Two weeks ago we reported that Apple and Google were being investigated for suspicion of anti-competitive hiring practices. The belief is that, in California where non-compete agreements are rarely, if ever enforced that Google and Apple had an unwritten rule to prevent the poaching of employees from either business. Now Bloomberg News confirms that Steve Jobs wanted to make a similar deal with Palm.The talks began in 2007 after Palm hired former Apple executive (now Palm CEO) Jon Rubinstein who was critical in the creation and release of the original iPod. Former Palm CEO Ed Colligan supposedly rejected the offer, after much deliberation, because he felt any deal would be wrong and could be illegal. As we noted in our previous article, as long as nothing is in writing these types of deals are technically legal. While exact specifics of what was purposed are not available, similar agreements basically prevent companies from recruiting specific employees but are free to hire employees who applied of their own volition.
Many attribute the Palm Pre's easy touch gestures and iTunes syncing to the Apple employees that Palm snatched away. Apple has taken shots at Palm and followed the launch of the Pre with several quotes that it was prepared to defend its intellectual property and has gone through several rounds with Palm over the Pre syncing with iTunes.
While it is now common knowledge that several Apple employees were hired for the creation of the Palm Pre, Apple hired at least 2 percent of Palm's workforce to create the original iPhone so both companies have taken from each other's cookie jars. And both Apple and Palm have declined to comment on the matter so it will definitely be interesting to see how this spat turns out.
This is how they operate. The biggest bunch of cry babies I've ever seen. I cannot stand that company.
/Sarcasm.
Glad to see Apple being put under the microscope.
It's not like the companies own these guys. If you were an experienced developer of touchscreen smartphones it makes sense to look for work (surprise!
It makes sense, for Apple to have hired Palm employees, when Palm was struggling, and had no directly competing product. On the other hand, having Palm try to hire Apple employees to develop a directly competing product seems just plain wrong. I know Palm had smartphones, but I'm talking about a nearly feature-point identical competing product, like the Pre vs iPhone. The same would be true if RIM tried to hire Apple employees to develop the BB Storm, or LG to develop their Vu smartphone.
I would agree with Palm if the roles were reversed, and Palm hired Apple employees to develop the Pre first, and then Apple tried to hire Pre developers to make a competing iPhone.
That's not to say this entire thing is just plain wrong.
"Apple hired at least 2 percent of Palm's workforce to create the original iPhone"
And now Apple is crying because of the Pre? What a joke!
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.