apple
Report a problem

iPod Touch being adopted for networked warfare

Brad Sams   on 20 April 2009 - 13:37 · 43 comments & 6317 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The United States military is taking Apple's iPod touch onto the battlefield. A report shows that the iPod Touch is perfect for "networked warfare" and that it will allow soldiers to be linked together and view shared data across the battlefield.

An example of how it might be used is that images being sent back by an UAV could be shared to all soldiers across the battlefield giving them the best available options on how to engage the enemy from their perspective locations.

Other tools such as translation software are being adopted to help soldiers communicate with local citizens without the aid of a human translator. The versatility of the platform has truly shown Apple's iPod Touch is much more than a media device and that it continues to find new uses all the time.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 43 additional comments
(8 replies) #1 XerXis on 20 Apr 2009 - 13:51
like they would work very long in the hot dessert while being roughly handled in the sand
#1.1 vanacid on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:28
I own one iPod touch and I firmly beleive this is a good idea.
They would work in the sand, nothing can get inside these devices and very hot temperature doesn't seem to affect them.

They also have one h*** of a good screen, it absolutely never scratches (the back of my device is really full of scratches everywhere, but the screen it always clean, I even tried to scratch it with my keys and it never did, I really don't know what the screen is made from, but it is absolutely unbeleivable)
#1.2 BoDEAN on 20 Apr 2009 - 15:23
XerXis said,
like they would work very long in the hot dessert while being roughly handled in the sand


Hmm, it's DESERT............it's not going to work in someones dessert, you're right.
#1.3 +Jedimark on 20 Apr 2009 - 16:04
XerXis said,
like they would work very long in the hot dessert while being roughly handled in the sand

My iPhone spent 5 months in the desert working just fine.
#1.4 Xero on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:12
My concern is actually using the device without any gloves on. Needing skin on screen might be an issue but other than that power to them, definitely help them out.
#1.5 Recon415 on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:43
Who has sand in their dessert? Yum...?
#1.6 DanielZ on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:09
Xero said,
My concern is actually using the device without any gloves on. Needing skin on screen might be an issue but other than that power to them, definitely help them out.

Well actually, some companies have already started making iPhone-compatible gloves, which work even when they're on, thanks to nipple-like points on the fingers.
#1.7 danisflying527 on 22 Apr 2009 - 10:45
BoDEAN said,
Hmm, it's DESERT............it's not going to work in someones dessert, you're right.


Actually bro it wouldnt be too bad served with tomato sauce and a side of fries
#1.8 Skullpture on 23 Apr 2009 - 13:56
XerXis said,
like they would work very long in the hot dessert while being roughly handled in the sand

With the permission of Apple, the U.S. military can modify it to make it more war-friendly and sturdy. I think it's a great idea. Makes me proud to be an American AND a iPod Touch owner.
#2 cabron on 20 Apr 2009 - 13:52
****ing awesome!!! can't wait to own one of these devices one day.
(4 replies) #3 The2 on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:08
and what if they wear gluvs?
#3.1 vanacid on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:29
hmmm.... good point, they have to remove their gloves first... it is something that can be annoying.
#3.2 PsykX on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:43
I believe the army has so much technology that it's going to invent gloves who work with iPod touches It shouldn't be that hard in fact, you just need very small pulses of electricity or something like that...
#3.3 mmck on 20 Apr 2009 - 18:58
Ermmm over engineering gloves now are we, how about make the touch work with gloves other devices can do it.
#3.4 tylershaw on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:40
The third party styluses that are available work very well - no need to take off the gloves.
(1 reply) #4 offroadaaron on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:08
Oh lets get on the band wagon of every Mac or Windows news. Mac rules its superior you know it is!!! blah blah blah

Continue....
#4.1 Recon415 on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:44
Lol.
#5 tsun on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:08
yay for marketing

i think that the army would prefer a more robust piece of hardware designed for their needs then a commercial product designed for the general population
(3 replies) #6 vetneufuse on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:23
something tells me they arn't going to run apple's OS on them but a customized version of it
#6.1 vanacid on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:31
Why? The Apple iPhone SDK contains everything they need for their apps. iPhone SDK 3.0 will ease the development process even more and bring a lot more possibilities for the dev.

Care to explain your point ?
#6.2 starburst1980 on 20 Apr 2009 - 16:22
vanacid said,
Why? The Apple iPhone SDK contains everything they need for their apps. iPhone SDK 3.0 will ease the development process even more and bring a lot more possibilities for the dev.

Care to explain your point ?

Ill explain it: Security issues.
#6.3 vetneufuse on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:55
vanacid said,
Why? The Apple iPhone SDK contains everything they need for their apps. iPhone SDK 3.0 will ease the development process even more and bring a lot more possibilities for the dev.

Care to explain your point ?


