microsoft
Report a problem

Microsoft changes 'Windows Genuine Advantage' name

Kevin.   on 07 May 2009 - 18:24 · 50 comments & 9513 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft will be changing to name of it's activation and validation system from "Windows Genuine Advantage" to "Windows Activation Technologies" according to a report by Mary-Jo Foley.

However, the "Genuine" brand isn't completely disappearing. A press release states that Microsoft will continue to deliver genuine updates and notifications for XP users. The program has been criticized for its punishment tactics and false-positive results, even though Microsoft has fixed some of these problems in Vista SP1.

According to Microsoft, Windows 7's activation will be built on the same software protection platform that was part of Vista, with some minor tweaks made for Windows 7.

"In Windows 7 we modified this process: When customers choose to activate later they will see a dialog box highlighting how activation helps them identify if their copy of Windows is genuine and be allowed to proceed immediately without a 15-second delay. In Windows 7 we've made changes so that users will see more informative notifications messages and be able to more easily complete the tasks they need to.", said Joe Willians, general manager, Worldwide Genuine Windows in a Q&A session.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 50 additional comments
(15 replies) #1 CrazyK on 07 May 2009 - 19:53
Hmm even though they say it doesnt, I kind of feel we was right a few years ago when we said there would be no real "genuine advantage" once MS got everyone used to the nag screens before downloading.
#1.1 Rudy on 07 May 2009 - 20:19
there's never really been any advantage of having a genuine copy (except for the feel good inside feeling some people get)
#1.2 C_Guy on 07 May 2009 - 21:03
Yeah, not being a criminal (or a person with an entitlement attitude disability) does feel good. I don't expect Microsoft's employees to work for free. If you do, switch to Linux.
#1.3 Marshalus on 07 May 2009 - 21:11
Agreed w/ C_Guy.
#1.4 +Kirkburn on 07 May 2009 - 21:29
Dammit, C_Guy got there first
#1.5 The Stylish Hobo on 07 May 2009 - 22:20
I pirate. I don't believe it is morally right (although I don't think it exactly "wrong"). I do it because I can get away with it, and giving in to my natural human nature. Until they can stop me, I will continue to do it. I'm also a lost sale, if they could stop it, I would buy it.
#1.6 excalpius on 07 May 2009 - 22:45
The "genuine advantage" was double-plus good speak, perfected to an art during the Bush years. I, for one, would appreciate this change back to common sense English descriptions that actually mean what they say.
#1.7 michael.dobrofsky on 07 May 2009 - 23:57
The Stylish Hobo said,
I pirate. Until they can stop me, I will continue to do it.


Bully for you.


#1.8 McDave on 08 May 2009 - 01:50
The just try and stop me attuide to piracy is why people who genuninly buy a copy are bing crippled. Most people get windows with your computer and if you put something else on just buy oem it's not that expensive.
#1.9 The Stylish Hobo on 08 May 2009 - 06:36
Uh huh, well stop complaining about it because it's completely in vein. The point I was trying to get across was that I was the average pirate. And this, my kind of pirate will always exist if the situation allows its. It's akin to complaining "Why is the tornado going through my town?!".
#1.10 Unplugged on 08 May 2009 - 08:50
CrazyK said,
Hmm even though they say it doesnt, I kind of feel we was right a few years ago when we said there would be no real "genuine advantage" once MS got everyone used to the nag screens before downloading.


The GA isn't *strictly* just to stop pirates. Its to let people know their corner shop PC store has sold them a PC with a dodgy copy on. People who genuinely KNOW their copy is dodgy tend to find ways around it.

I don't think I own a non legit copy of windows now because I cba to build machines any more so normally get windows with. I normally disable or refuse to install GA and GA Notifications etc as much as possibly because I generally know if the software is legit or not and dont need something using up rescourses to tell me.
#1.11 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 17:57
Rudy said,
there's never really been any advantage of having a genuine copy (except for the feel good inside feeling some people get)


You don't get annoyed all the time by the non-genuine notifications and you don't have to patch it every few months.
#1.12 Captain555 on 08 May 2009 - 17:58
If they would only get rid of all that crap activation and passed on the saving to the customers, there wouldn't be a problem with pirated copies.

The whole problem is only created by the fact that Windows is way too expensive.
#1.13 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 17:58
The Stylish Hobo said,
I pirate. I don't believe it is morally right (although I don't think it exactly "wrong"). I do it because I can get away with it, and giving in to my natural human nature. Until they can stop me, I will continue to do it. I'm also a lost sale, if they could stop it, I would buy it.


