OpenOffice.org for Windows Build 641C
Posted by Daniel Fleshbourne on 29 December 2001 - 16:07 · 7 comments & 682 views
- Advertisement
-
-
#1 Posted by velocity3k on 29 Dec 2001 - 20:15
- This is a 50mb file!
-
#2 Posted by velocity3k on 29 Dec 2001 - 20:15
- Just to warn those on 56k's
-
#3 Posted by hurting101 on 29 Dec 2001 - 20:29
- I tried it. Here's what I found: - Loads much slower than OfficeXP (+15 seconds) - OpenOffice folder takes up more space than OfficeXP - Doesn't uninstall registry entries (assiciations)
-
#4 Posted by Anon on 29 Dec 2001 - 21:14
- OpenOffice is in BETA, Office XP is not. OpenOffice is FREEWARE while you have to pay bucks for OXP.
-
#5 Posted by hurting101 on 30 Dec 2001 - 04:05
- Yeah I know.
-
#6 Posted by rockcreek on 31 Dec 2001 - 04:35
- It's a piece of crap. yeah it is free... So is manure in some cases. Open source because no one would pay anything for it LOL
-
#7 Posted by iconman on 19 Jan 2002 - 00:48
-

Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
Changes in Current Version:
Secure packets
Of late, wireless, or Wifi, networks have become very popular because they are cheap and easy to set up, and remove the need for lots of unsightly, expensive cables.
However, the method Wifi networks use to scramble data, known as Wireless Equivalent Privacy (Wep), has been comprehensively defeated by both security professionals and hackers.
The vulnerabilities have led some hacker groups to engage in "war-driving" expeditions which map wireless networks and show which ones are open to attack.
To improve Wep, RSA has developed "Fast Packet Keying" which gives each packet of data its own encryption key. Anyone gathering data from such a network would have a much harder job breaking into the packets of information.
RSA pointed out that the fault with Wep did not lie with the RSA-authored RC4 algorithm it used to encrypt data.
Instead, it lay with the way that the computers were sharing a wireless network and the hub shuffling data around all of them.
Wep provided too little protection for the way that hubs and the connected computers decided on how to encrypt data packets travelling through the air.
Security experts found that by capturing packets they could gradually work out the encryption key being used to scramble the data passing across the network.
With enough information, a determined malicious hacker could find the key to descramble all the data passing across a network.
Protection problems
But some experts fear that the system developed by RSA will not do enough.
"The damage has already been done as far as Wep is concerned," said Bob Brace, from Nokia's internet communications division which develops security systems to protect voice and data networks. "Users see it as a weak security system."
Other security experts fear that a beefed up encryption system will do little to protect wireless network users.
Ian Peacock, a consultant at net security firm Defcom, said often many companies failed to even turn on the Wep encryption system when they installed a wireless network.
He said security audits by Defcom of wireless networks used by its clients showed that some failed to take even the most basic precautions.
"The number of networks around the City [of London] that do not have Wep enabled is scary," he said. "Those that set up and use the latest technology often do not appreciate that there are emergent security issues."
Mr Peacock said the ease with which wireless networks could be set up fooled many people into thinking their new network was secure.
However, he said, the start-up settings of many wireless networks meant they were vulnerable to attack.
Despite the shortcomings there is a lot that users can do to protect themselves.
"There's a shortlist of at least 20 things you can change to make wireless networks more secure," he said.
At the very least, anyone using a wireless network should change default IDs, turn on Wep, place the network behind its own firewall and use extra levels of encryption to secure traffic passing across it and into other corporate networks.