hardware
Report a problem

Quad-Core on the cheap: AMD Athlon II X4 620 reviewed

Julio Franco   on 16 September 2009 - 07:00 · 50 comments & 8167 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD is launching a new series of affordable quad-core processors today under the Athlon II brand name. Based on the 'Propus' architecture and built using a 45nm design process, the new series is intended to help AMD secure the low-end portion of the market, as Intel's Core i5 750 and LGA1156 platform have clearly made life difficult for them on the mainstream front.

This is essentially the same Deneb architecture that is used by the Phenom II X4 series, except for the L3 cache which has been removed from the Athlon II X4 parts. With models ranging from 2.20GHz through to 2.9GHz on the horizon, AMD has decided to unleash the Athlon II X4 620 first, clocked at 2.6GHz and expected to retail for just $100.

The amazingly low price tag puts this chip in a category of its own, as there are currently no quad-core parts competing here. In our review, we will put AMD's budget quad-core processor to the test next to comparable offerings like the Phenom II X2 550 and the older (yet still well-regarded) Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600.

View: AMD Athlon II X4 620 Processor Review

These articles are brought to you in partnership with TechSpot

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 50 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 +Berserk87 on 16 Sep 2009 - 07:33
$100 for a quad core. :o
#1.1 RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 07:47
Newegg had one Phenom x4 for under 90 bucks, it's now sold out.

I do think it's not wise for AMD to cut performance for any of their CPUs; they need all the speed they can get.
#1.2 daftperception on 16 Sep 2009 - 07:53
RAID 0 said,
Newegg had one Phenom x4 for under 90 bucks, it's now sold out.

I do think it's not wise for AMD to cut performance for any of their CPUs; they need all the speed they can get.

You obviously don't understand what they are trying to do.
#1.3 Liam Wolf on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:32
But I do;

Currently AMD is cornering a market for budget systems. They're releasing cheap but efficient products, especially a product that can be overclocked heavily like this one.

Athlon II X4 620 can be overclocked to 3.9 GHz using air cooling. As pointed out in the review on Tweaktown.

Not to mention the L3 Cache can be unlocked

Last edited by Liam Wolf on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:46
#1.4 RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 16:32
daftperception said,
RAID 0 said,
Newegg had one Phenom x4 for under 90 bucks, it's now sold out.

I do think it's not wise for AMD to cut performance for any of their CPUs; they need all the speed they can get.

You obviously don't understand what they are trying to do.


Whatever

Last edited by RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 16:47
#1.5 carmatic on 16 Sep 2009 - 19:41
Liam Wolf said,
Not to mention the L3 Cache can be unlocked

with no effects on stability or maximum overclock?
#1.6 Neoauld on 18 Sep 2009 - 00:46
i dont think most of hte ppl buying these POS processors know anythin of the performance, just the price and the fancy name and the fact that it's a quad
i mean amd's fastest processor is the phenom 965 and an i5 probably beats it out
(1 reply) #2 +Zapadlo on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:18
While this is good news I would be far more interested in processors higher in price but that attempt to match i7s.
#2.1 Atlonite on 19 Sep 2009 - 13:33
+1 bout time AMD did some major catch up in both MHZ and ability
(2 replies) #3 scratch42069 on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:44
The benchmarks have impressed me enough to replace my Phenom 9750 with the Athlon II X4 620. Can't go wrong with a $100 quad core, even though the L3 cache is removed.
#3.1 Liam Wolf on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:48
#3.2 scratch42069 on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:29
Liam Wolf said,



Oh that's even better news. I just flashed my M3A78-T with a new BIOS that enables unleashing mode so I'll be able to unlock the L3 cache on the X4 620
(7 replies) #4 hardgiant on 16 Sep 2009 - 08:49
The numbers look pretty bad, I think I would recommend coughing up the money for the Intel i5 750.
#4.1 cakesy on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:08
Only if you are a fool.
#4.2 FrozenEclipse on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:23
cakesy said,
Only if you are a fool.


i5's are like $200-250. Well worth it.
#4.3 dr_crabman on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:59
FrozenEclipse said,
i5's are like $200-250. Well worth it.


