microsoft
Report a problem

Update: MSFT to RTM Windows 7 by June 26? Build 7260 leaks

Tom Warren   on 16 June 2009 - 16:41 · 138 comments & 56895 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Earlier today Neowin reported that Windows 7 build 7232 had leaked. What a difference a few more hours makes, now 7260 has leaked and the Russian site Wzor claims that Microsoft will build the RTM (release to manufacturing) build between June 15-19.

If Wzor is correct, and that's a big if and rumour, then we may see the final Windows 7 RTM build ready this weekend. Internal sources indicate that 7260 is still the latest build under the win7_rtm branch. Build 7260 carries the tag 7260.win7_rtm.090612-2110 and is an RTM escrow build meaning vigorous testing will commence to ensure this is the final code unless there are show stopper bugs. Folks inside Microsoft who wish to remain anonymous have also indicated that many people internally are growing tired and bored of the leaks and want development to conclude as soon as possible. I think everyone here at Neowin feels the same, lets see what the weekend brings.

Microsoft will officially release Windows 7 to the public on October 22.

Updated: According to our own reliable sources Microsoft is set to RTM by June 26.



Don't forget to grab the latest Windows 7 wallpaper (Harmony):


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 138 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 mucter on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:44
wtfbbq? They are spitting out builds "like a bawsss".
#1.1 freeeekyyy on 17 Jun 2009 - 06:45
That's because they are the boss.
#1.2 bluewind_89 on 17 Jun 2009 - 17:07
Talk to corporate.


Like a bawss.
#1.3 Señor Fake ASDF on 18 Jun 2009 - 01:26
Hit on Deborah...


Like a Boss....


Get Rejected...


Like a boss....
#1.4 Tommy DW on 19 Jun 2009 - 11:37
Suck a dudes dick...like a boss
Suck my own dick...like a boss
(1 reply) #2 leo221 on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:45
bring it on!
#2.1 Lord Ba'al on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:28
Still .vhd only though, and what's worse, x86 only so far.
(3 replies) #3 signalpirate on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:45
so this build expires before RC??
#3.1 lee26 on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:26
Same date. 1st of March 2010. It's written in US format.
#3.2 Glendi on 17 Jun 2009 - 00:24
lee26 said,
Same date. 1st of March 2010. It's written in US format.


Please translate it to European, I can't understand.
#3.3 Raa on 17 Jun 2009 - 09:16
Nah, MS doesn't suppor the EU anymore... jks
(3 replies) #4 TOOLaudiofan on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:45
Holy crap. There is no way in hell Microsoft is not intentionally leaking these! I mean, are they are really that focused on getting this out the door, they can't find the leak?

Man I can't wait till October 22.
#4.1 ork on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:54
There are 10000+ people in windows org alone who have access to the builds, not counting other groups and individuals who have access. The builds are too huge to be keyring'd based on users. So any of these employees could be the source of the leak.

However, the point is these leaks are not hurting MSFT (as long as windows genuine advantage included in Win 7 is not broken), they are on the other hand providing valuable data for bug fixes.
#4.2 cerealfreak on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:26
ork said,
There are 10000+ people in windows org alone who have access to the builds, not counting other groups and individuals who have access. The builds are too huge to be keyring'd based on users. So any of these employees could be the source of the leak.

However, the point is these leaks are not hurting MSFT (as long as windows genuine advantage included in Win 7 is not broken), they are on the other hand providing valuable data for bug fixes.



The WGA has already been broken as has the timestamp
#4.3 DanJamesJr on 21 Jun 2009 - 03:38
TOOLaudiofan said,
Holy crap. There is no way in hell Microsoft is not intentionally leaking these!


Controversy man.. Microsoft loves when people talk!
(7 replies) #5 Max™ on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:48
Folks inside Microsoft who wish to remain anonymous have also indicated that many people internally are growing tired and bored of the leaks and want development to conclude as soon as possible

What the hell? They're developing the damn thing. Why should leaks interest them? And for gods sake, don't rush the last week of development.
#5.1 Jugalator on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:10
Yeah, haha, how odd isn't that How do leaks impact their work on their product?
#5.2 Hurmoth on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:16
^ Agreed! That comment doesn't make any sense at all to me.
#5.3 +Brandon Live on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:59
None of us care or are in a hurry, don't know where that came from. Nothing is going to be "rushed." We have a plan and we're sticking to it.

