editorial
Report a problem

Twitter, and why it's not just about what your breakfast was

Sam Symons   on 09 April 2009 - 06:50 · 41 comments & 7019 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Twitter has taken the internet by storm since its creation in 2006, but every day I seem to find somebody who states, "I just don't get Twitter. It seems all people to is tell others about what they're doing... what's the point of that?" Well, thankfully, there's not much to get. Those people I find who say that seem to think that Twitter is for people who are incredibly boring and wish to tell others about their incredibly boring lives; those very same people tend to be those who have actually never used the service.

Twitter features the tagline 'What are you doing?'. This, to me, actually doesn't seem very appropriate any more. Twitter, today, is less about status updates, and more about general communication. I read an interesting tweet by Major Nelson of Microsoft that read, "Twitter is starting to remind me of IRC....kinda of in some ways. But not in others." I actually agreed with this, quite strongly, and I know others could as well. Why? Because I notice more conversations happening on Twitter than anything else. You get a couple people who actually use it to declare their dogs new name, or the status of the weather where they are, but the vast majority aren't like that. Twitter is a hustling, bustling community of people all talking at once, to one another -- not shouting out into the darkness, hoping somebody is listening. Use the service for five minutes and you'll notice the same thing. The best thing about this community is that everybody is equal. Find a celebrity account and you'll see they they're more than willing to chat casually with fans, because on Twitter, popularity doesn't really matter. We're all humans, and Twitter knocks everybody down to the same level.

So, let me list a few reasons that show that it's not about selfish people with no lives. Firstly: NASA. NASA provides Twitter updates on projects like Space Shuttle missions, as well as the International Space Station. If a social networking tool is enough to gain the interest of a company like that, it has to be doing something right. Sure, I could use any other example, but it's pretty unique to see NASA on a service like this, I think. Secondly: news. Yeah, you all knew that was coming, I'm a news reporter, blah blah blah, but it's true! 95% of the news that I read comes from Twitter; the thing with it is that it's instant. There's no waiting for RSS feeds to update, or having to check your favorite website... it just happens. This is especially handy for people like me, as time matters. Half an hour can make a world of difference when it comes to huge scoops, so the ability to get the details the second they happen is vital. Of course, this is great for non-journalists, too, but I'm just pointing out that using Twitter has actually helped me get news to Neowin quicker, and that's always a good thing. If you can argue that it doesn't matter in that respect, then I'm afraid you're a member of the wrong website. Thirdly: unique content. What does this mean? Well, it means that there's certain new or competitions that you won't find anywhere else. I'll use one of my favorite bands, Muse, as an example. They provide occasional photos or videos of them recording their new album on Twitter, and nowhere else. A lot of other bands are that way, as well as other celebrities. Not only this, but I have seen hundreds of exclusive Twitter competitions, ranging from signed John Mayer guitars to simple iPhone apps. This isn't, of course, vital to anyone, but it certainly is great; I've won a few things in under 140 characters myself.

Twitter is essentially a great way to stay up to date with the current events, without having to do much work yourself. Companies like CNN, Engadget, Gizmodo and even Neowin use Twitter to send out news updates, so unless you enjoy checking all these different websites, then you'll find it to be quite handy indeed. You don't even need to make status updates at all. I know that people will comment complaining that, "Oh, Sam, you foolish fool, why would I want a service to do what I can do already? I know how to read news!" and that's all well and good. If you enjoy it that way, so be it, but if you want to be able to get really up to date news, then Twitter is probably your best bet. And not only that, you can have fun doing it too!

So lastly, you know what else is strange? I don't think I've actually had anybody tell me about what they had for breakfast.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 41 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Mike on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:03
"Twitter is starting to remind me of IRC....kinda of in some ways. But not in others."


A perfect example of many pointless messages on twitter. Always said it's the worst part of facebook made into a separate site. I do agree that it's useful for big organisations to give out information but what's wrong with using their own site (where people would actually go in the first place)?
#1.1 forcer on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:12
internet users don't just visit 1 site though, they may visit like 10? having all these on twitter gives you 10 updates on 1 site...

I agree it is pointless, but if u want something to read, boredom killer, free time at work filler... then it's great.

Like said in the article, you can't argue with it, with the amount of celebs and organisations using it.
#1.2 Sam Symons Live on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:17
forcer said,
internet users don't just visit 1 site though, they may visit like 10? having all these on twitter gives you 10 updates on 1 site...