They are. But that's not the point. "Overall we are impressed with the level of value that the new Athlon II X4 620 presents budget builders with" is. The i5 costs 2x-2,5x as much and a lot of people don't need it's power.
#4.4 hardgiant on 16 Sep 2009 - 11:16
i5 750 has already hit $159 and motherboard $79
#4.5 RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 16:32
hardgiant said,
i5 750 has already hit $159 and motherboard $79


Link or source?
#4.6 neodorian on 16 Sep 2009 - 17:57
RAID 0 said,
Link or source?


Yeah, Newegg has it for $199 and Amazon and Tiger have it for $209. Don't see any for $159 although I'm sure it won't be too long until we do.
#4.7 SHS on 19 Sep 2009 - 01:25
neodorian said,
Yeah, Newegg has it for $199 and Amazon and Tiger have it for $209. Don't see any for $159 although I'm sure it won't be too long until we do.

Have a look then
http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_...duct_id=0317379
(1 reply) #5 Anaron on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:07
Not bad, considering it's slightly better or on-par with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600.
#5.1 RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 16:35
The C2Q has been out for almost 3 years. This AMD CPU is brand new.
#6 Soldiers33 on 16 Sep 2009 - 09:22
as soon as I get a job, am going to be saving for a new amd PC. been using intel for a while and wanna try out AMD
(2 replies) #7 jporter on 16 Sep 2009 - 10:12
So basically, they release this cpu which is as quick as the Q6600 that came out what... 1,5/2 years? *clap* *clap* I get the point of low budget system and quad core but still....
I'd rather get a second hand Q6600 and clock that tbh...
#7.1 dangel on 16 Sep 2009 - 13:09
jporter said,
So basically, they release this cpu which is as quick as the Q6600 that came out what... 1,5/2 years? *clap* *clap* I get the point of low budget system and quad core but still....
I'd rather get a second hand Q6600 and clock that tbh...


I hear you - but now if someone comes to me for a budget system i've got a choice for all-new cheap quad system it's amazingly good value (and overclocks like hell too) with low TDP to boot. At this end of the market it's absolutely revolutionary to me.

#7.2 jporter on 16 Sep 2009 - 15:44
dangel said,
jporter said,
So basically, they release this cpu which is as quick as the Q6600 that came out what... 1,5/2 years? *clap* *clap* I get the point of low budget system and quad core but still....
I'd rather get a second hand Q6600 and clock that tbh...


I hear you - but now if someone comes to me for a budget system i've got a choice for all-new cheap quad system it's amazingly good value (and overclocks like hell too) with low TDP to boot. At this end of the market it's absolutely revolutionary to me.


Okey, you've got me convinced Guess I hadn't looked at it that way...
(4 replies) #8 ahhell on 16 Sep 2009 - 10:44
Poor AMD. Trying so hard to stay relevant.
#8.1 Xenomorph on 16 Sep 2009 - 12:09
ahhell said,
Poor AMD. Trying so hard to stay relevant.


Intel wouldn't be where they are at now if it weren't for AMD.
#8.2 dangel on 16 Sep 2009 - 13:09
Xenomorph said,
Intel wouldn't be where they are at now if it weren't for AMD.


QFT!
#8.3 Magallanes on 16 Sep 2009 - 14:11
dangel said,
QFT!


Intel and Amd have a long story together.

In any case is good to have options.
#8.4 LaP on 16 Sep 2009 - 21:14
ahhell said,
Poor AMD. Trying so hard to stay relevant.


