apple
Report a problem

Apple approves nearly 1400 Apps in one day

Brad Sams   on 22 September 2009 - 17:30 · 46 comments & 4401 views

Advertisement (Why?)
It's no secret that Apple's App store has been a huge success for Apple. It has helped to propel the iPhone to the de facto stature that it is today. Last Friday (9/18/09) Apple approved a massive 1394 apps for its store, according to Appshopper.com.

The massive amount of applications that Apple is approving clearly shows how popular the platform is and that Apple clearly has a hit on its hand. A quick look at the graph (posted below) shows that Apple on average approves roughly 400 apps a day.

The immense volume also shows how Apple must stay on top of the organization of the App Store. With such a large volume of applications, developers must find alternative ways to attract attention to their products or else they will be lost in a sea of undiscovered apps.

For some comparison, it would be as if the "Blackberry App World catalog were published in just one day. 1400 is more than double the number of games currently on the PS3 (557) and just a tad short of the number of titles in the PS2's library (somewhere around 1,900)." VIA Gizmodo.com


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 46 additional comments
(8 replies) #1 thealexweb on 22 Sep 2009 - 17:54
No Google Voice, no Opera Mini, explain those Apple.
#1.1 Jugalator on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:43
Do Apple need to explain Opera Mini more than they have already done? They have already said that they can't be too similar to their own services. I think you have a problem with their stance on this, more than understanding why.
#1.2 Mike415 on 22 Sep 2009 - 20:23
Jugalator said,
Do Apple need to explain Opera Mini more than they have already done? They have already said that they can't be too similar to their own services. I think you have a problem with their stance on this, more than understanding why.

You realize there are multiple other browsers too right? Which are actually much more similar to Safari than opera mobile would be
#1.3 tom5 on 22 Sep 2009 - 20:40
Jugalator said,
Do Apple need to explain Opera Mini more than they have already done? They have already said that they can't be too similar to their own services. I think you have a problem with their stance on this, more than understanding why.


Microsoft should then ban other browsers in Windows. Because they're similar to their services (Interner Explorer).
#1.4 bob_c_b on 22 Sep 2009 - 21:10
tom5 said,
Microsoft should then ban other browsers in Windows. Because they're similar to their services (Interner Explorer).


If you have ever used the mobile version of IE you would know why MS has to allow other browsers, it is simply awful.
#1.5 cakesy on 22 Sep 2009 - 22:09
tom5 said,
Microsoft should then ban other browsers in Windows. Because they're similar to their services (Interner Explorer).

They would love to, and if they ever got the chance they would. Fortunately, some countries around the world have balls -> Thanks you EU.
#1.6 Chris4 on 22 Sep 2009 - 22:58
cakesy said,
They would love to, and if they ever got the chance they would. Fortunately, some countries around the world have balls -> Thanks you EU.

+1
#1.7 +Kirkburn on 22 Sep 2009 - 23:01
cakesy said,
They would love to, and if they ever got the chance they would. Fortunately, some countries around the world have balls -> Thanks you EU.

Seriously? My god man, are you that much of an MS hater/Apple fanboy?
#1.8 andrewbares on 22 Sep 2009 - 23:52
Jugalator said,
Do Apple need to explain Opera Mini more than they have already done? They have already said that they can't be too similar to their own services. I think you have a problem with their stance on this, more than understanding why.


Yes, they can continue on explaining how Anti-Competitive they are. Wait, I think there's laws against that? EU, we need you!
(3 replies) #2 Dead'Soul on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:02
Apple is monopolist: For apple: Safari beats opera... dont have to say about google voice. Apple is afraid of Google
#2.1 thealexweb on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:05
Dead'Soul said,
Apple is monopolist: For apple: Safari beats opera... dont have to say about google voice. Apple is afraid of Google


Apple has no reason to be afraid of Google, it's AT&T that are scared. Apple's business model is diverse enough to weather pretty much anything, Google are in an incredibly precarious situation where nearly all of their revenue come from one source, advertising, if they could be beaten there Google would be a broken firm. For Apple to be broken, iPod sales would have to cave in, Mac sales stall , etc.
#2.2 cybertimber2008 on 22 Sep 2009 - 20:55
thealexweb said,
Apple has no reason to be afraid of Google, it's AT&T that are scared.

BS. Google Voice wouldn't have worked on the iPhone w/o AT&T, and AT&T still would have earned money from those who used it, because they needed AT&Ts service. (in the US anyway)
BUT Apple wouldn't have earned anything from a free app. No 30% share, nothing, and they would have "lost control" of phone functions.
#2.3 thealexweb on 22 Sep 2009 - 21:11
cybertimber2008 said,
BS. Google Voice wouldn't have worked on the iPhone w/o AT&T, and AT&T still would have earned money from those who used it, because they needed AT&Ts service. (in the US anyway)
BUT Apple wouldn't have earned anything from a free app. No 30% share, nothing, and they would have "lost control" of phone functions.


