editorial
Report a problem

Neowin's Top 10 Windows applications

Sam Symons   on 11 April 2009 - 03:01 · 133 comments & 26876 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A little while back, Neowin news writer Andrew Lyle went ahead and asked the community about their favorite Windows Mobile and iPhone applications. It seemed fitting to repeat this process, with a larger scale in mind; the top 10 favorite Windows applications. I'm not going to bore you with a witty introduction or lame jokes, so let's just jump straight into it, starting from #10.

#10: TuneUp Utilities 2009
TuneUp Utilities tends to be the crowd favorite when it comes to performance optimization software. It has a crazy range of features, and it wraps them all up into a slick interface. I use it myself, daily, and have done for years now. You can do a lot of stuff with it... there's defragmenting tools, UI customization features, a hard drive error checker and you can even go and change your boot screen if you are so inclined. If you feel like having a bit of a read, you can check out the Neowin review of this program right here. If reviews aren't your style, you can head over to the official website for the product and download the free trial.

#9: VLC Media Player
VLC tends to be the enthusiasts choice when it comes to media playing software. First and foremost, it's free, and it also comes on a vast amount of operating systems. Perhaps the biggest benefit, though, is that it can play pretty much any codec you can think of, and does so with simplicity. One of my favorite 'features', however, is the size of it. It's more than easy enough to just stick it on a USB key and take it wherever you need a good video player, which is very handy. You can pick up VLC here, for the aforementioned price of free.

#8: 7Zip
7Zip is a popular extracting and archiving tool, available on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Not only is it free, but it supports a wide range of archive formats, including .zip, .rar and it's very own .7zip format. There's not much else that needs to be said about this program, so if you're interested, head of to its website and nab it.

#7: Opera
Opera is a web browser that was first released back in 1996, that is currently available for operating systems, as well as mobile platforms as well. It's rather popular, and, although has a smaller market share than most, is certainly no worse than any of the other competitors out there. The software giant Adobe uses it for some of their products, and the Nintendo DS and Wii use it exclusively for their web browsing needs. If you're wanting to give it a try, head over to the official webpage and download it.

#6: Pidgin
Pidgin (or Gaim, as it was previously known) is a very popular instant messaging client, for Windows, Mac OS X and various Linux variations. It's been around since 1999, and it's essentially the client of choice amongst Linux users. You can use it to chat to a huge range of protocols, including MSN, AIM and even MyspaceIM. If you wish to give it a shot, your best bet would be to go here.

#5: Windows Live Messenger
Windows Live Messenger is the Microsoft iteration of an IM client, which comes included with Windows Vista. It's extremely popular, not because it's already installed on Windows machines, but because it has a great range of features, customization and even built-in games. You can head over here to install it (if you need to, for whatever reason), and keep in mind that if you're on a Mac then you'll be automatically redirected. It's worth noting that the Mac OS X client is much different to the Windows version, and isn't as fully featured, but still does the job well.

#4: WinRAR
WinRAR is probably the most popular archiving tool available for Windows, I'd say. It's available here, and is available for purchase or as a free download. It's a shareware application, so if you want a fully free alternative, look elsewhere.

#3: Adobe CS4 Suite
Adobe's latest Creative Suite, CS4, is the newest addition to possibly the most popular and famous graphics editing package in the world. CS4 features a bunch of programs, including Dreamweaver and Illustrator, but most importantly it included Photoshop. Photoshop is the professional choice when it comes to image creation and manipulation, and whilst there are very good free alternatives, Photoshop is in a league of its own. If you're willing to shell out the big ones to get this, you can head over here, or you can also try a 30 day full-featured trial.

#2: µTorrent
µTorrent is, apparently, one of the most popular torrent clients around. It's got a great range of features, and works very well. It's currently available for Windows, or as a beta on Mac OS X. Aside from its features, it's also very small in filesize so is great for people with limited hardware. It's handy for downloading that Linux .iso, or what-have-you, so if you want to get a hold of this if you haven't already, please go here to do so.

#1: Firefox
Is anybody really surprised about this? Firefox appears to be the browser of choice with Neowin, and it's no wonder. It's fast, it's free, and it has a wonderful range of add-ons that make it hugely customizable while still being very usable. Development for Firefox is very strong and consistent, with new versions released daily, and Mozilla (the company behind it) have a great community, as well as a current 22.905% market share as of March, 2009. If, for whatever reason, you don't have this wonderful piece of software installed already, please visit the website and get it.