The leaks are getting really annoying though. I hope that person screws up and gets fired Real Soon Now.
#5.4 winlonghorn on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:56
Brandon Live said,
None of us care or are in a hurry, don't know where that came from. Nothing is going to be "rushed." We have a plan and we're sticking to it.

The leaks are getting really annoying though. I hope that person screws up and gets fired Real Soon Now.


Can't blame you there. It is a real pain when you put so much into a product and then it leaks. What I can say though is that you all are doing tremendous work at Microsoft. This is the best release of Windows ever and I am proud to be a Windows user thanks to your hard work. Don't let the idiots of the world discourage you by any means. They exist and are a pain, but they are not worth it. lol.

#5.5 Vakerorokero on 17 Jun 2009 - 03:09
Microsoft could easily find who is leaking the builds, but of course, someone up the chain is doing it, generating publicity that has made windows 7 the revindication of Vista.

Microsoft is getting tons of free good publicity from us, so companies (the ones that made them rich) will do buy their stuff.
#5.6 PGHammer on 17 Jun 2009 - 13:04
Max? said,
What the hell? They're developing the damn thing. Why should leaks interest them? And for gods sake, don't rush the last week of development.


The leaks look bad from a corporate security standpoint (even though they are fantastic from a public-relations and buzz/press standpoint). What the folks inside are likely thinking is "When er're done, the leaks should friggin STOP!"
#5.7 LiquidSolstice on 21 Jun 2009 - 02:44
Well, to be fair, the leaks are on no better terms as far as licensing goes because they all expire at the same time.
(11 replies) #6 Satchmo Bevins on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:53
I've installed & reinstalled so many times I have my RC key memorized.

Maybe just one more time.....maybe

#6.1 plocri on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:55
Satchmo Bevins said,
I've installed & reinstalled so many times I have my RC key memorized.

LOL LOL LOL
This happened between me and Windows 98 :-P
#6.2 eblkheart on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:29
plocri said,
LOL LOL LOL
This happened between me and Windows 98 :-P

This is on par with the same amount of leaks too...

God I remember those days...
#6.3 MistaT40 on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:25
Satchmo Bevins said,
I've installed & reinstalled so many times I have my RC key memorized.

Maybe just one more time.....maybe


Hahahahaha......
#6.4 pasty2k2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:35
Twas a while back. Cant say I can remember the RC key, but Im copying and pasting that each time as opposed to write it down on the CD and type in 5 blocks of 5... back in the day eh!
#6.5 rseiler on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:37
Satchmo Bevins said,
I've installed & reinstalled so many times I have my RC key memorized.

Why do you enter the key at all? There's no need to if you're installing builds as frequently as you suggest.
#6.6 McoreD on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:50
Satchmo Bevins said,
I've installed & reinstalled so many times I have my RC key memorized.

Maybe just one more time.....maybe


I use Autounattend.xml
#6.7 Satchmo Bevins on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:14
rseiler said,
Why do you enter the key at all? There's no need to if you're installing builds as frequently as you suggest.


Ya, I do. It may only count as a "click" to Microsoft in terms of usage numbers, and it may not be that important for them to get that click, but I do it anyway.

And I like having my computer trimmed out proper. That includes activation.
#6.8 Satchmo Bevins on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:19
McoreD said,
I use Autounattend.xml


Thanks! I had no clue were to start with automation. Now I do.


#6.9 Satchmo Bevins on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:23
pasty2k2 said,
Twas a while back. Cant say I can remember the RC key, but Im copying and pasting that each time as opposed to write it down on the CD and type in 5 blocks of 5... back in the day eh!


That's kinda why I do type it in. It brings back some warm, fuzzy memories from Windows installs past.

Copy/Pasta? It just seems cold. ;-)
#6.10 PGHammer on 17 Jun 2009 - 13:14
eblkheart said,
plocri said,
LOL LOL LOL
This happened between me and Windows 98 :-P

This is on par with the same amount of leaks too...

God I remember those days...


And Windows 98/SE were *the* all-stars of the 9x era (especially SE, though it certainly wasn't *planned*)

98 SE and ME were the "unplanned" 9x OSes, as the original plan had Neptune (NT-based consumer OS, basically Windows 2000 Home Edition) directly following Windows 98. 98 Second Edition came to pass because the core code for Neptune (Windows 2000/NT 5) wasn't ready (it didn't even get to RC stage until after 98 SE went RTM), and ME (AKA ME-ow) came about because the OEMs (not the testers, users, or even most of Microsoft and the software partners) wanted a last 9x-based OS, protesting that the user base wasn't ready.
#6.11 LiquidSolstice on 21 Jun 2009 - 02:45
I don't enter my RC key anymore. Why? Because I never use a build longer than 30 days because the next one leaks!

