apple
Report a problem

Apple and Africa - (Product)Red

Elliot Harrison   on 02 May 2009 - 02:15 · 15 comments & 5567 views

Advertisement (Why?)
This article marks my third addition to Neowin and I thought rather than write about something particularly techie I'd give some opinion on Apple's more charitable side. I was having a look on the web last night for some Apple news and stumbled upon this article by the 'Macteens'. I know its a bit dated but I still thought it was quite interesting and worth sharing with you all.

As readers of Neowin.net will probably already be aware, (Product)Red is something which has been around for a while now. Created by U2 frontman and all round charitable chap 'Bono' along with Bobby Shriver of DATA (Debt, AIDS Trade in Africa) and launching itself officially in January 2006. at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland; Its a brand which is licensed to partner companies who in turn brand select products or even create new products which are then advertised with the (Product)Red logo.

But why? Well, the idea is that a portion of the profit gained from these select products is donated to the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Big names are supporting it as well: American Express, Gap, Microsoft and of course Apple to name but a few.

(Product)Red is a cause which Apple has supported since January 9. 2007 by introducing a special iTunes (Product)Red gift card with $25 of credit loaded. Only available in the US at first, but now in the UK as well via Apple their respective online stores. Apple donates 10% of each sale to the Global Fund ($2.50). Eight months later Apple released their first (Product)Red duo. The iPod Nano and Shuffle. Since then they have supported the cause continually by still providing the Special Edition (Product)Red Shuffle and throughout three more generations of iPod Nano.

This seems a really positive step to fight the good fight, however its been a process which has also been slammed by some critics. Apple happily donated $10 of the $149 priced iPod Nano during the initial stages of the campaign, however now fail to disclose donation amounts. I wondered why this was so I got in touch with an Apple spokesperson at Apple UK to see if I could get my mitts on some figures. I also asked if more Apple products will be sporting the Redness soon. My reply was simple:

"We don't break out the figures for iPod product lines so I can't provide the financial details. We donate a portion of the price of the purchase price of (PRODUCT) RED Special Edition iPod models and iTunes Gift Cards to the Global Fund to fight AIDS in Africa...I cannot comment on what we may or may not do in the future."


I really hope this is a case of Apple being modest when it comes to releasing figures. To be fair, if I'm someone who invests in a product for charitable purposes, I really would like to know how much of the money I'm spending is going to the cause so that I can better appreciate the difference I'm making. Despite its criticisms I've learned a lot researching for this article and I've come to fall a little in love with the (Product)Red brand. I think I might save up for a Nano!

As a conclusion to this article I'd love to ask you all if you'd like to see more Apple products (Product)Red branded? Also, whether you think Apple are doing enough to support this cause or whether you think they've got it covered for now?

All I know is that I've got a Red Incase Hardcase over my MacBook and I must say its pretty nifty...perhaps a possibility? How about a (Product)Red iPhone?

Please comment with ideas and suchlike!

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 15 additional comments
#1 m.keeley on 02 May 2009 - 02:36
No. If I want to donate to charity I prefer to do so directly and to ones of my choice. The three charities mentioned wouldn't be in my top 10.
(2 replies) #2 artzm on 02 May 2009 - 03:06
1st Point: The way I see it aslong as they don't charge me extra for a product (red) I don't mind(which they don't), otherwise like what m.keeley said there are other things I would like to donate to.

2nd Point: Because they aren't charging more I don't think they need to necessarily tell us how much they are donating, but I agree it would be nice to know.
#2.1 theslam08 on 02 May 2009 - 05:00
artzm said,
1st Point: The way I see it aslong as they don't charge me extra for a product (red) I don't mind(which they don't), otherwise like what m.keeley said there are other things I would like to donate to.

2nd Point: Because they aren't charging more I don't think they need to necessarily tell us how much they are donating, but I agree it would be nice to know.


Both very valid points to me too. Its just a 'good' thing they are doing by not taking that [insert donation amount here] and putting it in their profits bank like any normal company does.

