software

Kazaa Lite K++ 2.1.0 build 3 Final

Steven Parker   on 19 April 2003 - 13:38 · 31 comments & 2221 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks Hilbrand for this email notice. The popular "Lite" version of KaZaA Media Desktop is available. Lite version removes restrictions on search results making it possible to receive many more results than you normally would, more importantly it is completely AD free and does not include any Spyware.

What's New in build 3:
  • Fixed a serious bug with Sig2Dat quicklinks
  • Updated start page
Download: Kazaa Lite K++ 2.1.0 build 3 Final @ Betas.intercom


Mozillazine's forums have been inaccessable for the past couple of hours for me. When the blackout on the forums was first encountered, an error page showed a suspicious message. Note that this message has now been replaced by a "Technical Difficulties" notification. Have the forums been hacked? And by who? Perhaps by Firebird database zealots who have been trolling constantly for the past several days, or could it be some anonymous hacker, taking advantage of the immaturity of both sides of this battle, and attempting to instigate a open source war?

Clearly, this issue must be resolved quickly before it escalates any further, but the question remains, how can both sides be appeased? Phoenix browser's developers spent a long time researching their new name on the legal battleground. The official verdict? All clear. Unfortunately, Firebird database and its supporters have put up a wall of resistance to any sort of civil discussion over the issue. Those on the old Phoenix forums who are attempting to offer their opinions and support are being overwhelmed by the sheer number of users who try to spread confusion and anger in the name of their beloved database. After having their e-mail addresses posted publicly on a Firebird Protest page, several members of the Phoenix/Firebird development team had their accounts mailbombed. Other members have even been impersonated by these childish brats. Does the Firebird database team really deserve to keep their name unique if they cater to the whims of these cretins? While the official Firebird database team has stated that they "sincerely hope to avoid" any conflicts, evidence posts on Firebird browser's forums suggest otherwise.

Nearly every article I have come across lately has addressed this issue from Firebird Database's perspective. Perhaps it is high time to see this from the Phoenix Team's point of view.
  • Firebird is a common name, owned by a number (over 60) open source projects, none of which have attempted to secure the name as an official trademark.
  • By chance, Firebird is also a common english word, the name of a car, etc.
  • Firebird database is simply a database. Firebird browser is a browser built for surfing the net, serving the same purpose as Netscape, or IE, or Mozilla. A database is NOT the same thing as a browser.
  • The Phoenix Team did NOT know that Firebird database supporters would object to one more open source project sharing its name, in the light that there were already open source software projects existing which also had the name Firebird.
  • Claims that this naming will cause confusion have been blown out of proportion. One project is a database. The other is a browser. There is nothing stopping people from referring to one as Firebird database, and Firebird browser.
  • You don't whack someone if they happen to have the same name as you.
I believe that there has been a misunderstanding between the two projects, however, with time, and perhaps a little tolerance, from both sides, this issue will blow itself over.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 31 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Sierra_Whiskey on 19 Apr 2003 - 14:17
this version: 76% cpu usage imesh lite: 3%
#1.1 LiGhTfast on 19 Apr 2003 - 14:58
that used to happen with me in build 1, not gonna try this build think i'll stick to #2
#1.2 Quick Reply on 08 May 2003 - 09:16
imesh lite comes with some backdoor, i recommend against imesh lite
#2 net-cruizer on 19 Apr 2003 - 15:59
They could have been more specific about the serious bug, cuz I've used verified quicklinks with the 210 b2 release and never noticed any bugs. And as for startpage, I never have used it and used my own basicly blank customized one, ever since K++ first came out.
#3 Xahid on 19 Apr 2003 - 16:30
wow... A new build after every 2nd days....
(3 replies) #4 Kriz on 19 Apr 2003 - 17:09
They do get betta + betta every build tho
#4.1 memNOC on 19 Apr 2003 - 18:44
[neoquote=#4.0 by Kriz]They do get betta + betta every build tho[/neoquote] removing kazap in build2 and that ever so controversial "disable sharing" option kinda blew IMO.. sure, you shouldnt be using it, but its nice to have that there, esp. for ppl on 56k.. so i degraded to b1..
#4.2 xWeston on 19 Apr 2003 - 19:30
It seems like there should be a way to disable sharing still, through a registry key or something. I havent looked into it but i'd definitely like to be able to. I do like how they are going for a more free sharing society though, but some people do need it to be disabled for certain reasons.
#4.3 Ti220 on 20 Apr 2003 - 18:50
You could alwase move the files to another folder.......
(1 reply) #5 WebOrbiter on 19 Apr 2003 - 19:18
For music, I still use WinMX, but this for everything else. I don't have 76% CPU usage so maybe you've got somethin else goin on Sierra...
#5.1 sorlag on 20 Apr 2003 - 20:42
this only occure when you have a big downstream and when you download many files at the same time.
#6 Dale on 19 Apr 2003 - 19:33
they changed the website to the downloads mirors nope.. i was wrong.. they just re-directed k-lite.tk to the mirrors

