main
Report a problem

Mozilla collecting all web tools together in one directory

Sam Symons   on 10 July 2009 - 02:46 · 29 comments & 6295 views

Advertisement (Why?)
If you're a web developer, you'll hopefully be aware that there are many helpful (and free) tools designed to progress your quest for an epic website; the only problem with this, though, is that you have to find them. There is currently no centralized directory for all such tools, but Mozilla's fed up of this, and has set out to build one of their own, according to MoMB (via the folks at TechCrunch).

Mozilla has posted an entry on their official blog regarding the new site, with Ben Galbraith saying, "There are an immense number of tools that have been created to help web developers. Unfortunately, you might never know this; there's no central index of these tools. It turns out that keeping up with all the development in this space is really difficult–even for folks like us who have been tracking it every day for years." He continues to say that Mozilla wishes people to submit tools to the directory, via this URL., and to place feedback regarding features and usability of it, too. One idea on how they wish to display more info about a tool can be spotted here.

If you're running a modern browser, such as Firefox 3.5, Opera 10, Chrome 2 or Safari 4 (to name a few) you can already check out the project as it is, though note it's still in Mozilla Labs, so it's still a work in progress. This is great if you have a nifty tool that you wish to get out to the world, as that's exactly what Mozilla wants; submit your tools now, and place feedback here in the comments (or preferably, to Mozilla) on how things work out for you.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 29 additional comments
(8 replies) #1 RaidenX on 10 Jul 2009 - 04:01
I love how the site renders simple HTML if you use IE. As if IE8 isn't a modern browser. I'd rather stick with IE than use that P.O.S. Chrome, or Firefox
#1.1 +Tony. on 10 Jul 2009 - 06:38
I really hope you are being sarcastic there...
#1.2 Jugalator on 10 Jul 2009 - 08:14
RaidenX said,
I love how the site renders simple HTML if you use IE. As if IE8 isn't a modern browser. I'd rather stick with IE than use that P.O.S. Chrome, or Firefox

Huh? IE 8 has a lot of features added to it, but it's still behind in precisely the web standards department and use to do horrible in benchmarks measuring compliance in the latest technologies. But sure, the web site should perhaps fall back prettier to IE8's limited standards compliance in more modern technologies.
#1.3 Xeron on 10 Jul 2009 - 08:51
It falls back because the site uses the canvas tag which is part of HTML5. As far as I'm aware, it's still a draft specification so i wouldn't says it's due to limited standards compliance.
#1.4 RaidenX on 10 Jul 2009 - 13:04
@+Tony - I'm not being sarcastic. I prefer IE, with 60% of the browser market, there's a higher chance any site I go too will render properly in IE, standards compliant or not, it makes sense for developers to tailor there sites for IE. I use Chrome as well, but it's download manager(if you can call it that) is messy to say the least. At least with IE and Firefox which has the best download manager, I can close the browser without terminating a download. Firefox would be my primary browser if it's pop-up/under blocking wasn't the weakest of the three IMO...
#1.5 ]SK[ on 10 Jul 2009 - 13:08
I've not seen one popup in firefox at all. Try installing "Adblock Plus".
#1.6 +dead.cell on 11 Jul 2009 - 07:56
IE8 has a download manager?

Firefox also has what I feel to be the best popup/advertisement blocker out there. I've even tried AdMunch in an attempt to switch to Chrome but I still find using that even to be pretty weak compared to Adblock Plus.
#1.7 T.W. on 11 Jul 2009 - 16:20
WOW extreme fanboy.
#1.8 RaidenX on 11 Jul 2009 - 17:33
Extreme fanboy! So I'm wrong that Chrome is a lousy browser... I had thought that giving reasons for my browser choice would eliminate such a response
(1 reply) #2 qdave on 10 Jul 2009 - 04:52
it seems mozilla is lazy to code web pages using proper standarts.
in any case simple looks much better than that mess.
#2.1 jwmcpeak on 10 Jul 2009 - 13:35
I agree. What's wrong with a simple list displaying the tools and their descriptions? This looks like a jumbled mess.
(3 replies) #3 nowimnothing on 10 Jul 2009 - 04:59
The UI is very slow to respond for me in FF. The IE version is obviously crappy looking, but at least it responds properly.
#3.1 em_te on 10 Jul 2009 - 06:15
To slow on my PC even under Firefox 3.5. What happened to graceful degradation?
#3.2 +Tony. on 10 Jul 2009 - 06:40
Running perfectly here.. I'm running tete009's optimised build though..
#3.3 Krosan on 10 Jul 2009 - 10:05
I'm on windows 2000 with FX3.5 and it runs like a charm.
(3 replies) #4 Leeoniya on 10 Jul 2009 - 05:02
this thing is cool. i submitted a couple libraries that i use too.

