software

Azureus v2.3.0.2

JCAP   on 25 May 2005 - 15:39 · 54 comments & 3236 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Azureus is a Java based BitTorrent client that offers multiple torrent downloads, queuing/priority systems (on torrents and files), start/stop seeding options and instant access to numerous pieces of information about your torrents. It also features an embedded tracker that is easily set up and ready to use.

Download: Azureus v2.3.0.2
View: Changelog
News source: azureus.sourceforge.net


It is important to note that this issue is not a security vulnerability or a hack that puts customers at any risk, nor is it a vulnerability in the activeX control WGA uses to determine if a customer is running genuine Windows. This is simply an issue of users taking a validation code from a genuine copy of Windows and using it on a non-genuine copy of Windows. The threat is similar to that posed by the illegal distribution of software burned to CDs.

Of course a counterfeiter could use this method to steal software for themselves, but because the code expires quickly, it would be useless to share the code with any other users.

Q: Who would benefit from this practice?
A: This method of counterfeiting is only an option for relatively sophisticated users who are running both a genuine version of Windows (from which they would take the code) and a non-genuine version (to which they would apply it). This method only applies to the Download Center, where customers would need to know exactly what to look for, and not Windows Update or the Automatic Updates feature that most customers use.

Q: How does the code expire?
A: Microsoft “hashes” the PID returned from the validation tool (genuinecheck.exe) with a Microsoft.com timeserver time code that is checked by the page logic on the Download Center, which means the code is only valid for a short period of time.

Q: Does Microsoft have plans to change or improve WGA validation to address this vulnerability?
A: With WGA, Microsoft seeks to balance the need to make downloads easily available for customers, while trying to safeguard our IP from counterfeiters. In striking this balance, Microsoft will defer to the needs of its customers to validate their computers as easily as possible so that they can receive the updates they need to stay secure. Furthermore, because the code generated by the validation tool expires so quickly, we don’t perceive this as an issue significant enough to outweigh our customers’ needs for hassle-free downloads.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 54 additional comments
#1 caerma on 25 May 2005 - 15:58
Thanks for the info.
#2 kazgor on 25 May 2005 - 16:12
Memory usage on this one is much better that the 2.3.0.0 release, so def try this if you one of those that suffered.

i now hover around 70 to 110megs, but dont forget SAFEPEER plugin with 80,000 ips does use up a lot of memory for it.
#3 Valerus on 25 May 2005 - 16:41
cool, thanks for the information.
(7 replies) #4 iller on 25 May 2005 - 16:49
But the problem with Nod32 has not been fixed.
#4.1 theyarecomingforyou on 25 May 2005 - 17:34
That's because they have changed the way data is sent/received, meaning that NOD32 now intercepts it. I'm stuck with 2.2.0.2, until they either fix the problem or another client overtakes the version I'm running.
#4.2 ev0| on 25 May 2005 - 20:38
NOD needs to fix what their doing since this doesn't affect a single other antivirus product besides them.
#4.3 maulia on 26 May 2005 - 06:14
Just put the javaw.exe as the exclusion list in the IMON settings.... all works fine then!
#4.4 SIG on 27 May 2005 - 08:32
Still doesn't work for me.
#4.5 eAi on 27 May 2005 - 09:35
Its up to virus scanners to not produce false positives, no for software developers to work around virus scanners.
#4.6 theyarecomingforyou on 27 May 2005 - 17:00
QUOTE
Just put the javaw.exe as the exclusion list in the IMON settings.... all works fine then!


lmao - Java is the last thing I'd put in the exclusion list; most of the viruses I've ever had have been related to Java.
#4.7 ivand67 on 27 May 2005 - 19:09
I am using Azureus 2.3 (now 2.3.0.2), and NOD32, without any problems.

If you are stuck with the old version, it means you haven't searched for help on this issue.


The Wiki at the Azureus site, and the FAQ, have all the answers on how to get around the problems with NOD32.

Excluding javaw.exe in your IMON is not very dangerous. theyarecomingforyou (what kind of a user name is that?), just make sure you don't download any bullcrap from Limewire or anything that would use Javaw.exe, or from any BitTorrent site, and you should be fine.

