editorial
Report a problem

IE8, and why fixing that pesky 'tab issue' sealed the deal

Mitchell LeBlanc   on 02 April 2009 - 19:56 · 89 comments & 19666 views

Advertisement (Why?)
In my most recent piece, "IE8, and why it's almost my default browser", I outline a couple of factors that inhibited IE8 from holding the default browser position on my PC. Since writing that article, due in part to some helpful Neowin members and some quality time with IE8, I have since awarded IE8 that coveted position on my PC and have promptly thrown Google Chrome to the curb.

Perhaps the most taxing of my issues was what has been colloquially referred to as the 'tab issue'. Many users have complained of severe delays when opening new tabs in Internet Explorer. The solution I have discovered (thanks to helpful Neowin members) is that the 'tab delay' is actually caused by Spybot S&D's Immunization settings. Upon hearing this, I promptly entered into Spybot S&D and de-immunized Internet Explorer. To my amazement, IE8 opened instantaneously! I went completely tab-happy and started opening an insane amount of tabs, and they all opened just as fast as they did in Chrome!

In taking a moment to wipe the tears of joy from my face, I was reminded of my other issues with IE8, as mentioned in my previous article. Stumbling upon the Chrome Experiments website alerted me to the shortcomings of my beloved browser, as it was clear that javascript in the form presented, was not an ability of IE8.

The experiments certainly are cool, but I quickly began to question their relevance. I visited all of my frequent sites, the ones which utilizes javascript and found that while IE8 may indeed be unable to render an onslaught of virtual bouncy-balls, it could handle what was actually important quite proficiently.

With my two biggest issues solved, one with a quick-fix and the other with an enlightenment of sorts, I proudly designated IE8 as my default browser.

At the conclusion of my previous piece, I mentioned that the importance lay in the fact that IE8 fell short for very few reasons. With the reasons having been properly dealt with, it no longer falls short! I've disposed of my flavour-of-the-week, Google Chrome and am happily surfing the Internet with IE8.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 89 additional comments
(7 replies) #1 Marshalus on 02 Apr 2009 - 19:59
Spell check is something that is still holding me back.
#1.1 Sam Symons Live on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:04
Marshalus said,
Spell check is something that is still holding me back.

Lack of OS support is holding me back. I read up on Mac OS X progress though, and it's coming along nicely
#1.2 Electric Bolt on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:05
But isn't IE8 specializing in the user experience and speed? Wouldn't that include making IE8 more open to addons? Such as spell check, couldn't that be an addon?
#1.3 Intelman on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:10
Electric Bolt said,
But isn't IE8 specializing in the user experience and speed? Wouldn't that include making IE8 more open to addons? Such as spell check, couldn't that be an addon?


IE has addons always has had addons.
#1.4 Marshalus on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:55
Yeah, they have support for it, but I don't know of any spell check plugins that work like the Firefox/Chrome squiggly line spell check does.
#1.5 GP007 on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:49
IE7Pro, if it gets support for IE8 works and has spell check. It has the redline under words and then you do the right-clcik and see a list etc.

It works well in IE7, but it's not yet ready for IE8 it seems.
#1.6 +dead.cell on 02 Apr 2009 - 23:19
Yeah, I keep hearing people say IE7Pro for IE8. If the developers of IE7Pro plan to release a version for IE8, I really hope they change the name to IE8Pro...
#1.7 osm0sis on 03 Apr 2009 - 06:26
I read somewhere they're just going to call it IEPro from now on, so it's version independent.
(3 replies) #2 Luis Mazza on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:04
They could fix the tab issue, the annoying clicks to fill up cached login and passwords, they could also make selecting a word to use the Google Toolbar. They could also add something like FF Persona and the icons for the bookmarked pages could be loaded correctly like they do in Firefox.
After all of that, THEN it could be MY default browser.
Yes... I forgot about spellcheck too...
Firefox still rules. Only $$some blinds don`t agree with that.
#2.1 Doli on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:48
The tab issue is caused by other programs not made by Microsoft and Google needs to work on a selected word using their toobar not Microsoft.
#2.2 Luis Mazza on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:54
True. But I have nothing against Microsoft. But unfortunately, the lack of good browser support may be the reason for those issues, because the beta testing program was long and big enough to solve these problems.
#2.3 Quikboy on 04 Apr 2009 - 03:33
Of course not everybody will agree with you. Whatever floats your boats, doesn't necessarily float my boat.
(13 replies) #3 Solid Knight on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:13
Ad blocking?
#3.1 MitchLeBlanc on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:21
I use AdBlock Pro. http://www.adblockpro.com/
#3.2 garlandchaos on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:32
Free Ad blocking?
#3.3 MitchLeBlanc on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:34
If I'm not mistaken, we can block ads using the InPrivate filtering feature. To be honest, ads don't really bother me that much. Maybe that's just me?
#3.4 +stifler6478 on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:42
MitchLeBlanc said,
If I'm not mistaken, we can block ads using the InPrivate filtering feature. To be honest, ads don't really bother me that much. Maybe that's just me?


