linux
Report a problem

Ubuntu 9.04 RC released, final coming Thursday

Marshalus   on 20 April 2009 - 21:33 · 70 comments & 16783 views

Advertisement (Why?)
While Microsoft preps their upcoming RC of Windows 7, and Apple continues work on Snow Leopard, the Ubuntu Linux team has already published the release candidate of their upcoming 9.04 version, dubbed "Jaunty Jackalope," and is set to publish the final version of the code on Thursday, April 23.

Some of the major features of this release include:
  • GNOME 2.26
  • UPnP support for Totem
  • MAPI support for the Evolution e-mail client
  • Improved multi-monitor support
  • X.org server 1.6, with Mesa 3D DRI, version 7.4
  • Wacom tablet hotplugging
  • New style for notifications and notification preferences
  • Quicker boot performance (30% faster)
  • Linux kernel 2.6.28
  • Ext4 filesystem support (ext3 will remain the default)
In the release notes for 9.04, the team cites some problems with their Ext4 support that are present in the release candidate, but that they say should be fixed before the final release.

The 9.04 release will be an important one for Canonical and the Ubuntu team, as it should be the release that is out and in use when Windows 7, Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" and Fedora 11 are released. That is, unless Windows 7 slips into an RTM at a date past October of this year, in which case Canonical will get a second chance when they release 9.10, which is already dubbed "Karmic Koala."

Download: Ubuntu 9.04 RC

To highlight the decreased boot time of Ubuntu 9.04, one user installed the beta onto their ThinkPad, equipped with a Intel X25-E solid state hard drive. The result was a boot time of only 17 seconds, from GRUB loader to starting Mozilla Firefox.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 70 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 artfuldodga on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:36
nice! will my new blu-ray burner i just bought work properly with this OS? NO?... damn
#1.1 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:46
Why wouldn't it? I'm pretty sure there is Blu-ray burning software out there for Ubuntu/Linux.
http://www.nero.com/eng/linux3.html
#1.2 artfuldodga on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:56
if i wanted to buy **** commercial software for my free OS, doesn't that defeat the purpose of ubuntu...
#1.3 geoken on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:57
Maybe next time you're out trolling you can spend 4 seconds on google to save yourself from looking like an idiot.
#1.4 Majesticmerc on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:57
artfuldodga said,
if i wanted to buy **** commercial software for my free OS, doesn't that defeat the purpose of ubuntu...


Umm... no? Some software costs money, deal with it.
#1.5 vetmarkjensen on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:48
artfuldodga said,
if i wanted to buy **** commercial software for my free OS, doesn't that defeat the purpose of ubuntu...

Ummm... no.

You obviously lack an understanding that "Free" means "libre", not "gratis".

Nor would installing Firefox on Windows violate some "purpose" in the reverse situation.
#1.6 FlyingToaster on 10 May 2009 - 18:49
artfuldodga said,
if i wanted to buy **** commercial software for my free OS, doesn't that defeat the purpose of ubuntu...


No. Just because the OS doesn't cost anything, that doesn't mean that all applications for it will be free of cost. I really don't understand this line of thinking.. The cost of applications should be in line/proportionate with the cost of the OS? No. Anyone can price their product any way they want.
#2 acido00 on 20 Apr 2009 - 21:46
yes, the new ubuntu will burn Blu-Ray without problem.

I just tested it
(3 replies) #3 XIII on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:05
What a noob. Install Intel SSD into a T60 and suffer a speed cap of SATA I < 120MB/s. Install that into a T400 and we can talk.
#3.1 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:09
Still pretty impressive.
#3.2 Lord Zog on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:19
XIII said,
What a noob. Install Intel SSD into a T60 and suffer a speed cap of SATA I < 120MB/s. Install that into a T400 and we can talk.


Yup.. Hes a noob cause his hardware specs.. I think the word "noob" is being overused now for some situations.... Sad...

On topic, after playing with the RC for an hour or so, I like it.. Can't wait for final on thursday and play with ext4. I find the whole OS a little more snappy which will benefit from my new MythTV HTPC build.

Last edited by Lord Zog on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:26
#3.3 Divide Overflow on 21 Apr 2009 - 08:38
Lord Zog said,
Yup.. Hes a noob cause his hardware specs.. I think the word "noob" is being overused now for some situations.... Sad...

On topic, after playing with the RC for an hour or so, I like it.. Can't wait for final on thursday and play with ext4. I find the whole OS a little more snappy which will benefit from my new MythTV HTPC build.


Perhaps I'm stating the obvious, but the "noob" comment was more directed at the individual's decision to install a drive in a laptop that cannot take advantage of the drive's full capabilities. The way I see it though, the "noob" comment is indeed being misused. That SSD is still fast as hell, and can be moved to a newer laptop eventually anyway.
(15 replies) #4 Lannister on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:06
Tried the Alphas and one beta, it boots really fast. Shame font rendering is still terrible in Ubuntu, altough not so bad in Kubuntu, where desktop font rendering is acutally quite nice, but both firefox and Konqueror still look nasty compared to Windows.