Much easier to just partition the hard drive into a main and backup drive, and just keep tossing stuff on the backup.
#7 Boifido on 16 Jun 2009 - 16:54
Hahaha Microsoft must put the Windows 7 builds on an unprotected FTP to have this many leaks. How many is this today now? 5? (1/2j/k)
(5 replies) #8 gamestargrinder on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:01
Good News about RTM

As far as the leaks go, Doesn't Apple have some very good ways of tracking leaks for their versions of OSX.
I mean, I remember a few years back hearing that apple could pin point a leaker based on a serial number or pid number.
I don't know if Microsoft really cares that much about the leaks, but I would assume they would have some good measures to track who is leaking them.
#8.1 Ambroos on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:12
gamestargrinder said,
Good News about RTM

As far as the leaks go, Doesn't Apple have some very good ways of tracking leaks for their versions of OSX.
I mean, I remember a few years back hearing that apple could pin point a leaker based on a serial number or pid number.
I don't know if Microsoft really cares that much about the leaks, but I would assume they would have some good measures to track who is leaking them.


Since every build has a solid timebomb and Microsoft doesn't really do secred features and stuff they don't really care I guess. Some builds do have a developer signature and they don't get leaked because they would be able to be traced back.
#8.2 GP007 on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:04
They just don't care, extra bit of free testing for them. And they can see that with all the downloads people really like Win7. I bet they're happy all around.
#8.3 Atlonite on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:26
M$ dont do secret features LOL if thats so then you'll know just how many times windows phones home then and the fact that the US govt demands a back door in no secret features pfff get real
#8.4 BeatBlaster on 17 Jun 2009 - 17:57
Atlonite said,
M$ dont do secret features LOL if thats so then you'll know just how many times windows phones home then and the fact that the US govt demands a back door in no secret features pfff get real


Where's your proof?
#8.5 LiquidSolstice on 21 Jun 2009 - 02:48
Atlonite said,
M$ dont do secret features LOL if thats so then you'll know just how many times windows phones home then and the fact that the US govt demands a back door in no secret features pfff get real


I love your so far up your ass in conspiracy that you can't even say Microsoft, you have to say "M$" like an uneducated idiot. As for your little theory, if you're dumb enough to install the Malicious Software Reporting Tool, then you deserve that backdoor. That simple.
(10 replies) #9 KnightWolf on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:02
is it just me or has the whole "windows 7 awesome" stage kinda passed? its fast, stable and everything, but the "new" feeling isnt there anymore... i dunno, just how i feel
#9.1 Ambroos on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:10
KnightWolf said,
is it just me or has the whole "windows 7 awesome" stage kinda passed? its fast, stable and everything, but the "new" feeling isnt there anymore... i dunno, just how i feel


+1
#9.2 +AltecXP on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:11
Yeah thats actually a problem to me, I really liked the look/feel of Vista then when it was released i wasn't impressed because I had already been using it for so long.
#9.3 MioTheGreat on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:29
KnightWolf said,
is it just me or has the whole "windows 7 awesome" stage kinda passed? its fast, stable and everything, but the "new" feeling isnt there anymore... i dunno, just how i feel


Your OS isn't supposed to constantly remind you of itself. It's good for it to fade into the background.
#9.4 gamestargrinder on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:30
Thats the issue with leaks for me. I don't test every leak, RC1 is the first build for me. When you see it in the news everyday, its almost as if its been released and the WOW factor goes down.
#9.5 х.iso on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:57
KnightWolf said,
is it just me or has the whole "windows 7 awesome" stage kinda passed? its fast, stable and everything, but the "new" feeling isnt there anymore... i dunno, just how i feel

well, you can try go back to Vista or even XP, then return to 7 and most probably you'll get this "awesome" feeling again.
#9.6 KnightWolf on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:36
MioTheGreat said,
Your OS isn't supposed to constantly remind you of itself. It's good for it to fade into the background.


not what i mean, the OS isnt even released yet but feels dated already... ive only used the RC of 7, didn't get any of the leaks
#9.7 KnightWolf on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:38
Ñ….iso said,
well, you can try go back to Vista or even XP, then return to 7 and most probably you'll get this "awesome" feeling again.