Last edited by 24287 on 19 Apr 2003 - 19:38
(1 reply) #7 xWeston on 19 Apr 2003 - 19:33
I just found the key, but i dont know if it works in the new builds: HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareKazaaLocalContentDisableSharing (set to 1 for disabled) Anybody want to try it?
#7.1 Noxerus on 19 Apr 2003 - 20:02
*cough* you can do this from Kazaa's options screen anyway.
(2 replies) #8 LunaC on 19 Apr 2003 - 20:09
Why would you want to disable sharing?? If no one shares there would be nothing to download
#8.1 Sierra_Whiskey on 19 Apr 2003 - 20:56
[neoquote=#8.0 by LunaC]Why would you want to disable sharing?? If no one shares there would be nothing to download [/neoquote] the option to disable everything supports those who are against file sharing
#8.2 zivan56 on 20 Apr 2003 - 04:54
[neoquote=#8.1 by Sierra_Whiskey]the option to disable everything supports those who are against file sharing [/neoquote] Why would they be using Kazaa then? Of course, they are called leechers.
(1 reply) #9 KICK_XP on 19 Apr 2003 - 20:45
yer but what if your 56k etc
#9.1 Sierra_Whiskey on 20 Apr 2003 - 00:03
at least 1 upload should be all right
#10 nomis_nehc on 20 Apr 2003 - 03:51
haha, maybe you shouldn't download at all then
#11 scoult01 on 20 Apr 2003 - 04:07
What part of Final do the people who code this not understand. You cant label something as final then release 50 more builds of it. Seriously... LONG LIVE IRC@#@$
#12 ZuLwArN on 20 Apr 2003 - 07:58
pfff am not using this version no matter what ... but hey if u want to disabl sharing then just remove all the folders from the sharing option of corse the "my shared folder" will still be shared but u just dont put anything there thats easy like i do .... coz i have a 56kb modem ... even so i realy download alot from there ad no one complane
#13 nocture on 20 Apr 2003 - 09:16
build 3 is nice!
#14 lwebster on 20 Apr 2003 - 12:37
to disable sharing simply share a folder that has no files in - easy
#15 Electroglitter on 20 Apr 2003 - 13:21
How can they say having 56k is not an excuse??!! Its "OK" i guess if you just want to download and do nothing else with your connection.. but even then.. you have a max of about 4.7kb/s bandwidth with 56k (phone line and ISP) reduce it to around that... so you if you share your downloading at a max of 2.5kb/s and sending at about 2.3kb/s ... and you cant do anything else, so that means if you share files on 56k u cant do anything else while online... and i dont see the point in leaving the pc when your not using it. i think people who have 56k have the right to disable file sharing.. unless they are gunna just leave they pc alone constantly and not do anything that uses their connection
(1 reply) #16 Nervosa on 20 Apr 2003 - 16:30
what happened to kazap?
#16.1 Napalm on 20 Apr 2003 - 19:39
It was removed, since it was linked to a number of crashes with the Kazaa Lite software.
#17 Jerichohol on 20 Apr 2003 - 19:04
i'm still using 1.7.1 - no problems at all
#18 nomis_nehc on 20 Apr 2003 - 20:22
heh... yeah, well, if there was no broadband, there will be no files for anyone to download if everyone disabled sharing... kinda defeats the purpose... oh well, I am not gonna debate over this... I haven't used kazaa lite in some time... is the intensive cpu usage some kind of bug?
#19 stncttr908 on 20 Apr 2003 - 22:48
I still use 1.72, it's the best.
#20 longwilli on 23 Apr 2003 - 11:32
this version is slightly better then those before it, it looks slightly more polished, although i hated the build before this i had so many problems with it

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)