microsoft
Report a problem

Inside Microsoft's home of the future [Video]

Tom Warren   on 13 May 2009 - 08:08 · 57 comments & 15029 views

Advertisement (Why?)
We have seen pictures of Microsoft's home of the future concept previously but this time the BBC has recorded a tour of the unit based at Microsoft's HQ in Redmond.

The video demonstrates speech and object recognition software that Microsoft is currently working on in its research divisions.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 57 additional comments
#1 Glendi on 13 May 2009 - 08:29
#2 +xiphi on 13 May 2009 - 08:33
Very cool. Wish my bed room had wallpaper like that as a kid. lol
#3 tainted_c0bra on 13 May 2009 - 08:36
Kooky, just kooky... I'm a techno-geek, and I'd love this house. But within time, some how I can invision a hacker posting a video of me in the shower or something on the net, if I were to live in this a house like this.

Wouldn't that the be the best hack, instead of defacing a website or stealing information or what not, why not turn on a persons house against them? lol.
(2 replies) #4 Critical Error on 13 May 2009 - 08:46
This house is nice but electricity is more and more expensive...
#4.1 mikefarinha on 13 May 2009 - 11:55
The only reason energy is getting more and more expensive is because governments want to increase the price.
#4.2 bmgoau on 14 May 2009 - 05:29
mikefarinha said,
The only reason energy is getting more and more expensive is because governments want to increase the price.


I hope you simply forgot your /sarcasm tag. Im an electrical engineer working for a state owned electricity company and while i admit the state has a lot to do with prices being high (inefficiency) its not nearly as significant as the simple fact that is there MORE PEOPLE using MORE ELECTRICITY and the cost of coal (which accounts for the major source of most nations electricity) is getting more expensive due to demand on it too. Governments may seem like magical all powerful and corrupt organizations behind all your personal grievances, but quite often the simplest solution is the right one
(3 replies) #5 eck0 on 13 May 2009 - 08:52
Did anyone else think of the episode from the simpsons?
#5.1 singularity0821 on 13 May 2009 - 08:57
Lol, just wanted to write the same as reply to #3's last sentence.
#5.2 jordanthegreat on 13 May 2009 - 17:32
I thought of the disney movie Smart House.
#5.3 cyberdrone2000 on 14 May 2009 - 05:19
I thought of the SciFi series Eureka.
#6 M.F.D.K on 13 May 2009 - 09:10
That's just effing great.
(5 replies) #7 Airlink on 13 May 2009 - 09:33
Only problem is, nobody needs this kind of technology.
#7.1 Manish on 13 May 2009 - 10:00
Airlink said,
Only problem is, nobody needs this kind of technology.


Of course it's not needed, in the sense that it's not an absolute neccessity. But would a lot of people want this technology? Well I would, yes.
#7.2 zhouij on 13 May 2009 - 10:11
You just reminded me of "No one needs more than 640k of RAM" lol.
#7.3 Manish on 13 May 2009 - 10:25
Exactly. Who needs technological advances?
#7.4 XerXis on 13 May 2009 - 11:14
Airlink said,
Only problem is, nobody needs this kind of technology.


yeah sure, reminding old people that they have to take their medicin is something we obviously don't need.
#7.5 A.B.L.N.N. on 13 May 2009 - 12:50
Airlink said,
Only problem is, nobody needs this kind of technology.




You don't need a car, you don't need a computer, hell you don't even need a house but they are all things that are good to have to make your life easier.
#8 Recon415 on 13 May 2009 - 09:41
Wow.
(1 reply) #9 Funk Dok on 13 May 2009 - 09:57
Interesting, but flawed:
- I don't want 6 wallpaper-projectors per room in my house, and 6 digit electricity bills.
- Some piece of software telling you what to wear? Aka Microsoft sense of style replaces yours. No thanks.
- Microsoft won't get my mom to shout at the kitchen table for recipes.
The phone-table has potential though. It might greatly extend tiny mobile's functionnalities.
#9.1 Manish on 13 May 2009 - 10:24
They should be factoring costs into their research. I doubt cost effectiveness and efficiency is something they would overlook. Also it wasn't designed for every room. I don't tend to throw things at my bathroom wall, for example. But out of the different application options, this was the least useful to me.

