RIAA case dismissed as 'speculation'

The Recording Industry Association of America had applied for judgement in the case of Interscope Records, UMG Recording and Atlantic Recording versus Yolanda Rodriguez, which had gone unanswered by the defendant. The legal challenge was filed against Rodriguez on 14 November 2006, and a summons was served exactly one month later. Rodriguez was accused of downloading copyrighted recordings and making them available for other internet users.

However, US senior district court Judge Rudi M Brewster said that the plaintiffs had not shown enough evidence to rule in their favour: "Plaintiff here must present at least some facts to show the plausibility of their allegations of copyright infringement against the defendant. Other than the bare conclusory statement that on 'information and belief' defendant had downloaded, distributed and/or made available for distribution to the public copyrighted works, Plaintiffs have presented no facts that would indicate that this allegation is anything more than speculation." The record companies have 30 days from the judgement to amend the complaint and serve it again.

News source: vnunet

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Apple Activates $100 Offer For Early iPhone Customers

Next Story

AMD K10 Family Chips Support DDR3 Memory – Documents


Commenting is disabled on this article.

So specualtion is the means by which the RIAA bungholios have to take someone to court? We all have internet connections and computers, therefore it is a valid specutation that we all have violated copy rights. Take us to court, send us to jail, and that is that.

Score one for the people. Screw you RIAA and MPAA.

SomeAzn said,
Um, people are charged for going to court. Everyone gets charged when they bring a suit...

I believed he said "charged" as in "being accused of". Like contempt of court, for instance.