Precisely. It's also pretty good in other aspects; I've met a whole bunch of cool people via Twitter who I now talk to daily through other means :p
(2 replies) #2 Avalanche on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:09
I still don't get it
#2.1 darkpuma on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:21
Avalanche said,
I still don't get it

Neither do i, but i've still never been to the website, I just hear about it...
#2.2 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:48
Clearly both of you need to go check it out
(1 reply) #3 dodgetigger on 09 Apr 2009 - 10:38
Getting the news quicker is all nice and stuff, but I see one big problem nowadays:
The quality of the news. While I can get news on things much faster, often this news is not accurate.
For example, here in Germany, we had one of those school shootings recently. And there was so much false information floating around as everyone wanted to be the first one to report, neglecting to check on their sources.

So I don't see the faster updates necessarily as a good thing. There are drawbacks, like the quality of the news.
Today, it happens more and more often that some obscure rumor makes the news just because noone bothers to check its validity, only to be the first to report is important.
(Kinda like those stupid "First post!" postings in comments)
#3.1 epple on 10 Apr 2009 - 09:11
Yeah it's been getting worse and worse since blogers got more and more attention about stuff like this. I don't like where it's headed at all.

If you're well-respected in the Twitter community (or any social community for that matter) you could easily start a rumour about someone or something and people will take it for the truth (until proven otherwise), but then it might be too late and the damage is already done.
#4 wolfi64 on 09 Apr 2009 - 11:07
I totally get the point, but I'm not feeling like using it anyways. Why? Because I want my website to be on top of the search engine results when someone is looking up my name. Facebook, Twitter and many other of those web 2.0 services always got placed higher than my own website which is why I renamed/deleted all those social networking accounts. Now my website ranks #1 and everyone is happy.
(1 reply) #5 FoxieFoxie on 09 Apr 2009 - 11:11
Can you please stop pposting about twitter? I had 50+ feeds subscribed and only 7 left due to all the twitter **** all over. Can you please just stop it?

#5.1 michael.dobrofsky on 10 Apr 2009 - 02:19
It's hard to stop something as powerful as hype
(1 reply) #6 basix on 09 Apr 2009 - 11:14
What happened to RSS?
#6.1 Aq3e on 09 Apr 2009 - 17:17
What happened to going outside and doing stuff in the real world, Or actually doing your job when your at work. Or maybe getting real friends to talk to instead of strangers online who you'll never see. Get a life people....
#7 SniperX on 09 Apr 2009 - 11:19
Those people I find who say that seem to think that Twitter is for people who are incredibly boring and wish to tell others about their incredibly boring lives; those very same people tend to be those who have actually never used the service.

Then let me be one of those who bucks this trend. I have tried it, several times in fact, to give status updates to clients. Not only did I find it supremely tedious, but my clients invariably asked the same question as I ended up asking myself - why not just use e-mail or phone, or even text?

Find a celebrity account and you'll see they they're more than willing to chat casually with fans, because on Twitter, popularity doesn't really matter.

Wasn't it reported, only last week I think, that in 50 Cent's case it is his manager who does his Twittering for him? Do you really think that is a unique scenario? I shake my head at those who really believe they are reading the words of the celebrities on MySpace, Twitter, Facebook, etc.

This is especially handy for people like me, as time matters. Half an hour can make a world of difference when it comes to huge scoops, so the ability to get the details the second they happen is vital.

Hang on a second. Looking at your profile, I see you are a student. Are you classing what you do here at Neowin as deadly serious journalism? I hardly think that Neowin is a throbbing hive of up to the minute breaking news. BBC, sure. Neowin? Hmmm.... Maybe I've just misuderstood something and you are actually a journalist elsewhere, in which case, my apologies.

Twitter is essentially a great way to stay up to date with the current events, without having to do much work yourself. Companies like CNN, Engadget, Gizmodo and even Neowin use Twitter to send out news updates, so unless you enjoy checking all these different websites, then you'll find it to be quite handy indeed.

I'm of the generation that likes news to be a bit more informative than a few characters long. If I don't have time to catch the news, then I wait until I have. I have yet to find myself in a situation where I fear that my life may end if I don't or can't read or hear everything 'as it happens'. It is a paradox perhaps that those older people (the ones with less time ultimately) are the ones who are more able to take their time, while the youth, the ones with so much more time, fool themselves into thinking they are so busy that they need everything now.
(1 reply) #8 +kraized on 09 Apr 2009 - 11:24
#8.1 epple on 10 Apr 2009 - 09:14
Why?
(1 reply) #9 spacer on 09 Apr 2009 - 12:17
Twitter is the dumbest thing to happen to the internet since Facebook...which is the dumbest thing to happen to the internet since Myspace...etc, etc.
#9.1 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:49
Read the article.
#10 ZombieFly on 09 Apr 2009 - 12:50
in terms of bringing instant communication to the masses, you can't argue with the facebook/twitter concept. Anyone that "doesn't get it" must be missing the point. I agree that the current implementation of twitter contains a lot of useless info which could be described as noise, but if you know what you want and you're selective about who you follow then it becomes REALLY useful for updates and inside info into products/bands/software/news etc.