Apple's SDK's do NOT provide everything a military needs to develop apps... the SDK is severly limited in terms of what an armed forces contractor is used to having access to in a system.. thats one of the reasons they love windows and linux, they have full access to hardware, and write custom security and communcations systems for them
(1 reply) #7 Ji@nBing on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:30
Wouldn't it make more sense to use an iPhone so it can get a signal from a coms satellite, rather than an iPod touch that only has wifi?
#7.1 vanacid on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:32
iPhone SDK 3.0 brings the possibility to exchange information ad-hoc without having the need for a Wi-Fi network. iPod touch costs a lost less too.
(1 reply) #8 vanacid on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:35
BTW, I'm not saying iPhone/iPod are the best, but it is a good choice. A good Android-powered device or a good Windows Mobile powered-device would have done a good job too.
#8.1 DanielZ on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:11
vanacid said,
BTW, I'm not saying iPhone/iPod are the best, but it is a good choice. A good Android-powered device or a good Windows Mobile powered-device would have done a good job too.

Somehow I doubt that a WinMo device would work well for their needs; I see angry businessmen restarting their WinMo phones almost every day on the bus.
(4 replies) #9 JamesWeb on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:35
Wow, there's your tax dollars at work.
#9.1 vetmarkjensen on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:44
JamesWeb said,
Wow, there's your tax dollars at work.

Actually, compared to the custom military specs that yielded $800 hammers and the $1500 toilet seats of the past, using an existing commodity item is a refreshing change of direction toward a more common-sense approach.
#9.2 StarLion on 20 Apr 2009 - 15:00
markjensen said,
Actually, compared to the custom military specs that yielded $800 hammers and the $1500 toilet seats of the past, using an existing commodity item is a refreshing change of direction toward a more common-sense approach.
You win for referencing Independence Day.
#9.3 SirEvan on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:50
Actually stuff does cost that much. I was in the army, and heres a list of costs for certain items.

6ft DB-25 Printer Cable: 350$
733Mhz computer with 20GB HD and 10" touch screen: 52,000$
grounded power plug : 150$
20GB Hard drive replacement: 800$

So yes, a hammer very well could cost 800$
#9.4 Raa on 22 Apr 2009 - 10:01
If I was contracting to the army for computer stuff, that would be my price too!!!
#10 Antaris on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:47
Whilst listening to War! huh! Yeah!

Hmmm
#11 +Tech Greek on 20 Apr 2009 - 14:57
Wow, I see more than three broken iPhones and iPoods a day and they want to hand these to our soldiers? SURE... Should I take a picture of what our Security Forces did to a brand new Impala that was given to them (playing dukes of hazard off the hills here apparently).
#12 epple on 20 Apr 2009 - 15:10
They haven't done this before? That kind of scares me...
(1 reply) #13 Airlink on 20 Apr 2009 - 16:50
Utter bullzhit.
First of all, the Army doesn't need a freaking iPod. They already have the Ground Soldier System (formerly know as the Land Force Warrior program) coming on-stream in 2010 (although the Army projects that it won't be completely rolled out until around 2032) which integrates a HUD-projecting eyepeice and associated eyewear, camera, microphone and belt-worn computer with real-time managed battlefield communications and other Milspec communications elements into a modular design. Frankly, comparing the GSS gear to an iPod is like comparing an M16 to a water pistol.
#13.1 SirEvan on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:55
M4...army's slowly going away from M16
(1 reply) #14 metro on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:13
Since when is an iPhone or iPod Touch a candidate for something that would most definitely need to be NSA approved? Good luck with that.
#14.1 vetneufuse on 20 Apr 2009 - 19:56
metro said,
Since when is an iPhone or iPod Touch a candidate for something that would most definitely need to be NSA approved? Good luck with that.


Hence why they would run their own OS on it, I think they are more interested in the hardware then the software
#15 psionicinversion on 20 Apr 2009 - 20:21
It's not implying every soldier would get an iPod just most likely to the group leaders dunno what there called. You don't want every soldier looking at an iPod instead of the enemy. I do think it's a really good idea, doesn't be an iPod but the idea behind it. The gss sounds good but a system like that won't be quickly implimented and expected to work flawlessly so till the 2032 sorted date this is a good idea for now
#16 starsky2 on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:24
Hoah!
#17 psionicinversion on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:02
also they will need there own OS on there cus you know the americans would run into a fight with top gun sound track blaring out there ipods gunning everything down then saying oh my god great balls of fire lmao
#18 jonnytabpni on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:30
LOL! Imagine if they were forced to put all the apps in the app store!
#19 Tim-WinMbl on 12 May 2009 - 00:24
Windows mobile devices are perfect for the military applications because of their ability to multi-task and the multi-threaded operating system that developers can take full advantage of. It will be interesting to watch this story and see how things go for the iPod tests. I think they will be purchasing some windows mobile devices...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)