So, there we have it, Neowin. You voted, and these are the top 10 applications of choice. So, which software almost made the cut? Let's have a look.

Honorable mentions:

Google Chrome:
Google's Chrome browser hasn't been around as long as its competitors, but it certainly is popular already. It is based on the Chromium project, and is currently available for Windows, but as a pre-alpha for Ubuntu and Mac OS X. If you've yet to try out Chrome, you can do so here. It's currently sitting on 1.23% market share, as of March, 2009.

CCleaner:
CCleaner is a very popular (and free!) tool for Windows, designed to remove all the unwanted files you may have lying around. It's had over 260 million downloads, and has many features including a registry cleaner and, most importantly, it's damn fast. According to the website for the software, it usually takes less than a second to run.

So concludes the Windows edition of our top 10 list, but it shan't end here. Keep your eyes peeled if you're not a Windows user if you wish to have your say in the coming weeks.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 133 additional comments
(22 replies) #1 Memnochxx on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:28
Why do people use anything besides 7zip?
#1.1 C++ on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:40
Maybe because WinRAR, true to it's spot on the list, is better? Every time I get suckered by one of those articles claiming 7-Zip has better compression I just end up uninstalling it and wishing I hadn't wasted my time. It is not as good as WinRAR.
#1.2 Kushan on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:37
It DOES have better compression, usually, but I find Winrar has a much much nicer interface. Also many people don't use 7z, RAR is much more common.
#1.3 ThaCrip on 11 Apr 2009 - 05:40
Kushan said,
It DOES have better compression, usually, but I find Winrar has a much much nicer interface. Also many people don't use 7z, RAR is much more common.


what Kushman said pretty much sums it up... although lately i been preferring 7-zip just because it's FREE and seems to be a all around solid application although WinRAR does have a better interface that's more tuned.

but at this point WinRAR is to much of a standard to change to something else even if that something else is better.

it's sorta like mp3's ... those are 'the standard' even though .OGG (etc) might be better than MP3.
#1.4 Faisal Islam on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:47
WinZIP Pro rocks
#1.5 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:03
WinRAR is a hands down winner.
#1.6 barteh on 11 Apr 2009 - 15:39
+1 for winrar
#1.7 Mikeyx11 on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:05
I used to use WinRAR, until I discovered TugZip. It supports all the big archiving formats, such as RAR and 7z. I prefer it over WinRAR because it's entirely free, and prefer it over 7Zip because it has a nicer UI. It's also fast and easy to use. www.tugzip.com is their site if anyone wants to check it out.
#1.8 +ckempo on 11 Apr 2009 - 17:06
Mikeyx11 said,
I used to use WinRAR, until I discovered TugZip.


Me too for the same reasons. How many people shouting for WinRAR actually have the paid edition and aren't just avoiding the nag screen?
#1.9 rm20010 on 11 Apr 2009 - 17:17
WinRAR also backs up metadata and security settings for files on NTFS drives.
#1.10 shakey_snake on 11 Apr 2009 - 19:19
What UI is even required for an archive extractor?


I use explorer context menu items for 99% of anything I have to do with archive files.
#1.11 Lord Ba'al on 12 Apr 2009 - 01:03
+1 for 7zip, especially for its x64 version which WinRar is sorely lacking.
I haven't found anything in WinRar that would make me want it over 7zip.
If only 7zip would change the *ugly* buttons in its UI... but since I only use context extensions 90% of the time, it doesn't bother me that much.
#1.12 Dead'Soul on 12 Apr 2009 - 07:16
Using WinRAR and 7-Zip together...
#1.13 WAR-DOG on 12 Apr 2009 - 09:06
+1 for winrar because it's awesome and has command prompt support
-1 for winrar because it's not free
#1.14 sullysnet on 13 Apr 2009 - 00:56
I feel most hate Winrar cause it is not free compared to 7Zip. If Winrar was free we wouldn't be comparing
#1.15 Mikeyx11 on 13 Apr 2009 - 06:38
shakey_snake said,
What UI is even required for an archive extractor?


I use explorer context menu items for 99% of anything I have to do with archive files.


Not everyone just uses them for extracting things. They are archiving tools, extraction is just one feature...
#1.16 Magallanes on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:20
I tested both, winrar and 7zip and in max compression, 7zip compress around 1% - 3% more that winrar but at expensive of doubling the time (or even more).

Also, 7zip is not used by the scene, even when there are some groups that tried (and failed) to put as a standard.
#1.17 geoken on 13 Apr 2009 - 17:05
Mikeyx11 said,
Not everyone just uses them for extracting things. They are archiving tools, extraction is just one feature...