XP is main, actually using it right now... guess what i meant is it feels dated already and it doesnt release until oct.

Last edited by KnightWolf on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:51
#9.8 FrozenEclipse on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:32
KnightWolf said,
XP is main, actually using it right now... guess what i meant is it feels dated already and it doesnt release until oct.


Wait...you think that Windows 7 feels dated and you're using XP? Uhhhh....
#9.9 KnightWolf on 17 Jun 2009 - 02:01
FrozenEclipse said,
Wait...you think that Windows 7 feels dated and you're using XP? Uhhhh....


yep, not a hugh stretch of the imagination, one can use a piece of software/os that is 8 years old and still feel that having a public beta and rc that has been going on for 4-5 months is dated
#9.10 Atlonite on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:31
when WOW turns to WOOPIE over hyped and over leaked
#10 Digitalfox on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:20
Well unfortunately no new icons then in 7 RTM if all this is true...

I don't expect them to put new icons or skin in the last 3 or 4 builds.. Maybe 10 or 15 last builds, but if this is really true I guess is for Windows 8...

Love 7 anyway, it would just made me more happier...
(2 replies) #11 +Callum M-R on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:24
Hmm.... Seems worth the jump from 7201 just because of the build number, artificially increased as it may be :p
But I can't.. uhm.. wait, can I say that here? If I don't say I'm downloading it, just observing its availability (as you do). Not seeing it at the usuals.
#11.1 Calum on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:18
Callum M-R said,
But I can't.. uhm.. wait, can I say that here? If I don't say I'm downloading it, just observing its availability (as you do). Not seeing it at the usuals.

*giggles*

Callum, if you don't admit to downloading it, you have nothing to worry about
#11.2 Lord Ba'al on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:38
Calum said,
*giggles*

Callum, if you don't admit to downloading it, you have nothing to worry about

Yes, because we all know that no one of us ever downloads anything at all... (now where's that whistling smiley when you need it?)
#12 Kartikk on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:33
this is too much, a multi-billon $ crop. lets its showcase product out on the net like this within weeks ????
(1 reply) #13 Kevin. on 16 Jun 2009 - 17:44
Wow that was quick! And Microsoft should take it's time it's the RTM development. The last thing we need is for something to bugger up in the end.
#13.1 excalpius on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:03
It would be a MOST welcome surprise to be a month early, but...

I think someone is translating their Russian poorly. I believe this is the START of the final RTM build cycle, not the end.

I'm pretty sure there are still some outstanding drivers from major vendors still working their way through the system...namely nVidia for one, haha.
(6 replies) #14 nyolc8 on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:02
I removed the logo from the wall, so here it is the wallpaper without the logo. Hope you like it.
#14.1 The2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:13
nyolc8 said,
I removed the logo from the wall, so here it is the wallpaper without the logo. Hope you like it.

nice!
#14.2 shouck on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:21
I suppose anyone who knows Photoshop can do it, but I can't. So I'm impressed! Nice work!
#14.3 pasty2k2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:39
nyocl8, could you put the logo back on it, but smaller? That would be awesome to have a wall like that...
#14.4 Lord Ba'al on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:40
You could just as well take the login wallpaper and mirror it horizontally, and have pretty much the same.
#14.6 epilepsynweed on 17 Jun 2009 - 14:14
pasty2k2 said,
nyocl8, could you put the logo back on it, but smaller? That would be awesome to have a wall like that...


Or simply the logo by itself, save it in PNG, and resize it to whatever you want.
(4 replies) #15 NinjaGinger on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:22
I wonder if the final build will mean all my hardware works, e.g the Microsoft fingerprint reader working would be nice and a 64 bit driver wouldn't go amiss for the fingerprint reader.
#15.1 zagor on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:24
NinjaGinger said,
I wonder if the final build will mean all my hardware works, e.g the Microsoft fingerprint reader working would be nice and a 64 bit driver wouldn't go amiss for the fingerprint reader.

which fingerprint model do you have?
mine is working fine.
#15.2 rev23dev on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:43
already been announced that ms fingerprint reader is dicontinued and unsupported in windows 7. on microsoft.com/hardware you can find a phone number about it, and they'll send you a $39.95 check.
#15.3 winrez on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:45
rev23dev said,
already been announced that ms fingerprint reader is dicontinued and unsupported in windows 7. on microsoft.com/hardware you can find a phone number about it, and they'll send you a $39.95 check.