AT&T are scared because they fear that the rise of VOIP will be less profitable for them than actual calls opposed to data transfer across their networks.
(3 replies) #3 artfuldodga on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:03
... quality over quantity
#3.1 ModernMech on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:39
I think it's great that there are a ton of apps, but hasn't that been the Apple battlecry for... well forever? Quality over quantity. Apple and their fans have said this about the computers, the laptops, the players, the iPhone, the software ecosystem, etc. Then all of a sudden it gets more popular and we have "OVER 12 QUADRILLIONJ APPS!" with no mention as to the quality of these apps.

So sure, 1400 apps in a day. Great. How many are iFart apps?
#3.2 Jugalator on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:47
All I know is that Spotify is a recent one among them. Jeez, cheer up, guys.
#3.3 Remote Sojourner on 23 Sep 2009 - 09:09
Jugalator said,
All I know is that Spotify is a recent one among them. Jeez, cheer up, guys.


All I know is my HTC Hero (Android) can run spotify in background (without "jailbreaking") while iPhone cant
(9 replies) #4 TH3ROOKIE on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:05
and just a tad short of the number of titles in the PS2's library (somewhere around 1,900).


I'm sure every PS2 owners would have loved to have the lighter app or the iBeer app on their PS2... hours and hours of fun.

I think it's ok to bring numbers to compare popular devices to others. But comparing a multipurpose device to a console is irrelevant, we could turn this around by saying the PS2 has triple the number of steering wheel than the iPhone or comparing it with the VHS library... And from what I've seen of the iPhone apps, if we could drop some chemicals in the AppStore to get rid of all the bad seeds like iBeer, how many good apples would be left?

Cheers!
#4.1 The Stylish Hobo on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:12
Such a shame, everything Brad Sams writes is almost always subject to scrutiny on the basis of content or grammar :]
#4.2 +dead.cell on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:15
Sorry, but I agree with him. The comparison doesn't really make much sense at all.
#4.3 The Stylish Hobo on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:20
Not that the scrutiny is without reason ^^
#4.4 bdsams on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:55
The Stylish Hobo said,
Such a shame, everything Brad Sams writes is almost always subject to scrutiny on the basis of content or grammar :]


When thousands upon thousands read what you write, you cant please them all. Ill take the grammar abuse, thats my fault (and in my defense I had 9 postings in a row without one single error) which had 10's of thousands of views...so yes judge me by my one mistake, or one article that you dont approve of, but you cant hide behind the facts of the App store
#4.5 +dead.cell on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:17
Well, you compared it to the number of games the PS2/3 have which not many people know. Thus, the comparison is flawed, not only because it is a bad comparison, but because it doesn't help anyone to really see just how many apps that is.

As to the other reasons it doesn't make sense, aside from what TheRookie provided, the sheer fact is that games and Apple app development are pretty much entirely different in terms of cost to create, time needed, how much content is present, and what the content is overall. That's only naming a few.

No one is judging you here.
#4.6 bdsams on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:20
dead.cell said,
Well, you compared it to the number of games the PS2/3 have which not many people know. Thus, the comparison is flawed, not only because it is a bad comparison, but because it doesn't help anyone to really see just how many apps that is.

As to the other reasons it doesn't make sense, aside from what TheRookie provided, the sheer fact is that games and Apple app development are pretty much entirely different in terms of cost to create, time needed, how much content is present, and what the content is overall. That's only naming a few.

No one is judging you here.


Firstly, it was a quote I took from another site but we are looking at the numbers in two different ways....I was refering to it as a platform for devlopment and for devlopers to make money, you are looking at it from the perspective of games strictly....


I see your point but think of the PS2 as a platform instead of a game console, and you shall see my point...toe-may-toe, toe-mah-toe
#4.7 cakesy on 22 Sep 2009 - 22:11
TH3ROOKIE said,
I'm sure every PS2 owners would have loved to have the lighter app or the iBeer app on their PS2... hours and hours of fun.

I think it's ok to bring numbers to compare popular devices to others. But comparing a multipurpose device to a console is irrelevant, we could turn this around by saying the PS2 has triple the number of steering wheel than the iPhone or comparing it with the VHS library... And from what I've seen of the iPhone apps, if we could drop some chemicals in the AppStore to get rid of all the bad seeds like iBeer, how many good apples would be left?

Cheers!


