Smoked by Windows Phone makes more appearances

Microsoft seems to have hit a gold mine, in terms of marketing, with its Smoked by Windows Phone campaign. It started as a simple CES 2012 stunt that went viral after Microsoft posted videos of Windows Phone devices beating other smartphones in speed challenges. More recently, Smoked by Windows Phone turned into an official online ad campaign and there are apparently plans to turn it into a TV commercial.

Microsoft is also seeing this effort expand overseas. In a new post on the Windows Phone site, Microsoft states that Indonesia launched their own version of Smoked by Windows Phone, as 50 team members challenged citizens in Jakarta to smartphone speed battles. You can see the results in the video above. Microsoft said that the final result was pretty respectable for Windows Phone; 640 wins and just 50 losses.

A number of Microsoft student partners in India also held Smoked by Windows Phone challenges in that country, giving out flash drives if the person with another smartphone managed to beat a Windows Phone device. In addition, Nokia held its own version, “Blown Away by Nokia Lumia", in a couple of Indian cities, Delhi and Pune. If the person with the rival smartphone won the challenge in India, Nokia gave them 1000 rupees.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Windows 8 app developers get migration advice

Next Story

Bing gains more market share in web search

12 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Smokin' !!! :-) Awesome! Awesome awesome Windows Phone! It's just a better designed User Experience than everything else on te market.

Must have been very busy 3 days if they did challenge almost 700 phones. I wish they had shown atleast one test between the Lumia and their own N9 lol

Muhammad Farrukh said,
640 wins and 50 losses?
That's massive

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.

a1ien said,

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.

....what?

a1ien said,

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.


what the hell are you on about?

a1ien said,

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.


Go to sleep...

a1ien said,

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.

...............................................................................

a1ien said,

I dunno if it's good enough... 50/(50+640) * $100 = $7.24, which means the expected profit from taking their challenge is $7.24. Now considering it wastes only a few minutes to play, that means the 'winning decision' is to play them. If Windows Phone were so good that only 1/100 would win for example, the expected profit would be $1.00, not worth a few minutes, so playing them would be a 'losing decision'. It would appear that MS is losing.

On a positive note, if each game is worth over $7.25 to Microsoft, then you can say that 'everybody wins'.


hahahahahaha it is hilarious to see people go so far