Nice I have 37 of them in my office I will have to call (Thanks for the tip)
#15.4 NinjaGinger on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:03
zagor said,
which fingerprint model do you have?
mine is working fine.


itis the Microsoft one, didn't know it was discontinued bet the offer is US only, not rip off Britain.
#16 ilovetech on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:29
windows 7 RC itself is so good that it could be RTMd..i have no issues with it that i experienced with beta. its a good news they will sign off it soon...
(1 reply) #17 jase chaos on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:43
wow another leak... any real major changes?? New icons yet!?
#17.1 Faisal Islam on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:21
nah
#18 +Echilon on 16 Jun 2009 - 18:56
Woohoo!
(4 replies) #19 SoLoR1 on 16 Jun 2009 - 19:46
In all honesty im tired of this leaks as well, I mean reinstalling whole computer (yes i hate upgrade) every two/three days, just isnt fun! once/week is enough! however this build didnt leak yet in to general public, so its bit to soon to call it "leak" i guess, but since its outside MS then i gues it is definition of leak already
#19.1 ahhell on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:03
Why would you need to run every leaked build?
#19.2 SoLoR1 on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:07
couse its new! (and yes this is only reason and stupid one but still )
#19.3 toadeater on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:49
SoLoR1 said,
couse its new! (and yes this is only reason and stupid one but still )


Reinstalling software for no good reason is not a healthy hobby.
#19.4 freeeekyyy on 17 Jun 2009 - 07:08
SoLoR1 said,
In all honesty im tired of this leaks as well, I mean reinstalling whole computer (yes i hate upgrade) every two/three days, just isnt fun! once/week is enough! however this build didnt leak yet in to general public, so its bit to soon to call it "leak" i guess, but since its outside MS then i gues it is definition of leak already


Yes, being that the public isn't supposed to have it, that does make it a leak.
(6 replies) #20 Chugworth on 16 Jun 2009 - 20:46
You people who install every single leaked build are wasting your time. Really now, you spend a few hours reinstalling Windows and all of your programs for what? A new background? There may be a few minor tweaks here and there, but since the leaked builds don't go through as much testing as the official releases, they're likely to introduce bugs that the official builds don't have. Also, the official releases may receive updates that the leaked builds don't get.

As for the RTM, BRING IT ON! It would be awesome if we could get the RTM build this weekend. I've been running Windows 7 both at home and at work since Beta 1 was released, and in my opinion, even Beta 1 was release-quality.
#20.1 keuka on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:50
I haven't installed every single leaked build, I'm currently on Build 7201, I encounter a few minor glitches that I was hoping would be addressed by the likes of build 7260. And I don't know what your big concern with other people's time is, but the more people that install leaked builds the more testing they go through and the more problems get resolved and fixed in the finished product. I doubt many bugs would be "introduced" with incramenting builds as they are designed to iron out bugs. Windows Updates has worked fine on build 7201 with Office 2007 so that statement of "may receive that the leaked builds don't get" is inaccurate.
#20.2 excalpius on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:51
You can just do in place upgrades you know. There hasn't been a reason to do a clean beta install since they fixed some of the underlying driver conflict errors.
#20.3 rseiler on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:45
keuka said,
Windows Updates has worked fine on build 7201 with Office 2007 so that statement of "may receive that the leaked builds don't get" is inaccurate.

Right, but what I think he's saying is that what if someone intends to use one of the late pre-RTM builds for an extended period of time and MS releases updates through WU for RC -- would it be a good idea to install them on 7260 or whatever random build you have (if it's even possible)? I'm not so sure, but some people do intend to take advantage of the March 2010 expiration and use RC for a while. I'd feel less comfortable doing that using [insert random build here].
#20.4 poind on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:13
keuka said,
...Windows Updates has worked fine on build 7201 with Office 2007 so that statement of "may receive that the leaked builds don't get" is inaccurate.

Things like Office might get updated, but the only build of the OS itself that has received Windows Updates is the official RC. Windows Update does not work "fine" on other builds -- just with things like Office that get updated regardless of build.

