software

Mozilla 1.4 RC 2 Released

xpfreak   on 18 June 2003 - 18:07 · 34 comments & 1240 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks to macster for the heads-up from our BPN Section.

Just a quick newsbit, Mozilla 1.4 RC 2 has been released for the general publics consumption :)

Download: Download Mozilla 1.4 RC2



The keyboard is significantly smaller than that of the original Treo. The keys have a dome shape to them intended to make typing with thumbs easier. It has an integrated digital camera and will be able to send pictures via wireless e-mail. It will also play MP3 music files. The only thing we see missing is Bluetooth, and that can easily be added in a later model if the market demands it.

It will run Palm OS 5.2 and will come in versions for both GSM and CDMA wireless phone networks. On the CDMA side, you can expect Sprint PCS to be a major carrier--as it has carried the Treo 300 for some time and has a history with Handspring.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 34 additional comments
#1 mikulka on 18 Jun 2003 - 18:21
changelog? anyone?
#2 Kaneda on 18 Jun 2003 - 18:23
(2 replies) #3 123_kid on 18 Jun 2003 - 18:55
Yep, it won't even start up for me
#3.1 Cygoku on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:36
Yup, sucking thing!

Cygoku
#3.2 123_kid on 19 Jun 2003 - 03:37
I got it to work after deleting the "mozilla" folder. it's pretty nice
#4 Prelude76 on 18 Jun 2003 - 19:11
runs very well on my boxes. unless showstoppers popup, this will be renamed to final

apparently, 1.4 has 'thousands' of bugfixes and changes over version 1.3, with just 2 or 3 bugs left before final build is released.
#5 zivan56 on 18 Jun 2003 - 19:55
The XP theme integration is sweet!
(1 reply) #6 Cryton on 18 Jun 2003 - 19:59
Do these changes already appear in nightly builds of Firebird, or not? (does anyone know)
#6.1 Chipi on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:24
They should be. After all, Firebird is being built from the Mozilla source. And the Gecko engine is just the same.
(1 reply) #7 JaggedFlame on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:04
QUOTE
Mozilla now has smooth scrolling. It is disabled by default. To enable it, use about:config to add the boolean preference general.smoothScroll with a value of true. To disable smooth scrolling, set the value of the pref to false.


FINALLY.
#7.1 Chipi on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:22
It's there for more than a month...
#8 Fotix on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:53
Lists of changes since 1.4 RC1: Link

More fixes and stuff to do yet: Link
(2 replies) #9 nonick on 18 Jun 2003 - 20:55
anyone knows how to obtain the EMAIL program of the package alone for download? i heard they gonna split them isnt that right?
#9.1 Fotix on 18 Jun 2003 - 21:00
Mozilla Thunderbird: Homepage

Release 0.1 is coming soon according to developer chat.

Good Thunderbird site.
#9.2 nonick on 19 Jun 2003 - 08:46
thank you
#10 Webgraph on 19 Jun 2003 - 00:28
If it's 1.4 RC2, shouldn't have they added the RC2 part to it? The About window makes it think it's Mozilla 1.4 Final!
#11 Kaneda on 19 Jun 2003 - 02:15
the damn thing only has like 4 reported bugs on it. it's probably what they'll just use as final.
(10 replies) #12 notbychoice on 19 Jun 2003 - 04:10
good god.. this buggy slow resource hog of a browser is still around?
#12.1 Kaneda on 19 Jun 2003 - 06:23
well hey, if IE can do it and call it a "zenith"...
#12.2 kal-ky on 19 Jun 2003 - 07:13
notbychoice... you're an ignorant fool.
#12.3 nonick on 19 Jun 2003 - 09:49
I suggest you to kill your self right away.

Thank You.

#12.4 Prelude76 on 19 Jun 2003 - 13:32
buggy? down to 4 minor bugs. mozilla 1.3 and 1.4 series, number of crashes for me: ZERO. not a single f*kin' crash in past few months. how does IE stand up to that record? hugh? cant hear ya?

slow? 1.3 and prior, true, it was slow. 5 or so seconds to load. hard to compete speedwise against IE and the fact its PRE-LOADED into every XP bootup! but 1.4 versions boots up in under 2 seconds, and thats WITHOUT the turbo-launch option which can make it load in a split second.

so, i concur with comment about you being an ignorant fool
#12.5 notbychoice on 19 Jun 2003 - 20:07
im sorry
you retards are the ignorant fools

mozilla is slow as hell. There is not a single feature thats in mozilla thats not in MyIE2. tabbed browsing? popup blocker? mouse gestures? plugins? myie2 has it all. it loads EVERY page faster than mozilla (ie that is). it uses less ram and cpu. it loads faster. what in gods name could you ask more for?