You can also compress through the context menu. I can honestly say I've never seen the 7zip GUI and I've been using it for quite some time.
#1.18 /- Razorfold on 15 Apr 2009 - 22:52
Extractnow ftw. Its light, its fast and it works with like almost all archives
#1.19 Mikeyx11 on 19 Apr 2009 - 07:59
geoken said,
You can also compress through the context menu. I can honestly say I've never seen the 7zip GUI and I've been using it for quite some time.

When you are creating self extracting archives and need to modify settings etc then you use the GUI...
#1.20 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:23
C++ said,
Maybe because WinRAR, true to it's spot on the list, is better? Every time I get suckered by one of those articles claiming 7-Zip has better compression I just end up uninstalling it and wishing I hadn't wasted my time. It is not as good as WinRAR.

HOW is it any better the 7zip.. it does the same thing! and its free!
#1.21 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:24
Faisal Islam said,
WinZIP Pro rocks
now this guy is still living in the 90's
#1.22 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:27
sullysnet said,
I feel most hate Winrar cause it is not free compared to 7Zip. If Winrar was free we wouldn't be comparing

right on!
(12 replies) #2 Disengage on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:28
Good final list : ).
#2.1 Faisal Islam on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:48
-1, i don't like the list
#2.2 noroom on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:48
I disagree. Firefox and Opera? WinRAR and 7-Zip? Windows Live Messenger and Pidgin? This article should be titled "How I fill my computer with redundant applications".
#2.3 shortyg32 on 11 Apr 2009 - 13:00
noroom said,
I disagree. Firefox and Opera? WinRAR and 7-Zip? Windows Live Messenger and Pidgin? This article should be titled "How I fill my computer with redundant applications".


and what do you use smart ass ?
#2.4 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:03
I'm afraid i'd have to agree, some good and many bads. Firefox number 1? Give me a break.
#2.5 Nauge on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:05
shortyg32 said,
and what do you use smart ass ?

Redundant as in... you don't need two browsers, two file extractors and two IM applications.
#2.6 +Kirkburn on 11 Apr 2009 - 15:26
Nauge said,
Redundant as in... you don't need two browsers, two file extractors and two IM applications.

But if they're both great applications, why shouldn't they both be on the list?

It's not like it's a list of "best of" in individual categories.
#2.7 Mikeyx11 on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:14
noroom said,
I disagree. Firefox and Opera? WinRAR and 7-Zip? Windows Live Messenger and Pidgin? This article should be titled "How I fill my computer with redundant applications".


This list is supposed to be the top 10 applications, not the top 10 applications according to category. Nowhere does it say that any one person should have all these applications installed at the same time, does it? Even if the list comprised of only IM clients, it would still be valid because they may happen to be the most popular applications. Use your head.


Raa said,
I'm afraid i'd have to agree, some good and many bads. Firefox number 1? Give me a break.


These were all voted upon, and Firefox happened to be the most popular. Go and get a break elsewhere
#2.8 Lord Ba'al on 12 Apr 2009 - 01:05
Raa said,
I'm afraid i'd have to agree, some good and many bads. Firefox number 1? Give me a break.

Yes, Opera should be there on #1, rather than on #7 only
#2.9 Dead'Soul on 12 Apr 2009 - 07:17
noroom said,
I disagree. Firefox and Opera? WinRAR and 7-Zip? Windows Live Messenger and Pidgin? This article should be titled "How I fill my computer with redundant applications".


+1
#2.10 geoken on 13 Apr 2009 - 17:09
Mikeyx11 said,
This list is supposed to be the top 10 applications, not the top 10 applications according to category.


Which in turn makes it a bad list. The methodology is irrelevant. When 30% of the list is made up of redundant applications it's usefulness is impacted.
#2.11 Dashel on 09 May 2009 - 14:43
I agree, the methodology of this list is just silly.
#2.12 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:28
noroom said,
I disagree. Firefox and Opera? WinRAR and 7-Zip? Windows Live Messenger and Pidgin? This article should be titled "How I fill my computer with redundant applications".
i think someone doesn't know what they are talking about!
(5 replies) #3 br0adband on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:30
No sense having both compression tools on the list. WinRAR is the choice, bump 7Zip and move CCleaner into its spot, it deserves to be on that list.

And one browser is enough: Firefox, so get rid of Opera, and make room for something else (not another one, Chrome).

