microsoft
Report a problem

Analyst: Rumors of an EA takeover by Microsoft are "silly"

Joshua Seed   on 25 September 2009 - 03:03 · 11 comments & 4975 views

Advertisement (Why?)
As reported by Barron's, Doug Creutz, analyst for Cowen and Company believes that the likelihood of Microsoft taking over EA is "inconsequentially low."

"EA gets over 30% of its revenue from Sony PS2 and PS3 and the Nintendo Wii, which would almost certainly disappear in the event of a Microsoft acquisition, since presumably the whole point of the acquisition would be to secure EA's products as Xbox 360 exclusives. EA gets another 10% of revenue from Sony PSP and Nintendo DS handhelds, which would conceivably be at risk in event of a Microsoft acquisition."

According to the analyst "There is simply no way the math works due to the massive hit to EA's revenue and earnings post acquisition. This is even assuming such a deal would pass regulatory muster, which we find highly doubtful."

EA's shares rose $1.31, or 7.1 percent amid the rumors of the takeover.

Microsoft later released a statement saying the following: "We have no plans to acquire EA. They remain a very important partner to us. No acquisitions."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 Majesticmerc on 25 Sep 2009 - 11:06
I don't even know how rumors like this start, its so rediculous!
#2 vetneufuse on 25 Sep 2009 - 11:15
If MS took over EA that would DEFINATLY be a major power player, and would definatly try to be stopped by the DOJ and EU for a possible monopoly state
(2 replies) #3 stgeorge on 25 Sep 2009 - 11:54
So basically the article says Sony & Nintendo would get screwed by losing EA's titles on their systems... how is this bad for Microsoft again? There is nothing illegal about being a monopoly, it's abusing monopoly power that gets you in trouble and Microsoft has learned how to have 90%+ marketshare and not be a bully.
#3.1 vetneufuse on 25 Sep 2009 - 12:28
stgeorge said,
So basically the article says Sony & Nintendo would get screwed by losing EA's titles on their systems... how is this bad for Microsoft again? There is nothing illegal about being a monopoly, it's abusing monopoly power that gets you in trouble and Microsoft has learned how to have 90%+ marketshare and not be a bully.


But MS has abused them in the past, that's why they'd be so up for scrutiny about it
#3.2 M_Lyons10 on 26 Sep 2009 - 03:33
stgeorge said,
So basically the article says Sony & Nintendo would get screwed by losing EA's titles on their systems... how is this bad for Microsoft again? There is nothing illegal about being a monopoly, it's abusing monopoly power that gets you in trouble and Microsoft has learned how to have 90%+ marketshare and not be a bully.


It would hurt EA, as their books would take an immediate 30 - 40% hit. Since the sale of the company would be based on total revenue (Including the above 30 - 40%), it wouldn't be a good deal in the short term. Now, long term I'm sure Microsoft would probably benefit some, but it's too iffy...
#4 +Smigit on 25 Sep 2009 - 12:55
How would owning EA make them a monopoly anyway? A Monopoly of what? Theres other console, games developers and publishers out there?

Also I don't think it doesn't make sense for MS to own EA what so ever. Over night they would gain exclusive rights to a huge number of franchises, some of them rather big players such as Fifa, Madden, Need For Speed ect. Sure...currently none of those are ones you would base a purchase on but if they were MS exclusives then it gives them a huge leg up over Sony and you could expect at least some of that 30% to shift over to MS's side.

If you believe the possible rumours of Apple taking gaming more seriously on the Mac too then it also would add weight to their PC side by ensuring they retain those franchises (again the sports and Sims ones are big players)

I also think it's unlikely MS isn't working on a handheld to some degree so in a few years time losing sales to the PSP would probably be a non issue if they could again leverage EA to sell their own platform.

Now not saying MS will buy them of course...but it's hardly in the realm of stupidity either. This article seems flawed as it seems too heavily focues on what percentages Sony makes EA currently. Those would obviously change and any aquisition wouldn't be merely to gain their revenue but to also push sales of hardware too.
#5 LaP on 25 Sep 2009 - 16:56
To buy EA MS would need to pay much more than the actual price. There's just no reason for EA shareholders to accept if the price is not A LOT more than what it worth.

I think MS learned their lesson with Rare. This will not happen. And BTW most gamers save for blind MS fanboys would see this as a bad new so this would not be a good strategic move by EA.
(3 replies) #6 DClark on 25 Sep 2009 - 16:56
Someone (this analyst) doesn't understand the concept of INVESTMENT. Microsoft's EA would undoubtedly take a blow in the short run if they declared all titles to be XBOX 360/PC exclusive, but consumers will end up buying MS platforms to access EA titles, which means more software AND hardware sales in the long run for Microsoft's entertainment division.
#6.1 LaP on 25 Sep 2009 - 18:22
This is a two side deal.

It would make sense for MS probably if the price would be right. But for EA shareholders not really unless MS buy it for a lot more than what it really worth and EA already worth a good amount of money so ...

MS has shareholders too. We all love video games and all but MS lost a lot of money so far with the XBox console. And Rare invesment has been a bad one. Somewhere along the road all this money spent will need to bring food to the table.

This would be a complicated deal.
#6.2 M_Lyons10 on 26 Sep 2009 - 03:42
DClark said,
Someone (this analyst) doesn't understand the concept of INVESTMENT. Microsoft's EA would undoubtedly take a blow in the short run if they declared all titles to be XBOX 360/PC exclusive, but consumers will end up buying MS platforms to access EA titles, which means more software AND hardware sales in the long run for Microsoft's entertainment division.


Yes, and they would have some very big properties, but on the same token, if EA were not publishing these properties on Sony and Nintendo's consoles, this would open the door to competing brands in a BIG way. They wouldn't be branded, but they could still be quality titles. Also, since they weren't branded, there would be more profit in it as well. Also, exclusivity to one console may make future negotiations for brand exclusivity more difficult.
#6.3 M_Lyons10 on 26 Sep 2009 - 03:46
LaP said,
This is a two side deal.
MS has shareholders too. We all love video games and all but MS lost a lot of money so far with the XBox console. And Rare invesment has been a bad one. Somewhere along the road all this money spent will need to bring food to the table.


I agree with you on the Rare deal, but Microsoft is now using them for other things, like the avatars in XBox Live. I did want to correct you on the XBox losing a lot of money though. It's been making a profit for quite some time now. The original XBox lost money, but that was expected. It no longer is.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)