microsoft
Report a problem

Sneak peak of SharePoint 2010 released

Sean Bradford   on 20 July 2009 - 07:31 · 29 comments & 10461 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Earlier this year Microsoft announced the next wave of Office products that will "redefine how people work", which included Exchange 2010, Office 2010, Visio 2010, Project 2010, and SharePoint 2010. All will enter public beta later this year and is targeted for general availability in the first half of 2010.

Over the last few weeks we've seen a ton of information leak regarding the Office 2010 suite, and this week Microsoft has released a sneak-peak of SharePoint 2010.

So what exactly is SharePoint again? SharePoint is an enterprise portal that can be configured to run Intranet, Extranet, and Internet sites. SharePoint A SharePoint enterprise portal is composed of both SharePoint Portal and Windows SharePoint Services, with SharePoint being built upon WSS. WSS is typically used by small teams, projects, and companies. SharePoint Server is designed for individuals, teams, and projects within a medium to large company wide enterprise portal.

Feature Highlights:
  • New UI including Ribbon
  • Web Edit
  • Silverlight Web Part
  • Rich Theming
  • Multiple Browser Support
  • Visio Services
  • SharePoint Designer
  • Business Connectivity Services


The SharePoint 2010 team launched a sneak-peak website earlier this week, which you can find here. The site is loaded with videos, information on new features, and a complete overview of what is coming to SharePoint 2010.

There will be more announcements later this year in regards to new and improved features, which will be at the SharePoint Conference 2009 in Las Vegas on October 19th-22nd with CEO Steve Ballmer expected to be the keynote speaker.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 29 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 +Kyle on 20 Jul 2009 - 07:33
I love you Sean.
#1.1 Calum on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:15
Move over! Sean is mine!


...
(9 replies) #2 cakesy on 20 Jul 2009 - 07:46
Oh god, this is the worst piece of software I have ever used. If you haven't learnt yet from the problem of all the IT departments around the world not being able to update from ie 6, this is the reason. If you and your company wants to be at the mercy of Microsoft for the rest of your lives, then go ahead and get Sharepoint.

MS does some great software, but this ain't it. I would rather use Lotus (and note, yes they say multi-browser support, but support in anything other than IE is way behind, and means there are loads of stuff you can't do).
#2.1 grant0r on 20 Jul 2009 - 08:00
+1
#2.2 fobban on 20 Jul 2009 - 08:26
Uhm, so you've already tried SharePoint 2010 out and noticed it does not really feature multi browswer support? Previous versions, I agree, haven't been that good on it.

The test site they provided works perfectly well in multiple browsers.
#2.3 Majesticmerc on 20 Jul 2009 - 08:28
I don't see what your issue is? I've used SharePoint fine in Firefox 3.0. SharePoint doesn't obey Web standards particularly well, but now that IE8 is compliant to an extent, we can assume that SharePoint will be updated to reflect this.

EDIT: Also, the reason large organisations can't migrate away from IE6 is because (in my organisation at least) the people that developed the "Web applications" developed for IE6 instead of Web standards, and are still regretting it.
#2.4 skynetXrules on 20 Jul 2009 - 09:44
Majesticmerc said,
I don't see what your issue is? I've used SharePoint fine in Firefox 3.0. SharePoint doesn't obey Web standards particularly well, but now that IE8 is compliant to an extent, we can assume that SharePoint will be updated to reflect this.

EDIT: Also, the reason large organisations can't migrate away from IE6 is because (in my organisation at least) the people that developed the "Web applications" developed for IE6 instead of Web standards, and are still regretting it.


because at that time IE6 Is the standard
#2.5 Majesticmerc on 20 Jul 2009 - 11:32
skynetXrules said,
because at that time IE6 Is the standard


No, HTML 4.01 and CSS2 were the standards.
#2.6 machinethatgoesbing on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:08
Majesticmerc said,
No, HTML 4.01 and CSS2 were the standards.


Firefox doesn't help the cause though by not offering MSI packages for wide scale enterprise deployment or the lack of active directory integration. Many people I know in decision making areas want to leave IE but can't due to the alternative lack in a particular area.
#2.7 Josh on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:10
Our organization uses MOSS 2007 and we haven't encountered any of your concerns. And I've also used Domino/Lotus... which is FAR BEHIND sharepoint. Please know what you're talking about before you speak.
#2.8 ZombieFly on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:37
cakesy said,
Oh god, this is the worst piece of software I have ever used. If you haven't learnt yet from the problem of all the IT departments around the world not being able to update from ie 6, this is the reason. If you and your company wants to be at the mercy of Microsoft for the rest of your lives, then go ahead and get Sharepoint.

MS does some great software, but this ain't it. I would rather use Lotus (and note, yes they say multi-browser support, but support in anything other than IE is way behind, and means there are loads of stuff you can't do).


there speaks the uninformed. The latest sp for MOSS2007 upgrades non-ie browsers to a higher compatibility rating, however they still lack some of the functionality required to properly edit page layouts. I'm using ie 7 & 8 across the organisation with NO problems whatsoever. There is another issue which prevents the rich text editor working in anything but ie, this is easily rectified after 2 mins googling.

We are implementing MOSS to get away from the horrendous pot of **** that is Lotus Notes.
#2.9 JonathanMarston on 20 Jul 2009 - 14:26
cakesy said,
Oh god, this is the worst piece of software I have ever used. If you haven't learnt yet from the problem of all the IT departments around the world not being able to update from ie 6, this is the reason. If you and your company wants to be at the mercy of Microsoft for the rest of your lives, then go ahead and get Sharepoint.