As for TuneUp Utilities 2009, you can't be serious...
#3.1 Sam Symons Live on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:31
br0adband said,
No sense having both compression tools on the list. WinRAR is the choice, bump 7Zip and move CCleaner into its spot, it deserves to be on that list.

And one browser is enough: Firefox, so get rid of Opera, and make room for something else (not another one, Chrome).

As for TuneUp Utilities 2009, you can't be serious...

I didn't make the votes *shrug*

Although yeah, probably would be a good idea.

Last edited by Sam Symons Live on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:41
#3.2 Faisal Islam on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:49
yea...+p replace TuneUP with ACE Utilities
#3.3 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:04
Agreed, Tuneup? It's caused problems for a few of my customers, so I wouldn't rate it.
#3.4 Mikeyx11 on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:21
Unfortunately your one opinion does not outweigh the many combined opinions of Neowin members. Are you stupid?
#3.5 rm20010 on 11 Apr 2009 - 17:18
Faisal Islam said,
yea...+p replace TuneUP with ACE Utilities


And I wouldn't agree with that.

Majority wins, sorry.

br0adband said,
And one browser is enough: Firefox, so get rid of Opera, and make room for something else (not another one, Chrome).


Also, why should only one browser be on the list? This isn't a "best browser, best music player, best compressing utility" list.
(4 replies) #4 Chaks on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:35
Unfortunately I use only #5, #4 and #1 ,lol!

I think the final list is something totally biased to (some) people needs. I mean, I dont use any of the applications listed here except for #5, #4 and #1!
#4.1 Sam Symons Live on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:35
Chaks said,
Unfortunately I use only #5, #4 and #1 ,lol!

I think the final list is something totally biased to (some) people needs. I mean, I dont use any of the applications listed here except for #5, #4 and #1!

Yeah, I'd have to agree, definitely depends on the persons needs.
#4.2 Shokus on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:57
Haha at least I got #9, #8, #5, #2 and #1, so I'm pretty cool with the list, though I'm pretty surprised Media Player Classic HC didn't make it. Maybe next year's would include Internet Explorer?
#4.3 babyHacker on 12 Apr 2009 - 00:39
I also only use 3 of them (Opera, WinRAR and WLM).

Does everyone still really use VLC Player? This is like people still using WMP 6.4 (because it takes so few resources but the interface is crap). Anyway, GOM Player is what everyone should use. Been using it for years and for all the FOSS people, it is closed source and it works better
#4.4 Magallanes on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:26
I use media player classic + kl-codec pack and i can play almost any video around the net, including quicktime, realmedia and flv.

VLC is fine but the interface is meh, instead mpc the interface is way minimalist.
#5 DanManIt on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:41
I don't understand why there is both 7-zip and winrar on here, but oh well
(9 replies) #6 paradoxdream on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:44
Not sure how every one else feels but #9: VLC Media Player is ok but its dated and KM Player is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better in every way http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/index.php

and should of done the top ten by categories so you wouldn't have 2 browsers and compression softwares
IE comes with windows and didn't even make the list LOL
#6.1 Mav Phoenix on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:57
I still like MPC-HC
#6.2 yert* on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:00
+1324325346476879870342353465834092693247340
#6.3 ThaCrip on 11 Apr 2009 - 05:49
+1 to 'The KMPlayer' comment!!!

VLC Player is more popular when KMPlayer SHOULD be because it's not flawed and offers a crapload of options if you need them
#6.4 buletov on 11 Apr 2009 - 06:35
VLC media player in a top 10? Are you smoking something weird over there Neowin? VLC is so out and full of bugs, just read this:
http://forums.animesuki.com/showthread.php...683#post1910683

CCCP with MPC bundled is the way to go today.
#6.5 CyberDragon777 on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:20
paradoxdream said,
Not sure how every one else feels but #9: VLC Media Player is ok but its dated and KM Player is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better in every way http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/index.php

and should of done the top ten by categories so you wouldn't have 2 browsers and compression softwares
IE comes with windows and didn't even make the list LOL



If you don't mind The KMPlayer violating the GPL, sure.
FFmpeg Hall of Shame

Oh, and i use SMPlayer
#6.6 Aq3e on 11 Apr 2009 - 13:36
VLC Updated : Release Date: 2009-04-05
Kmplayer Updated: December 30, 2008

