hardware
Report a problem

AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE and Athlon II X2 250 review

Julio Franco   on 02 June 2009 - 02:11 · 8 comments & 5731 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD has made a successful transition to the 45nm fabrication process, giving the Phenom II series the necessary breathing room to prove it has what it takes to go head to head with the Intel Core 2 range. However, as of today it will be possible to get your hands around the Phenom II architecture for even less as we present you with the Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition processor.

The Phenom II X2 550 is based on the same specifications as the rest of the Phenom II family, but featuring half as many cores being a dual-core processor. The new processor operates at 3.10GHz, so about 100MHz slower (per core) than the flagship X4 955, and is expected to sell for a compelling $102.



AMD is also breathing new life into the Athlon brand with today's launch of the Athlon II X2 250. This new dual-core Athlon is the first of four models scheduled for release, of which the X2 250 should be the fastest part clocked at 3.0GHz.

View: AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE and Athlon II X2 250 review

These reviews are offered to Neowin visitors through a partnership with TechSpot.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 8 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 Airlink on 02 Jun 2009 - 10:32
They compared it against the Core 2 duo... but not the Core 2 quad or the Core i7? Yeah, way to ignore two entire Intel product lines there.
#1.1 iamwhoiam on 02 Jun 2009 - 10:55
Considering that it's the X2 (dual core) chip, I fail to see why it would be compared with a quad core. :rollseyes:
#1.2 cycro on 02 Jun 2009 - 10:58
Airlink said,
They compared it against the Core 2 duo... but not the Core 2 quad or the Core i7? Yeah, way to ignore two entire Intel product lines there.


Being a budget solution for $102, I don't see why they should compare it to a higher class of processors. Nobody's saying that AMD has competitive products in the high-end class.
#1.3 Lord Ba'al on 03 Jun 2009 - 00:55
Airlink said,
They compared it against the Core 2 duo... but not the Core 2 quad or the Core i7? Yeah, way to ignore two entire Intel product lines there.

Whoa, what a moronic statement.
Comparing a dual core against a quad core would be just plain dumb.
(3 replies) #2 AnthoWin on 02 Jun 2009 - 11:56
If they put these in netbooks they would kick Atom's ass (yes i know you probably cant compare these to the Atom but the AMD chips are quite inexpensive regardless)
#2.1 ahhell on 02 Jun 2009 - 14:41
Uh...the Atom is not about price, it's about low power consumption.
#2.2 RAID 0 on 02 Jun 2009 - 17:11
ahhell said,
Uh...the Atom is not about price, it's about low power consumption.


... and the low performance that goes with the Atom.
#2.3 Steven77 on 02 Jun 2009 - 20:12
Who wants to use a single core processor nowadays anyways.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)