main
Report a problem

Music labels strike a deal over internet radio

Brad Sams   on 08 July 2009 - 13:05 · 20 comments & 4099 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Good news has arrived to the millions of streaming music fans of the world. Internet radio that was once almost killed off by the record labels because of new royalty fees, has been saved.

In 2007 the federal royalty board ruled that streaming music websites, such as Pandora, need to pay a fee for each song played. Starting next year the rate would have jumped to 19 cents a song and that would have severely hurt the streaming services.

"Webcasters with significant advertising revenue, like Pandora or Slacker, will pay the greater of 25 percent of revenue or a fee each time a listener hears a song, starting at .08 cent for songs streamed in 2006 and increasing to .14 cent in 2015. Pandora had $19 million in revenue last year and expects that to rise to $40 million this year"

Record labels are increasingly seeing the benefit of the streaming sites that allow you to alter your listening habits. Because of this, many users discover new bands or songs that they like and will then likely purchase more music. If record labels would have killed off internet radio they would have lost even more money because of the loss of music purchases.

If you're one of the millions of music streamers you do not have to worry about your favorite service being taken offline by the industry.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 20 additional comments
#1 Michael Jacob on 08 Jul 2009 - 13:30
I don't get it.
stream websites will pay much more?
aren't they gonna close?
(1 reply) #2 mrmomoman on 08 Jul 2009 - 13:43
NO it says that they "would have paid" more if the new fees were to be implemented. It will remain closer to the 25% instead of increasing more and more over time.
#2.1 M_Lyons10 on 08 Jul 2009 - 23:45
mrmomoman said,
NO it says that they "would have paid" more if the new fees were to be implemented. It will remain closer to the 25% instead of increasing more and more over time.


Yeah, the article feels half finished...

I'm glad that whatever happened happened though. The music industry is one grubby industry it seems...
#3 Phalesafe on 08 Jul 2009 - 13:48
Pandora's new deal is 40 hours a month free, 99 cents a month for over 40 hours or $36 a year for unlimited and 192kbps quality.
#4 Digix on 08 Jul 2009 - 14:00
lol what a load of garbage. Stepping backwards in time for music industry, shame really they are so ignorant to modern standards.
#5 Chosen One on 08 Jul 2009 - 14:27
Music industry sucks, yay for streaming
(1 reply) #6 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#6.1 chemaz101 on 08 Jul 2009 - 14:51
yeah took me a while to really understand the article unfortunately, just didnt really make sense at first
(2 replies) #7 aero9 on 08 Jul 2009 - 14:51
yeah, i didn't like the way this article was written either.
#7.1 andrewbares on 08 Jul 2009 - 17:32
I was a lil lost too. But it's not an article that's meant to be skimmed through
#7.2 M_Lyons10 on 08 Jul 2009 - 23:47
andrewbares said,
I was a lil lost too. But it's not an article that's meant to be skimmed through


I didn't skim it. But it's quite confusing... It feels like we're missing something...
(3 replies) #8 hardgiant on 08 Jul 2009 - 16:00
I'm surprised streaming is popular at all.

#8.1 C_Guy on 08 Jul 2009 - 17:04
Try it. Then you'll understand.
#8.2 TechGuyPA on 08 Jul 2009 - 17:32
hardgiant said,
I'm surprised streaming is popular at all.


You need to move past 8-Track......

Sorry couldnt resist.
#8.3 andrewbares on 08 Jul 2009 - 17:33
Yea, my Zune Pass is incredible. I can't imagine paying for each song, I'd be in the most debt ever!
#9 FloatingFatMan on 08 Jul 2009 - 16:09
They've already killed Pandora for me, seeing as we can't get it in the UK anymore. Not without playing silly buggers with proxies, anyway.
#10 3dfxman on 08 Jul 2009 - 16:11
Good news for me, I love online radio
#11 KavazovAngel on 08 Jul 2009 - 17:16
What music/recording labels? Hollywood-dependent ones?
#12 +Dale on 08 Jul 2009 - 22:22
i miss launchcast
#13 werdwerdus on 09 Jul 2009 - 03:36
25% Of what?
#14 Quikboy on 12 Jul 2009 - 09:17
.08 cent and .14 cent?

Um, wouldn't that mean only 8% of one cent, or 14% of one cent?

14 cents =/= .14 cent

If it really is .14 cent, then I'm really surprised.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)