Not just you. I don't understand how it's so hard to ignore banner ads. On most well done sites, such as neowin, they're really unintrusive.

-Spenser
#3.5 MitchLeBlanc on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:42
MitchLeBlanc said,
If I'm not mistaken, we can block ads using the InPrivate filtering feature. To be honest, ads don't really bother me that much. Maybe that's just me?


A link that may be of help, with a "rules list" for the InPrivate feature. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22124619-...block-plus-list
#3.6 Solid Knight on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:46
stifler6478 said,
Not just you. I don't understand how it's so hard to ignore banner ads. On most well done sites, such as neowin, they're really unintrusive.

-Spenser


Because on many sites they clash or the ad is for something I really, really don't want to see.
#3.7 +TCLN Ryster on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:04
stifler6478 said,
Not just you. I don't understand how it's so hard to ignore banner ads. On most well done sites, such as neowin, they're really unintrusive.

-Spenser

Apart from that great big stonker of an ad slap bang in the middle of the site!
#3.8 Crash.Override on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:25
+1
#3.9 excalpius on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:02
ie7pro (http://www.ie7pro.com/) is free and wonderful at blocking ads and flash!
#3.10 Shadrack on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:51
stifler6478 said,
Not just you. I don't understand how it's so hard to ignore banner ads. On most well done sites, such as neowin, they're really unintrusive.

-Spenser


Neowin uses adwords. Adwords are the very essence of intrusive ad placement.
#3.11 +dead.cell on 02 Apr 2009 - 23:21
Shadrack said,
Neowin uses adwords. Adwords are the very essence of intrusive ad placement.


This. Honestly the most annoying advertisements I've ever seen, next to ads with sound.
#3.12 +Smigit on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:08
stifler6478 said,
Not just you. I don't understand how it's so hard to ignore banner ads. On most well done sites, such as neowin, they're really unintrusive.

-Spenser
Maybe for static ones. But then you get animated ones or ones that play audio or whatever other nasty ideas they have.
#3.13 Caleb on 03 Apr 2009 - 10:06
MitchLeBlanc said,
I use AdBlock Pro. http://www.adblockpro.com/


What a horrible waste of money. For $10 more you can buy http://www.admuncher.com which is updated daily, supports all browsers and other software and is super fast.
(3 replies) #4 Deathray on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:21
Extensions are the reason I am using Firefox and nothing else
#4.1 Gabe3 on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:25
Deathray said,
Extensions are the reason I am using Firefox and nothing else

+1
#4.2 Calum on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:22
With me, it's certain extensions and the location bar (the way it looks, the favicon, the tags, the way it shows bookmarks first, etc) which keep me using Firefox.

I prefer webkit as a rendering engine out of all of them.
#4.3 Quikboy on 04 Apr 2009 - 03:44
Deathray said,
Extensions are the reason I am using Firefox and nothing else


I wonder why there aren't any of these extensions for IE? Is it the browser, or is it that people just don't try?

I'm not dependent on extensions.
(15 replies) #5 kabix on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:46
It's a shame that neowin editors use IE. really.... just... just go in the corner!
#5.1 Frank Fontaine on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:50
Why? does the fact that they are editors mean they have to put the opinions of some anti-microsoft zealots before their own personal wishes?

For the record, Opera user here
#5.2 kabix on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:57
i dont think this has anything to do with anti-microsoft zealots. i think of neowin (especially editors) as advanced users and IE in my eyes is for people who do not know better.
#5.3 Marshalus on 02 Apr 2009 - 20:58
It's a shame that people feel they must insult each other over a browser. It all takes you to the same Internet.