You can still buy it. I bought about 95% of all items that I formerly pirated. This includes Windows. Now I get TechNet Direct and never worry again. I'll have a copy of Win7 Ultimate when it comes out.
#1.14 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 18:01
Unplugged said,
The GA isn't *strictly* just to stop pirates. Its to let people know their corner shop PC store has sold them a PC with a dodgy copy on. People who genuinely KNOW their copy is dodgy tend to find ways around it.

I don't think I own a non legit copy of windows now because I cba to build machines any more so normally get windows with. I normally disable or refuse to install GA and GA Notifications etc as much as possibly because I generally know if the software is legit or not and dont need something using up rescourses to tell me.


Yea. This was primary being used to try to shut down the places making illegal copies of Windows. One big "red flag" to when a shop was doing that is if they refuse to provide a copy of the installation media for the OS installed. I know a friend reported a local shop because they were pirating Windows and they were shut down soon afterwards. Their machines were dodgy sometimes too. I also know a few customers who got dodgy copies from their local tech shops.
#1.15 Captain555 on 08 May 2009 - 19:46
shinji257 said,
One big "red flag" to when a shop was doing that is if they refuse to provide a copy of the installation media for the OS installed.


Wait a second, that's not exactly how that work. You have OEM license that come with the label and the disk. But there also COA License where you only get the label without the CD. The COA cost a lot less to me and to my customers. And if they insist on getting the disk, I make them a copy.
(4 replies) #2 starburst1980 on 07 May 2009 - 19:56
I say it gets cracked in 2 hours.
#2.1 ricknl on 07 May 2009 - 20:05
I don't think Microsoft is really trying to build something that cannot be cracked but they are more like hunting down custom system builders pirating Windows.

People buy the system without knowing they are are using a pirated copy of Windows.
#2.2 m.keeley on 07 May 2009 - 21:05
Well duh, they're basically changing the name not the code.
#2.3 +Kirkburn on 07 May 2009 - 21:30
m.keeley said,
Well duh, they're basically changing the name not the code.

How very drole and original.
#2.4 toadeater on 07 May 2009 - 22:01
m.keeley said,
Well duh, they're basically changing the name not the code.


It's a much less pretentious name, so good move for them. A company in the position of MS should do everything possible not to seem arrogant. MS's arrogance, in particular Steve Ballmer's arrogance, has done more to hurt MS' image than the shoddy quality of Vista. MS should try to be a little more honest, because it isn't fooling anyone with Seinfeld commercials or other goofy marketing schemes. "Genuine Advantage" ... people laughed at that as soon as they heard it. Who believes that kind of equivocation besides marketing people and Steve Ballmer? WGA wasn't an advantage, it was an unpleasant nuisance for legit customers.
(2 replies) #3 Rob2687 on 07 May 2009 - 20:23
WAT?
#3.1 JamesWeb on 07 May 2009 - 20:35
Damn, someone beat me to it.
#3.2 Antiprophet on 07 May 2009 - 22:20
+1
(5 replies) #4 zeke009 on 07 May 2009 - 20:31
I still think they shouldn't give 1 shi* let alone 2 sh**ts about a pirated install of their OS. No patches, no updates, not a dang thing.

Let em sit there with an unsecure system or get a legit license.

*EDIT*
But that comment leaves those who were swindled as ricknl stated above... dang.
#4.1 king_of_hearts on 07 May 2009 - 20:40
Or... The pirates all crack the "Windows Activation Technologies" while still enjoying the benefits of updates, patches, and pretty much everything everyone else paid for. Brilliant!

Plus people don't even need automatic update because of services like..

http://windizupdate.com/

And programs like..

http://www.windowsupdatesdownloader.com/
#4.2 +Kirkburn on 07 May 2009 - 21:31
zeke009 said,
I still think they shouldn't give 1 shi* let alone 2 sh**ts about a pirated install of their OS. No patches, no updates, not a dang thing.

Let em sit there with an unsecure system or get a legit license.

Unsecured systems can affect everybody, unfortunately (zombie PCs, spamming, DoS attacks, etc).
#4.3 _X_ on 07 May 2009 - 22:13
king_of_hearts said,
Or... The pirates all crack the "Windows Activation Technologies" while still enjoying the benefits of updates, patches, and pretty much everything everyone else paid for. Brilliant!


Bang on. All this talk of pirates being shafted, bull. Since XP, pirates have been enjoying all the benefits any Windows OS has to offer and it will continue through Win7 and beyond.
#4.4 excalpius on 07 May 2009 - 22:47
MS should have been declared a Monopoly over a decade ago. That comes with rights AND responsibilities.
#4.5 yakumo on 08 May 2009 - 09:32
Kirkburn said,
Unsecured systems can affect everybody, unfortunately (zombie PCs, spamming, DoS attacks, etc).


