microsoft
Report a problem

Microsoft cuts 800 more jobs

Brad Sams   on 04 November 2009 - 17:58 · 26 comments & 4511 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft has confirmed that it will be cutting 800 jobs effective today. The jobs will be cut across many different product groups and about a quarter of them will come from the Seattle area.

The final 800 cuts complete the announcement in January that the company would terminate 5000 employees over the following 18 months. Employees who are affected will be notified today.

"Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer had said in May that the company was almost, but not quite completely, finished with the planned 5,000 job cuts at that point. Microsoft has continued to hire in some areas even as it has cut back in others, reducing the net effect of the job reductions."

As the ugly side of the economy continues to show its head, we can only hope that the company will right itself and not need to reduce its work staff in the future.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 26 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 leo221 on 04 Nov 2009 - 17:59
yeah
#1.1 Lord Ba'al on 05 Nov 2009 - 00:51
What disgusting turds.
They're making a huge deal of money now with Windows 7, and they still fire thousands of people.
Ballmer should be shot in the head for this.
#1.2 njlouch on 05 Nov 2009 - 01:16
He is cost saving, moreover the decision such as this is massively unlikely to be part of his remit,

Having been through redundancy a few times, I know it's nothing personal and a business practice that is necessary
#2 AgentGray on 04 Nov 2009 - 18:04
So... this isn't NEW job cuts, it's just them actually cutting the jobs they announced in January.

Meaning it's not necessarily a sign that the company's still doing bad, just not good enough to go back on the cuts they said they'd make almost a year ago.

Title could use some clarification than
#3 este on 04 Nov 2009 - 18:05
As the ugly side of the economy continues to show its head, we can only hope that the company will right itself and not need to reduce its work staff in the future.

yeah really ... for such a big company this is not good news =\
#4 Examinus on 04 Nov 2009 - 18:42
I suppose it's easy to forget how many people work for Microsoft. People generally see Microsoft as Windows, Office and Live.
#5 ccoltmanm on 04 Nov 2009 - 19:01
Good points everyone. I'd like to see how many people were transferred to different areas, or were fired and hired in another department.
#6 cork1958 on 04 Nov 2009 - 19:35
Good, but sad thing about this, is that 4975 were salaried employees!!

To lose or be able to cut that many jobs is definitely a sign that they had way to many employees (chiefs), to begin with!

Still sad to hear about anyone losing their jobs now a days.
(4 replies) #7 artfuldodga on 04 Nov 2009 - 19:43
i actually welcome job cuts, the slimmer MS gets, the better
#7.1 Billus on 04 Nov 2009 - 19:46
try telling that to the 5000 unemployed employees. Perhaps they'll get jobs in other sections of MS.
#7.2 kizzaaa on 04 Nov 2009 - 21:30
artfuldodga said,
i actually welcome job cuts, the slimmer MS gets, the better


You've obviously never been made redundant before.
#7.3 Jugalator on 04 Nov 2009 - 23:02
kizzaaa said,
You've obviously never been made redundant before.

Maybe he's a CEO.
#7.4 GP007 on 04 Nov 2009 - 23:23
He does have a point, all I hear about is all the managers MS has, and there's all this middle layer between the top brass and the low end coders so stuff gets bogged down.

One of the things that helped win7 was that they cut back on the middle men and reworked the different devisions.

Besides these aren't new, they're the last line of old job cuts from back in Jan. It also doesn't state in which specific areas they worked on. If some part needs 4 workers but you have 8 and it doesn't seem to be helping, it only makes sense that you either move the extra ones to something else or cut them loose. That's just how it goes.
#8 SirDoan on 04 Nov 2009 - 20:12
wow. that sucks
(6 replies) #9 TonyLock on 04 Nov 2009 - 20:43
All because Vista failed!
#9.1 +Tony. on 04 Nov 2009 - 22:46
Oh ffs.

Microsoft is not just about Windows. Also, you need to think that a company can grow too big as well. Cutting back could be a good thing for Microsoft, but obviously not for the employees and no doubt that Microsoft has a very good reason for doing this.
#9.2 toadeater on 04 Nov 2009 - 23:11
Tony. said,
Oh ffs.

Microsoft is not just about Windows.


Windows/Server/Office is MS's primary source of revenue by far. MS took a big hit from Vista's failure.

http://www.microsoft.com/msft/earnings/fy1...10.mspx#Channel
#9.3 omni1 on 05 Nov 2009 - 01:57
toadeater said,
Tony. said,
Oh ffs.

Microsoft is not just about Windows.


Windows/Server/Office is MS's primary source of revenue by far. MS took a big hit from Vista's failure.

http://www.microsoft.com/msft/earnings/fy1...10.mspx#Channel


I'm sorry but did you actually read your own link? Segment revenue and operating income/loss clearly show Windows as one of their lowest earners (and second highest losses). If you are trying to use the 2008 versus 2009 totals as evidence that Vista had a huge impact on Microsoft then you are sorely mistaken and need to go back to ACCY101--the reduction in 2009 revenue is across the board and not just in the Windows segments indicating additional causality; i.e. the global economic crisis.

The fall in Windows revenue in 2009 versus 2008 is furthered by the anticipation of Windows 7 causing a freeze on the OS market while consumers wait.
#9.4 waldenasta on 05 Nov 2009 - 02:13
omni1 said,
toadeater said,

Tony. said,
Oh ffs.

Microsoft is not just about Windows.


Windows/Server/Office is MS's primary source of revenue by far. MS took a big hit from Vista's failure.

http://www.microsoft.com/msft/earnings/fy1...10.mspx#Channel


I'm sorry but did you actually read your own link? Segment revenue and operating income/loss clearly show Windows as one of their lowest earners (and second highest losses). If you are trying to use the 2008 versus 2009 totals as evidence that Vista had a huge impact on Microsoft then you are sorely mistaken and need to go back to ACCY101--the reduction in 2009 revenue is across the board and not just in the Windows segments indicating additional causality; i.e. the global economic crisis.

The fall in Windows revenue in 2009 versus 2008 is furthered by the anticipation of Windows 7 causing a freeze on the OS market while consumers wait.

#9.5 waldenasta on 05 Nov 2009 - 02:14
Everyone know that MSFT makes most of there money in the Enterprise. I lay user is just a blip on the MSFT radar. Huge volume licensing is where the monies at!
#9.6 omni1 on 05 Nov 2009 - 02:20
waldenasta said,
Everyone know that MSFT makes most of there money in the Enterprise. I lay user is just a blip on the MSFT radar. Huge volume licensing is where the monies at!


That's pretty much it. Though, from what I have been told, Microsoft's Office for Mac makes more then Office for Windows as it is almost always sold at full RRP versus the abundance of discounts offered on Windows versions of Office.
(1 reply) #10 dezdog on 04 Nov 2009 - 22:12
Windows 7 success will hopefully prop up microsoft...
#10.1 Magallanes on 05 Nov 2009 - 14:36
Yes but because Windows 7 can be considered as a final-product (not like Vista that was a transitional product), then there is not need to keep a thousand of developer working at once where a small group can patch the code and nothing much else.
#11 Jugalator on 04 Nov 2009 - 23:03
I see it's time to reap what's been sown.
#12 redfox2200 on 05 Nov 2009 - 06:29
Oh not again they did this last year and they canceled all interview, I was willing to apply this year and see if Im lucky but as long as they are cuting jobs Im sure they will do like last year and wont accept any new employees or do any interviews
#13 Magallanes on 05 Nov 2009 - 14:33
bye bye american workforce.
and hello indian outsorcing.

:-/

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)