@RaidenX - IE8 is Microsoft's best browser to date, but i would never call it "modern" Never mind that it spectacularly fails Acid3 (which is a pipe dream of stuff anyhow), how about a standards compliant JS engine, SVG and Canvas support and passing at least 75% of a modern css selector test: http://www.css3.info/selectors-test/test.html

"modern" compared to which browser exactly? ie6?

Leon
#4.1 billyea on 10 Jul 2009 - 05:38
Modern enough to not have to be fed simple HTML table as an excuse for a site.
yes, it looks wonderful in Firefox/Chrome, but wow, mozilla didn't even try for browsers they don't consider modern
#4.2 Leeoniya on 10 Jul 2009 - 05:47
i'm sure they'll polish it once it gets out of the labs. who wants to waste time coding workarounds for IE-tastic JS quirks rather than releasing pilot projects. that site is 90% js.
#4.3 SolwayUK on 10 Jul 2009 - 16:53
my CSS test results

IE8
From the 31 selectors 22 have passed, 1 are buggy and 8 are unsupported (Passed 208 out of 270 tests)


FF 3.5
From the 43 selectors 43 have passed, 0 are buggy and 0 are unsupported (Passed 578 out of 578 tests)


i prefer FF3.5 because there is rare a page it can't render better/faster than IE
plus i love the addons like adblock
#5 guru on 10 Jul 2009 - 10:08
#6 nunjabusiness on 10 Jul 2009 - 11:06
The non-simple interface is a horrific hodepodge of tiny pictures with nearly unreadable titles and no clear way to return to the main page after clicking one.

The simple interface is at least readable. Ridiculous.
(1 reply) #7 blozzo on 10 Jul 2009 - 12:27
Canvas tag is part of Html 5 which is in draft still. How is this following standards? Its not even a standard. If it was the other way around there would be quite a few more posts!
#7.1 +Kirkburn on 10 Jul 2009 - 13:37
blozzo said,
Canvas tag is part of Html 5 which is in draft still. How is this following standards? Its not even a standard. If it was the other way around there would be quite a few more posts!

A draft standard is still a standard. Yes, it could substantially change, no it's unlikely.

Firefox are using something that the web /will/ be moving towards. It's only a matter of time before IE supports canvas. It's pretty much the only browser that doesn't atm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of...es_%28HTML_5%29
#8 blozzo on 10 Jul 2009 - 16:28
It is a draft, it is not standard yet. If the shoe was on the other foot and IE did this everyone would be up shouting how IE is not standards compliant.
(1 reply) #9 rob.derosa on 10 Jul 2009 - 16:50
"a modern browser, such as Firefox 3.5, Opera 10, Chrome 2 or Safari 4"

Yes IE 8 is totally ancient :p
#9.1 buletov on 10 Jul 2009 - 18:03
they meant a browser with a modern rendering engine...
(2 replies) #10 S3P€hR on 10 Jul 2009 - 19:16
IE can never be as good as Mozilla Firefox. I give you an example: free Plugins for video downloading, torrent tools and etc. Since its not an open source nobody can fix it not even microsoft itself. It never gonna happen. Trust me.
#10.1 GreyWolfSC on 10 Jul 2009 - 20:43
IE has an AddOn API too. It has for quite some time.
#10.2 S3P€hR on 11 Jul 2009 - 00:55
GreyWolfSC said,
IE has an AddOn API too. It has for quite some time.


I did not say It doesnot have extension API, but the point is: does it have a sort of variety plugins such as videoDownload helper or torrent bar? IE doesn't even have a proper built-in download manager. you have to install program for every single purpose since it is not plug-in based, it is active-x bases... I used to work with IE before I found firefox. but now I feel using IE is painful

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)