Builds for Windows 7 keep powering forward; it seems there are new ones being reported weekly, but here's one that might be worth sitting up and paying attention for: it appears Windows 7 has reached build 7105. But in addition to this, it's worth remembering that a Windows 7 RC could possibly be available April 10th. This timing makes it seem as though Neowin's exclusive source was dead on, and that in a few days time Microsoft will announce availability of an RC build for its latest operating system. It's likely that build 7100 will be named as the release candidate.The string for this build is 6.1.7105.0.090404-1235_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD, and it was compiled on April 4th. Many contested that this means it's a fake; April 4th is a Saturday, but those thoughts have been dismissed with the fact that Microsoft still compiles builds on Saturdays.
Russian site WZor is reporting this. The last reported build leak was last month, and it's expected for 7105 to be leaked shortly also, although it's hoped a public announcement will be made soon, as mentioned. So, what are they changes that are being reported so far?
1. Improved networking support, the work in the local network
2. Added support for some previously incompatible programs
3. Extras in the LP (?) and small cosmetic interface improvements
4. Added support for new drivers for various devices
5. Extended support sensory displays
6. A small optimization and changes in the kernel
It seems that Windows 7 development is definitely drawing to a close, as now the only changes are bug fixes and optimizations; no new major features are being added, although keep in mind that there could still be some surprises left.
It's because they reached a new milestone. The build number is always increased to the next full hundred on such an occassion.
btw, there's a typo in the article:
"So, what are they changes..."
I've changed it to read Milestone, as opposed to Escrow.
no, i dont belive them because their track record is bad. As soon as some page posts more then one OBVIOUSLY fake pictures as it is the truth, then it must be something wrong with the site. Its like beliving in to http://windows7pe.cn/ just not that extreme.
Don't worry, I didn't write this based on their information alone.
You know what happened to the last guy who provided screens?
Jesus was killed on a pole, and yet there is no "pictures"
YOU don't care, but many others do
http://translate.google.com/translate?prev...history_state0=
Correct, pictures of it didn't happen
He also fed thousands of people of a couple of loafs of bread and wine :p
..has anyone here seen this or have this..for real? Stop bull****ting..
..has anyone here seen this or have this..for real? Stop bull****ting..
wzor
In branch ( assemblies win7rc ) emerged new Assembly релиз-кандидат claiming, currently ( 6.04.09 ) their only two , ñáîðêà 7073 this. 0. 090330 -2032 and ñáîðêà 7077.0.090404-1255 , but nevertheless in the main branch assemblies ( ) WinMain these assemblies yet no!
Draw your attention that 30 March was collected two assemblies 7073 , in the main branch ( ) and WinMain ( win7rc ) релизкандидатной.
ЦЯ!
p.s : we quite seriously consider the possibility of establishing он-лайн betting to determine the status of any assembly products Microsoft , very successful will model business
Like they will tell some ramdom person what their plans are..
More than likely this isn't all its cracked up to be. I hafta agree with Chris and SoLoR, it's being blown out of proportion.
there wont be 7105 (unless some mirricle happens), we will see something along 7077 or higher as rc-escrow. However there is no real time table for it. Could be tomorrow, could be in a week, could take even longer so if you didnt install yet, its up to you if you are willing to wait.
According to WZor.Net, on the 2nd April : 6.1.7076.0.winmain.090402-1838 ;
Then MS would have artificially jumped to 71xx branch (major milestone reached) : 6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235, so 6 builds in 2 days. It is consistent with the recent annoucements of MS Windows OEM manager Laurence Painell.
There has been a lot of guessing with no real basis of proof given apart from "supposed" build dates that have wrong before.
So.... where is the PROOF ????
Yeah, every other windows beta.
The Windows Whistler / XP was worst. I still have the CDs of every leaked release. Great time.
+1 Belive me;
10/01/2000 Microsoft Whistler Beta1
12/06/2000 Microsoft Whistler Beta2
02/14/2001 Microsoft Whistler RC1
03/21/2001 Microsoft Whistler RC2
04/18/2001 Microsoft Whistler Final Build
plus leaked builds (don't remember how many).
Just kidding.
SHOW ME !!!
The Beta release (7000) was the last milestone and it did not jump builds either side of it !!!
How can you say these things just to try and justify this "supposed" 7105 build !!!???
They say that a dying man will clutch at straws to survive, I feel that this is one instance of that.
WAIT FOR THE RC !!!
The builds didn't jump at all !!
The builds you have stated are the ones that the general public know of ...and that's all that means.
For example are you telling me that between 7057 and 7068 there were no builds ????
Of course there were !!!
The builds didn't jump at all !!
The builds you have stated are the ones that the general public know of ...and that's all that means.
For example are you telling me that between 7057 and 7068 there were no builds ????
Of course there were !!!
I'm sorry, but you have no clue how MS does their builds..
WHAT BBS can I FXP IT FROM!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?! HAZ GOTTA HAVE IT NOW OMG OMG OMG
calm down
Windows 7 build 7105 RC Milestone reached
dear neowin team,
I would like to inform you that owner of djforum is one of the biggest bull****ters in whole RU internet zone...
So this list of changes:
2. Added support for some previously incompatible programs
3. Extras in the LP (?) and small cosmetic interface improvements
4. Added support for new drivers for various devices
5. Extended support sensory displays
6. A small optimization and changes in the kernel
is better to be removed from the article
We could call 7077 old at this point since 7105 is already confirmed.
*Wonders*
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.