And if some major security issue comes up, the RC is likely to receive a patch, but other things won't.
#20.5 Atlonite on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:46
is there updates for 7100 all i've had are few crummy test updates and a few win defender ones nothing of real importance
#20.6 poind on 17 Jun 2009 - 12:38
Atlonite said,
is there updates for 7100 all i've had are few crummy test updates and a few win defender ones nothing of real importance


Yes. KB970789 at the minimum was considered critical, and appeared solely for the RC. IE8 on the RC received updates as well, including to correct an annoying hang. They don't bother to issue updates for comparable things on other builds.
(3 replies) #21 ThePitt on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:06
how many bugs they have fixed between 7232 and 7260?
#21.1 xendrome on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:19
7 and a half.... seriously.. what kind of question is that.
#21.2 ThePitt on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:43
A serious question. Should be a good reason to compile over and over again the same code...
#21.3 Atlonite on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:47
six hundred and sixty six pretty soon they'll have the key to hell and then we'll all burn LOL
#22 crazlunatic on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:35
why would the staff be sick of the leaks? it doesn't really concern them in any way
#23 mrmomoman on 16 Jun 2009 - 21:54
You can look at the leaks from a security perspective and say why can't Microsoft stop the leaks? It can be a PR thing if you look at it from another light. Not really but it can be percieved in that way.

I too would like to see a change in icons or what MS might do is release icon themes like they have now with the themes from America and other countries. This would be a good move as well if they cannot shove it in the RTM.

Control Panel icon can be improved as well as the the notification icons. Just minor tweaks with some color or animation would be cool.

(1 reply) #24 hardgiant on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:18
Still running 7048....no real reason to upgrade until RTM.
#24.1 pasty2k2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:41
I will suggest that you go for RC at least mate, it is much more stable for me and the debug code is removed from the RC while its in 7048 - it IS faster, noticeably, on a Q6600 rig. Just a tip top top tip
(5 replies) #25 -=imaak=- on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:26
Hey folks
i did sumthing cool with these Wallpprs.... so wanted to share this with u....
now just do what i say
and u'll really like it !
First of all.. Save that windows logo wallpaper...
now ..in the comments search for a user named "nyolc8"...he uploaded a wallpaper without the windows logo....everything else is same in the wallpaper...So..save his wallpaper too...
Select both these wallpaper and click on "change wallpaper every 10 secs or so"
Then just wait and watch....
it will give a very nice fade in/fade out effect to the windows logo...
i hope every1 will like it...
#25.1 Izlude on 16 Jun 2009 - 22:41
haha i did that, it was really cool!
#25.2 artfuldodga on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:00
lol yeah, forgot about the fade ... works nicely
#25.3 DerAusgewanderte on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:17
nice nice. works great and looks cool!
#25.4 pasty2k2 on 16 Jun 2009 - 23:42
Nice idea!
#25.5 DClark on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:51
I like!
#26 Welshknight on 17 Jun 2009 - 00:16
awesome... im still running RC1
(1 reply) #27 salamanca on 17 Jun 2009 - 00:22
me thinks
06-17-2009
= rtm date
NTv6.1 - Win7th edition = 06-17
17 June
#27.1 xendrome on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:03
looking way too deep into stuff..
#28 EagleWing on 17 Jun 2009 - 00:48
I have only installed a couple of beta releases of Windows 7 and am still waiting to be impressed. Maybe I'll be impressed when the RTM official release is available. Maybe!!!
(3 replies) #29 Boothy on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:07
Noticed this on the MSDN subscriptions site:

Scheduled Maintenance

Duration (GMT-: Friday, June 19, 2009 7:00:00 PM To (GMT-: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:00:00 PM

Last Updated (GMT-: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:03:54 AM

Benefit or Service: Impact:
Subscriber downloads
Subscribers will not be able to access benefits

I seem to remember the same sort of weekend outage when Vista RTM was released - fingers crossed!!
#29.1 Intelman on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:25
Boothy said,
Noticed this on the MSDN subscriptions site:

Scheduled Maintenance

Duration (GMT-: Friday, June 19, 2009 7:00:00 PM To (GMT-: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:00:00 PM

Last Updated (GMT-: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:03:54 AM

Benefit or Service: Impact:
Subscriber downloads
Subscribers will not be able to access benefits

I seem to remember the same sort of weekend outage when Vista RTM was released - fingers crossed!!