For the record, I use Google Chrome.
#5.4 rm20010 on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:00
Why not IE? What do you expect them to use?
#5.5 +TCLN Ryster on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:05
kabix said,
i dont think this has anything to do with anti-microsoft zealots. i think of neowin (especially editors) as advanced users and IE in my eyes is for people who do not know better.

Well then, your eyes need some adjustment. I suggest contact lenses, or spectacles if you're not bothered about style.
#5.6 Memnochxx on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:09
Marshalus said,
It's a shame that people feel they must insult each other over a browser. It all takes you to the same Internet.

For the record, I use Google Chrome.

Yeah, but some of them take you to the internet and give you a screwed up picture of it.
#5.7 Solid Knight on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:38
Make room for the browser fascists!
#5.8 excalpius on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:04
Memnochxx said,
Yeah, but some of them take you to the internet and give you a screwed up picture of it.


Show us a few. And NOT Joe Blow's home Linux web blog. Show us some major sites that IE screws up on that Firefox or Chrome show correctly.

Please. I'm serious.
#5.9 GP007 on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:07
People use what they like, get over it.
#5.10 Silverskull on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:12
kabix said,
i dont think this has anything to do with anti-microsoft zealots. i think of neowin (especially editors) as advanced users and IE in my eyes is for people who do not know better.

In your eyes, maybe. For others, it's a great browser that's only improved with this latest release. IE6 was awful, IE7 was ok, but IE8 is great. I use it all the time. Used to use Firefox... actually I still do sometimes. But IE8's my default.

You should try it.
#5.11 Calum on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:25
kabix said,
It's a shame that neowin editors use IE. really.... just... just go in the corner!

Comments like this really do not help contribute to a meaningful discussion :/

I despise Internet Explorer because of how far behind it is compared to the other major browsers, but I understand that it does the job for some people and I understand they have a choice in what they would like to use.
#5.12 Mav Phoenix on 03 Apr 2009 - 12:21
Calum said,
Comments like this really do not help contribute to a meaningful discussion :/

I despise Internet Explorer because of how far behind it is compared to the other major browsers, but I understand that it does the job for some people and I understand they have a choice in what they would like to use.

Far behind in what?
#5.13 C_Guy on 03 Apr 2009 - 16:17
Why are people feeding the troll? IE has always been the better choice now let's all move along.
#5.14 DanielZ on 04 Apr 2009 - 02:54
IE has always been the retard that lags behind his classmates in every aspect. It still doesn't support SVG or CSS3, which other browsers have been doing for quite some time now. IE still doesn't have spell-check or plugins capability. The only reason people still use IE is because most of them are too lazy and/or ignorant to download other, better browsers. Plus, I really don't feel like castrating all my websites to work in a browser that only lazy people use. Burn IE.

This is coming from an everything-but-IE user. I've used Safari, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc, and I can safely say that all of the above are better choices.
#5.15 Quikboy on 04 Apr 2009 - 03:38
kabix said,
It's a shame that neowin editors use IE. really.... just... just go in the corner!


It's more of a shame that somebody bases their opinions on others by the web browser they use.
(7 replies) #6 Chewbob on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:06
I have the tab issue and I don't have Spybot installed. I've disabled practically every addon and there is still about 1 second delay when opening a tab, which doesn't sound like a big deal, really, but I'd rather do without.
#6.1 Shiranui on 03 Apr 2009 - 00:40
Chewbob said,
I have the tab issue and I don't have Spybot installed. I've disabled practically every addon and there is still about 1 second delay when opening a tab, which doesn't sound like a big deal, really, but I'd rather do without.



Check your hosts file.
#6.2 osm0sis on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:22
Probably the same issue though. It's not just Spybot, it's anything that fills up the Restricted Sites list. They changed the logic handling for the RS List between RC and Final and that's what is causing the delays. Any program that adds a large number of entries to it will cause these delays, not just Spybot. Empty your Restricted Sites list and see if that fixes it.
#6.3 briangw on 03 Apr 2009 - 12:20
osm0sis said,
Probably the same issue though. It's not just Spybot, it's anything that fills up the Restricted Sites list. They changed the logic handling for the RS List between RC and Final and that's what is causing the delays. Any program that adds a large number of entries to it will cause these delays, not just Spybot. Empty your Restricted Sites list and see if that fixes it.


