Winamp 3.0 Build #498 (Developer Build)
Posted by PROGAME on 21 March 2003 - 05:48 · 17 comments & 1253 views
- Advertisement
-
-
#1 Posted by Rev. Otto on 21 Mar 2003 - 10:33
- Lose the bloat, just give me Winamp 2.9 already!
-
#2 Posted by nomis_nehc on 21 Mar 2003 - 12:17
- a beta version of WinAMP v2.9 is now available.
-
#3 Posted by Rev. Otto on 21 Mar 2003 - 12:32
- I knew somebody was listening.
-
#4 Posted by Unforgiven on 21 Mar 2003 - 14:16
- lol

-
#5 Posted by Apollo on 21 Mar 2003 - 14:18
- 2.9!!!
-
#6 Posted by Yvo on 21 Mar 2003 - 15:03
- 2.9 > 3.0
-
(1 reply)
#7 Posted by SpeaR on 21 Mar 2003 - 16:30
- When will it use less resources ?
-
#7.1 Posted by Unforgiven on 21 Mar 2003 - 17:00
- [neoquote=#7.0 by SpeaR]When will it use less resources ?
[/neoquote]
Never 
-
#8 Posted by Ti220 on 21 Mar 2003 - 17:03
- I want Winamp3 lite or standard to come out.
-
#9 Posted by xp1ode on 21 Mar 2003 - 19:50
- hmm... whats so good about winamp 2.9? i have winamp3 and it works fine??
-
#10 Posted by Spider_Man on 21 Mar 2003 - 20:20
- Yeah same here. What gives?
-
#11 Posted by destrox on 21 Mar 2003 - 22:06
- 2.9 is much less eyecandy, faster, and overall better for anyone that wants to multitask with things such as games. 2.x works flawlessly running in the background with games, 3.x takes up much more memory & cpu usage , which in turn takes away from anything else running.
-
(2 replies)
#12 Posted by [EvilBeAr] on 22 Mar 2003 - 03:34
- buy a new computer then...
winamp 3 runs fine on my computer... i dont notice it during games. The mmd theme makes it nifty and small... suits me. -
#12.1 Posted by Qumahlin on 22 Mar 2003 - 05:51
- It has nothing to do with buying a new computer. For some people 3 runs good, for others it doesn't. It is fully of buggy code and has quite a few memory bloat issues.
-
#12.2 Posted by JustaPinoy on 22 Mar 2003 - 06:22
- I concur with Qumahlin..
-
#13 Posted by devnulllore on 22 Mar 2003 - 23:43
- WInamp 3.0 is ANYTHING but fast. When it was first released I tried it, and have given it the benefit and tried it several more times, but gave up. Too slow, less features I like and older fav skins make it crash. Trying 2.91 beta now.....
-
#14 Posted by bangbang023 on 23 Mar 2003 - 17:13
- The fact that it takes 2 seconds longer to load bothers you people that much? That's the only slowness you'll see is in loadtime.
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
- Fixed Bug #2483: Monitor Aspect Ratio "Other" Crash
- Fixed Bug #1566: Removing currently playing song stops PL
- Fixed Bug #1068: Playlist name saved clicking white space
- Fixed Bug #629: Detecting Read-Only Winamp folder (XP/2K Admin Install)
- Fixed Bug #479: PL queuing oddities
- No more damn waveOut script errors
- New PCM EQ engine
- The return of Internationalization
For better or worse. Appears to cause less problems, sill experimental though.
- Issue: Eject (Open Files) button does not function.
- Issue: Delayed load time, last play list memory.
- Other unknown thingies