main
Report a problem

Fujifilm announces first 3D camera, due September

Sam Alderwick   on 22 July 2009 - 12:16 · 32 comments & 10796 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Fujifilm has launched a new compact digital camera which is capable of capturing 3D images and video. The camera, named the Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1, is Fujifilm's first camera to be able to do this, and does it through the use of two lenses and two 10MP CCDs. The camera will be launched in the UK in September, according to a statement from Fuji.

The camera is held securely inside an aluminium die-cast frame, and has a 2.8 inch 3D LCD screen at the back of it, capable of displaying the 3D images and video clips that are captured by the camera. The 3D image capture works by capturing images from both lenses and then merging them into a single image, through the use of Fujifilm's "Real Photo Processor 3D".

The camera allows the two lenses to work independently, meaning that a picture of the same scene could be taken by both lenses, but with different photographic settings for each one. In addition, the user can take a picture of an object from one position, and then take a picture of it from another position, and the camera will merge the two, giving a better sense of depth in images captured.

In 2D shooting mode, the user can take advantage of the 3x optical zoom offered by each lens, taking a wide-angle shot with one lens, and a close-up with the other.

Images and videos made in 3D will require a frame capable of displaying them in 3D, and Fujifilm have released a product for just that: the Fujifilm Real 3D V1 picture viewer. Images captured on the camera can be wirelessly transferred to the frame by infrared, although only SD/SDHC memory can be used for the transfer of 3D movies.

Prices are unavailable for the products so far, but there should be an update in the coming weeks, as the products are due for release in the UK in September.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 32 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 paokun on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:36
Amazing, this is something I wasn't expecting.
Fujifilm is not my personal favourite brand, but if it gets good reviews I may put my hands on one.
Since it's the first one I doubt prices will be cheap, but hopefully Nikon, Canon and Sony will catch up.
#1.1 Sazz181 on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:39
Yeah, the moment I saw the word "professional" in the product description I knew that whatever price it is I won't want to know
(3 replies) #2 jobarr on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:49
#2.1 Sazz181 on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:57
"World's first digital camera to capture realistic 3D stills and movies."
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09072206...ilmw1.asp#press

#2.2 _dandy_ on 22 Jul 2009 - 16:33
jobarr said,


Right...it's stereoscopic, not 3D in the sense that you can do full 360 degree rotation. But of course, "3D" sounds a lot more impressive to your average ejit.
#2.3 GAM on 24 Jul 2009 - 10:06
jobarr said,
First 3D camera?


That is not what they wrote. It's the first one from FujiFilm.
(5 replies) #3 Twisted Chaz on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:50
I still don't get how it's 3D.
#3.1 Pupik on 22 Jul 2009 - 14:21
Twisted Chaz said,
I still don't get how it's 3D.

Check the features page. You got an example there:
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/3d/camera...es/page_02.html

You can change the angles, in a limited range.
#3.2 The Teej on 22 Jul 2009 - 14:37
Pupik said,
Check the features page. You got an example there:
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/3d/camera...es/page_02.html

You can change the angles, in a limited range.


Seems kind of pointless really, if that's the angle range. If you could turn a massive 180 degrees, I'd be somewhat more impressed, but otherwise, meh.
#3.3 GP007 on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:49
I think using this to take photos and showing them on the newer 3D monitors would give you a very good effect actually. I wouldn't be so quick to say "meh".
#3.4 P1R4T3 on 22 Jul 2009 - 16:03
GP007 said,
I think using this to take photos and showing them on the newer 3D monitors would give you a very good effect actually. I wouldn't be so quick to say "meh".

I still 0.5xmeh.
#3.5 carmatic on 25 Jul 2009 - 16:00
The Teej said,
Seems kind of pointless really, if that's the angle range. If you could turn a massive 180 degrees, I'd be somewhat more impressed, but otherwise, meh.

you cant generate a 3d image beyond the pictures you already took... so supposing that you use the 'merge' feature with a firmware update that allows more than 2 pictures, and assuming that the scene around your object is still enough, you could create a 'ring' of pictures which go around your subject...
(1 reply) #4 Escalade_GT on 22 Jul 2009 - 12:53
Some interesting information about 3D photography:

http://www.anachrome.com/
#4.1 Social on 22 Jul 2009 - 13:08
Escalade_GT said,
Some interesting information about 3D photography:

http://www.anachrome.com/


wow that site is like a time machine! I just went back to 1996
(1 reply) #5 Ghost_one on 22 Jul 2009 - 13:31
id hit that
also im 9th 1!!!!oneone
#5.1 ]SK[ on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:03
WTF?
(3 replies) #6 jordanthegreat on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:09
So let me get this straight. This is 3d in that you can rotate the image a few degrees around? and not 3d like you put on special glasses 3d?.... yawn.
#6.1 Kostaz on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:17
Technology progresses in small steps.
I'm sure this will be MUCH more developed in 10years.
#6.2 Shadrack on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:23
Their little "REAL 3D V1" display that they advertise on their web site's center image is what looks like a photo popping out of the frame in a very 3d-way. Is that false advertisement? I haven't dug through all the details yet.