Um what?
#6.7 paradoxdream on 11 Apr 2009 - 20:18
CyberDragon777 said,
paradoxdream said,
Not sure how every one else feels but #9: VLC Media Player is ok but its dated and KM Player is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better in every way http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/index.php

and should of done the top ten by categories so you wouldn't have 2 browsers and compression softwares
IE comes with windows and didn't even make the list LOL



If you don't mind The KMPlayer violating the GPL, sure.
FFmpeg Hall of Shame

Oh, and i use SMPlayer


YA I DON'T MIND AT ALL in fact i use some of the software on that page why.... because it works and does a dam good job so beyond that i could not care less same reason i use http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=announce&f=12&id=11 codec packs the fact is km player has played every thing i have ever thrown at it with out a incident and has more options then any other player i have used
#6.8 Lord Ba'al on 12 Apr 2009 - 01:11
+1 for KM Player

While vlc is still a lot better than wmp, it can't hold a candle to KM Player.
#6.9 geoken on 13 Apr 2009 - 17:17
paradoxdream said,
YA I DON'T MIND AT ALL in fact i use some of the software on that page why.... because it works and does a dam good job so beyond that i could not care less


It's unfortunate that you have no problem with people leeching off other people and disobeying their requests.
#7 C++ on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:44
I use the top 5 and both honorable mentions. Tried Pidgin and it wasn't for me. I have Opera installed but it is only ever launched when I check newly made websites for compatibility. 7-Zip holds no candle to WinRAR. VLC is pretty good, but The KMPlayer is better. Never tried TuneUp Utilities. Might give it a shot after reading this.
#8 Mav Phoenix on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:49
Nice range, from uTorrent to CS4 suite, the method and prize in one list for a lot of people lol.

I'm really surprised Windows Live Photo Gallery wasn't mentioned or Picasa, or foobar? Heck I'd throw Steam in there over some of these applications.

#9 way2quik on 11 Apr 2009 - 03:55
#3 Adobe CS came as a surprise for me.
Right when FireFox wasn't listed as #2, it had to be #1.
Nice list compiled from us neowiners.
(4 replies) #10 Andrew-DB on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:16
Pidgin is a joke compared to the functionality that Digsby gives.
#10.1 LiquidSolstice on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:34
Digsby is a joke compared to the free RAM and simplicity Pidgin gives.

Oh, and Pidgin doesn't try suckering you into installing a bunch of crapware on install. What? What was that? Oh yeah, Pidgin is OPEN SOURCE, kthx.

Damn Digsby-fanboys marching around like they're the kings of IMing.
#10.2 Neoauld on 11 Apr 2009 - 08:06
Andrew-DB said,
Pidgin is a joke compared to the functionality that Digsby gives.


lots of things are missing from digsby
till this date they havent got any way of indicting whos blocked/unblocked in contact list view..no icon..no changed text..
#10.3 Joshie on 13 Apr 2009 - 22:36
LiquidSolstice said,
Digsby is a joke compared to the free RAM and simplicity Pidgin gives.

Oh, and Pidgin doesn't try suckering you into installing a bunch of crapware on install. What? What was that? Oh yeah, Pidgin is OPEN SOURCE, kthx.

Damn Digsby-fanboys marching around like they're the kings of IMing.


*sigh* Open source is not an instant win. RAM exists to be used. It's common for free software to include a toolbar or something during install, and it's always very easy to spot its checkbox and disable it. People who clickthru installs without looking at what they're doing deserve a messy system.

Really, come up with a better criticism of Digsby. I mean, the RAM angle? That's so tired. Half of NeoWin usually jeers people who are terrified of software that actually uses a little of that 2+GB of RAM.

Not to mention, I've had Digsby running all day and it's taking up 12MB of my memory. Oh dear lord save me. My system will cave in on itself. The world is coming to an end. Oh no. Oh no. Whatever shall I do. Wherever shall I go.

Is there a pic of a sad cat somewhere I can use for this?
#10.4 liamwolf on 14 Apr 2009 - 08:08
Miranda IM > All.
(2 replies) #11 flash_flicker on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:26
I think CCleaner should have made the cut..........And Having both 7Zip and WinRaR in the top 10 doesn't make sense !!
#11.1 Sam Symons Live on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:38
flash_flicker said,
I think CCleaner should have made the cut..........And Having both 7Zip and WinRaR in the top 10 doesn't make sense !!

I wasn't sure whether to allow one of each type or just have a definitive top 10, so I went with the latter
#11.2 +Kirkburn on 11 Apr 2009 - 15:28
Sam Symons Live said,
I wasn't sure whether to allow one of each type or just have a definitive top 10, so I went with the latter

I think you made a reasonable choice.
(2 replies) #12 SoulEata on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:33
I think there should have been a limit to one browser or something.
#12.1 toadeater on 11 Apr 2009 - 08:10
SoulEata said,
I think there should have been a limit to one browser or something.


