linux
Report a problem

Fedora 11 now available

Sam Alderwick   on 09 June 2009 - 14:47 · 37 comments & 11878 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Fedora 11, the next release of the popular Linux distribution, is now available from the Fedora website. You can find full details of the major improvements and changes in this latest release in our previous post about the launch of Fedora 11, but to mention just a few, the release claims to have major speed improvements, boasting a 20 second startup, as well as overall speed improvements as ext4 is now used as the default file-system.

Another interesting feature is the ability to perform a minimal install, which amounts to about 500MB (at mount-point '/'), which should make this release more appealing to users running servers, or machines with older hardware. However, this does of course come at the cost of features.

In addition, the latest versions of GNOME and KDE are included with the respective versions. The release was delayed several times due to last minute issues, however it is now officially available. You can see the screenshot tour here, showing the installation process and the desktops for both GNOME and KDE.

The release is now available through BitTorrent and direct download, however, at the time of writing, not all mirrors had Fedora 11 to download, so you may be better off using torrents if you cannot find a mirror. Custom Fedora 11 spins are also available, including the Fedora Games Spin and Fedora Xfce spin.

For those wishing to upgrade, you must be using version 10 in order to upgrade to Fedora 11 through Yum. Users running Fedora 9 must upgrade to version 10 first, because of this. In case you aren't familiar with Fedora, it is a free, open-source Linux operating system, and the whole project is sponsored by Red Hat, a company providing enterprise Linux solutions.

Download: Download page

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 37 additional comments
#1 Tarrant64 on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:23
I just got used to 10...
#2 ripgut on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:35
Will try it, haven't played with Fedora since 2004
(1 reply) #3 FoxieFoxie on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:39
any screens? ktkx
#3.1 Sazz181 on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:42
There are several screenshots here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Screenshot_Tour

Unfortunately I can't provide my own yet, as I will have to set it to download overnight. Once I've got them though, I'll post 'em up
(4 replies) #4 rakeshishere on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:43
More Linux news plssssss (Windows Vista and 7 RC user)
#4.1 FoxieFoxie on 09 Jun 2009 - 16:33
rakeshishere said,
More Linux news plssssss (Windows Vista and 7 RC user)


The only linux which is worth news: RedHat
#4.2 Marshalus on 09 Jun 2009 - 19:28
We're trying.
#4.3 timmmay on 10 Jun 2009 - 00:27
http://www.tuxmachines.org is a good source
#4.4 michael.dobrofsky on 10 Jun 2009 - 00:47
Well I was free to do Linux news...but then I got another gig
#5 ripgut on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:47
Burning ISO now, will boot from Live CD when i get back to my desk here at work.
#6 vetmarkjensen on 09 Jun 2009 - 16:29
Cool. I will have to add this to my list of distros I seed on torrents when I get back home. (Y)
(1 reply) #7 turk4n on 09 Jun 2009 - 16:39
Never liked Fedora, however I can always try it out :>
#7.1 tiagosilva29 on 11 Jun 2009 - 09:02
I have a beef with RPM-based distros, and yet I try them with every release.
(3 replies) #8 zeke009 on 09 Jun 2009 - 16:42
Anyone loaded it in VirtualBox yet? If so, did you have to do any crazy configurations that a Linux newbie (like me) would struggle with at first?
#8.1 NeoTrunks on 09 Jun 2009 - 17:25
zeke009 said,
Anyone loaded it in VirtualBox yet? If so, did you have to do any crazy configurations that a Linux newbie (like me) would struggle with at first?


I haven't tried it yet, but that's very doubtful. Fedora offers a pretty user friendly installer. It's Gentoo and possibly Slackware that might be more involved.
#8.2 Shiranui on 10 Jun 2009 - 00:06
zeke009 said,
Anyone loaded it in VirtualBox yet? If so, did you have to do any crazy configurations that a Linux newbie (like me) would struggle with at first?


When I was installing f10, virtual PC didn't work at all! Virtualbox ran it beautifully with no special configuration needed.

I'm sure f11 will be fine with virtualbox.
#8.3 zeke009 on 10 Jun 2009 - 12:22
Shiranui said,
When I was installing f10, virtual PC didn't work at all! Virtualbox ran it beautifully with no special configuration needed.

I'm sure f11 will be fine with virtualbox.

I can't get the Guest Additions to load, but the install to VB worked fine.
(2 replies) #9 sanke1 on 09 Jun 2009 - 17:24
Installed it, uninstalled it in 60 min.

1. Too hard to bring it to daily usability level.
2. I primarily use it for listening to music. But I still find amarock, and its clones half baked. One player does videos/music/tagging/library management anyone ? Some might debate but none of the music players still come close to itunes or wmp or foobar.
3. Sound quality is terrible. May be i am using some crappy drivers.
4. Trivial but i hate the new wallpaper. Looks like someone splashed muddy water on their previous one. Hehe
5. I am finding it difficult to customize.

