microsoft
Report a problem

Microsoft consolidates explicit Bing content to new address

Andrew Lyle   on 16 June 2009 - 01:56, updated 16 June 2009 - 04:20 · 34 comments & 9704 views

Advertisement (Why?)
When Neowin reported last week about Bing allowing users to watch porn videos and browse pornographic material using its search, businesses, schools and other large corporations complained that Bing maybe a gateway to free porn. Bing was blocked by some companies to prevent porn surfing during work hours, where Microsoft instantly became to form a solution to the problem. Fox News was one of the first to come forward with criticisms of Bing, claiming that it provided "a cornucopia of pornography" and that it was easy to transform "the search engine into [your] very own pornographic Web site."

Microsoft has now come up with a solution to fix that problem by filtering all explicit material through a new URL, explicit.bing.net, which is invisible to the end user. The update will allow businesses, schools and others to easily filter this address and block all explicit material even if SafeSearch has been turned off, without limiting access to Bing completely.

Much to the disappointment of some, attempting to directly visit the http://explicit.bing.net address with a browser will redirect you to the regular bing.com, and not to a dedicated Microsoft porn site.

Bing will also start to return source URL information in the query string for both images and videos, so businesses will be able to catch explicit material, in case Bing does not filter a web site the company does.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 34 additional comments
#1 pasty2k2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 04:25
I read half of that then tried to go there manually myself haha!
(10 replies) #2 nunjabusiness on 16 Jun 2009 - 04:26
They missed the obvious.
Should have been bada.bing.net
#2.1 Tikitiki on 16 Jun 2009 - 05:02
I just lol'ed - love that
#2.2 Matt500 on 16 Jun 2009 - 06:04
nunjabusiness said,
They missed the obvious.
Should have been
bada.bing.net

#2.3 Matt500 on 16 Jun 2009 - 06:05
Love it
#2.4 Tom W on 16 Jun 2009 - 07:01
haha yea, someone twitter their team and tell them to change it
#2.5 excalpius on 16 Jun 2009 - 07:41
Oh yes, yes it should. +100 for Bada.Bing!
#2.6 macrosslover on 16 Jun 2009 - 08:38
well after I picked myself up from the floor..i typed the adress in and it is registered to bing...so who knows what the future brings.
#2.7 Ambroos on 16 Jun 2009 - 10:49
macrosslover said,
well after I picked myself up from the floor..i typed the adress in and it is registered to bing...so who knows what the future brings.


It's just a subdomain. If you buy bing.com or bing.net then everything that ends on .bing.com or .bing.net is yours.
#2.8 Routerbad on 16 Jun 2009 - 11:43
macrosslover said,
well after I picked myself up from the floor..i typed the adress in and it is registered to bing...so who knows what the future brings.


Of course it is, it's either just a cname for one of their servers or another forward lookup zone within the bing.com dns namespace.
#2.9 lylesback2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 14:23
That's actually kind of clever, but they should save it for something special
#2.10 Quigley Guy on 16 Jun 2009 - 15:24
+1
needs to be done.

Bing is trying to be cool, this would help
#3 TRC on 16 Jun 2009 - 04:55
and not to a dedicated Microsoft porn site


Well it's useless then!
(8 replies) #4 Grandaevus on 16 Jun 2009 - 06:18
Lots of talk about porn, almost no talk about if Bing is any good.
Has anybody made the switch from thewellknownsearchengine? I for one haven't.
#4.1 dafin0 on 16 Jun 2009 - 06:25
im trying to, bing seams to work REALLY well.. problem is that my fingers just type google automatically
#4.2 Calum on 16 Jun 2009 - 08:29
Grandaevus said,
Lots of talk about porn, almost no talk about if Bing is any good.
Has anybody made the switch from thewellknownsearchengine? I for one haven't.

I've made the switch I like Bing more and I think it is better in many ways, even with relevancy of results

I sometimes type "google.com", by accident, but then I just change it to "bing.com"
#4.3 rwx on 16 Jun 2009 - 08:55
Grandaevus said,
Lots of talk about porn, almost no talk about if Bing is any good.
Has anybody made the switch from thewellknownsearchengine? I for one haven't.


Not me and have no intention to. I don't trust any other search engine but Google but that's about all of the relationship between me and Google except for the fact that I use Chrome even though I have encountered a few rendering issues here and there.