how about you idiots stop being so ignorant, and realize that microsoft has put out a superior product with IE. dont try to be ONLIEN REBELZ by using mozilla. youre still losers.
#12.6 Mav Phoenix on 19 Jun 2003 - 21:41
Bill? Is that you?
#12.7 mrbester on 20 Jun 2003 - 10:47
IE a superior product? Go to W3C's style pages and note how the righthand menu is fscked in IE (using the Gold stylesheet) but works as scripted in Mozilla [Firebird]. This is standard CSS, but to get the thing to work in IE you have to use browser sniffing JavaScript and event watching.
#12.8 kal-ky on 20 Jun 2003 - 10:59
You still want to use a closed, insecure browser who doesn't support W3C standards?
Have fun.
#12.9 notbychoice on 20 Jun 2003 - 18:19
QUOTE (#1.7)


yes.. and im sure everyone visits w3c's gold style page everyday.

so what if w3c purposely make that menu that doesnt work in IE. so what if its the "standard". the point is, as long as people can see the sitse load up properly, people are going to use IE. they dont give a rats a$$ if the html was not standard. the page loads fine, the user is happy.

Do youthink webmasters have anything against IE? NO. All webmasters (good ones) including myself despise opera/mozilla/whatnot. The sites always look fine in IE, but then you have to go and make adjustments for the retards that use other browsers.

Let me tell you something about "standards". standards are, whether you like it not, set by the kings. when it has 95% market share, if you page is standard compliant but doesnt work in IE, thats YOUR PROBLEM, not ies. You go fix that up so the world can browse you page properly, not complain that MS wont follow standards. MS SETS the standards, not w3c as they have you believe.

And for god sakes, go get some benchmarks off google. Every test has proven IE is faster, and uses less resources than its ugly mozilla cousin. and with MyIE2, there is no reason whatsover to use mozilla, unless like i said before, you like feeling like an ONLIEN REBEL because youre so popular in real life.
#12.10 Webgraph on 21 Jun 2003 - 22:46
notbychance, you are very immature on the forums. If I was still a moderator on this site, I would have had you BANNED!

Yeah, most people might end up using IE, but that's only because Microsoft integrated their browser with the Windows Operating System, which Microsoft forced the major computer manufacturers to include with their PC's! Microsoft is losing ground with the Mac market since they halted development of IE for Mac permanently thanks to the quality of Safari, which is a combination of Konqueror and Firebird.

As for performance, I use only a 500 MHz Pentium III and Mozilla loaded within 3 seconds! It takes about 8 - 10 seconds to load up IE 6 and this is using Windows XP. Nearly all the web pages loaded up faster in Mozilla, thanks to the Gecko Rendering Engine, which was developed by Netscape. As for the pop-up blocking, IE is the only browser not to use it and it never will. As for the plugins, nearly all web browsers used the Netscape Plugin System and Microsoft's Internet Explorer wouldn't have survived without Netscape's technology. But then again, the ActiveX development took over and eventually, many of the companies used Microsoft's propietary code. So if you're dissing Mozilla because it was branched off of Netscape, you are blind!

Besides, if Mozilla keeps on with this development, Microsoft's IE might have to surrender even in the Windows market.
#13 Kaneda on 19 Jun 2003 - 04:58
double post

Last edited by 3393 on 19 Jun 2003 - 06:23
#14 Zerosignull on 19 Jun 2003 - 11:25
remember to visist optimoz and isnstall the mouse gestures files
(1 reply) #15 Riggs on 19 Jun 2003 - 15:10
OMG, I just installed it and I opens FASTER than IE. It loads pages faster than IE. It does pretty much everything better than IE. Just one question. Does anyone know if they've fixed the bug in the mail application that makes the devider between the message and the message preview window jump around?

[EDIT] Nevermind, it still jumps around...hopefully they fix this in the final version. [/EDIT]

Last edited by 337 on 19 Jun 2003 - 15:43
#15.1 lj300 on 20 Jun 2003 - 02:32
better that that's impossible, ie is a Microsoft App (hope you get the sarcasm)
#16 mjames on 20 Jun 2003 - 02:49
Mozilla is nothing but a lame duck. Use Firebird 0.6, it's rock solid.
#17 Zerosignull on 20 Jun 2003 - 09:09
firebird is nothing withough mozilla

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)