hardware
Report a problem

Solid State Drive Comparison - Round 2

Julio Franco   on 21 August 2009 - 10:29 · 14 comments & 7559 views

Advertisement (Why?)
As a follow-up to our previous SSD coverage, today we will be looking at four popular mainstream SSD offerings which include the A-Data S592 128GB, Corsair P Series 128GB, OCZ Agility 120GB and the OCZ Vertex Turbo 120GB.

Although all these products are MLC flash-based and target the consumer enthusiast market, they do vary in price, on-board controllers, memory chips, and cache sizes, which should make for some very interesting results.



With dozens of manufacturers now offering some kind of solid state drive, you should know there are only a handful of them you should concern yourself with. MLC drives based on either the Samsung S3C29RBB01-YK40, Indilinx Barefoot or Intel's own controller are all you should be looking at today. While the Intel controller remains the superior performer when it comes to small data writes, the Samsung and Indilinx controllers are worthy alternatives.

View: Solid State Drive Comparison - Round 2

These articles are brought to you in partnership with TechSpot

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(7 replies) #1 master2k27 on 21 Aug 2009 - 11:06
prices need to drop about 30-40% before i think of getting one
#1.1 Thom on 21 Aug 2009 - 11:18
yep, same here.. wish i was rich
#1.2 master2k27 on 21 Aug 2009 - 11:48
Also i wont get anything under 256 GB.
#1.3 Thom on 21 Aug 2009 - 11:57
Haha, ditto again! 120gb is bit small for my liking these days, to be honest 500gb is ideal but obviously that's quite a high order with where we're currently at with these drives. Irritating as standard 500gb hard-drives are so cheap compared to several years ago, just need solid states to follow that pattern, quickly preferably too!
#1.4 Ci7 on 21 Aug 2009 - 12:06
30%/40% drop you ask ?

at least wait until mid/late next year
#1.5 master2k27 on 21 Aug 2009 - 12:15
i don't mind waiting a year
#1.6 neodorian on 21 Aug 2009 - 13:14
I'm in no hurry. I would love a fast OS drive but for the time being, regular hard drives are so cheap that it will take a lot to get me to buy a SSD. Maybe once I can get a 256GB for $120 or something like that...until then I will keep rocking my big-ass cheap hard drives.
#1.7 _dandy_ on 21 Aug 2009 - 19:07
Thom said,
Haha, ditto again! 120gb is bit small for my liking these days, to be honest 500gb is ideal but obviously that's quite a high order with where we're currently at with these drives. Irritating as standard 500gb hard-drives are so cheap compared to several years ago, just need solid states to follow that pattern, quickly preferably too!


I certainly don't see SSD as a replacement for mass storage. Are traditional hard drives not fast enough for your pictures, videos, and crap like that?

Leave those for the big, fat hard drives. Put your OS and apps on SSD, that's where you're gonna see the most benefit.
(1 reply) #2 texasghost on 21 Aug 2009 - 13:23
Well..the problem right now is...you have these SSD's that will slow down to a crawl the more you use them. To me...the technology is not there yet for the SSD to maintain stability in speed. Cause if I am going to buy a hard drive...they need to have the same speed when I first bought it...to the day it dies....or at least close to the same speed. And the benchmark tests show that these SSDs show a significant speed reduction compared to spindle drives.

So for me...it's a no brainer...I will stay with my 10,000 rpm Velociraptor until they can prove to me these SSDs can maintain speed and performance.
#2.1 Magallanes on 21 Aug 2009 - 13:29
texasghost said,
Well..the problem right now is...you have these SSD's that will slow down to a crawl the more you use them. To me...the technology is not there yet for the SSD to maintain stability in speed. Cause if I am going to buy a hard drive...they need to have the same speed when I first bought it...to the day it dies....or at least close to the same speed. And the benchmark tests show that these SSDs show a significant speed reduction compared to spindle drives.

So for me...it's a no brainer...I will stay with my 10,000 rpm Velociraptor until they can prove to me these SSDs can maintain speed and performance.


There are a new SSD that self-defrag when idle and can restore your initial read/write speed in less than a half a hour.
#3 vetneufuse on 21 Aug 2009 - 14:11
give me a 128GB SSD that has a GOOD controller on it for < $200 and we'll talk...
#4 +warwagon on 21 Aug 2009 - 22:43
Give it to me for $100 then i'll talk.
#5 JDonner on 22 Aug 2009 - 02:45
I have seen corrupted files with brand new memory related devices multiple times, I only saw corrupted files on my hard drives when they died. I'll stick to hard drives until the SSD technology becomes more reliable than hard drives (for desktop computers that is).
#6 SirEvan on 23 Aug 2009 - 20:19
heres a thought. Traditionally, it was a good idea to keep your page file (swap) on a seperate drive, so that it's reading and writing wouldn't affect your main drive performance. With these High speed SSD drives, is it alright to keep the swap file on your main drive now? Or should it still be kept off drive?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)