software

DivX Bundle 4.12

aco   on 20 December 2001 - 09:39 · 16 comments & 659 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Version 4.12 of the DivX codec fixes some minor issues with version 4.11, which introduced full optimizations for the Intel® Pentium 4 processor. Version 4.12 does the following:
  • Fixes a crash on Pentium 4 when encoding in YUV12 mode

  • Fixes a crash on buggy VIA motherboards (in both the encoder and decoder)

  • Adds more complete support for future advanced DivX video features
View: DivX Download Page
Download: DivX Bundle 4.12 (Fileforum - 812KB)
Download: DivX Codec 4.12 (Fileforum - 565KB)



The deal closes another chapter in Armstrong's efforts to reshape the cable, telephone and broadband Internet landscape during the past few years.

Armstrong re-created AT&T as the biggest cable company in the country with back-to-back buys of Tele-Communications Inc. and MediaOne. But the debt he amassed in spending more than $100 billion on the two companies finally helped to destabilize the phone giant, ultimately prompting a break-up plan that would have split the telephone, cable and wireless phone businesses into separate companies.

Wednesday's deal modifies that plan. The wireless business has already been spun off as an independent, publicly traded company. The cable business will now be merged with Comcast, although AT&T shareholders will control 56 percent of the stock and have a 66 percent voting interest in the combined entity.

Armstrong will be chairman of the new cable behemoth, while Comcast CEO Brian Roberts will be the new company's CEO.

That leaves the final pieces of AT&T--business services and consumer telephone divisions--hanging. The company has previously said the consumer division will still be spun off as its own tracking stock, but many analysts speculate that a Baby Bell might eventually buy the business services division or both. The company held merger talks with telephone companies including BellSouth earlier this year.

Comcast first bid for AT&T this summer, offering about $44 billion for the assets. At the time, AT&T dismissed the bid as too low and invited other bids.

Those bids took considerable time to evolve, and ultimately AOL Time Warner and Cox were in the running. But at a meeting Wednesday, AT&T's board of directors unanimously decided to accept a revised Comcast offer.

The purchase price had been improved for several reasons, Roberts said in an interview on CNBC. The new deal now includes AT&T's 25 percent stake in AOL Time Warner. But AT&T Broadband has also done a better job of bringing its financial margins closer to the industry standard, he said.

AT&T Broadband, which inherited outdated infrastructure from TCI, has historically seen low margins and low subscription rates for its advanced services such as digital cable and Internet service. It has focused heavily on improving its aging network for the last several years.

Roberts pinpointed several reasons why Comcast was so intent on the buy, painting a picture of a company evolving well beyond its cable roots.

AT&T has spent considerable time building up its ability to offer telephone service over the cable network; the original reason Armstrong was interested in the cable business was in order to compete with the local phone companies' dominant networks.

With a reach of 30 million households, AT&T Comcast can bring its own local phone service to a level that can compete with the powerful local phone companies, Roberts said.

"We are particularly excited about the telephony prospects," Roberts said. "The size of our telephony footprint, combined with AT&T's expertise and leadership in the telephony space, will enable us to accelerate the deployment of telephone services to many new markets."

AT&T's own cable telephony business has been modestly successful. As of the third quarter of 2001, the company had 924,000 customers, up from 324,000 the year before. The company drew quarterly revenues of about $104 million from the business that quarter.

The companies initially had little to say about the cable Internet business, which is in the greatest period of flux it has seen since its inception. Together they have about 2.2 million broadband subscribers.

AT&T Broadband is in the midst of relocating 850,000 Excite@Home subscribers to a parallel network that it built at fever pace during the past few months. That network draws on the resources that AT&T's cable business already had in hand, such as the cable lines themselves and network operations centers.

But it also uses network elements that belong to AT&T proper, such as a primary backbone for hauling data over long distances. Comcast, meanwhile, is in the process of creating its own new network for its Excite@Home customers, with plans to move customers early next year.

As the merger deal is unlikely to close until near the end of 2002, those two networks will have to be up and running for some period of time before they are merged. Executives predicted they would need about nine months of regulatory and shareholder scrutiny.

This is one issue that will likely be in the purview of a team appointed to deal with transition issues on both sides. That team will include Comcast Cable President Steven Burke, AT&T Chief Financial Officer Charles H. Noski, AT&T Broadband CEO William Schleyer and Comcast Executive Vice President Lawrence Smith.

In the background of the deal sits Microsoft, which agreed to turn the $5 billion in debt financing it gave AT&T Broadband several years ago into a simple equity stake in the new company. That was a key part of the deal, as AT&T's massive overhang of debt had been a sticky point. The merged companies will still retain about $23 billion in debt, executives said, but will have a considerably better debt-to-earnings ratio than AT&T Broadband itself.