If it really does give some real picture depth with a custom frame then that is still kind of cool. There could also be some interesting depth filter in photoshop and other photo editing suites.
#6.3 GP007 on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:52
If the photo has 3D depth data in it, if you display it with one of the newer 3D monitors I think you'll get the effect you're thinking of, or close to it.

No glasses etc, they do it now for video basically, I don't see why photo's wouldn't work as well.
(6 replies) #7 DanielZ on 22 Jul 2009 - 15:28
Wake me up when Fuji releases a 3D DLSR.
#7.1 Shadrack on 22 Jul 2009 - 16:05
I don't think fugifilm makes dslr cameras. At least I have never seen one.
#7.2 perochan on 22 Jul 2009 - 17:35
Shadrack said,
I don't think fugifilm makes dslr cameras. At least I have never seen one.


they do. just expensive.
#7.3 Shadrack on 22 Jul 2009 - 18:13
perochan said,
they do. just expensive.


Hmm...I remember seeing some basic point-and-shoot shutter lens cameras with some fancy lenses. The Finepix Pro series is what I'm thinking of. Hrm... some places are advertising it as an SLR. I wouldn't consider it an SLR, but i may be wrong. We have one here where I work, and the quality and over feel of it is more like a CCD censor with a fancy lens. Doesn't match the quality of our Nikon and Cannon DSLR cameras by a long shot IMHO.
#7.4 Harbinger on 22 Jul 2009 - 19:28
Shadrack said,
I don't think fugifilm makes dslr cameras. At least I have never seen one.


http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/s/

Their S series are around for quite some time now. I'm surprised you've never seen a Fuji DSLR.

#7.5 Shadrack on 22 Jul 2009 - 20:36
Hmm. So they do, lol. I guess everyone I know who is into cameras only really speaks of Canon and Nikon so that's all I'm around.
#7.6 GAM on 24 Jul 2009 - 09:32
Shadrack said,
I don't think fugifilm makes dslr cameras. At least I have never seen one.


FugiFilm doesn't make DSLR cameras, but FujiFilm does (or at least did) and pretty spectacular ones too. I am a happy owner of the FujiFilm FinePix S5Pro myself, and this is an awesome camera. It can't be beat on color tones and dynamic range, but it is not a sports-camera.

Check out this one: http://www.flickr.com/photos/carpeicthus/450812330/
(3 replies) #8 SirEvan on 22 Jul 2009 - 21:51
thats because Nikon and Canon are the two main brands when it comes to pro digital SLR's Theres Kodak, Fuji, and a few others, they're just the main players.

Get into high end fashion photography though, and neither exists, then you deal with the 3 big players, Mamiya, Hassleblad, and Contax
#8.1 GAM on 24 Jul 2009 - 10:03
SirEvan said,
Theres Kodak, Fuji, and a few others, they're just the main players.


Kodak exited the DSLR business. FujiFilm hasn't released anything since the S5Pro, but they haven't said whether or not they will return with new camera(s) or not. I'm hoping FujiFilm will release a Super CCD EXR based DSLR, but nothing has been announced --except compact and bridge cameras, and special cameras like the 3D camera here as well as many types of industrial imaging products.

SirEvan said,
Get into high end fashion photography though, and neither exists, then you deal with the 3 big players, Mamiya, Hassleblad, and Contax


Not quite true, many high end fashion photographers use the S5Pro.
#8.2 Harbinger on 24 Jul 2009 - 14:17
GAM said,
I'm hoping FujiFilm will release a Super CCD EXR based DSLR, but nothing has been announced --except compact and bridge cameras, and special cameras like the 3D camera here as well as many types of industrial imaging products.


How about http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_c...inepix_s200exr/ ?

Unless I'm terribly mistaken these 2 new models sport a Super CCD EXR sensor.

And btw, I'm a big fan of Fuji's Super CCDs. Definitely one of the best sensor out there.
#8.3 GAM on 24 Jul 2009 - 20:02
Harbinger said,
How about http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_c...inepix_s200exr/ ?

Unless I'm terribly mistaken these 2 new models sport a Super CCD EXR sensor.


Yes, but those are bridge cameras, not DSLRs.

Harbinger said,
And btw, I'm a big fan of Fuji's Super CCDs. Definitely one of the best sensor out there.


Yes, but it is not just the sensors, it is also the IQ FujiFilm use to process the information from the sensors when producing the images. Simply stunning. The day FujiFilm launches a new DSLR with EXR is the day I get a new DSLR.
#9 carmatic on 25 Jul 2009 - 16:09
imho, wouldnt it make abit more sense for the 3D if the lenses were as far apart as your eyes? the camera would have to be the size of your head but i think that's the only proper way to do 3d... as it is right now , its as if you are looking at the world when you are shrunk to the size of the camera, or to put it in another way, the world would look like a bigger place through the 3D effect...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)