WTB: Cleartype font rendering in Gnome...
#4.1 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:08
Yeah that is one major complaint I have about Linux/Gnome is the way it renders fonts. I followed some random steps off a tutorial one time and got it working beautifully for a while, then some Xorg update or something killed it. So I live with less then ideal rendering on my Linux box.
#4.2 Jugalator on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:16
You can configure rendering quite a bit in Gnome though, to make it look entirely different from the default settings and at least very similar to the OS X antialiasing.
#4.3 Lannister on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:24
The font rendering is the only thing stopping Linux being full-time installed on my laptop, even with the approach of windows 7 (buying two copies of that for our desktops will be enough expense ).

Tried more tweaks than I care to mention for Gnome, and never got it looking good for my probably very picky eyes which just end up trying to "blink" away the blur, but as I said, Kubuntu default font settings are quite clear and readable. It's just webpage rendering (even with mscorefonts etc installed) that falls flat on it's face for me.
#4.4 tiagosilva29 on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:02
I don't have font issues in GNOME. And the reason why you don't have a bit better sub-pixel rendering is because of Microsoft's patents.
#4.5 vetJames7 on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:29
I don't see problems at all with font rendering, not even going back to Feisty Fawn. I don't know what I've been doing right, but it's all been clear. All I do after installing a new Ubuntu (including Jaunty) is go to the System/Preferences/Appearance menu and the Fonts tab and select "subpixel smoothing (LCDs)" and it looks clear to me. Hmmmmm....
#4.6 GreyWolfSC on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:33
tiagosilva29 said,
I don't have font issues in GNOME. And the reason why you don't have a bit better sub-pixel rendering is because of Microsoft's patents.


Huh? Microsoft has patents on their specific method of font rendering. There's nothing stopping another OS from implementing their own. I'm sure there's more than one way to do it.
#4.7 tiagosilva29 on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:55
GreyWolfSC said,
There's nothing stopping another OS from implementing their own. I'm sure there's more than one way to do it.

Uhm, no. They're forced to bend it like Beckham just to play ball.
#4.8 Macalicious on 21 Apr 2009 - 03:40
Lannister said,
Tried the Alphas and one beta, it boots really fast. Shame font rendering is still terrible in Ubuntu, altough not so bad in Kubuntu, where desktop font rendering is acutally quite nice, but both firefox and Konqueror still look nasty compared to Windows.

WTB: Cleartype font rendering in Gnome...


IIRC it doesn't use the patented font smoothing algorithm so unfortunately you end up with something that is subpar. The best I can suggest is to learn how dpkg works and recompile freetype with the relevant switches enabled in ftoption.h
#4.9 liberatus_sum on 21 Apr 2009 - 03:43
Lannister said,
Tried the Alphas and one beta, it boots really fast. Shame font rendering is still terrible in Ubuntu, altough not so bad in Kubuntu, where desktop font rendering is acutally quite nice, but both firefox and Konqueror still look nasty compared to Windows.

WTB: Cleartype font rendering in Gnome...


Dude you need to enable full hinting and sub pixel rendering. It's 100 x better than windoze
#4.10 liberatus_sum on 21 Apr 2009 - 04:12
http://bayimg.com/BApLmaAbc

Fonts look pretty good to me
#4.11 +dwhall on 21 Apr 2009 - 04:16
dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config FTW
#4.12 Lannister on 21 Apr 2009 - 06:24
dwhall said,
dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config FTW



Hmm tried that one, but apparently it doesn't work like it did before? saw a thread on the ubunutu forums about it. NO longer gives you a string of options to choose from, it just automates recreating your font config or something, unless that's changed now for the release candidate.
#4.13 Lannister on 21 Apr 2009 - 06:25
tiagosilva29 said,
I don't have font issues in GNOME. And the reason why you don't have a bit better sub-pixel rendering is because of Microsoft's patents.



Not sure who holds what patents, but when you enable sub pixel smoothying in Gnome using OpenSolaris 2008.11 it wanrs you that you may need a lisence from Apple, not Microsoft...
#4.14 Julius Caro on 21 Apr 2009 - 07:29
Ugh, the font issue. I eventually grew tired of changing the font settings everytime i installed ubuntu, especially because they kept changing it themshelves with every version.

Fonts CAN be tuned to get desirable rendering ,but the truth is not all apps will abide to the same font settings, so in the end, no matter what you do, it will not look the same across all applications. open office has/had their own font aliasing across their apps, gtk1.x apps are different from gtk2, then the aps using QT... it's all a mess. then firefox looks as if it uses fonts of a smaller size than the rest of gnome.
#4.15 tiagosilva29 on 21 Apr 2009 - 21:12
I usually install these extra fonts: ttf-dejavu, ttf-dejavu-extra, ttf-liberation.