Maybe one app for each category.
#12.2 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:06
Disagree, it comes down to personal choice. And theres a wide range of opinions on browsers now.(IE, Chrome, FF, Opera)
(4 replies) #13 koppit on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:53
hmm, I'm thinking AVG should make this grade, too - and maybe filezilla ftp client

Good list though, I use almost all of them!
#13.1 Andrew-DB on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:37
I like WinScp3 for an ftp client.
#13.2 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:07
AVG? Get out of here. What about NOD32? We could go on for hours with apps
#13.3 thealexweb on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:14
Raa said,
AVG? Get out of here. What about NOD32? We could go on for hours with apps


It would be touch and go if AVG went on that list but NOD32 is no whear near worthy to go on to that list. Not sure why Opera is on that list.
#13.4 duneworld on 12 Apr 2009 - 22:19
I think an AV would have to be literally perfect to get on a list such as this.
(5 replies) #14 Scrinner on 11 Apr 2009 - 04:57
Windows live messenger doesnt come included in either vista or 7. There is only a link to it within Vista, unless I am missing something regarding the OEM scene?

Edit: Oh and I watch alot of anime and VERRY few groups ever recommend even using VLC. Most recommend against it and getting a pack such as CCCP which includes media player classic home cinema. Its why I believe the CCCP (Though i guess technically its not an application...) should be included and as mentioned, Windows Live Photo Gallery and possibly even steam.

Edit 2: Secunia PSI needs to get up there someday!
#14.1 SonicSam on 11 Apr 2009 - 05:32
Scrinner said,
media player classic home cinema.


I see people mentioning media player classic as the best Video player. Isn't it just the ancient WMP from win95 days, ugly ugly ugly. How is it better than WMP11 with the right codecs?

I know I'm probably missing something which is why I'm asking...
#14.2 acedriver on 11 Apr 2009 - 06:55
SonicSam said,
I see people mentioning media player classic as the best Video player. Isn't it just the ancient WMP from win95 days, ugly ugly ugly. How is it better than WMP11 with the right codecs?

I know I'm probably missing something which is why I'm asking...

media player classic home cinema is a different thing..

http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/
#14.3 nonick on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:09
acedriver said,
SonicSam said,
I see people mentioning media player classic as the best Video player. Isn't it just the ancient WMP from win95 days, ugly ugly ugly. How is it better than WMP11 with the right codecs?

I know I'm probably missing something which is why I'm asking...

media player classic home cinema is a different thing..

http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/


and MPC + FFDShow tryouts > VLC
#14.4 Faisal Islam on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:51
[quote=nonick said,]
[quote=acedriver said,]
[quote=SonicSam said,]
and MPC + FFDShow tryouts > VLC[/quote]


ryt..MPC is far better
#14.5 Dazer on 15 Apr 2009 - 11:06
nonick said,
and MPC + FFDShow tryouts > VLC


Agreed. MPC is awesome.
#15 kaffra on 11 Apr 2009 - 05:22
could have been a better list, with those 10 apps listed, windows users are still missing a lot of functionality. Like firewall, antivirus, editor, pdf etc
#16 ThaCrip on 11 Apr 2009 - 05:45
swap #9 with 'The KMPlayer' as that's just all around better than VLC Player in my opinion... although 'VLC Player' seems popular.

i agree with #6 ... it's much better than using the official clients to MSN/AIM/Yahoo etc and it's only '1 program' instead of loading up a billion others.

i agree with #8 to... as 7-zip is probably the best FREE archiving software and it can extract .rar files to... 7-zip's main flaw is that it's basic interface needs tweaking.

i also agree with #'s 1 and 2 ... because Firefox is THE alternative browser of choice for most people with it's extensions etc etc... and torrent wise utorrent is pretty much king because it's all compacted into a single tiny .exe file

they also needed to add 'ImgBurn' to that list as i would consider that 'must have' software (and it's free) especially if you burn DVD's etc.... it's pretty much the masterpiece of burning software and beats ALL paying ones for what it does which is basic burning of images and basic data discs etc. (for AUDIO CD's i recommend 'Burrrn')
(2 replies) #17 WAR-DOG on 11 Apr 2009 - 06:59
what about notepad++?
#17.1 CyberDragon777 on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:26
WAR-DOG said,
what about notepad++?