I just disabled the Java addin and that fixed it. I have nothing in terms of restricted sites or Spybot installed.
#6.4 Chewbob on 04 Apr 2009 - 08:18
osm0sis said,
Probably the same issue though. It's not just Spybot, it's anything that fills up the Restricted Sites list. They changed the logic handling for the RS List between RC and Final and that's what is causing the delays. Any program that adds a large number of entries to it will cause these delays, not just Spybot. Empty your Restricted Sites list and see if that fixes it.


Restricted sites list is empty and I had the problem in IE7 as well, so what you suggested is not what causes the delays. Not in my case anyway.
#6.5 osm0sis on 04 Apr 2009 - 15:42
go into Manage Addons and pull the slider all the way over to the right so you can see the addon load times. Are any of them high? that'd be the culprit. especially if you've had this since IE7.
#6.6 Chewbob on 04 Apr 2009 - 22:27
osm0sis said,
go into Manage Addons and pull the slider all the way over to the right so you can see the addon load times. Are any of them high? that'd be the culprit. especially if you've had this since IE7.

Highest is AVG weighing in at 0.34 secs, which is disabled. The rest are 0.03/4 secs (and are also disabled anyway). Ah well, I probably wouldn't use it anyway. Thanks for the help.
#6.7 osm0sis on 06 Apr 2009 - 19:52
I'd see about uninstalling those addons and see if they reduce the load time (even though you say they're disabled). All of my addon load times are 0.00, so I would say that is where your bottleneck is. Somehow.
#7 Peter Griffin on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:08
I use both Macs and Windows PC's where I work. I have found, for me personally, that the browsers that are made by the same people that made the OS seem to function the best for me. Safari in OSX and IE8 in Windows are my choices. I've used the other browsers and have no issues with them, I just prefer the native browsers.
(2 replies) #8 WAR-DOG on 02 Apr 2009 - 21:38
I get some crashing with my IE8 browser with pages with lots of FLASH in it
#8.1 excalpius on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:05
Links please so we can confirm this.
#8.2 GP007 on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:09
Which is probably due to flash itself and not a IE8 bug.
#9 Sushovan De on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:45
Woot! Thanks - that helped me too!
(2 replies) #10 Shadrack on 02 Apr 2009 - 22:58
For me, Firefox is my browser of choice because of the extensions. Although, atheistically it has fallen behind when used in Vista or Windows 7... its still the web browser I have the lease amount of hassle with.

My experiences with IE are always looking over someones shoulders or having to do something on their machine. And almost every time there is some obtrusive nasty looking toolbar that they have installed that makes me want to run in the corner and puke my lungs out.
#10.1 random_n on 02 Apr 2009 - 23:08
Glasser + Hide Menubar, and they're practically indistinguishable in appearance. I generally use IE myself, but aesthetics through customizability has always been a strong point of Firefox.

As for the toolbar issue, Firefox isn't immune to that any more.
#10.2 mmck on 03 Apr 2009 - 00:05
+1

I actually think with glasser and hide menubar its the best looking browser around, that with the ability of add ons makes it fantastic.

Although customisation (including aesthetics) is a strong point of Firefox its a shame a couple more features aren't standard, I think the styling of glasser and the removed menu bar would be perfect - then the ability to right click the main bar similar to wmp without classic menus, to select the normal menus would be great (maybe they have classic menus or not as an option similar to wmp too)
(2 replies) #11 rm20010 on 02 Apr 2009 - 23:25
It's still not instant for me. Say from the front page I middle click on this article's link to open it in a new tab. It takes 1.5 seconds before the tab appears.

There are three addons which report load times of 0.03 seconds or less.
#11.1 rm20010 on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:09
On the other hand, it's also instant for me in the copy of IE8 on Windows 7 build 7068.
#11.2 ilaugh on 03 Apr 2009 - 03:15
rm20010 said,
It's still not instant for me. Say from the front page I middle click on this article's link to open it in a new tab. It takes 1.5 seconds before the tab appears.

There are three addons which report load times of 0.03 seconds or less.