And anyone that wants the nano for the nano not because its w/red, wont normally fuss about anything at all. The nano is $149 period. Great to apple for donating 'something'. Not making me a fan anyway, but still good of them.
#2.2 +Kirkburn on 02 May 2009 - 11:46
artzm said,
2nd Point: Because they aren't charging more I don't think they need to necessarily tell us how much they are donating, but I agree it would be nice to know.

For the second point, that assumes you were going to buy the product anyway. If you found out only 0.01% of the price went to Red (though I'm sure it's more), you might decide to buy a different product, especially if Red was something that attracted you in the first place.

That's why consumers deserve to know how much of their money is/isn't going to charity.
(1 reply) #3 C_Guy on 02 May 2009 - 05:18
(Product)Red is something which has been around for a while now
Apple is late to the game, as usual...and it's not hard to figure out why their donation amount ia a big secret. Other Red sponsors have no problem sharing.

However, something is better than nothing and at least Apple didn't jack up the price which some Red sponsors do.
#3.1 +Kirkburn on 02 May 2009 - 11:43
C_Guy said,
Apple is late to the game, as usual

(Product)Red is a cause which Apple has supported since January 9. 2007
#4 BBinder on 02 May 2009 - 09:20
This seems a really positive step to fight the good fight, however its been a process which has also been slammed by some critics. Apple happily donated $10 of the $149 priced iPod Nano during the initial stages of the campaign, however now fail to disclose donation amounts.


it could be worth writing a letter to Apple UK asking for the donation ammount under the freedom of information act

(1 reply) #5 Nighthawk-F117 on 02 May 2009 - 10:49
It's impossible to argue that RED is a positive thing. It's a miserable failure, why couldn't companies just donate the money? Because they need to let people know that they're doing something, and let the consumer feel like they're taking part.
Many companies have spend more money advertising RED than have actually given to the charity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/business/06red.html?_r=1
#5.1 +Kirkburn on 02 May 2009 - 11:43
Nighthawk-F117 said,
It's impossible to argue that RED is a positive thing. It's a miserable failure, why couldn't companies just donate the money? Because they need to let people know that they're doing something, and let the consumer feel like they're taking part.
Many companies have spend more money advertising RED than have actually given to the charity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/business/06red.html?_r=1

Sorry, how it is not a positive thing again, just because it costs money to advertise? It's not losing money, so...??
#6 Jugalator on 02 May 2009 - 10:58
Hehe, give it to Neowin to turn donations of any kind and amount into something bad.

And yes, I also prefer to donate actively myself instead of sponsoring this kind of products, and donate around $10 monthly, but from what I gather, it's not all too common to be e.g. a UNICEF Global Parent.
(2 replies) #7 Magallanes on 02 May 2009 - 15:41
There are not cure for AIDS and never will be (not at least with the current technology).
AIDS is viral and we are not succeeded to cure any single virus, not even a single flu and flu is more old than the humanity.

So, every business involving with the self-called study against the aids is fraudulent.

#7.1 m.keeley on 02 May 2009 - 18:58
Yeah OK, whatever.
#7.2 Vieira on 03 May 2009 - 20:32
Finding a cure is not the only way of fighting a disease. A good example that proves you wrong is Smallpox which was eradicated in 1980.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox
#8 Slayer on 03 May 2009 - 15:40
AIDS is simple population control. There's a reason that the people at the bottom of the totem pole are the people in which the virus is most rampant. I say we should stop trying to cure it and focus on things that affect people at random like multiple sclerosis and even cancer.

Apple probably doesn't donate anything to any cause because they're a bunch of greedy ****s anyway.
#9 Vakerorokero on 05 May 2009 - 08:06
You want Apple to do more for RED? not even Bono is doing more stuff for RED. They can't just donate the money because they whole basis of RED is to "FIRST BUY MY PRODUCTS AND I'LL DONATE TO HELP THE CAUSE, BUT I'M CHARGING YOU THE DONATION MONEY ALSO". How is an idea like that helping?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)