main
Report a problem

Feds want hackers to secure the nation's networks

Sam Symons   on 18 April 2009 - 20:44 · 31 comments & 6526 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Hackers can cause governments a large amount of trouble from day to day, from stealing valuable info to changing websites, and they're getting a bit fed up about it. A job posting has been listed on ResumeWare.net, asking for an applicant who will "understand hacker methodologies, tools, and tactics. Additionally, the candidate will have an understanding of common operating system and domain structures, servers, services, and associated vulnerabilities."

This report comes from Fox News, who say the job posting is on behalf of the Homeland Security Department, and that they (the applicant) would receive payment to secure the nation's networks. It seems everybody is getting on the cyber security bandwagon; the Pentagon is increasing the number of security experts they have from 80 to 250 by 2011. David Powner, who is the director of technology issues for the Government Accountability Office, said that, "We're clearly not as prepared as we should be." The U.S. has not kept up with technology innovations which are needed to protect the country from cyber attacks, of which there are a vast amount each day. The Pentagon has reportedly spent over $100 million in the last 6 months, on repairing damage from these attacks, and responding to them.

It's good to see security against cyber attacks being stepped up, and it will be a vital step in many respects. The U.S. is ill-prepared for a cyber attack, as Fox News states, and this job posting will fill a position in the government that is greatly needed.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 31 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 WAR-DOG on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:10
what if the dude fails?
#1.1 Chris-Gonzales on 19 Apr 2009 - 04:21
WAR-DOG said,
what if the dude fails?


You do know they wont just hire someone and give him the job right away. The word is TRAINING
#1.2 WAR-DOG on 19 Apr 2009 - 07:37
ok, after 1 year of training there comes a chinese script kiddy and pwnz him, what then?
#1.3 carmatic on 19 Apr 2009 - 10:33
WAR-DOG said,
ok, after 1 year of training there comes a chinese script kiddy and pwnz him, what then?


then they revise the training and job requirements... theyre kind of adaptable, you know
#1.4 ScottKin on 19 Apr 2009 - 13:13
Based on the scope of work for this position, do you really think that they're only going to hire 1 person for this positon?
#1.5 Tim Dawg on 20 Apr 2009 - 06:54
It says they're going from 80 to 250 which might lead one to believe that they're not hiring a single person. This is probably just the beginning.

All I have to say is, "it's about time!".
#1.6 mokthraka on 20 Apr 2009 - 20:38
actually the pentagon is going from 80 to 250

homeland never said exactly how many people they are hiring

but you can sure as hell guess it would be more then 1 person
(1 reply) #2 ev0| on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:13
Feds want hackers wanted huh ? wow.
#2.1 mokthraka on 20 Apr 2009 - 20:39
the goverment and other security related companies have always wanted hackers

google white hat hacker

I think that is the term
#3 pauldr777 on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:14
Glad to see the government taking this a bit more seriously, hopefully they give this dude some leash to run or we won't ever get anywhere
(3 replies) #4 carmatic on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:39
whats this thing about some 'dude' , i thought they were looking for 250-80=170 people to fill the jobs?
#4.1 Chris-Gonzales on 19 Apr 2009 - 04:21
carmatic said,
whats this thing about some 'dude' , i thought they were looking for 250-80=170 people to fill the jobs?


Not everyone wants to be called "dude"
#4.2 carmatic on 19 Apr 2009 - 10:34
Chris-Gonzales said,
Not everyone wants to be called "dude"

hey dude, whats up?
#4.3 Shiranui on 20 Apr 2009 - 00:58
Chris-Gonzales said,
Not everyone wants to be called "dude"


"Dude!"
"Homey!"
"Buddy!"
"Buddy!"
"Homey!"
"DUDE!"
(2 replies) #5 ThaCrip on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:50
"Feds want hackers to secure the nation's networks"

i have not read the article but that sounds like it could be a doubled edged sword... because even though in a sense it could be a good thing but at the same time you got to ask yourself 'can i trust them'

but i guess if they have some security experts there and sorta look over the hackers then maybe it would be reasonably safe.
#5.1 carmatic on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:53
ThaCrip said,
"Feds want hackers to secure the nation's networks"

i have not read the article but that sounds like it could be a doubled edged sword... because even though in a sense it could be a good thing but at the same time you got to ask yourself 'can i trust them'

but i guess if they have some security experts there and sorta look over the hackers then maybe it would be reasonably safe.


yeah i was thinking the same thing too, kind of like a chain of command but instead of decreasing rank, its increasing hacker-ness, i guess... kind of like your supervisor in a vocational college, your free to make up your own stuff and the supervisor has to figure out what you've done
#5.2 Solid Knight on 19 Apr 2009 - 01:22
Well, you can always send a CIA ninja to their house if they screw you over. When these guys apply for the job I'm sure knowing their residence will be a requirement.
#6 Webworldx on 18 Apr 2009 - 21:52
Government have used hackers for years, some convicted.
#7 conan_2000 on 18 Apr 2009 - 23:30
I wouldn't think this would seem unusual, one of my departments service offerings is 'ethical hacking' where we are essentially hired to hack into corporate networks to assess vulnerabilities. It would make sense to hire people who know how to do this to secure a network. None of the guys at work who participate in this ever do hacking for personal purposes.
#8 kraven on 19 Apr 2009 - 00:06
The people who hack these systems, don't do it for the money, they do it because they can and for the kudos. Giving people recognition for finding the holes in these systems, however they do it, ethicaly or not is a good idea. Personally if someone finds a hole in my system, i would rather it was someone who has no financial or military gain, as opposed to someone who wanted to rip me off.

If this story is true, then it's a government growing up, as opposed to a government in denial.

K.
#9 Cloaker on 19 Apr 2009 - 00:33
Sounds like a job for Kevin Mitnick. He was hacking from Radio Shack in the begining with 5" floppies. Remember them? They'd stay open late for him if he wasn't finished, thinking he was doing homework.
just a thought...

http://www.kevinmitnick.com
#10 +warwagon on 19 Apr 2009 - 04:58
I think this is a pretty smart idea. This is the way it should be. Someone hacks you, you don't arrest them, you hire them to help secure you. Because they obviously know more than you.
#11 FoxieFoxie on 19 Apr 2009 - 09:08
Do they hire trolls?

I could work there then
#12 psionicinversion on 19 Apr 2009 - 10:43
or knowing the amercians theyll just arrest everyone who applies for the job. they cant hack if there behind bars, problem solved hahaha
#13 pphheerroonn on 19 Apr 2009 - 10:52
David Powner... What a name!
#14 n_K on 19 Apr 2009 - 11:20
So the UK guy that got extradited to america and they're just jailing him....
Does anyone else think they're an absolute bunch of idiots?
#15 Typhon on 19 Apr 2009 - 13:59
wow 100,000,000 and the tech is still not up to date??????? I think that is BS and they need to look into wtf they are spending the money on.
#16 JoeSam1 on 19 Apr 2009 - 14:27
I hope they're going to carefully go through the applicants to separate the people who are genuinely good at what they do from the no talent script-kiddies that they'll probably get flooded with.
#17 xXDestroyerGRXx on 19 Apr 2009 - 15:31
Pathetic.
#18 Airlink on 19 Apr 2009 - 21:08
It says above: "This report comes from Fox News"
Allow me to translate:
"This report is a FUD piece from Faux News"
#19 crashguy on 19 Apr 2009 - 22:03
It's been made official. Hackers are more reliable then anyone else... ohh the horror lol

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)