Couple of years ago Intel was trying to stay revelant with the Pentium D.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2736&p=9

Competition is good. Only fanboys don't want it.
(1 reply) #9 Darrian on 16 Sep 2009 - 13:49
****, the Athlon II 620 probably performs better than my Phenom 9600, and my 9600 is still kicking some serious ass (I run all my games at 1080p just fine, and with only a GeForce 9800 GTX). For only $100, though, I'd hit that! I don't think I'll get these for myself (I'm considering spending a bit of money and switching to a Core i7 920), but I have a couple friends who seriously need to upgrade from their old dual-cores and can't afford to spend a fortune, plus they already have AM2+ motherboards, so they could just drop them in.
#9.1 LaP on 16 Sep 2009 - 21:16
I still have an Opteron 180 (with a geForce 8800GTX OC) and it works great with all games at 1650x1080 medium settings. Only Crysis makes it rush. I will probably wait until SSD drives become a better option to upgrade my PC.
(1 reply) #10 +warwagon on 16 Sep 2009 - 14:06
Everyone here saying OMG the i7 and i5 wipes the floor with this CPU. Something tells me this CPU isn't meant to win over i7 / i5 users. This is meant for budget systems. Frankly it sounds like a really good CPU to put inside a Media center PC that gives you a quad core without breaking the bank.

Last edited by warwagon on 16 Sep 2009 - 14:14
#10.1 sibot on 17 Sep 2009 - 15:58
I agree, this would really hurt the Intel market unless they decide to counter it with something cheap.

Anyone looking for an upgrade from their C2D would def go in for this.
#11 Frank Fontaine on 16 Sep 2009 - 14:42
The performance comparison with the Q6600 is really impressive, this is a great budget CPU, looking at those benchmarks makes me think I need an I5/I7 upgrade as the Q6600 is showing its age
(1 reply) #12 techfreak on 16 Sep 2009 - 14:54
The primary problem I have with all the processors in this comparison their high power usage. 153w at idle? 204w at peak? You have to be kidding me. Shall use these to bake a chicken?
#12.1 carmatic on 16 Sep 2009 - 19:47
ahh yes...that would be one of its downsides...what you save on paying for this cpu, rather than say an i5, you make up for in your electricity bill!
(1 reply) #13 DarkNovaGundam on 16 Sep 2009 - 15:37
I've always preferred AMD over Intel because AMD had cheaper prices, this just keeps me going to them.
#13.1 jporter on 16 Sep 2009 - 15:47
It's nice to have a cheaper priced product but there is more than price when it comes to processors and the system you build around it.
#14 +majortom1981 on 16 Sep 2009 - 16:46
Why even bother compairing it to a q6600.. ITs awfully hard to get a q6600 now for under $150 since its not produced any more.

This is an amazing cpu for only $99 . For people on a budget this could sell tons.
#15 qdave on 16 Sep 2009 - 17:34
This is certainly a ood deal. There is almost no point to get i5 anymore
The performance you get by paying additional 100 is minimal.
#16 DO_A_BARREL_ROLL on 16 Sep 2009 - 18:03
$100 for a quad cpu...wait, WAT
(3 replies) #17 Mekun on 16 Sep 2009 - 18:50
What is good is a quad core right now or any time soon? What programs utilize all that cpu power.
#17.1 toadeater on 16 Sep 2009 - 19:31
Mekun said,
What is good is a quad core right now or any time soon? What programs utilize all that cpu power.


Besides servers and databases, pretty much anything to do with multimedia. Although this is going to change once all these apps become GPU-accelerated with CUDA, OpenCL, etc.
#17.2 RAID 0 on 16 Sep 2009 - 21:08
BOINC uses all 4 of my cores.
#17.3 Frank Fontaine on 16 Sep 2009 - 22:46
Nerovision, Bioshock, UT3, Crysis series, FarCry2, HL2 Episode 2, WinRar, to name but a few
#18 S3P€hR on 16 Sep 2009 - 21:01
I have always liked AMD for their cheap processors where their performance is as good as an expensive intel similar model. Besides, those two brands might use different architecture for their processor but more or less have the same technology and power consumption.
#19 greenwizard88 on 16 Sep 2009 - 23:39
I'm in the market to upgrade my $20 AMD CPU I got off Newegg last year (yes, I spend $20 on it). I think that this might do the trick.

...And that's why I like AMD. I can make a computer for cheep!
#20 sibot on 17 Sep 2009 - 15:57
Can someone explain why the AMD blows Q6600 in every aspect except the Single thread processes? And is it relevant in any way?

I'd def consider the AMD way whenever I upgrade my PC next. This is really an amazing option to exploit.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)