Damn is Linux still for ubber-geeks ??
#9.1 roadwarrior on 09 Jun 2009 - 23:53
Hmmm, "geeks" are the ones who would worry about the differences in music player software, sound quality, wallpaper, and customizing, so I guess it's not for geeks.
#9.2 Magallanes on 10 Jun 2009 - 14:15
roadwarrior said,
Hmmm, "geeks" are the ones who would worry about the differences in music player software, sound quality, wallpaper, and customizing, so I guess it's not for geeks.


yes, i though the same. I think you can disagreed with the audio but the wallpaper?. :-/
#10 m.keeley on 09 Jun 2009 - 17:30
Pretty much unless it meets your requirements straight out of the box.
#11 Optimash Prime on 09 Jun 2009 - 17:36
i love the look of the gui, but then its not really about the gui is it... Doh!
(1 reply) #12 roblife on 09 Jun 2009 - 18:07
Good news that it came out. I will have to install and see. Fedora is pretty solid system. I love to use it. And its free. Best windows for your new test build system. You can upgrade and burn in you system. Also its the best for your browsing experience its secure. Usual i learned to keep my windows computer off the network and for games only. Windows xp and vista and dont know yet about 7 but they cannot be trusted on the network so when I need to upgrade it i use the fedora system to download stuff for windows. And now my I mac is another great system I can use the I mac to brows and get files for windows and just run windows in parallels with no network interface. All the windows files I download in the subdirectory shared by windows and its great. Fedora keep the good distros coming. One day you'll be the king of computer jungle.
#12.1 RAID 0 on 10 Jun 2009 - 04:39
Dude! Can I get some of what you're smoking?
#13 x-byte on 09 Jun 2009 - 18:21
Oh, please roblife.


Installing now. Hopefully this works fine. Have had some trouble with linux distros om my NC20 before. Only got OpenSUSE 11 and Fedora 10 up and running earlier.
#14 NyaR on 09 Jun 2009 - 18:28
rofl at this guy

anyway, been waiting for fed11 since win7 RC was released, so I could dual-boot.
#15 Avogadro on 09 Jun 2009 - 23:01
Did a minimal install and Quad booting with Win7, Vista and F10. Boots just as fast as Windows 7 and a lot faster than F10. Just added the RPMfusion.org repository and installed nVidia drivers. Noticed that they added the Biometrics login option, which works great on my ThinkPad. They also seem to have fixed the issue I had with PulseAudio on F10. So far so good.
#16 Solid Knight on 10 Jun 2009 - 01:50
Meh, it's like running Fedora 10 or Fedora 9 or Fedora 8.
(2 replies) #17 Aahz on 10 Jun 2009 - 08:51
That is one picky installer/partitioner. Apparently, Fedora wants the HDD partitioned in one particular way and I, silly ole me, prefer it partitioned my way. A trivial and small problem that I'd be more than happy to remedy were the Fedora partitioner able to actually start.

I've tried the Live CD and the Full Install DVD but both of them stop before they even get started. I went as far as to boot into gparted Live and even temp install gparted into each of the Live Fedora sessions but nothing. Total non-starter. gparted works like a dream in all of the scenarios but Fedora's partitioner fails miserably.
#17.1 vetmarkjensen on 10 Jun 2009 - 11:30
Can you describe how you tried to partition your drive? I am pretty sure you didn't file a report, so I would like to duplicate and confirm your finding, then file a report.

You know... So it might get fixed and all that.
#17.2 Aahz on 10 Jun 2009 - 19:04
There was no trying to it. The partitioner wouldn't even start.

As for the HDD layout: NTFS 20gbs, swap 3gb, ext3/4 10gb, remainder in one large NTFS partition.

As for filing a report; it seemed useless when the problem was easily found in the Fedora forums where the only solution was to use Fedora's partitioning scheme with the Live CD or use the DVD and instead do a full install. (claiming that the DVD allowed for more partitioning options but alas it only failed at the same exact point...on 3 similarly partitioned HDDs in 3 different machines)

It's always odd to me when I'm playing with Linux and something stops me from doing things my way. Whether that's locking me into software sources or out of codecs or stopping me from setting up my HDD in the way that I see fit.

The more distros I try the more I find that are closer to the very closed Apple model of removing options and claiming it as increased security.

Good luck at getting it fixed. I chased my tail around with 3 different machines trying to get Fedora 11 to start an install from either the Live CD or DVD but my new distro lust went away about 1-2 hours in.
(4 replies) #18 Xenomorph on 10 Jun 2009 - 13:26
I haven't used Fedora in a while, so I'll probably try this.

It will get the "one hour test". If I find myself getting ****ed at the computer after an hour because I have to keep opening the command line to get something done or have to search endless pages on Google trying to figure out how to make something work, it is obviously NOT for me.
Basically, how I see it: If everything "just works" for a user with Windows or even Mac OS X, then why would someone want to switch to this and put up with all the headache?
#18.1 Sazz181 on 10 Jun 2009 - 13:57
You're right to say that, but thats the point, with all but Ubuntu, most Linux distributions aren't made for "everybody", rather, server administrators, technicians, and webmasters.

I forced myself to try Fedora for a month, and like you, was sick of command prompts all the time. However, although I had to use it to compile PHP, I have to say I used it very few times, and now, 2 months on, I haven't used it for weeks.

I only use it on my laptop, but it's so much faster than XP was on it, plus it's free.
#18.2 Magallanes on 10 Jun 2009 - 14:26
Sazz181 said,
You're right to say that, but thats the point, with all but Ubuntu, most Linux distributions aren't made for "everybody", rather, server administrators, technicians, and webmasters.

I forced myself to try Fedora for a month, and like you, was sick of command prompts all the time. However, although I had to use it to compile PHP, I have to say I used it very few times, and now, 2 months on, I haven't used it for weeks.

I only use it on my laptop, but it's so much faster than XP was on it, plus it's free.


A colleague mine installed Ubuntu in their new notebook and everything worked fine without needing of access the shell.



#18.3 Sazz181 on 10 Jun 2009 - 17:25
That's why I said "with all but Ubuntu"
#18.4 Litespeed on 10 Jun 2009 - 20:43
I don't think OS X is really a fair comparison in this respect - it should "just work" because Apple control the hardware as well.
#19 Bri- on 01 Aug 2009 - 00:49
Looks nice but it doesn't offer me anything than Mint, which works flawlessly for me.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)