I think a decent implementation on a mobile device is also essential otherwise you're not exactly getting the full twitter experience. I see this technology being adopted or mangled into some kind of mobile standard, which maybe will replace sms, allowing you to broadcast and chat with defined groups of friends or just shout out to the world in general. I have to say though that with twitter and facebook i do find myself wondering why I now know more about people i haven't seen for 15yrs than I did when I saw them daily in real life. Whats even weirder is the fact that i've no intention of speaking to half of them and find what they are doing as annoying as I did when I knew them

...information overload
(1 reply) #11 C_Guy on 09 Apr 2009 - 14:31
It seem with all the recent editorials on Twitter that some Neowin staff are on a mission to get people to sign up for it. I think a vast majroity of people who say they don't "get" Twitter is because they either have too many other things to do with their time or they can't think of anything that the rest of the world would find interesting to read.

In any case, just because we have no desire to use Twitter doesn't mean we don't get it.

As for NASA (yawn) and other news, I've never had a problem finding it fast enough before Twitter. Besides, I don't know any site that gets news (and weekly Apple hardware updates) published faster than Neowin
#11.1 SniperX on 09 Apr 2009 - 14:38
C_Guy said,
It seem with all the recent editorials on Twitter that some Neowin staff are on a mission to get people to sign up for it.

lol I thought that too, but I couldn't find a way to word it kindly.
#12 cheng on 09 Apr 2009 - 15:10
Twitter is just a infomation ocean of gabage.
#13 JonathanMarston on 09 Apr 2009 - 16:02
Like somebody else already said, Twitter is just the bad part of Facebook made into its own site, and for some reason, the Facebook guys are trying to be more like Twitter now. Don't they realize it's the structure of Facebook that made it so much better than other, similar sites? Now it's turning into a blinding sandstorm of random posts and status updates....

Please, let Twitter die...
#14 kferd on 09 Apr 2009 - 16:02
I guess I just don't get it. I've tried Twitter a number of times and just found it to be confusingly basic. It just seems like it is the most basic part about social networking sites (facebook, Myspace, etc) but marketed in a way that makes it appear to be the "Cutting Edge Thing". Its not. Its nothing different. It doesn't make you any more tech savvy to tweet about 5hit you do. And chances are, nobody that you actually want/need to communicate with even has the slightest idea what Twitter is and how to use it.
#15 Tempus on 09 Apr 2009 - 16:14
In my mind, Twitter does nothing but make people think they are more important they they probably are. I really don't need to know anything in real time and guess what, neither do most of the rest of the 6.5 billion people on the planet. If you think you are one of those that DO need real time information about things (including NASA Shuttle updates) then one of these situations probably exist:

1. You really aren't as important as you think you are - get over it.
2. You have too much time on your hands - go outside and look at the big orange ball of light I like to call the sun.
3. You control the destiny of millions of people.

Reporting for Neowin (sad to say) doesn't quite qualify for number 3 so I'd have to say Sam you probably fall in to slots 1 or 2. I actually think the world was a better place before we became this in your face information overload society.
#16 m.keeley on 09 Apr 2009 - 17:42
While it can undoubteldy be useful and informative doesn't alter the fact that the almost all (wouldn't be suprised ifit were 99%) are lame/ego seeking feeds which you'd have to be a pretty sad individual to follow. So basically the same as Facebook but it's currently the in thing.

The other obvious problem is that, often, even the interesting ones only twitter (no blog etc) and therefore don't provide enough information on a topic.

All in all if you have somethng useful to say then a blog is often a better option and don't say they're hard to maintain because they're not.

(1 reply) #17 perochan on 09 Apr 2009 - 19:03
myspace, facebook, twitter, etc = attention whores

#17.1 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:51
Of course. NASA must be an attention whore too.

[/sarcasm]
#18 atari800 on 09 Apr 2009 - 19:52
Outside of Neowin - I dont hear anyone talking about Twitter.

For grins - I went to Twitter to look for Jim Carey
Well - he didnt pop up.... maybe he is not there, maybe he is buried in the 70000000 results... so I randomly picked a user off of the 1st page

*I removed some letter from names to protect innocent
-----
@rautennis champagne on clay, there is nothing like it DD So how was your serve, did you own it?