#4.4 GP007 on 16 Jun 2009 - 09:19
I switched, I don't do searches that often either way, but what I've used of bing so far has worked for me.
#4.5 Majesticmerc on 16 Jun 2009 - 12:04
dafin0 said,
im trying to, bing seams to work REALLY well.. problem is that my fingers just type google automatically


Same. I've got firefox set up to quick-search both, but it's hard to break habits (which is why Google will be so hard to beat)
#4.6 Knad on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:34
I have not, I have a strange trust for Google.
#4.7 DATmafia on 17 Jun 2009 - 04:36
Grandaevus said,
Lots of talk about porn, almost no talk about if Bing is any good.
Has anybody made the switch from thewellknownsearchengine? I for one haven't.


Bing is easy on the eyes but doesn't search better than google in any area. The local news is rather sparse. The regular search doesn't seem to have dealt with the problem of relevance to the query.
#4.8 TRC on 17 Jun 2009 - 08:44
I haven't used Google since Bing went live.
(1 reply) #5 Soldiers33 on 16 Jun 2009 - 07:07
went from google to bing, just for testing. havent turned back just yet
#5.1 pupdawg21 on 16 Jun 2009 - 07:53
I have increasingly been trying to use Microsoft properties on the web as a little experiment. With Bing.com in particular I am really liking what I'm seeing with the search engine (decision engine in marketing speak) and have for the most part replaced Google as my default search engine on all of my workstations and desktops. I have also been trying out My.Live.com in place of igoogle.com and so far I still somewhat prefer the igoogle.com (google.com/ig) to the my.live.com site for aggregating my frequently visited sites and rss feeds from around the web. Maybe the team that did Bing.com will re-envision the my.live.com site and re-brand it to be bingafied and my opio]nion might change. I have also replaced visiting Youtube with using Bing's video search instead which links to Youtube.com videos anyway and allows viewing of those pages without leaving Bing which is nice (Porn is big too as the news has been clamoring on about). I find the video search of Bing.com to actually be better than that provided by Youtube.com and the like even though Bing seems to be doing nothing more than indexing everyone else content. The image search I have also found to be superior to Googles current offering. So, overall I am impressed by the changes Microsoft has made to the Live search engine. I still haven't found a good Microsoft equivalent or replacement for Finance.google.com which I find to be very useful. Microsoft's MSN money site is ok but it's doesn't let you get to hard numbers for multiple stocks and funds as quickly or easily as I find I can with Google's finance site. No direct comparison with Yahoo since I've never used Yahoo! much for anything other than e-mail. The biggest issue and hurdle I see for Microsoft with the Bing offering right now is there are too many conflicting brands (Bing, Live (Not Xbo, and MSN) all seemingly competing with each other still in some capacity. But I have noticed that MSN has increasingly been rebranding some areas to point to Bing, while many of the other Microsoft Web applications are still branded Live.

Oh and I hear the porn search is the best. lol.

(1 reply) #6 Jugalator on 16 Jun 2009 - 07:45
My penis turned microsoft from these news. :-(
#6.1 GP007 on 16 Jun 2009 - 09:20
That sucks. But i'm sure you're a pro at finding pr0n on the internet the old way.
(1 reply) #7 Calum on 16 Jun 2009 - 08:31
The article
Much to the disappointment of some, attempting to directly visit the http://explicit.bing.net address with a browser will redirect you to the regular bing.com, and not to a dedicated Microsoft porn site.

Baha! That's one market Microsoft should venture into

As for consolidating explicit Bing content to a new address, this is brilliant and should please a lot of people who complained!
#7.1 smooth_criminal1990 on 16 Jun 2009 - 15:26
loool, that's one address you do not want anyone finding in ur history

But hey, why else did they put "InPrivate Browsing" into IE8? XD
#8 vetneufuse on 16 Jun 2009 - 12:20
They should call the porn search version of Bing - BingBong... hehe
(1 reply) #9 hotdog963al on 16 Jun 2009 - 12:52
Good, I was tired of pictures of cats everywhere.
#9.1 +dead.cell on 16 Jun 2009 - 14:34
lmao.
#10 Shiranui on 17 Jun 2009 - 00:22
This whole pr0n non-issue is certainly providing bing with plenty of much-welcomed free publicity.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)