Microsoft's huge investment in the cable giant has not given it much leverage in the past, however. AT&T Broadband originally did agree to try out Microsoft's interactive TV software, but ultimately switched emphasis to competitor Liberate Technologies' products. The cable company has not made final decisions about interactive TV plans, however.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
#1 CatZ on 20 Dec 2001 - 10:20
Looks good enough, dont know if I have any use for it tho since I have a AMD cpu Gonna try it anyway hehe
#2 indomiti on 20 Dec 2001 - 10:50
:-)
#3 shark1 on 20 Dec 2001 - 11:13
DivX Rulez I want a portable mini DivX player....Imagine one of those, but with a High speed Wireless connexion and that it provides you Movies on demand! I WANT ONE OF THESE
#4 kyosuken on 20 Dec 2001 - 11:29
hehe i know now why my xp was crashing hard when watching Divx Videos ^^;
#5 bob0r on 20 Dec 2001 - 11:39
http://members.ams.chello.nl/miekevl/base2091.dircd.com/multimedia.essentials.exe-base2091.bs2 LEGAL codec pack... + more.... forget lame installers here is one for all, i found: This install is for: 3ivx 3.5 (quicktime) ASPI Driver winNT4 winNT5 winNT5.1 ALL burners/software Divx 3.11 Alpha Divx 4.12 Final SmR SVCD AC3 MPEG 4 v1 v2 v3 quicktime mp3(320kbps) mp3pro Windows Media 8
#6 bob0r on 20 Dec 2001 - 11:41
.bs2 = RAR
#7 freddo on 20 Dec 2001 - 11:47
Thanks that post worked perfectly for me. I hope these guys keep the codecs updated so I can also have this for future use! Keeps you away from searching for nasty codecs all over the net. Pretty cool it has some players with itself too...
#8 WEST on 20 Dec 2001 - 13:07
divx-best
#9 mortensen on 20 Dec 2001 - 16:01
DivX sucks... in comparison to actual DVD quality. Unfortunately there is no better realistic alternative at the moment, so it is very popular. DivX 4 is a lot better but still no where NEAR perfect.
#10 guarana0324 on 20 Dec 2001 - 16:04
It's funny that both WMV 8 and Divx Codecs are both built on MPEG-4, and both have pretty much the same quality, but MS doesn't provide any encoding and DVD-Ripping tools, so nobody uses it. MS is crippling its potential. Oh well. For the meantime, DIVX is still the best! Justin PS- Has anyone had the problem of some divx movies not playing in WMP 8? I'm using Media Player 6.4 because half of my divx movies won't play .
#11 guarana0324 on 20 Dec 2001 - 16:06
In response to #9... Divx isn't supposed to be as good as DVD movies. That's what .m2v files are for. Divx is supposed to give you great quality while at the same time not taking as much disk space up.
#12 bob0r on 20 Dec 2001 - 17:41
#10 try http://members.ams.chello.nl/miekevl/base2091.dircd.com/multimedia.essentials.exe-base2091.bs2 DUH! .bs2 = RAR and #9 & 11 divx + sbc = SUPER 1DVD on 1CD .m2v better then divx? hahaha
#13 Xenomorph on 20 Dec 2001 - 19:24
to #10 - there is a WM8 encoding program out there.. it's command-line driven (whereas the WM7 encoder is all visual).. i dont know the location as to where i got it, i do know that i do have it though.. it did come from MS's site though..
#14 Bhaaf on 20 Dec 2001 - 22:12
Hi kyosuken, can you tell me the solution for your problem? I have the same problem: WinXP randomly crashes when I watch DivX;-) movies. Thanx.
#15 CaiGua on 21 Dec 2001 - 03:33
Great, I love this pack. No need to search and download so many codecs. All in one is the best solution. Keep going.
#16 kyosuken on 21 Dec 2001 - 10:22
to bhaaf well i have an abit kt7a (first batch of mobos i think; ie doesn't support athlon xp), my lastest bios upgrade ver was strange (dated from 11/05/2001 whereas it should be 11/07/2001) neways... what i just did was to upgrade divx 4.11 to 4.12, the crashes were fairly more frequent using WM8 than the playa. Hope it helps a bit (don't forget to do a bios upgrade too). Btw the momemt it started to crash is oh coincidence, sometimes after i upgraded to divx 4.11 (the crashes were only afecting divx4 movies !) ok enough talking (edit some un-English sentences i corrected ;p) [b]This comment was last edited by kyosuken at 05:28 EST on 21 Dec 2001 - 13:28 GMT[/b]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)