Comcast settles throttling lawsuit, go get your money
By Benjamin Rubenstein, 22 December 2009 - 22:23 30 comments
After Comcast was caught throttling P2P traffic back in 2007, a class action lawsuit (Hart vs. Comcast) was filed against them. According to Benzinga, the lawsuit has now come to an end, as Comcast settles it for $16 million. According to Scott+Scott LLP, one of the the law firms in charge of the suit, United States users who were affected by the throttling may be eligible for a refund or credit assuming they fall into one of the following categories:
- Used or attempted to use Comcast service to use the Ares, BitTorrent, eDonkey, FastTrack or Gnutella P2P protocols any time from April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 and were unable to share files or have reason to believe that the speed at which files were shared was impaired; and/or
- Attempted but were unable to use Comcast service to use Lotus Notes to send emails any time from March 26, 2007 to October 3, 2007.
Lexington Law Group partner, Mark Todzo calls the settlement "a great result for Comcast customers." He says that "It creates an efficient and effective mechanism that will put money back in the customers' hands without them individually going to court." Unfortunately, not everyone sees it that way. CrunchGear's Nicholas Deleon is reporting this as a travesty and outright slap in the face to consumers.
"Whoever says the legal system in this country is broken, well, you're right. Comcast was caught tampering with its customers' packets two years ago. It bitched and moaned like nobody's business, earning itself no friends. The Federal Communications Commission sanctioned the gigantic corporation in what amounted to a slap on the wrist. Big deal. A class action lawsuit was filed, which was just settled for $16 million. Comcast raked in $34.3 billion in revenue in 2008, meaning that this settlement amounts to four hours of revenue. That's right: four hours. Take that, corporate America!"
Whatever the case may be, you might be entitled to some compensation. To make a claim, call 1-877-567-2754, or visit www.P2PCongestionSettlement.com for more information.

Comments (30)
timmmay - 23 December 2009 - 06:27
I read $16 billion in the second sentence but it seems it is $16 million
Blasius - 23 December 2009 - 06:28
Yeah fixed. Sorry about that
still1 - 23 December 2009 - 06:51
wow thats a lot of money
mohan_168 - 23 December 2009 - 06:29
for $16 billion, they would go bankrupt.
Raa - 23 December 2009 - 06:39
Doubt it, when they raked in $34.3 billion in a year.
Andrew Lyle - 23 December 2009 - 06:45
It is actually $16 million. Sorry about that, the typo is fixed however.
Raa - 23 December 2009 - 08:47
Yea I know, all good mate
taintedc0bra - 23 December 2009 - 06:55
What a devistating loss... I hope they'll be able to manage a comeback... lol...
Solid Knight - 23 December 2009 - 06:56
Yay! I can claim an amount up to sixteen dollars!
Athlonite - 26 December 2009 - 13:12
haha lol and while doing so you profess to the world to doing illegal things and get taken to court and sued for 1.6 million
splur - 23 December 2009 - 07:02
But the precedent has been set. The money really doesn't matter in a class action lawsuit such as this, it's the message that it sends. It's really quite amazing that they won, considering the power corporations have in the US system.
+Shadrack - 23 December 2009 - 16:46
Indeed
ziggie216 - 23 December 2009 - 07:19
" If you submit a valid Claim Form, you will receive a share of this amount, not to exceed $16.00"
Oh.. thats it?
SkyyPunk - 23 December 2009 - 13:25
Oh.. thats it?
thats not even 1/3 of my monthly Internet bill...and I only subscribe to their Internet services
xendrome - 23 December 2009 - 13:41
thats not even 1/3 of my monthly Internet bill...and I only subscribe to their Internet services :(
Yea if anyone can find the actual ruling, the lawyers that file the suit are the only ones that ever get the millions....
Pc_Madness - 23 December 2009 - 07:57
rofl, and then Comcast will sick the RIAA on anyone who claims the money, and get the money back + interest.
BrainDedd - 23 December 2009 - 08:33
Torrents aren't always for illegal content. :P
Tim Dawg - 23 December 2009 - 09:04
Yeah but to be safe I think I'll forgo the $16 - just in case. It's not like $16 goes too far. 16 song downloads I guess?
ir0nw0lf - 23 December 2009 - 14:50
Ayup, but do you think something like that would keep the RIAA off your back??
Tim Dawg - 23 December 2009 - 09:10
The best part is you can't submit a claim online anyways. The link is there but it's "under construction".