Yes for some reason the IE 8 I use in Windows 7 beta 7000 is actually faster than the version currently available for Windows Vista.
(1 reply) #12 BilliShere on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:10
i tried google chrome and got use to it.. but the lack of extensions was killing me. got adblocking to work with adsweep! excellent! loved the super fast launch speed and browsing speed
i wanted my extensions badly. so i browsed for a solution and came across firefox minefield... and damn is it fast! super fast browsing speed but launch speed is still slower than google chrome...cant blame firefox for that though because i have like 38 addons and it takes 15 seconds for a cold start but around 5 seconds for a warm start.
chrome on the other hand launches in 1 second roughly, has slower browsing speed than minefield, a more compact interface (but not even close to the compactness and beautiful interface i get with firefox after a bit of customization).

these two are my main browsers right now.. minefield for main browsing and google chrome for quick launch browsing (like when i wanna look up summin quick)

tried internet explorer 8 and the first page I loaded showed up with artifacts when i scrolled down. never fired ie8 up again.
#12.1 Macalicious on 03 Apr 2009 - 02:34
BilliShere said,
i tried google chrome and got use to it.. but the lack of extensions was killing me. got adblocking to work with adsweep! excellent! loved the super fast launch speed and browsing speed
i wanted my extensions badly. so i browsed for a solution and came across firefox minefield... and damn is it fast! super fast browsing speed but launch speed is still slower than google chrome...cant blame firefox for that though because i have like 38 addons and it takes 15 seconds for a cold start but around 5 seconds for a warm start.
chrome on the other hand launches in 1 second roughly, has slower browsing speed than minefield, a more compact interface (but not even close to the compactness and beautiful interface i get with firefox after a bit of customization).

these two are my main browsers right now.. minefield for main browsing and google chrome for quick launch browsing (like when i wanna look up summin quick)

tried internet explorer 8 and the first page I loaded showed up with artifacts when i scrolled down. never fired ie8 up again.


Chrome will have extensions support soon - I'm sure someone could right a hack but then it would be stuck in a cycle of incompatibility because of a lack of a stable extension api.
(3 replies) #13 iwod on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:40
Those who did / are still doing Web Development should never encourage IE usage. Not even IE 8.
We could give them a chance in 3 - 4 years time again. But for now they should be punished.
#13.1 chAos972 on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:45
iwod said,
Those who did / are still doing Web Development should never encourage IE usage. Not even IE 8.
We could give them a chance in 3 - 4 years time again. But for now they should be punished.


Wrong. IE8, Opera and Chrome all displayed a site I desigend perfectly. I had to go back to fix things for Firefox3.
#13.2 jase savior on 03 Apr 2009 - 06:49
chAos972 said,
iwod said,
Those who did / are still doing Web Development should never encourage IE usage. Not even IE 8.
We could give them a chance in 3 - 4 years time again. But for now they should be punished.


Wrong. IE8, Opera and Chrome all displayed a site I desigend perfectly. I had to go back to fix things for Firefox3.


Agreed. IE8, Chrome, and even Opera seem to display websites perfectly, while FF3 still has some issues. I use FF3 still to this day, but I use Chrome when I am designing a website, to ensure it works to what most people still use.
#13.3 geoken on 03 Apr 2009 - 20:49
I think you missed his point. He's saying IE should be punished for it's years of neglect.

Also, can you tell me what specific FF3 issues you've had?

I'll give you a specific IE8 issue. It fails to register an absolutely positioned element as a child of the closest parent element with display: relative. If I apply something to the parent element, the absolutely positioned child acts as if it doesn't belong to the parent and doesn't inherit the style. It causes big problems when trying to make pure CSS dropdown menus.

Chrome, Safari, FF3 all behave identically, IE8 is the only problematic one. And no, it wasn't in any compatibility mode I verified that through the developer tool
(3 replies) #14 PatrynXX on 03 Apr 2009 - 01:59
Have my dad and brother use IE all the time and they are always the first to get those dumb fake Vista popup's that install malware on the computer. Since I never do, never have that problem. nuff said.
#14.1 JonathanMarston on 03 Apr 2009 - 02:15
I've never once seen one of those pop-ups on my Vista machine, and I'm a heavy IE user. Maybe it's the sites they visit?

Although I had nearly decided to switch to Firefox before IE 8 came out, I've since gone back to 100% IE. Compared to IE 8, Firefox 3 feels slow to me now...
#14.2 Macalicious on 03 Apr 2009 - 02:36
JonathanMarston said,
I've never once seen one of those pop-ups on my Vista machine, and I'm a heavy IE user. Maybe it's the sites they visit?

Although I had nearly decided to switch to Firefox before IE 8 came out, I've since gone back to 100% IE. Compared to IE 8, Firefox 3 feels slow to me now...


