10 Dec 2008 - 11:07
why would someone call themselves terrorist's i don't really understand. is it cool to be a terrorist?
#20.1 Glendi on 10 Dec 2008 - 12:58
'Some call us terrorists, some call us heroes" - Taken from Harold and Kumar: Escape from Guantanamo Bay
#21 Skullpture on 11 Dec 2008 - 14:34
They should have done more damage. Defacing and forcing advertisements on a Microsoft webpage is ironic and sudden but not as funny as destroying one of their servers or lowering the sale price of Vista like someone else had mentioned.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)