hardware
Report a problem

Nokia N97 hits U.S. flagship stores today

Unto Darkness   on 09 June 2009 - 10:40 · 25 comments & 6499 views

Advertisement (Why?)
According to Engadget, Nokia's most powerful handset, the Nokia N97, will be hitting flagship stores in New York and Chicago. Unofficial sources claimed that the handset would launch on June 2, but the date was not confirmed by Nokia. This comes after the release of other 'blockbuster' handsets: the Palm Pre on June 5 and Apple iPhone 3G S (available June 19) yesterday at the WWDC.



The device is expected to retail for $699.99. However, for those who have pre-ordered the device, it would run them $524.25, through a $174.75 discount. No U.S. network provider plans to carry the phone, so do not expect any subsidised prices through contracts. For those who are willing to wait a little longer, they can get the N97 from Amazon at a discounted price of $603.99. However, the release date has been fraught with delays.

Here are the specifications of the N97 in brief:
  • Screen: Resistive TFT touch screen, 16M colors, 360 x 640 pixels, 3.5 inches with handwriting recognition
  • Connectivity: GPRS Class 32, HSCSD ,EDGE Class 32, 3G HSDPA, 3.6 Mbps, WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, UPnP technology, Bluetooth v2.0 with A2DP, USB v2.0 microUSB, GPS with A- GPS
  • OS: Symbian OS v9.4, Series 60 rel. 5
  • CPU: ARM 11 434 MHz processor
  • Messaging: SMS, MMS, Email, Push Email, IM
  • Camera: 5 MP, 2592x1944 pixels, Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, LED flash, video light

For those who want to know more about the device, you can check out the detailed specifications on Nokia's European website. You could also check Engadget Spain's hands on of the device to see how the device fares during use.

Well, June is proving to be an exciting month for technology enthusiasts with the launch of several highly hyped devices. For those in need of a highly capable handset, and an alternative to the Palm Pre and iPhone 3Gs, the Nokia N97 might just be for you.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 25 additional comments
#1 GP007 on 09 Jun 2009 - 11:50
That looks pretty nice, I like having a full keyboard option as well.
(1 reply) #2 Nashy on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:07
It just doesn't strike me as nice as the Xperia X1. I dunno, I'm usually really big on Nokia compared to SE, but something doesn't sit well with me on this phone.

Nokia also have a bad habbit of doing fancy new things that don't work well.
#2.1 protocol7 on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:20
Nashy said,
It just doesn't strike me as nice as the Xperia X1. I dunno, I'm usually really big on Nokia compared to SE, but something doesn't sit well with me on this phone.

Looking for a new phone here and I was all over the Xperia till I found this article. Now I'm looking hard for a good alternative.
(1 reply) #3 +bob21 on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:14


That looks surprising familiar ... , But seriously though its a great form factor and thumbs up to nokia for using it IMO this should be the default form factor for all PDA Phones

Last edited by bob21 on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:20
#3.1 mmck on 10 Jun 2009 - 09:30
It looks nothing like it - apart from a screen and a keyboard underneath.
(2 replies) #4 LynxMukka on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:22
I really am sorry, but I'm not a great believer in Nokia phones anymore. Samsung is quickly taking over the phone market IMO and other companies need to keep up with the touch screen revolution.

This isn't really it, IMO.
#4.1 Shetland on 09 Jun 2009 - 13:15
LynxMukka said,
I really am sorry, but I'm not a great believer in Nokia phones anymore. Samsung is quickly taking over the phone market IMO and other companies need to keep up with the touch screen revolution.

This isn't really it, IMO.

LMFAO samsung touch phones are totally unresponsive, only just better than LG.
i would say apple are who to look for. i hear the pre is alright too, i've not used that though.
#4.2 LynxMukka on 09 Jun 2009 - 14:57
Shetland said,
LynxMukka said,
I really am sorry, but I'm not a great believer in Nokia phones anymore. Samsung is quickly taking over the phone market IMO and other companies need to keep up with the touch screen revolution.

This isn't really it, IMO.

LMFAO samsung touch phones are totally unresponsive, only just better than LG.
i would say apple are who to look for. i hear the pre is alright too, i've not used that though.


