apple
Report a problem

The last time Tim Cook ran Apple

Hurmoth   on 16 January 2009 - 12:09 · 5 comments & 3025 views

Advertisement (Why?)
On Wednesday, Apple's stock in after-hours trading took a tumble on the news that CEO Steve Jobs would be taking medical leave. To take the helm for Jobs is Chief Operating Office Tim Cook, who isn't new to the job.

In 2004, while Jobs recovered from surgery that removed a malignant tumor from his pancreas, Cook briefly took over running day-to-day operations. The stock also took a tumble then too, down 2.3% on August 2, the day after Apple announced the news. The stock continued to fall to nearly 8% by the end of that week.

A month later, the stock not only recovered, but gained 10.9% on its July 30 price, closing at what now seems an impossibly low $35.86.

In July 2004, two weeks before Jobs' operation, Apple reported earnings of $61 million on sales of $2.014 billion and was holding just under $5 billion in cash. In its last quarterly statement, Apple reported earnings of $1.14 billion of sales of $7.9 billion, with nearly $25 billion in cash.

In other words, it's the same company, only four or five times bigger.

News source: CNN | Fortune

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 5 additional comments
#1 LTD on 16 Jan 2009 - 13:42
Cook will do a great job.

He's an absolutely fearsome organizer.
#2 +King Mustard on 16 Jan 2009 - 14:01
"He regularly begins sending emails at 4:30 AM and used to hold Sunday night staff meetings by telephone to prepare for the next week."

lol screw that...
#3 Rob2687 on 16 Jan 2009 - 22:58
^ That guy is not human.
(1 reply) #4 pasty2k2 on 17 Jan 2009 - 05:45
Im kinda lost to the point of this? Someone took over from Steve and did a good job, thats great. Where is the news?
#4.1 PsykX on 17 Jan 2009 - 13:16
It's an explanative article, not a news.

"The last time Cook ran Apple" could not be a news anyway

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)