I use it. Pretty neat.
#17.2 WAR-DOG on 12 Apr 2009 - 09:04
yea, but thats probably the must have application if you are somekind of developer, otherwise you don't need it right?
#18 tiagosilva29 on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:27
I don't get this. Where is the voting thread?
(2 replies) #19 Solid Knight on 11 Apr 2009 - 07:56
What about AOL, Bonzai Buddy, TopRebates, WebSearchBar, WarezClient, BargainBuddy, 180search Assistant, Webhancer, FavoriteMan, and Memmaker? I just don't see anyone using their computer without these wonderful applications.
#19.1 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:08
Can you GET BonziBuddy anymore?
#19.2 Solid Knight on 11 Apr 2009 - 22:15
I keep an old installer laying around. Do you want a copy?
#20 Crucify on 11 Apr 2009 - 08:06
LOL "AOL"
(8 replies) #21 franzon on 11 Apr 2009 - 08:30
CCleaner and TuneUp Utilities are useless and dangerous because they damage Windows
#21.1 gcgonster on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:12
that was quite a bold statement.... I'd have to totally disagree with you there. I use CCleaner to remove all temporary files hanging around while TuneUp is good for fixing system errors. I never knew them to damage windows.....
#21.2 CyberDragon777 on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:12
Anything can damage Windows if the user is persistent/stupid enough
#21.3 nonick on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:26
franzon said,
CCleaner and TuneUp Utilities are useless and dangerous because they damage Windows

I am sure if you type your sentence this way, it must be true..

...

#21.4 sibot on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:48
nonick said,
I am sure if you type your sentence this way, it must be true..

...

haha!
#21.5 Faisal Islam on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:52
LOL.....r u maddd???
#21.6 Raa on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:08
Agreed Tuneup has caused a fair share of problems for people, so I wouldn't suggest it for everyone. CCleaner though? C'mon, go easy
#21.7 Airlink on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:42
Well, sure: If you don't know what the **** you're doing then yes; Using those two apps can screw with your system registry. But it's not like it does it by default.
#21.8 ThaCrip on 11 Apr 2009 - 17:57
CCleaner i think is a 'safe program' i been using it for a good 1+ years and it's never done ANY damage to my system.

because it's pretty basic in what it cleans which means it's much safer than the more through ones.
#22 sibot on 11 Apr 2009 - 09:48
I think CCleaner should've made the list for sure and ofcourse as mentioned above 2 archiving applications shouldn't be on the list.

How about a list of Top 10 Windows Free Applications?
(1 reply) #23 AnthoWin on 11 Apr 2009 - 12:18
My list:
antivirus: Rising antivirus
office: open office
pdf reader: foxit pdf reader
pdf printer: dopdf
browser: google chrome
powerdvd alternative (great for bluray): Arcsoft Total Media Theatre

oh and glary's utilities is the best ccleaner and tweaking software ever!
#23.1 Joshie on 13 Apr 2009 - 22:39
AnthoWin said,
My list:
antivirus: Rising antivirus
office: open office
pdf reader: foxit pdf reader
pdf printer: dopdf
browser: google chrome
powerdvd alternative (great for bluray): Arcsoft Total Media Theatre

oh and glary's utilities is the best ccleaner and tweaking software ever!


Foxit's still around? Ever since Adobe Reader got that huge speed boost a version or two ago, I haven't paid alternatives any attention. Heck, nowadays I think the official Adobe option is even faster than I ever remember Foxit being.
#24 DrunknMunky on 11 Apr 2009 - 12:19
I use 8 of them (plus CCleaner). Good list
#25 G0NADS on 11 Apr 2009 - 12:58
quite possibly he is, yes
#26 aarste on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:15
Does anyone else dislike the new Windows Live Messenger 9.0? I went back to 8.5 heavily a-patched for the minimalist look.
#27 Gary7 on 11 Apr 2009 - 14:29
I use 1,2 , 3 and 4. CCleaner should have made it and some others on the list should not have.
#28 Glendi on 11 Apr 2009 - 15:01
I like Gom Player more than any other player.
(2 replies) #29 noku on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:15
gimp should be on the list as well
#29.1 Solid Knight on 11 Apr 2009 - 22:16
noku said,
gimp should be on the list as well