You know you don't have to listen to the mirror? It's not forcing you what to wear anyway. It lets you look through the different combinations, allowing you to choose more easily. Suggestions of clothing options would probably be based on your input (i.e. previous outfit combinations) or customisable simple "tags", such as colour or occasion.

In what way is the 3rd point a flaw? Is it that she would need to shout or is it because (you think) she doesn't need to look at recipes? The woman in the video was hardly shouting. I think the kitchen table application would be a very useful tool. A nice addition would be if the surface was able to tell you the weight of the items placed on it.

I think your flaws are flawed. Not that this technology has no flaws; I just don't think they're the ones you've mentioned (apart from cost, maybe). Someone "hacking into my house" would be of bigger concern to me.

Last edited by Manish on 13 May 2009 - 10:30
(2 replies) #10 Lilrichie on 13 May 2009 - 10:27
I once had a simillar idea for resteraunts with creditcard recognistion. I knew i should of done something sooner.
#10.1 Silverskull on 13 May 2009 - 12:42
Lilrichie said,
I once had a simillar idea for resteraunts with creditcard recognistion. I knew i should of done something sooner.

What? You mean on tables? You mean like Microsoft Surface?
#10.2 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:45
Yea, Microsoft Surface does that. I wish business would use Surface already, come on AT&T, Tucson needs some love!
(1 reply) #11 jwil1 on 13 May 2009 - 10:59
It's highly unlikely this will be in everyone's home within 10 years, given the current state of the economy and that no-one really needs it! And it WILL be horrendously expensive - to buy and to run.
#11.1 Beastage on 13 May 2009 - 11:37
If you think that is expansive you should check to see prices on kitchens, marble, bathrooms decorations, etc.

Standalone it might seem expensive, but put it in a new house, in a major development areas like Las Vegas or Phoenix and the price doesn't seem so high anymore.
#12 +dave164 on 13 May 2009 - 11:33
That is absolutely freaking awesome.. i would love a house like that.

The wallpaper i wouldn't have though =/ I don't think people that are complaining on this thread understand you could just not buy the feature you don't like xD

Sod the price!
#13 WAR-DOG on 13 May 2009 - 11:44
the question is not how much, but when?!

When will it be available for us mortals to buy it
#14 Silverskull on 13 May 2009 - 12:24
Paul Thurrott had an article about this a few months ago... yeah, it's pretty awesome.
#15 Batfink on 13 May 2009 - 13:01
I remember reading about the smart fridge something like 10 years ago that we were all meant to have in our homes by 2005! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/521065.stm

Then, way back in 2005 Microsoft said that within a few years we would have technology enabling "the mirror on the bedroom wall becomes a monitor, allowing you to watch a film, browse the web - or turn up the heating and open the blinds." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4508897.stm

I wait years for all this cool technology and it never comes! I can't even get my lights to turn on and off automatically without working out how to program X10 modules...

None of this stuff will ever happen!
#16 +stifler6478 on 13 May 2009 - 13:02
Sick.

When I win the lottery, this is mine
#17 Alkaif on 13 May 2009 - 13:08
sigh, that'd use a crap load of power... do we really want to leave carbon footprints?
#18 +littleneutrino on 13 May 2009 - 13:28
sort of reminds of me minority report.
(2 replies) #19 +Chipshop on 13 May 2009 - 13:48
I'd love a house like this but only if it was truly customizable. In the sense that you could adapt things to your specific needs.
It's good to see things like this in the research and development phase, this is how modern technology evolves and we should embrace it. Yes it may well be way out of most peoples price range (certainly mine! but this will not be forever, remember how expensive PCs originally were?

