A lawsuit made by a couple who claim that Google's Street View violated their privacy, has been dismissed by a federal judge, according to BBC News.Christine and Aaron Boring claimed that the photographs, taken from the foot of their driveway, were an invasion of privacy and trespassing. The couple said that the photographs had caused the couple "mental suffering" and diluted the value of their home. Mr and Mrs Boring sought $25,000 in damages.
In her 12-page decision, Judge Amy Reynolds Hay of US District Court for Western Pennsylvania wrote, "While it is easy to imagine that many whose property appears on Google's virtual maps resent the privacy implications, it is hard to believe that any - other than the most exquisitely sensitive - would suffer shame or humiliation."
Google provides procedures for removing pictures from Street View upon request. The Borings failed to take advantage of these procedures, a point not missed by Judge Reynolds Hay.
"The Borings do not dispute that they have allowed the relevant images to remain on Google Street View, despite the availability of a procedure for having them removed from view," she wrote.
"Furthermore, they have failed to bar others' access to the images by eliminating their address from the pleadings, or by filing this action under seal."
The Judge concluded, "The plaintiffs' failure to take readily available steps to protect their own privacy and mitigate their alleged pain suggests to the Court that the intrusion and that their suffering were less severe than they contend."
The California based company said in a statement that it respects people's privacy and blurs identifiable faces and license plates caught by one of Google's camera cars and provides tools to request the removal of pictures from Street View.
They said, "It is unfortunate the parties involved decided to pursue litigation instead of making use of these tools."
















I thought it was part of the title...o.O
Last edited by CalumJR on 19 Feb 2009 - 17:47
[< snipped > - CalumJR
]
and loosing his leg isnt?
How about a filter for dweebs who can't spell 'lose'.
If you are going to call somebody a "dweeb", please make sure you don't refer directly to another member.
Luckily, you haven't here, but with a comment like this, I can see you breaking this rule in the future...
Scumbags. Everyone's always trying to make an easy buck. Good to hear that the case was dismissed.
make him go back to his boring life insted of trying to make money from little things that are stupid
and why dont ya go further and try the Airlines that pass over your house ( they can see your roof , Nasa Satellites , your government Sats also , oh and also Microsoft Maps
Uhhhh no, not really. While I agree that they didn't have enough "mental suffering" to spark a lawsuit they shouldn't have to be constantly checking Google for images and requesting them to be deleted. If everyone had to do that we'd waste hours every day running around in circles... "Am I on this site? This site? This site?"
Google has a weird elitest entitlement complex where they think that can do whatever they want. Throwing out this lawsuit is not going to help the situation.
Also, what other sites are you talking about here? As far as I know, Google is the only one attempting such a project. But yes, let's go ahead and use this lame idea that you can sue whoever for putting images of your house on the internet and elsewhere. Would you be able to sue the local news stations if your house is in the background where they are filming about a murder/accident/etc? I mean, you can't watch every news station 24/7 can you? And is there even a procedure for requesting such footage down, or blurring of your home?
It doesn't make sense. It's public property anyway, not yours. Unless you have your land in allodial title, it does not belong to you entirely. Besides, anyone willing to make this much fuss for that amount of money clearly has one goal in mind, and the concerns of their house being on the internet is probably the last of their worries.
I understand you don't like Google, but defending these greedy people is probably the worst thing you could do.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.