The head of the National Security Agency said the USA is in need of a "digital warfare force," according to an article by the BBC. The article states that the head of the NSA, Lt Gen Keith Alexander, said that the US needed to create a digital warfare force for the future, and to reorganise its existing cyber operations.The general stated that the current departments relating to this required more resources, as well as training. The proposed department would be completed by 2010, and would be part of the US Strategic Command, working with the US Department of Homeland Security.
Operations chief of First Base Technologies said "My own view is that the only way to counteract both criminal and espionage activity online is to be proactive. If the US is taking a formal approach to this, then that has to be a good thing". However, he added "if the US takes on the mantle of the world's police; that might not go down so well."
Within the last 6 months, over $100m has been spent by the Pentagon on repairing damage done by cyber attacks, and related network issues.
















Haha... but first, they need to build "The Turk"
Have you actually tried yet? You should try to get a job first. You need to contact them rather they contact you.
I know a NSA linguist that just recently retired from the U.S. Army. All he did was go to the front office, setup an appointment, and go upstairs to hand his resume in. Three weeks later he had a job.
Yeah but he was also a member of the Army. That allows you to put you foot way in the door.
It's not hard getting a TS clearance. Just takes a while and can be expensive.
You couldn't blam everything on hackers. Not every hacker is bad, like me.
i beg your pardon? are there lots of espionage web sites we need to monitor or something?
maybe i am thinking about this all wrong. but, wouldent having a internal network defense force be what you want? a "digital warfare force" sound like your hankerin' to start some ****.
oh yeah, and then there is that small fact that we are broke. actually, scratch that, we are in a state of soul crushing debt. lets make more government agencies. because, not only do they do their jobs well, they are cost effective to boot!
i beg your pardon? are there lots of espionage web sites we need to monitor or something?
maybe i am thinking about this all wrong. but, wouldent having a internal network defense force be what you want? a "digital warfare force" sound like your hankerin' to start some ****.
oh yeah, and then there is that small fact that we are broke. actually, scratch that, we are in a state of soul crushing debt. lets make more government agencies. because, not only do they do their jobs well, they are cost effective to boot!
So all those people the government trains to read Jihadist websites and intercept e-mails, those people are all useless right? Because terrorism, that is ****ing bull**** right? I mean that war in Chechnya I fought in, totally about expanding the Russian Mafiya's control closer to the Adriatic.
uh, no. not necessarily useless. but certainly not a good use of resources.
In fact hackers in other countries really hate or maybe want to challenge this "new kind of army force" 'cause hacking is about using knowledge, not weapon or power. Knowledge is the only available powerful weapon for our hacker. Being a hacker is like being a human, it's any where in the world.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.