I actually assume:

1. Globally there are more pirated copies of windows in use than legitimate.
2. Most of these systems are in fact MORE likely to be infected by trojan/dos bots. They pirated windows , they're likely to use other dodgy software that often comes infected.

3. Therefore it's actually MORE important to get them security updates as they're the ones hosing everyone else off the internet.
(2 replies) #5 +0sm3l on 07 May 2009 - 20:42
Windows Genuine disAdvantage was more like it... after having to call them 3 times to re-activate my computer for upgrades I flashed my bios with an OEM one and have been happy ever since.
#5.1 m.keeley on 07 May 2009 - 21:05
God that was funny, nearly split my sides.
#5.2 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 18:04
0sm3l said,
Windows Genuine disAdvantage was more like it... after having to call them 3 times to re-activate my computer for upgrades I flashed my bios with an OEM one and have been happy ever since.


At one point I was calling them every other day for activation due to my reinstalls. Activation is supposed to be automatic if it is installed on the same hardware. Wasn't for me with Vista. Oh and WGA != Windows Activation...
#6 java2beans on 07 May 2009 - 20:55
Man, I really hate Windows Genuine Advantage! But, I gotta say Vista's activation was relax compare to Windows XP. With Vista you could at least still use it after the deadline.
#7 astrofaes on 07 May 2009 - 21:15
WAT! OKAAAY!
#8 roadwarrior on 07 May 2009 - 21:16
As far as Microsoft is concerned, all of my systems are "genuine". OEM activation in Vista and VLK in XP, both pass WGA (oops, WAT, too many TLAs in this sentence!).
(4 replies) #9 aarste on 07 May 2009 - 21:44
Now, just drop the telephone activation stuff and make it an online method already.

"But it already has internet activation, idiot!"

No. What I mean is when you've used up your Internet activations due to troubleshooting hardware problems, you'll need to use the phone to tell them your PID and answer questions to get a new serial number of some sort in return to activate. But why the phone? This is a disadvantage to the deaf population. We embrace the internet because it's deaf-friendly. Why on earth can't Microsoft use a webform or application that we can answer questions to and punch in our generated PID code in? Such fail.
#9.1 +Frazell Thomas on 07 May 2009 - 23:44
The deaf can use TTY systems like they do now to communicate with the myrid of phone systems and people.
#9.2 aarste on 07 May 2009 - 23:46
I had no more use for one since I discovered the Internet. but meh.

Plus I've read TTY relay doesn't work very well with an automated talking computer.
#9.3 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 18:05
aarste said,
I had no more use for one since I discovered the Internet. but meh.

Plus I've read TTY relay doesn't work very well with an automated talking computer.


You can skip the automated system and go directly to an out-sourced human.
#9.4 +shinji257 on 08 May 2009 - 18:06
aarste said,
Now, just drop the telephone activation stuff and make it an online method already.

"But it already has internet activation, idiot!"

No. What I mean is when you've used up your Internet activations due to troubleshooting hardware problems, you'll need to use the phone to tell them your PID and answer questions to get a new serial number of some sort in return to activate. But why the phone? This is a disadvantage to the deaf population. We embrace the internet because it's deaf-friendly. Why on earth can't Microsoft use a webform or application that we can answer questions to and punch in our generated PID code in? Such fail.


It is usually only a couple of questions although I've noticed them changing them up a bit. To simplify the matter I usually start off by indicating that it is my only install and that I have installed it previously. That usually gets them to skip to the point of the call and give me my dang activation code.
#10 Joshie on 07 May 2009 - 22:31
Why am I seeing a giant mutant pear in my mind.
#11 goatsniffer on 07 May 2009 - 23:48
IS IT GENUINE!!!?!?!?!?!
#12 TonyLock on 08 May 2009 - 02:00
Calling a spade a spade. Finally!

Now, StarBucks need to stall calling it a "small" rather than a "tall"
#13 Airlink on 08 May 2009 - 02:47
Better name would be "Windows Genuine Annoyance"
#14 xpclient on 08 May 2009 - 05:45
The only "advantage" was that some WGA downloads and offers were better than Ultimate Extras. Other than that, it only slows down XP's logon for genuine users.
#15 C++ on 08 May 2009 - 09:03
LOL WAT?
#16 Eddo89 on 08 May 2009 - 09:07
If only the stuff don't cost an arm and a leg most of the time.
#17 Ender2070 on 08 May 2009 - 19:12
They should call it something more accurate, like the "Customer Abuse Program". As it only effects customers who legally purchased the software, the pirates bypass all that nonsense and redistribute it to all the noobs who can't.
#18 Albert on 09 May 2009 - 07:24
ass-tagging will always be ass-tagging. no matter how msfudd call it ...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)