main
Report a problem

AT&T will spend $18 billion to help boost smartphone speeds

Andrew Lyle   on 27 May 2009 - 22:59 · 14 comments & 1925 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AT&T has been sued multiple times over its alleged "3G" network, where people claim the speeds are not actually 7.2mbps, and range far less than that, even in hot spots. The plan to help keep up with the growing number of iPhone and smartphone sales put a stress on the current 3G wireless network.

After lawsuits in Florida, San Jose and San Diego in California, and Alabama, the company has set forth $18 billion to upgrade all of their networks. The upgrades will include adding fiber optic cables to almost all of their cell phone towers to provide true 3G speeds (7.2mbps). AT&T will be adding 2,100 new cell cities across the nation to widen their reach across America.

The company also plans on upgrading to HSPA 7.2 and LTE (Long-Term Evolution) next year, the successor to UMTS 3G technology; providing faster download and upload rates on mobile devices. AT&T also plans to almost double their current radio frequency capacity. Currently, most of their cell phone towers use the high-quality 850-Mhz spectrum in more than half of their towers.

The purposed $18 billion budget for upgrading AT&T's network across America is planned to begin operations soon and last up till 2011, trying to keep up with the demand of the mobile cell phone market.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 KeR on 28 May 2009 - 01:37
Good, because their coverage sucks...at least here where I am.
#1.1 hkgonra on 28 May 2009 - 17:03
They beat everybody on coverage where I am and where I travel.
#1.2 Tim Dawg on 28 May 2009 - 17:55
Sucks for me too.
(1 reply) #2 AndyD on 28 May 2009 - 02:52
Who cares about increase speed if the coverage isn't even there? Most of Manhattan is not even in the 850-mhz. How they are getting away with charging the amount they do and delivering on their part boggles my mind.
#2.1 peterish on 28 May 2009 - 03:12
AndyD said,
Who cares about increase speed if the coverage isn't even there? Most of Manhattan is not even in the 850-mhz. How they are getting away with charging the amount they do and delivering on their part boggles my mind.


Personally I don't understand the AT&T hating...my coverage in NY metro is great...comparable with Verizon. Better than T-Mobile anyways.
(3 replies) #3 AndyD on 28 May 2009 - 03:24
Comparable to Verizon? I had Verizon for years. No way is it comparable
#3.1 CronicHazel on 28 May 2009 - 04:15
So that means you haven't used AT&T, how are you comparing? D:
#3.2 Joshie on 28 May 2009 - 14:11
He has this friend who knows some guy whose cousin's step daughter's ex-boyfriend has a piano teacher married to an AT&T sales rep.

/Verizon and AT&T both shuck corn
#3.3 Tim Dawg on 28 May 2009 - 17:56
I've had both. AT&T sucks.
(1 reply) #4 Sacha on 28 May 2009 - 03:26
Geez, even in Australia I'm using 14.4Mbps on my mobile. Granted, it never really gets to that but I'm sure it's faster than whatever AT&T has right now.

Things are looking up for you guys though. LTE coming soon and AT&T are getting it around 2011. No word on when Australia gets it.
#4.1 Lowdown on 28 May 2009 - 14:24
True but remember the United States is always behind the rest of the world when it comes to cell phones. Usually Asia or Europe has the phones or the technology before it hits the states.
(1 reply) #5 andrewbares on 28 May 2009 - 04:36
7Mbps is faster than my home's DSL internet
#5.1 HeartsOfWar on 28 May 2009 - 15:04
My thoughts exactly.

in the future, it may be better to pay 30.00 USD for an unlimited data plan with your cell-phone, get a free USB laptop connect card, and not need home internet...

We'll be seeing a lot more routers with USB WAN support!
#6 Mike415 on 28 May 2009 - 20:39
Verizon in the Bay Area is way better than AT&T's rollout of 3G so far. I was dropping over 50% of my calls on my iPhone when I was at home and traveling from the NorthBay down to Mountain View, and in between in Daly City and Hillsborough.

Plus 3G only accounted for less than 50% of my service in supposed well covered areas.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)