MS does some great software, but this ain't it. I would rather use Lotus (and note, yes they say multi-browser support, but support in anything other than IE is way behind, and means there are loads of stuff you can't do).


IE7 and 8 work fine with SharePoint 2007, and everything works in FireFox except the rich text editor, which is easily replaced by a cross-browser one. MOSS 2007 is an awesome product, and 2010 looks like it will be even better.
#3 Examinus on 20 Jul 2009 - 08:50
Here's a tip: don't find an annoying man and make him talk for 10 minutes about content that should be on the site before you actually show anything.
(3 replies) #4 Xire on 20 Jul 2009 - 10:40
...redefine how people work - yes, you already did this with ribbon. "Thank" you for that. Definitely not looking forward to get one.
#4.1 Calum on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:21
And as you surely know, the ribbon was an improvement. So, why are you not looking forward to getting the new SharePoint?
#4.2 ZombieFly on 20 Jul 2009 - 12:40
Xire said,
...redefine how people work - yes, you already did this with ribbon. "Thank" you for that. Definitely not looking forward to get one.


Sharepoint can drastically improve communication in an organisation. Quite how you can compare that to a toolbar/menu enhancement i'm not sure
#4.3 RangerLG on 21 Jul 2009 - 13:26
Calum said,
And as you surely know, the ribbon was an improvement. So, why are you not looking forward to getting the new SharePoint?


I find the ribbon to be cumbersome. I waste more time looking for the command I need or just using keyboard shortcuts. The ribbon to me is a step backward.
(1 reply) #5 Amodin on 20 Jul 2009 - 13:41
I am so glad to be out of IT after 11 years of HELL and dealing with SharePoint. Such a nightmare to implement and administer. Good luck to those who still use it. I will wish you a quick and painless death.
#5.1 cakesy on 21 Jul 2009 - 03:24
A lot of companies are actually rethinking there everything-Microsoft strategy from being burnt in the past (see how many are still stuck with ie6). Things are slowly getting better.
(3 replies) #6 Magallanes on 20 Jul 2009 - 13:47
Sharepoint is good as a kickstart but it is insane to establish your business process based on Sharepoint.

#6.1 +Brandon Live on 20 Jul 2009 - 16:30
Not really... SharePoint scales very, very well. Building something custom to do that would be a nightmare / fraught with peril. There are other solutions yes, but most are more expensive and complicated to set up and maintain, and often lack many of SharePoint's features.
#6.2 JonathanMarston on 20 Jul 2009 - 16:37
The main draw to SharePoint for my company was the document and content management features, although we may start building apps on it in the future. I'd be interested to know why you think it's "insane" to build processes on top of SharePoint.

One thing I'm very interested to learn is if our SharePoint license will give us access to the Office web apps. Not everyone in our company needs Office, but it would be nice if they could do basic edits directly from SharePoint (we have more SharePoint CALs than Office licenses).

Last edited by JonathanMarston on 20 Jul 2009 - 16:42
#6.3 cakesy on 21 Jul 2009 - 03:25
JonathanMarston said,
The main draw to SharePoint for my company was the document and content management features, although we may start building apps on it in the future. I'd be interested to know why you think it's "insane" to build processes on top of SharePoint.


You are stuck with sharepoint, there is no easy way to get the content out of there, unlike most other systems which are very open, or built on open standards. Look for a system that uses SVN or git as a backend. Microsoft don't even use sharepoint, that should give you a hint to stay away from it.
(5 replies) #7 Garry on 20 Jul 2009 - 13:48
Very disappointed by the sneak peek. Most people who use Sharepoint in an Enterprise knows that the problem isn't the lack of ribbon or the need to use Silverlight web parts. We're certainly not missing 'Rich Theming.' The problem with Sharepoint is the lack of relational data, without using the BDC.

I'd like 'lists' to become more like tables in databases that can be cross-referenced. At the moment, they're very much like Excel Spreadsheets (without the functionality). This is the thing I wish most they'd address.

I also think that documents should be able to be 'published' to different areas of a site collection without having to create multiple instances. For instance, you might want a policy to exist in a central policy repository and also have it within the area of the site to which it's most applicable - for example, an IT policy. Sure, you can hyperlink but you then lose the ability to check out/edit/version history from the secondary location.

Seems like Microsoft just treated Sharepoint like the rest of the Office 14 suite and stuck on a ribbon. I hope there's more to come after this 'sneak peek.'
#7.1 Funk Dok on 20 Jul 2009 - 15:03
The problem with Sharepoint is the lack of relational data, without using the BDC.

+1
#7.2 BGM on 20 Jul 2009 - 16:28
Garry said,
Very disappointed by the sneak peek. Most people who use Sharepoint in an Enterprise knows that the problem isn't the lack of ribbon or the need to use Silverlight web parts. We're certainly not missing 'Rich Theming.' The problem with Sharepoint is the lack of relational data, without using the BDC.'

I completely agree, this is a MASSIVE problem. Come on ms
#7.3 Rohdekill on 20 Jul 2009 - 17:56
I strongly suggest you look into Knowledge Lake:

No Folder tree is used.
Insert/Index anything into SharePoint without having to run SharePoint
#7.4 Litespeed on 20 Jul 2009 - 22:28
IMO, the lack of proper relational data in Sharepoint is a major design fault which I had hoped they would fix by now.
#7.5 ZombieFly on 21 Jul 2009 - 09:22
Rohdekill said,
I strongly suggest you look into Knowledge Lake:

No Folder tree is used.
Insert/Index anything into SharePoint without having to run SharePoint


thanks for the tip. I'll be checking out Knowledgelake

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)