They appear on technology websites where the ad claims you have an infection or software problems and con you into clicking on it. IMHO the issue is the scum bags who do these ads rather than Microsoft.
#14.3 bob_c_b on 03 Apr 2009 - 17:18
Macalicious said,
JonathanMarston said,
I've never once seen one of those pop-ups on my Vista machine, and I'm a heavy IE user. Maybe it's the sites they visit?

Although I had nearly decided to switch to Firefox before IE 8 came out, I've since gone back to 100% IE. Compared to IE 8, Firefox 3 feels slow to me now...


They appear on technology websites where the ad claims you have an infection or software problems and con you into clicking on it. IMHO the issue is the scum bags who do these ads rather than Microsoft.


LOL, which "technology" site are you referring to?
(2 replies) #15 Wodin on 03 Apr 2009 - 02:07
The group I haven't heard from yet is webmasters. Has IE finally become standards compliant enough so that webmasters don't have to write one set of code for all normal browsers, and then a special set of code to get a page to function in IE.
For the record, I use Firefox for the addons, and the one I can't live without is Foxmarks, that syncs my bookmarks, and now even my passwords across multiple computers, i.e. home and work.
#15.1 JonathanMarston on 03 Apr 2009 - 02:14
The Live toolbar for IE will do that as well...
#15.2 gonchuki on 06 Apr 2009 - 02:13
it's finally almost perfect... still having it's kinks, but not more than the usual Webkit or Opera weirdness.
Out of all the engines, seems only Gecko always works as expected. Sometimes being slower just means they are doing the proper calculations for everything
(1 reply) #16 ilaugh on 03 Apr 2009 - 03:14
This doesn't work for me since I don't actually have Spybot installed on my computer. Tabs still open at a snail's pace.
#16.1 osm0sis on 03 Apr 2009 - 05:21
"Probably the same issue though. It's not just Spybot, it's anything that fills up the Restricted Sites list. They changed the logic handling for the RS List between RC and Final and that's what is causing the delays. Any program that adds a large number of entries to it will cause it. Empty your Restricted Sites list and see if that fixes it."
#17 BavonWW on 03 Apr 2009 - 08:04
Surely the spell checker is dependent on which program you select in the Tools Option: Programs (IE
There are perfectly good spell checker plug-ins available anyway....
I've not had one security issue since using IE8. As for display problems; none have been noticed. In fact all round IE8 is a great program!
(1 reply) #18 neoraptor on 03 Apr 2009 - 12:51
IE8 still have many problems properly rendering sites. I would like to see the rumor of having different rendering engines becoming true.
#18.1 artfuldodga on 03 Apr 2009 - 14:16
i've yet to run into any major issues with any sites i frequent, post one or two you're having issues with
(1 reply) #19 vetSpyder on 03 Apr 2009 - 16:55
In taking a moment to wipe the tears of joy from my face


this is rediculous
#19.1 artfuldodga on 03 Apr 2009 - 17:04
fairly sure he was just being funny, i know i was freaking happy when IE8 suddenly sprang to life at blazing speed
(1 reply) #20 Quick Reply on 04 Apr 2009 - 02:54
it sounds like the OP finds Google Chrome to be a perfectly capable browser but is easily swayed back to Internet Explorer for no reason other than it's Microsoft and he's managed to find it usable.

I'm a platform neutral person Windows/Mac/Linux, Microsoft/Mozilla/Google, etc. and I must say that out of all the fanboy groups, Microsofties are the worst breed of fanboy, even worse than the Linux Geeks.
#20.1 Quikboy on 04 Apr 2009 - 03:43
Microsofites are the worst? Are you kidding? Apple fanboys ought to be the worst; they usually gloat how superior their stuff is to everything (even though that's not necessarily true) and they make snarky remarks about other competitors, especially MS. At least Linux Geeks and Microsofties usually put more sense in their words.
(1 reply) #21 quentez on 04 Apr 2009 - 16:27
The main issue of IE 8 is (to me) the stupid sound it does each time you click something... Like in Windows Explorer.
#21.1 osm0sis on 06 Apr 2009 - 19:55
Hah! That's a Windows Sound Scheme

Control Panel -> Sounds and Audio Devices | Sounds

Scroll down to Windows Explorer. "Start Navigation" is the one you hate. I hate it too, along with many other default Windows sounds, which is why I customized my sound scheme LONG ago.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)