They can't really "plan" an RTM.
#29.2 PNutts on 17 Jun 2009 - 01:29
Nah, they're giving some CPU's to Apple for the iPhone 3g S launch.
#29.3 Witt3439 on 17 Jun 2009 - 03:18
I just saw the same message over on Technet also.
#30 +Xerxes on 17 Jun 2009 - 02:47
Maybe it's just me, but I have to say I'm getting sick of these leaks! I like Win7 and I'm happily using RC1, don't get my wrong Win7 is great but these constant leaks are getting wee bit much!..but meh maybe it's just me
(3 replies) #31 Zyxel112 on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:18
will this be the last leak? or there will be a build 7300?
#31.1 Dannydeman on 17 Jun 2009 - 10:45
7300 wil be the RTM.
#31.2 Marc Podito on 17 Jun 2009 - 18:00
7200 for sure 'coz 7260 is an RTM escrow.
#31.3 BorisX on 18 Jun 2009 - 10:32
7200 was IDX (RC2) release so this can't be it RTM sure is gonna be 7300
#32 epilepsynweed on 17 Jun 2009 - 14:19
I only "tried" (eg 2-3 minutes) the RC and Beta 1. As soon as it hits RTM and leaks, I guess Ill have to start updating all three PCs.

This leak could actually be worse than the XP leak.
#33 Scorbing on 17 Jun 2009 - 14:43
Folks inside Microsoft who wish to remain anonymous have also indicated that many people internally are growing tired and bored of the leaks and want development to conclude as soon as possible.


For this exact attitude is why Vista was never completed and tested correctly and why it failed to impress anybody. We don't want history to repeat itself. We want Windows 7 to work so TAKE YOUR TIME Microsoft!
#34 pzstm on 17 Jun 2009 - 17:15
6.1.7261.0.win7_rtm.090615-1900 - RTM branch build
#35 EddiePwnsYou on 17 Jun 2009 - 19:09
just do the vhd boot in w7 to test this leak (7260)
worked for me.
#36 lilsnoop40 on 17 Jun 2009 - 19:49
think we will see the rtm this weekend
(8 replies) #37 drnetwork on 18 Jun 2009 - 02:21


This is RTM...

See YA!
#37.1 sanke1 on 18 Jun 2009 - 02:27
RTM with evaluation copy as watermark ??

Nice Try
#37.2 eblkheart on 18 Jun 2009 - 03:29
Fake...
The build date is next month and there is no such time as 1970.

#37.3 Marc Podito on 18 Jun 2009 - 07:38
did they removed active window shadows?
#37.4 BorisX on 18 Jun 2009 - 10:34
heheh very good try build 7273 compiled on 10.07.2009 @ 19:70 hrs lol
#37.5 Izlude on 18 Jun 2009 - 14:56
oh cool a transparent notepad!!! was that shopped or is it real? if real, is it in RC1?
#37.6 Scorbing on 18 Jun 2009 - 15:30
Nice try faker. RTM is not yet ready so go try to fool someone else.
#37.7 BorisX on 18 Jun 2009 - 17:21
Izlude said,
oh cool a transparent notepad!!! was that shopped or is it real? if real, is it in RC1?

It's real but it's a free external program - http://www.deviantart.com/download/1259017...theking9794.zip
#37.8 Izlude on 18 Jun 2009 - 22:29
aha thanks so much i love this!!!
#38 Jughead on 18 Jun 2009 - 02:30
090710 nice try
#39 Farchord on 18 Jun 2009 - 13:47
Nice! RTM on my birthday! MS owes me a free copy!
#40 +lcg on 18 Jun 2009 - 14:05
Very good news! Wohoo!
#41 0nyX on 19 Jun 2009 - 04:30

(1 reply) #42 HardSide on 19 Jun 2009 - 15:01
If anybody wanna direct me where I can get the latest leak that would be helpful, my xp just got a virus and i might as well just redo everything
#42.1 rickube on 19 Jun 2009 - 16:46
softarchive.net
#43 rickube on 19 Jun 2009 - 16:46
Installed this and the previous serial numbers don't appear to work. is there another new list?
#44 Mocosoft on 20 Jun 2009 - 02:07
omg, still the same colors of used space and free space, isnt that from like win95?
#45 dancedar on 24 Jun 2009 - 17:12
So everyone will download the RTM (maybe not legally), install it over their RC installations, and have only 30 days unactivated use - great. If you can't buy activation keys by then whats the point of this unless you're buying a new pc.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)