Which ones did you try? O_O
#5 Digix on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:26
Great hopefully any day now here down under can go and get it forum thread on it here: http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=779770
(4 replies) #6 Shaun_ on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:43
$699.99....and in 2 weeks iPhone GS sells for half the price
#6.1 Digix on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:50
Shaun_ said,
$699.99....and in 2 weeks iPhone GS sells for half the price


half the features too seems fair.
#6.2 Beastage on 09 Jun 2009 - 13:43
What? the iphone comes with a stinky contract thats costs arms and legs... don't me you didn't know this by now.
#6.3 Faisal Islam on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:10
who cares Nokia-Symbian??? Going for HTC Touch Pro 2
#6.4 Fritzly on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:36
Shaun_ said,
$699.99....and in 2 weeks iPhone GS sells for half the price


Sim-locked and crippled by AT&T.... Excellent comparison.
(1 reply) #7 +Smigit on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:47
Will be interesting to see how it competes with the likes of the Palm Pre and iPhone which are being heavily pushed by telcos. I can't see it being overly appealing at $700US next to the others being subsidized on contract unless you really want to avoid certain companies. It certainly seems to me that the $99 8GB iPhone would appeal to more users on a financial basis alone.

I think it might fare better in Europe and Australia anyway given carriers will likely push it more.
#7.1 Digix on 09 Jun 2009 - 12:49
Smigit said,
Will be interesting to see how it competes with the likes of the Palm Pre and iPhone which are being heavily pushed by telcos. I can't see it being overly appealing at $700US next to the others being subsidized on contract unless you really want to avoid certain companies. It certainly seems to me that the $99 8GB iPhone would appeal to more users on a financial basis alone.

I think it might fare better in Europe and Australia anyway given carriers will likely push it more.


Most likely i mean nokias big everywhere except the US pretty much.
(6 replies) #8 Julius Caro on 09 Jun 2009 - 13:38
Bad software happens to good hardware. It looks nice, and I may feel nicer than the crappy n95 and n96, but it still has that crappy symbian on it. Hopefully the whole "symbian foundation" thing will bring new life to the otherwise dead mobile OS.
#8.1 Beastage on 09 Jun 2009 - 13:43
Julius why dead? symbian is the most popular mobile phone OS on the market...
#8.2 bluewind_89 on 09 Jun 2009 - 13:58
et tu Beastage?
#8.3 Julius Caro on 09 Jun 2009 - 14:09
Beastage said,
Julius why dead? symbian is the most popular mobile phone OS on the market...


Indeed, but that doesnt make it any good. Just compare the success of the itunes app store with symbian. In 2 years developers have come up with better applications for the iphone than in 6 years of symbian.
#8.4 skynetXrules on 09 Jun 2009 - 15:23
dead my ASS !!!


it kick ass !!!
#8.5 kizuran on 09 Jun 2009 - 16:54
Julius Caro said,
Indeed, but that doesnt make it any good. Just compare the success of the itunes app store with symbian. In 2 years developers have come up with better applications for the iphone than in 6 years of symbian.


Be that as it may, it just proves that it's easier for app developers & Apple (in general) to impose restrictions & cripple mobile apps on iPhone & App Store platforms than it is to do the same on Symbian.

Symbian is to Unix/Linux (free; open sourced) as iPhone is to Mac or Windows. The overwhelming majority of mobile app developers are ALWAYS going to favor the platforms where they can control the who/what/where/when/how of their apps over the platforms that it's more difficult to do so.

A simple example of this is merely installing a mobile app on these smartphones. With Symbian/Nokia S60/90, a user can can download an app package onto his/her pc or device (ota of course) from a browser, ftp server, or any electronic medium & install it, no fuss. If the user's in the market for "premium" or professionally written software, nokia's own Ovi service &/or symbian.com are available, where there are thousands of free & non-free apps available.

If i'm not mistaken, you can't do that with iPhones. The user HAS to use the "crApp Store" as a publishing/hosting medium, where the developer has to get approval from Apple to host/sell the app. Read that again, user HAS to use the "crApp Store" as a publishing/hosting medium, where the developer has to get approval from Apple to host/sell the app. To add insult to injury, the developer's hard work is then subject to Apple's own censuring, where Apple is it's own ESRB or FCC. Still on top of that, Apple further restricts the developer by rejecting apps that duplicate or overlap on any iPhone/iTunes functionality AUTOMATICALLY. That means you can't write ANY improved apps for audio/video playback, pic viewing, sms/mms messaging, graphics acceleration, a-gps handling, & the list could go on & on.
#8.6 Unto Darkness on 10 Jun 2009 - 04:54
Julius Caro said,
Bad software happens to good hardware. It looks nice, and I may feel nicer than the crappy n95 and n96, but it still has that crappy symbian on it. Hopefully the whole "symbian foundation" thing will bring new life to the otherwise dead mobile OS.


I am sorry? Crappy Symbian?

The last time I heard, it was one of the best smartphone OS on the market, and it could multitask.

Sure the interface may never be as intuitive as the iPhone's, but it is a powerful OS befitting a powerful handset.
#9 Procyon on 09 Jun 2009 - 18:57
wow @ 699!
#10 Anaron on 10 Jun 2009 - 05:39
It's a great phone but it's too expensive. I'm happy with my Nokia 5800 XpressMusic.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)