Edit: Apparently apt URIs aren't accepted in the URL BBCODE.

Last edited by tiagosilva29 on 21 Apr 2009 - 21:19
(9 replies) #5 ahhell on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:10
What's the point in releasing an RC when the final comes out 4 days later??
#5.1 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:12
The RC was released on April 17, we're just a little late in the game on reporting it.
#5.2 ahhell on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:20
So week then...exciting.
#5.3 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:30
One of the advantages of having a open source and having 6 month release cycle. Quick turn around.
#5.4 xendrome on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:57
Yea no I have to ask that also... why release an RC at all, if you already have a set date for final. The whole point of an RC is to have it tested in a large setting, and find out if it's ready to go to the masses as a final product.

Obviously it either is already, or they just don't care. Since they have set a final date that it will come out, regardless of how it works.
#5.5 GP007 on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:58
Helps when loads of coders are out there doing most of the background work for your linux distro for you.
#5.6 vetJames7 on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:31
I've been running the RC but I didn't try to switch to ext4. Will give it a go when the final comes out, given that people have said to wait there.

I have to say, though, that Intrepid-->Jaunty was a smooth transition. I had a few minor issues moving from Hardy to Intrepid.
#5.7 vetmarkjensen on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:52
xendrome said,
Yea no I have to ask that also... why release an RC at all, if you already have a set date for final. The whole point of an RC is to have it tested in a large setting, and find out if it's ready to go to the masses as a final product.

Obviously it either is already, or they just don't care. Since they have set a final date that it will come out, regardless of how it works.

Did you read the posted article at all?
In the release notes for 9.04, the team cites some problems with their Ext4 support that are present in the release candidate, but that they say should be fixed before the final release.
You see they obviously are ironing out wrinkles in ext4.
#5.8 PKHelloNasty on 21 Apr 2009 - 14:49
James7 said,
I've been running the RC but I didn't try to switch to ext4. Will give it a go when the final comes out, given that people have said to wait there.

I have to say, though, that Intrepid-->Jaunty was a smooth transition. I had a few minor issues moving from Hardy to Intrepid.


I would read a little more about it before going with ext4. It's not the default for a reason. I was hanging out in the irc channel and there was a small group of 6 or so complaining about lockups when changing tabs / switching screens, etc. I had it installed for a about 30 minutes until I went to the channel.
#5.9 PGHammer on 23 Apr 2009 - 02:25
ahhell said,
What's the point in releasing an RC when the final comes out 4 days later??


Also, as has been the case with every *buntu RC since Edgy Eft, you can upgrade-in-place to the final code (something which only openSuSE among other major Linux distributions, has implemented.
(2 replies) #6 ir0nw0lf on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:34
Installed this using Wubi this morning. Pretty impressive honestly. Couldn't get the X-Fi to work, even with the closed drivers from Creative. No biggie, everything else seems to be fine.
#6.1 Marshalus on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:37
Be sure to file a bug report.
#6.2 PGHammer on 23 Apr 2009 - 02:28
ir0nw0lf said,
Installed this using Wubi this morning. Pretty impressive honestly. Couldn't get the X-Fi to work, even with the closed drivers from Creative. No biggie, everything else seems to be fine.


I also did the Wubi install; had no issues with my XtremeGamer (the newer LP version). However, there is a (separate) issue with AlsaMixer that forces the main volume to zero (check out the mixer applet for your graphical environment or alsamixer).
(8 replies) #7 Luis Mazza on 20 Apr 2009 - 22:46
Linux is a fine name... But Ubuntu? It would be great at some African tribe, but for the rest of the world this name is simply a marketing no go.
#7.1 jonnytabpni on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:16
My peers and I would generally pronounce it "you-bun-too" which I know is wrong but it kinda just stuck with us
#7.2 GreyWolfSC on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:35
No-prize for both of you... You're both right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(philosophy)
#7.3 tiagosilva29 on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:01
#7.4 DanielZ on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:06
My dad says that whenever I say "Ubuntu," he starts thinking of hungry Africans running around with spears killing each other. Clearly they need a name to appeal to all races.
#7.5 vetmarkjensen on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:54
DanielZ said,
My dad says that whenever I say "Ubuntu," he starts thinking of hungry Africans running around with spears killing each other. Clearly they need a name to appeal to all races.

Yeah, no racist stereotypes there...
#7.6 Jimmerz28 on 21 Apr 2009 - 02:21
DanielZ said,
My dad says that whenever I say "Ubuntu," he starts thinking of hungry Africans running around with spears killing each other. Clearly they need a name to appeal to all races.