@Luupin oh dude, just you wait til later

@rautennis Love the swerashirt, love the Barca Trophy

@rautennis the end of the video makes me very very happy
-----

I can see the IRC of it but you dont get both sides of the story so it is mindless blather

I hit another twtter link and this guy/kid was sending updates to twitter from a mobile device about being bored hanging around his dad who was trying to entertain him (but failing)

then there was another link that was in some language I could nto make out - although it could be ROT13 encoded - I dont know

Twitter is a social wasteland in my opinion.
I am old fashion - I call people and visit or meet up with them.
As far as companies go - NASA, I would rather go to their site and look for launch info or whatever instead of twitter.
and I still say there is no way to verify that Segourney Weaver is Twttering or not... I bet if I signed up as Jesus H Christ or Dusty Rhodes or Sammy Davis Jr, I could get in and blog away and put on a good show too


(1 reply) #19 Deathray on 09 Apr 2009 - 22:14
Twitter is like text messages over cellphones, except everyone can read them...

It's good for organizations, they can tweet a lot of interesting/fresh information... but the general joe doesn't have much to tweet of value, which is where the fuel comes from people that is reflected in your title. Sure, in breaking news situations, the average joe gets his 15 minutes of fame, but beyond that... their information, while treated equal, is not really that important.

For the average joe... I guess it's a lazy way of keeping in touch with people you know... instead of actually talking to them directly/individually, you can tweet them about your life... which imo is cheap. As posters above have said... call people, visit, or even chat with them personally... as opposed to broadcasting your life and hoping they pay attention. Sort of like the Facebook current status or whatever it was... cheap, short updates on your life. Except now you have more room to say stuff

I can understand the idea of following a lot of organizations and/or important people... but I can't foresee any reason I would actually tweet. I can't see how this really, at the end of the day, isn't just RSS feeds from multiple groups, hosted on a single site, updated instantly... 140 characters isn't a lot to get the whole story.
#19.1 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:53
Deathray said,
Twitter is like text messages over cellphones, except everyone can read them...


Good comparison.
#20 ID2 on 09 Apr 2009 - 22:19
This is not an article, it's an advertisement.

Another example of degrading quality of information.
(1 reply) #21 Luis Mazza on 10 Apr 2009 - 01:10
So it is becoming a public Windows Live Messenger?
People like two things: chatting nonsense and publishing it. At least in my country (Brazil).
#21.1 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:54
Also every other country in the world.
#22 michael.dobrofsky on 10 Apr 2009 - 02:22
Yay for these comments! I'm loving reading the comments re: Twitter cos I sometimes thought I was in the minority of people who didn't get it and thought it was a bucket of pi**.
(1 reply) #23 Geranium_Z__NL on 10 Apr 2009 - 04:51
how come i never heard of twitter?
#23.1 chris4 on 10 Apr 2009 - 23:54
Because you don't keep up with the news?
(3 replies) #24 Sclomp on 10 Apr 2009 - 10:59
Twitter = boring. This is just another fad that will fade. It's almost exactly like blogs...we had message boards, websites, etc. already where people would post daily information, and then suddenly someone invented the word "blog" and it was this really cool thing that somehow never ever existed. Hey, if inventing a new word or website makes technology more accessible to more people, then so be it, but I'm definitely not using it.
#24.1 chris4 on 11 Apr 2009 - 00:01
Sclomp said,
Twitter = boring.

How? Have you even used it?

Sclomp said,
This is just another fad that will fade.

Just like Facebook is fading, right?
Oh wait, it's not: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=72353897130

So what if there's a new service on the internet that is gaining popularity? So what if blogs became popular? You don't explain any of your points. From your comment, you just seem like you dislike everything on the internet. Don't use it if you don't like it, but don't post that it's boring or what ever if you haven't tried it properly (note: I emphasize the word 'properly', as I predict you've probably had a look at Twitter and thought "nah this is sh*t". You can 'follow' a person or company within your interests, therefore how would it be boring?
#24.2 Adequate on 13 Apr 2009 - 15:17
@Sclomp

If it's so boring that you couldn't care less about it, why would you even comment?
#24.3 Sclomp on 13 Apr 2009 - 16:16
@ chris and Adequate.

I was simply posting my views on the subject. I didn't say you had to agree with me. I still think it's boring. I never said Facebook was fading--social groups online have been a big hit, even though I haven't really ever gotten so much into them in the past. And, many of your assumptions are false--I have tried a whole mess of things on the internet and like some things and dislike others. Twitter being one I think won't last--you're welcome to disagree.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)