Neowin.net

Sorry for the delay Mario... Mario of FreelancE VIP has updated the excellent utility BootXP to 1.50 RC1.

Changes are :-

• Removed unused code for optimization.
• The Preview Window now supports overlay and Animated Progress Bar.
• The Preview Window also supports Full Screen 640x480 Preview. You'll see your boot screens as if you were booting (Use ALT+ENTER to switch between modes).
• Support For NTOSKRNL.EXE files with full preview.
• Mix your BMP backgrounds with other ovelays and progress to create your own combination.
• And the last but the most important: Support for BMPs and NTOSKRNL.EXE
• Files with optimized palettes. Forget the palette limitation and improve your Boot Screens.

Where are the Windows® Logo in Windows XP® or Windows 2000®
The Boot Screen Logo Are Stored as a Resource in the NTOSKRNL.EXE File, This file is in your WindowsSystem32 directory and it is called at boot by the Windows Kernel when XP/2k starts.

Solution...
Before the creation of BootXP, the only way to change the Boot Screen was to replace this file with another resource hacked NTOSKRNL.EXE containing another Boot Screen.

News source: BootXP 1.50 home page
Download: BootXP 1.50 (261kb, 02/10/2002)

NOTE: This version has not been tested under Windows 2000.

In Tuesday's motion, the states also asked the judge to appoint a technical expert to help provide "impartial opinions on the complex, highly technical issues raised by the parties."

Microsoft has rejected both requests when approached directly by the states.

Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said the company had proved during the trial that it is impossible to remove software features from Windows without damaging the operating system.

"They're trying to relitigate issues that they did not prevail upon in the court of appeals," Desler said. "And, in doing so, they're trying to complicate this case unnecessarily."

Desler said state attorneys general are working "hand-in-hand" with Microsoft competitors, who "will stop at nothing to get access to our intellectual property."

Microsoft reached a deal with Justice in November to settle the long-running case. Nine of the 18 states in the lawsuit agreed to sign on to the deal, but nine others are pressing ahead and asking the judge to impose stricter sanctions.

During the trial, the government accused Microsoft of using its Windows monopoly to snuff out competitors who make add-on "middleware" products, such as Netscape Communications Corp.'s Navigator browser.

In a landmark ruling on the case in June, a federal appeals court dismissed parts of the government's case, but upheld a lower court's conclusion that Microsoft had used illegal tactics to maintain the Windows monopoly.

Among the illegal tactics cited by the court was the "commingling" of Windows source code with add-on middleware.

The dissenting states -- including California, Massachusetts, and Connecticut -- say the availability of a stripped-down browser, without additional features, would help restore competition to the software business.

Later in the day, lawyers for the two sides said in a joint legal filing that they cannot agree on how much time each should have to bring witnesses before the judge.

The dissenting states want each side to be limited to 20 witnesses and no more than 85 hours of testimony. They said that would amount to about three weeks of courtroom time.

Microsoft proposed that each side be allowed up to 150 hours worth of testimony, nearly double the states' proposal.

The states have in the past accused Microsoft of using legal maneuvers to drag out the proceedings and delay the outcome of the case.

But Desler said Microsoft is not stalling.

"We'd like nothing better than a short process. However, given the breadth of the states proposals, and their potential harm on industry and consumers our recommendations on time and witnesses are entirely appropriate."