I always wanted an OS called Trailertrash.
#7.7 ir0nw0lf on 21 Apr 2009 - 14:10
Jimmerz28 said,
I always wanted an OS called Trailertrash.

Redneck Linux is sure to be a hit too. LOL
#7.8 vetmarkjensen on 21 Apr 2009 - 19:30
ir0nw0lf said,
Redneck Linux is sure to be a hit too. LOL

Usedta outta be able to install that thar Red Hat in Redneck!
http://www.ninesys.com/fun/
#8 Symod on 20 Apr 2009 - 23:58
Less than 3 days left, can't wait!
#9 agreenbhm on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:23
If you guys think that is fast, try running it on Ext4. Def. faster than Ext3.
#10 .beta on 21 Apr 2009 - 00:40
Ubuntu for the win.
(2 replies) #11 EZ8 on 21 Apr 2009 - 01:38
Is ext4 the default file system in 9.04?
#11.1 Lord Zog on 21 Apr 2009 - 01:53
No. For now, ext3 is default but you can use ext4. The support is included.
#11.2 EZ8 on 21 Apr 2009 - 02:04
Lord Zog said,
No. For now, ext3 is default but you can use ext4. The support is included.

ah, thanks!
#12 liberatus_sum on 21 Apr 2009 - 03:29
I've been using the Kubuntu 9.04 beta for a few days now, and it's sweet. Ext4, good performing and stable compositing [desktop cube / window effects etc]. Ubuntu just keeps getting better with each iteration

The only annoyance I have is the NetworkManager service which is pretty bad for wireless. Luckily when I disabled it [sudo /etc/init.d/NetworkManager stop && sudo update-rc.d -f NetworkManager remove] and manually configured /etc/network/interfaces to use wpa_supplicant it worked like a treat, and no ping spikes due to the NetworkManager periodically scanning for available wireless networks

Last edited by liberatus_sum on 21 Apr 2009 - 03:36
(1 reply) #13 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#13.1 ge_generation on 21 Apr 2009 - 04:36
There are people out there that do care about Linux releases, since the computing world doesn't revolve around Microsoft, and there are many Linux users out there
#14 Master97 on 21 Apr 2009 - 04:56
i agree.. iv been using 10.5.6 for a while now and i love it!
#15 Sean2989 on 21 Apr 2009 - 05:25
I'm really happy because they have more support for wacom enabled laptops!
#16 Airlink on 21 Apr 2009 - 09:16
Will be putting the Eeebuntu version of Ununtu 9 on a netbook when it's ready.
#17 ajua on 21 Apr 2009 - 09:38
I will try it as soon as it is published.

Ubuntu is one of my favorite distros, along with Fedora.

I don't use linux much, but i have to try new distros from time to time just for the sake of it.
#18 PKHelloNasty on 21 Apr 2009 - 17:37
Installed RC1 this week and it runs great. They actually recommend against installing msscorefonts package now, as the liberation font package includes many of the needed defaults. I have to say the system looks and runs beautifully.

The new notification system looks great. It reminds me of Growl notifications on mac. Its a small change, but really increases the overall feel of the OS.

There is an open issue with VLC not being able to run in a single window. It appears fixed according to the bug, but hasn't made it to the Jaunty repos yet.

I feel free the blue screens and jumping through hoops to make it look like I want, and nothing comes close to compiz.
#19 Lord Zog on 21 Apr 2009 - 17:59
Agreed.. While I am happy with my Windows, I use Linux for more these days but its not my main OS. There are things linux and windows can't do so i use both.. Each have cons and pros.
#20 Grandaevus on 22 Apr 2009 - 08:34
Safe to say that Ubuntu really is the Linux distro that comes closest to being able to say "It just works".
Polished, fast and functional. Factors that are very important to be able to make it big time on the desktop.
#21 +Xerxes on 22 Apr 2009 - 13:01
Looking good, the beta was awesome looking forward to the final build!
#22 ironsight2000 on 23 Apr 2009 - 05:36
where is it its 1:34 am and its not here
#23 +MetalHellsAngel on 23 Apr 2009 - 07:28
I live Near Seattle and in my experience the new releases are normally out anywhere from 5:00 - 6:00 A.M. release day, (just fyi that -7 GMT) currently as I post it's 12:29 A.M. On Thursday April 23rd. So there are a few hours to go still. I personally always order the CD and just wait for that before I do my install, that way there's no worry of downloads taking forever......
#24 lflashl on 24 Apr 2009 - 08:54
Why is this the not in on the front page! the release of a new version of ubuntu should make front page!
#25 illustrick on 25 Apr 2009 - 07:56
i wish steam would support linux..... i would install it on my desktop....cause before i bought my copy of vista, i installed it, and god damn was it fast.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)