Who cares, it is just a simple comparision. There is nothing wrong with that comparison, as long as you don't draw stupid conclusions from it. It doesn't mean the iPhone is a better games machine than the PS3. Keeps your knickers on. Sheesh.
#4.8 TH3ROOKIE on 22 Sep 2009 - 22:35
I was not judging the author or the grammar, only the facts. I still stand my point that the PS2 was/is a game console. Sure you had that Linux kit that you could install and be used for development, but out-of-the-box experience, the PS2 was a game console, no extra modem/Ethernet adapter/keyboard/mouse/hdd to buy to do what it was design to do in the first place. Out-of-the-box, the iPhone is a multipurpose platform.

As for iPhone games Vs PS2 games, I’d rather play 1 Grand Theft Auto or 1 Gran Turismo on PS2 than playing 2000 Bookworm on Iphone.

Anyway, I was just saying the PS2 fact doesn’t belong between those lines, whoever wrote it, IMO.

Cheers!
#4.9 dp123 on 23 Sep 2009 - 00:00
2000 Bookworms would make something like 17,500% more revenue than 1 Gran Torismo for the PS2 (2000 * $4.99 = 9980 versus $56.99 for GT5 on Amazon). I think that's the point. Other people aren't that interest in your personal experience of it as a consumer; they are interested in it as a business, platform, and ecosystem.
(2 replies) #5 ccoltmanm on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:18
I am wondering about Quality Control here. Besides that, how many of these Apps are repeat cheap versions just to make money.
#5.1 ModernMech on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:37
And how many are just upgrades and bug fixes. I would assume they need to get approved as well, or else you could just get an app through and change it into anything.
#5.2 Jugalator on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:45
And how many are great?

Of course, as with all software, regardless market, some of it sucks, some of it is great. But this is a massive number of approvals, which likely means a major amount of quality apps, as well as a large number of low quality apps. But the simple throughput we're talking here is impressive.
(1 reply) #6 magnetra7 on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:23
That number '1394' makes me think of 'IEEE 1394', which is Firewire. Which was developed by.... Apple!
#6.1 +dead.cell on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:32
Maybe that was done intentionally?

"Alright guys, load up with caffeine today! We're gonna hit 1394!!"
(1 reply) #7 jafoman on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:31
Glad to see Appshopper.com being sourced. I visit their site every day (along with Neowin of course).
#7.1 bdsams on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:56
I try to dig down to the source when I remeber too, sometimes other sites (not us of course ) mask the original source!
(2 replies) #8 dancedar on 22 Sep 2009 - 18:55
99% of these apps are utter crap and won't be used/around in a years time. Just makes it harder to find decent ones.
#8.1 Gabe3 on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:48
dancedar said,
99% of these apps are utter crap and won't be used/around in a years time. Just makes it harder to find decent ones.

so true, its hard to find the good ones, i'm usually left with watching iphone commercials to find apps.
#8.2 andrewbares on 22 Sep 2009 - 23:54
dancedar said,
99% of these apps are utter crap and won't be used/around in a years time. Just makes it harder to find decent ones.

Yep.
(1 reply) #9 Brendando on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:38
People always find something to b*tch about. Kind of pathetic really.
#9.1 C_Guy on 22 Sep 2009 - 20:53
How ironic.
(1 reply) #10 Julius Caro on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:44
1394? Firewire!!!
#10.1 andrewbares on 22 Sep 2009 - 23:55
Mentioned above. LOL.
(1 reply) #11 acnpt on 22 Sep 2009 - 19:46
So eerrrr thats about 100 times the total number of apps in the Palm Pre store
/s
#11.1 Deihmos on 22 Sep 2009 - 21:17
Kinda makes sense since the palm pre came out in June. I just hope Palm doebsn't follow this route by having alll these crappy nonsense people want to sell as applications.
#12 cork1958 on 23 Sep 2009 - 01:01
What over kill!!
#13 Ronnie Sunde on 23 Sep 2009 - 03:15
I wonder one thing, I thought about making an app for the iPhone, you know making some money, I sat down and thought about what app I could make, couldn't think of any apps that to me seemed to be worth the effort... so how the &^%#$ are there on average 400 new apps every day??

maybe I am just stupid as mud or there are about 399 **** apps coming in every day... and how the ^#% is someone able to go through all that **** to find a good app to buy - DAILY? crazy...
#14 Magallanes on 23 Sep 2009 - 12:47
At least it is ten thousand times better than Symbian.

If you want to sell a software for symbian, then you must pay $100 for every application (plus $100 for the developer signature), then pass the insane process of certification (it can last for over 6 months) and your request can be rejected (usually is rejected), then you must start all over the process (and pay again $100). And finally, if you software is certificate then, you must sell your application by yourself (Nokia Store is not for everybody). But you can sell your software using a third party vendor (such Handago ), sadly they will takes over %60 for every sale.

So, it is not so strange why App Store is loved by the developer, even when xcode is clearly inferior to visual studio and eclipse.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)