software

Divx 5.0.4 Final Released

Keldyn   on 18 April 2003 - 06:56 · 16 comments & 1330 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks xStaindDx

Changes in Current Version:
  • The new RC doesn't use Q=1 frames anymore
  • No stuffing used, bitrate can be too low in some extreme cases
  • Strategy planning for rate control is much faster now
  • Better tracking of the planned RC strategy creating more consistent quality
  • Pro includes EKG™ advanced video encoding tool
View: Divx HomePage
Download: Divx Pro Download
Download: Divx Download Page


Clock speed isn't everything when it comes to measuring performance. The Opteron chips will come with 1MB of cache, which is a performance-enhancing reservoir of memory located on the same chip as the processor. The low-cost Xeons come with 512KB of cache. The $1,000-plus models for four- and eight-processor systems come with 1MB of cache.

AMD declined to comment.

Offering chips for higher prices than Intel marks a change for AMD. Typically, the company has had to sell its products at a substantial discount compared with Intel's, except during relatively short windows of opportunity when Intel was experiencing problems.

Opteron, which features an entirely new chip architecture, represents the best chance to date for the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company to crack the corporate computing market. AMD's chips primarily get used in consumer PCs, or in desktops aimed at small- to medium-size businesses.

Opteron, however, will sport a variety of technical enhancements that will not be seen in Intel chips. The chip runs 32-bit software, the kind used on most desktops today, and 64-bit code, seen on high-end servers.

Additionally, the chip connects to other processors and components through HyperTransport, a high-speed link. HyperTransport makes it easier to build four- and eight-processor systems, say analysts, a major engineering feat for Intel-based servers.

Moreover, the chip will reduce memory latency, or the time it takes for data to travel from memory to the processor, because it contains an integrated memory controller.

"Memory latency is a barrier to better system performance," Dirk Meyer, senior vice president of AMD's Computational Products Group, said in a recent interview.

The company will introduce the chip Tuesday in New York. A variety of smaller server vendors such as RackSaver, Newisys and Appro International have already committed to using the chip in servers, while executives from Sun Microsystems have said the company will "likely" use it in the indeterminate future.

Analysts speculate that IBM, which is helping AMD develop chip-manufacturing technology, could also one day adopt it.

In terms of software, SuSE will release a 64-bit version of Linux for the chip, while Microsoft is working on a 64-bit version of Windows that will likely emerge later in the year or in 2004. IBM has also agreed to port its DB2 database to Linux-Opteron machines.

AMD on Tuesday is also planning to talk about a 100 series of Opteron chips for single-processor systems, and an 800 series for eight-processor servers. These different chip families will vary by speed, price and cache size.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
#1 SOOPAH256 on 18 Apr 2003 - 06:58
awesome!
(2 replies) #2 nocture on 18 Apr 2003 - 07:13
use Xvid
#2.1 jardragon901 on 18 Apr 2003 - 08:14
I have had nothing but trouble from Xvid, I'm tired of people just using something just because they think its l33t.
#2.2 wuzz on 18 Apr 2003 - 08:33
same here. i'm using avic to switch xvid compressed movies to divx and it works no coloured noise anymore.
#3 mrk on 18 Apr 2003 - 08:34
divx owns xvid, especially the versions 503 and up with vbr and other settings
#4 tonyunreal on 18 Apr 2003 - 09:16
xvid is free, divx is not.
#5 Omeglidan on 18 Apr 2003 - 11:24
Just because something is free, doesn't make it better. When a product requires $$ to use, then atleast it has had some development time put into it.
#6 DjmUK on 18 Apr 2003 - 12:05
DivX is free - if you want the advanced feature then you pay for it, but I've had no problems with any version of DivX.
#7 mr_da3m0n on 18 Apr 2003 - 13:54
Yeah, I don't get why people get the ad supported annoyware version when all they want is to WATCH MOVIES. Dee: "Hmm... dude, are you going to encode?" Luser: "Nope. I just want to watch my anime." Dee: "Err.. then why the biggest package? It just gives you more features in the encoder... and even there they are minimal." Luser: "Because it's cooler since it's bigger!" *loud facepalm*
(1 reply) #8 NeoWhen on 18 Apr 2003 - 14:01
DOH! I've going to have to copy over 50 movies back to my HD and encode them from divx 5.0.3 to 5.0.4 and buy another 50 cd's
#8.1 uiop on 18 Apr 2003 - 15:03
um .... WHY?! you don't get out much do you
#9 xStainDx on 18 Apr 2003 - 16:26
i like my name as "xStaindDx" lol
#10 Endeavor on 18 Apr 2003 - 16:42
I dont like XVid. I had problems trying to play back movies encoded with xvid on Windows Media Player. The only thing that would play it was the divx player. I got a crappy monitor so the brightness controls on media player 9 is easier for me to use.
#11 Cryton on 18 Apr 2003 - 17:23
Is DivX 5.04 working for anyone who encodes? For me, it's not generating a .bin file when doing 2pass encoding, which means the 2nd pass always fails. Anyone else getting this, or is it just me?
#12 hunter1234 on 18 Apr 2003 - 22:18
I haven't had trouble with Xvid or DivX at all. I personally think that DivX is better now, since they fixed that sudden picture speed up problem that occurs everytime you fast forward.
#13 Owen on 19 Apr 2003 - 02:28
Anyone know where to just get the codecs since I really don't need all the extra stuff.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)