As for the energy needed, there is no reason why such advanced technology couldn't be developed to be 'greener' than today's everyday technology, working with solar, wind, hydro equipment to ensure greater efficiency.
#19.1 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:48
Solar's not really that efficient right now. We can't really sucessfully harness the sun's energy yet. But we should be able to develop our "green" act sometime soon.
#19.2 +Chipshop on 14 May 2009 - 08:46
Precisely my point!
Innovation leads to better use of today's equipment, moving it further along it's development cycle. Today solar isn't that efficient (although it is my parents only means of power in the Spanish mountains and they're doing alright) but further down the line it may be a whole more viable option.
(1 reply) #20 Bhav on 13 May 2009 - 13:56
The mirror is unbelievable!
#20.1 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:49
What would be cool is if you could stand in front of it and virtually "try on" outfits. Like it places a virtual version of your clothing over you on the mirror so you can quickly see how that outfit will look without having to bother with putting it on yourself.
#21 chemaz101 on 13 May 2009 - 14:19
Wow i want that house lol
As for the energy concerns, yeah would be expensive to run, but tbh if a house like that existed im pretty sure it would solar panels in the very least on the roof. and within say no more than 50 years there will be (hopefully) fusion power so probably by the time these things start to come in, we wont be too energy concious about them
I could possibly see these kinda thing in 10-20 years, or at least starting to come in then
(2 replies) #22 vetneufuse on 13 May 2009 - 14:47
how long until the usual "Microsoft doesn't innovate" or the "Apple would do it better" comments show up? *LOL*
#22.1 Calum on 14 May 2009 - 00:27
Erm, there haven't been any... (apart from your comment).

Last edited by Calum on 14 May 2009 - 00:33
#22.2 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:50
Yea, no Apple comments yet, lol. But honestly, Apple's not a big enough company to work on all of these projects that Microsoft does. Look at everything Microsoft does and compare that to Apple.
(2 replies) #23 TcKrockZ on 13 May 2009 - 16:00
god i want to watch this video so badly but it doesn't load:s
#23.1 Joshie on 13 May 2009 - 17:42
Yeah, if only it was Silverlight.

/teehee
#23.2 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:51
lol I thought the same thing! I right clicked it and was like, what?? Flash player? What is this outdated technology???
#24 Joshie on 13 May 2009 - 17:41
The strange thing about criticisms here is that we should be seeing this in terms of an alpha product. This is nothing more than putting the rough elements together and making it work. Very little refinement has taken place, and there's a lot of potential for adapting to new technologies and materials over the coming decades that would suit these products. This is Microsoft saying "See what the home can do," and now architecture and design can take these ideas and innovate new ways of building homes. It's the groundwork for massive cross-industry brainstorming.
(1 reply) #25 Zyphrax on 13 May 2009 - 20:46
Two months ago I went to Disneyland california. In tomorrowland - carousel of progress you can see a lot of these new technologies for yourself. The attraction has been revamped with Microsoft surface tables, the whole kitchen stuff and more of what you see in this video.
#25.1 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:52
Yea I heard Disneyland has Microsoft Surface. I wanna use the Surface soo badly but none of the stores around me have it yet! So was the Surface awesome???
(2 replies) #26 LiquidSolstice on 13 May 2009 - 22:52
Err.

Don't mean to be rude, but what the hell is BBC doing in Redmond?

I can't really remember the last time BBC ventured outside UK.
#26.1 Calum on 14 May 2009 - 00:32
Are you being serious?

So do you turn the news off before you see the reporters in Baghdad, reporting on the latest news from the conflict in Iraq?

On a tech-related note, they often follow-up Microsoft stories in such a way. They interviewed Bill Gates just as Windows Vista was released and they reported on the PDC etc.

#26.2 +Chipshop on 14 May 2009 - 08:47
Never heard of the BBC world service then :p
(1 reply) #27 Ludexiz on 13 May 2009 - 23:21
all home bathrooms cater to the female's needs. i want a stall!!! that's advanced enough as it is, but how many american homes have these?
#27.1 andrewbares on 14 May 2009 - 05:53
lol yea and TV's with football playing right in front of the stall. That would be the future.
#28 sorlag on 14 May 2009 - 01:37
Whoa nice.
#29 Shaka-de-virgo on 14 May 2009 - 02:02

Looks horrible, come on where is the style in this?
#30 Quikboy on 14 May 2009 - 03:16
Some of it's useful, though I think the mirror is kinda overkill. The OLED wallpaper is nice (could double as a TV screen) but even though it'd be cool to be immersed, it's also will take up some energy costs.
#31 superhuman on 14 May 2009 - 07:22
new invention -> porn wallpaper
#32 Biometric Man on 15 May 2009 - 01:03
I'm impressed.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)