Apple surprised many today by unveiling a redesigned iPod Shuffle. The new design gets a memory spec bump to 4GB for $80.00. The new design (seen below) has no screen but Apple did include a new VoiceOver feature.VoiceOver allows "[w]ith the press of a button, it tells you what song is playing and who's performing it. It can even tell you the names of your play lists, giving you a new way to navigate your music".
The new unit is on sale now in steel gray or charcoal colors and comes with the usual Apple accessories. Apple generally unveils new products on Tuesday but with this unveiling maybe Apple is trying to keep its followers on their toes.
Is that a 3.5mm jack?
Looks nice though, damn it's small.
I think you missed where he said "I can get something like that for half the price already".
Yes, but you will need an adaptor to be able to use 3rd party headphones.
LOL what a load of crap 3.5mm headphones jacks are 3.5mm headphones jacks why would you need an adapter. ROFL!
I dont like that. You're forced to use the crappy apple earbuds.
Apple are currently in talks with headphone manufacturers to create iPod shuffle compatible headphones.
I will link to a source for this when the story is covered
But... You know if anyone says that to a product it's not worth buying!
So yea, $80 for the new shuffle...or $70 and you get lots more...u decide.
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Sansa-Video-...36781405&sr=8-1
Last edited by techbeck on 11 Mar 2009 - 14:29
Haha...i forgot to add how the FUZE plays video as well to.
are you getting *free* 32gb microSD cards anywhere? even 16gb cards go for at least $45
not to talk about losing support for AAC audio... more space, wasted by higher bitrate MP3 files.
Last edited by gonchuki on 11 Mar 2009 - 15:50
are you getting *free* 32gb microSD cards anywhere? even 16gb cards go for at least $45
not to talk about losing support for AAC audio... more space, wasted by higher bitrate MP3 files.
2GB • 4GB • 8GB
Colors:
Black, Pink, Red, Blue & Silver
Expansion Slot:
microSD/SDHC
Battery:
24 hours music & 5 hours video playback
Headphone Jacks:
1
Speaker:
N/A
Radio:
FM tuner/40 presets
Recorder:
Built-in microphone
Music Subscriptions:
Rhapsody To Go, Napster, eMusic
Internet Radio:
N/A
Audio Books:
Audible, Overdrive
File Support:
MP3, OGG, FLAC, WMA, secure WMA, WAV, Audible, MPEG4
It's $99 for a 4GB one, only $10 more than the shuffle and it has a screen, a radio, a mic port, and expandable memory.
No loss unless you're addicted to iTMS really... Who uses AAC besides Apple and Nintendo?
EDIT: My bad... techbeck's Amazon link is for the 4GB for only $56, $24 cheaper than the Shuffle.
are you getting *free* 32gb microSD cards anywhere? even 16gb cards go for at least $45
not to talk about losing support for AAC audio... more space, wasted by higher bitrate MP3 files.
My bad...didnt ad the cost of the SD card.
a 16gb fuze half the price of a 16gb nano? yeah sure, but double as bulky and heavier, with lots of missing features... and as I mentioned before, needing higher bitrate files to achieve comparable quality in both audio and video. (and yes, I do a lot of video on my nano while commuting to work, and also use the TV out composite cable with nice 1.5mbit h264 files.)
a 16gb fuze half the price of a 16gb nano? yeah sure, but double as bulky and heavier, with lots of missing features... and as I mentioned before, needing higher bitrate files to achieve comparable quality in both audio and video. (and yes, I do a lot of video on my nano while commuting to work, and also use the TV out composite cable with nice 1.5mbit h264 files.)
Wasnt really comparing the size of the FUZE and the SHUFFLE. Just stated that the FUZE is a small MP3 player, cheaper, and has tons more features. Besides, the FUZE is not heavy at all. With options like the FUZE, why buy a shuffle?
a 16gb fuze half the price of a 16gb nano? yeah sure, but double as bulky and heavier, with lots of missing features... and as I mentioned before, needing higher bitrate files to achieve comparable quality in both audio and video. (and yes, I do a lot of video on my nano while commuting to work, and also use the TV out composite cable with nice 1.5mbit h264 files.)
Wasnt really comparing the size of the FUZE and the SHUFFLE. Just stated that the FUZE is a small MP3 player, cheaper, and has tons more features. Besides, the FUZE is not heavy at all. With options like the FUZE, why buy a shuffle?
jogging maybe? being able to carry it anywhere without fear of scratching the screen? 60 grams/2.1 ounces is enough to be cumbersome for most of the uses the Shuffle (and Nano) have.
plus, I just seen the Fuze has a 220x176 screen, blurry video FTW
bah, I guess you get what you pay for...
Doesn't seem too practical in my view...
(I also hate to depend on apple's headphones, and not being able to choose from the headphones I usually use)
I always look at the shuffle as a 'random' music player. Some people don't like that, but some people like having a radio-type thing in their pocket. Just a jumble of music, except they own the music so it's probably stuff they like. For that, there might not be a need for a screen.
I thought this was a joke. I still think it is. Is this one ego driven or something? It totally threw away what made the iPod series decent players, now instead forcing the user to take an input route that compromises either speed or granularity of control...
Last edited by TheNGTV on 11 Mar 2009 - 15:46
But I wish they included the $80 headphones (real cost of manufacturing: $1), but in black.
In England, they are £10.
Therefore, there is no need for a screen, playlists or any other type of navigation. Having that would make it just like every other small music player on the market.
With all the different options these days, Apple is pricing doesnt match the features. I mean, $80 for a 4gb Shuffle that only plays music? Thats WAY steep. The player is worth maybe 1/2 that and the other 1/2 you are paying for the Apple logo/name. Its ridiculous that they can price things like this and the consumers are so ignorant, they buy it.
With all the different options these days, Apple is pricing doesnt match the features. I mean, $80 for a 4gb Shuffle that only plays music? Thats WAY steep. The player is worth maybe 1/2 that and the other 1/2 you are paying for the Apple logo/name. Its ridiculous that they can price things like this and the consumers are so ignorant, they buy it.
Everything Apple makes is overpriced. Been that way since forever.
With all the different options these days, Apple is pricing doesnt match the features. I mean, $80 for a 4gb Shuffle that only plays music? Thats WAY steep. The player is worth maybe 1/2 that and the other 1/2 you are paying for the Apple logo/name. Its ridiculous that they can price things like this and the consumers are so ignorant, they buy it.
I agree with both of you
I think the features of the iPod shuffle really don't match what else is on the market, for a cheaper price. Also, I myself cannot live without a screen on a music player
I just thought I'd point out to some people why Apple leave the shuffle so limited in features
Apple's pricing is going to catch up with them sooner or later.
We will have to buy an apple make, well thats if no one makes an alternative for them
Bad design imo.
Lame. Just lame.
Hope this helps.
It's meant to shuffle! Thats it!
WTH are some people on about saying it needs a screen and more features!?
Or maybe I will be lucky enough to find a few of these between cushions.
Or maybe look like a fool trying to light a cigarette and "best of Bread" starts playing
Or maybe look like a fool trying to plug in the ear buds into a BIC lighter
Meh...might be a cool "re-gift"
*not for me at this time
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.