No, it shouldn't.
#29.2 WAR-DOG on 12 Apr 2009 - 09:03
paint.net should be
#30 Airlink on 11 Apr 2009 - 16:36
Spybot S&D should definitely be on this list. It's a must-have as far as I'm concerned.
#31 shakey_snake on 11 Apr 2009 - 19:25
How are there no audio players on this list?
#32 whYeNQue on 11 Apr 2009 - 19:45
my list would include, in no specific order... wlmessenger, ie8, wmp, yzDock, logmein, avast, winrar, ccleaner, treesize free and windows explorer
#33 PatrynXX on 11 Apr 2009 - 20:52
Had nothing by problems with CCleaner. Good way to corrupt a computer Fast!
#34 hardgiant on 11 Apr 2009 - 22:27
GOM media player

Google Talk

Winamp Lite

True Launch Bar

Trayit
(1 reply) #35 +S/R on 12 Apr 2009 - 01:49
I feel like this article is worthless.
#35.1 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:36
RIGHT ON! everyone is going the bitch about with what should and shouldnt be there! hell even im doing it!
#36 soonerproud on 12 Apr 2009 - 03:12
Windows Live Photo Gallery and WL Mail applications should at least get a honorable mention because they are that good. I stopped using Picasa once WLPG was released and never looked back.

Edit:

I use
9
8
2
1
And CCleaner

Last edited by soonerproud on 12 Apr 2009 - 03:27
#37 kerneltie on 12 Apr 2009 - 03:42
CCleaner, Tuneup Utilities... homeopathy for your PC.
#38 SakuraKira on 12 Apr 2009 - 08:28
shortyg32 said,
and what do you use smart ass ?


I agree with Noroom... Your reply seems to suggest that you think everyone has multiples of similar software on their computers. I only use Firefox (keep updates on IE because it's necessary), Pidgin, and IZarc (archive app).

When it comes to browsers these days, it's very subjective. Everyone has a different system configuration, and everyone has different preferences when it comes to UI. Having both of those browsers on the list seems to be placating those who would cry "foul" if their fave was left out. However, I do understand that web developers will want to have at least two different browsers to test things out.

I tend to think that lists like these are good if you're looking for a software recommendation, and popularity might indicate the better product. But that doesn't mean you'll like it too, or that it will meet your needs.
#39 JuanManuel on 12 Apr 2009 - 15:07
What about Foxit Reader?
I use it all days to view pdf files ...

And also Paint.Net, the best replacement for Paint in Windows.
#40 MMaster23 on 12 Apr 2009 - 17:58
Top10 Windows app lists are old and useless. The power of Windows is that fact there are thousands of application doning the same thing. Useless you might say .. true some are better then other however it does give the enduser choice.
#41 duneworld on 12 Apr 2009 - 22:54
I use 9, 5, 4 and 1. The only problem I have with VLC is that for a few seconds when opening a video the screen will be black, the (temporary) solution to this problem is to seek back to the beginning from where the video will play normally. I used to use Winzip, but hardly ever used it so got rid of it and just use Winrar now. I've never used any other IM client apart from WLM and don't intend to try out any others any time soon. And I use Firefox over IE because I have a sense of security with it due to addons such as noscript, and I like that I can change the look of it as well.
#42 miguel_montes on 13 Apr 2009 - 22:13
Is this top 10, the best windows applications, or the most used?

If it's the latter, I would include Microsoft Office in there, as well as Notepad, Freecell and Solitaire...
(1 reply) #43 Joshie on 13 Apr 2009 - 22:42
So I gave KMPlayer a shot based on the rabid recommendations of so many posters here, and, well...

Really? Seriously?

...okay...if you say so.

*goes back to MPC*
#43.1 duneworld on 16 Apr 2009 - 18:03
I tried also KMplayer based on people's comments on this thread, while it was more stable than VLC, it was much more invasive, I uninstalled it and still have it in context menus. Which makes me less inclined to reinstall it.
(2 replies) #44 BavonWW on 14 Apr 2009 - 05:36
Why no Internet Explorer 8? It's worth taking a look people. Much has changed and I've changed back to IE myself. For security it's the winner.
#44.1 stezo2k on 27 Apr 2009 - 22:36
good thinking, i think with IE ms didnt really innovate, just make it as much like firefox and opera as possible so it doesnt get the praise as much. i personally think its great. i still prefer firefox though for the fantastic plugins
#44.2 lflashl on 10 May 2009 - 22:37
firefox for the plugins(GO AD BLOCK)
#45 Picardilly on 06 May 2009 - 13:15
If you like shopping at Amazon, give Wootch a try.
It works like a charm with Windows7.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)