But I guess some of you are just scared to death! Kitties!
(2 replies) #5 peacemf on 25 May 2005 - 16:59
could someone else also confirm that this version doesn't work with Nortons.


thanks...
#5.1 kazgor on 25 May 2005 - 21:55
erm i can only confirm it work fine with Norton 2004
#5.2 Chanser on 26 May 2005 - 05:21
Works fine with Norton Systemworks Premier 2005.
#6 soldier1st on 25 May 2005 - 16:59
so the memory usage won't climb up till you got nothing left?
#7 smashguy on 25 May 2005 - 18:32
Cheer up!
#8 Mystical112 on 25 May 2005 - 19:01
nice thx...
#9 The Cub on 25 May 2005 - 19:07
Cool
#10 CrazyDelta on 25 May 2005 - 19:46
So what is this problem with NOD32? I currently use Bitcometh, but I was thinking to try this new version of Azureus.
(5 replies) #11 sLm4ever on 25 May 2005 - 20:02
did they update the "about" box = !!? .... coz' it says that I have the 2.3.0.0 after updating it =_=;
#11.1 sLm4ever on 25 May 2005 - 23:43
will someone PLEASE answer me T-T
#11.2 buroja on 26 May 2005 - 00:41
My About box says Azureus 2.3.0.2
#11.3 sLm4ever on 26 May 2005 - 01:29
thanks for the reply ... anyway ... I'll see what I can do with it =
#11.4 SIG on 26 May 2005 - 19:28
Mine also said 2.3.0.0

Guess the mirror had the wrong version even though the file name had 2.3.0.2 in it.
#11.5 sLm4ever on 27 May 2005 - 11:30
yup ... that's right

I downloaded it agine from other mirror and now every thing is fine
(2 replies) #12 freeza on 25 May 2005 - 20:25
yeah until the nod32 problem is fixed, and possibly still.....i'm a loyal bitcomet user now
#12.1 ev0| on 25 May 2005 - 20:39
but bitcomet doesn't have a distributed database now does it ?
#12.2 buroja on 26 May 2005 - 00:41
...
(2 replies) #13 echotheory on 25 May 2005 - 21:21
um.. if you use nod, just go in and tell amon or imon or whatever it is to allow all packets from azureus.. problem solved.
#13.1 iller on 25 May 2005 - 23:12
I have added javaw to the imon exclude list just as the guide says, but.
From my point of view it is not safe to let java have it´s way with your PC.
#13.2 Nave on 27 May 2005 - 07:50
It is not safe to let anything have its way in your PC, actually. I bet you are thinking about java applets. Azureus is not an applet, and as long as you get it from sourceforge you would be fine.
(4 replies) #14 beardly on 25 May 2005 - 22:32
R.I.P. elitetorrents
#14.1 CoLdFuSi0n on 26 May 2005 - 00:29
damn it i loved that site.
#14.3 Dirtie on 26 May 2005 - 09:35
Lol, I think the MPAA (or whoever it was) got PWNED!
#14.4 s0wi on 27 May 2005 - 04:06
Hey look, their user name. OMG...
#15 pacifica on 25 May 2005 - 22:56
nice
(2 replies) #16 alien555 on 25 May 2005 - 23:08
Just started using bitcomet the memory usage is GREAT!!! i used bittornado before and azureus arent near as good because they are coded in python and bitcomet is in c++. Give it a shot people.
#16.1 VikingStorm on 26 May 2005 - 13:03
No idea why, but BitComet and BitLord can only average out at 30kb/s while Azureus always gets me my max of 60kb/s average. Wonder what is up with that.
#16.2 pctoolbin on 26 May 2005 - 14:20
I used BitComet for quite a while, until some torrent sites blocked the BitComet from their site as a invalid download client....however, they haven't done the same to BitLord (v 1.1), so that's what I use. (As it's essentially BitComet with a facelift....

Also have used, and would recommend the ABC client as well....Azureus has always been too high of CPU usage for me to like it.....so maybe this revision will be better than all previous incarnations....
#17 ev0| on 26 May 2005 - 00:16
azureus has nothing to do with python. it's a java app.
(2 replies) #18 Surr3al on 26 May 2005 - 14:11
I am stuck with 2.2.0.2 until they fix Azureus's problem with netlimiter.
#18.1 Xenomorph on 26 May 2005 - 14:18
what problem with NetLimiter? i use NetLimiter.

Azureus 2.3.x.x causes all kinds of issues with 100% CPU usage, weird error messages, etc.

i keep going back to 2.2.0.2 as well since its the last version that works for me.
#18.2 pctoolbin on 26 May 2005 - 14:25
I've had problems with ALL versions of Azureus and high CPU usage (2.2.0.0. and 2.2.0.2 were high CPU for me as well).....so I am hoping with some reports of 2.3.0.2 being less CPU for some, it may be the "magic build" for me to try once more)
#19 AethylFilth on 26 May 2005 - 14:29
I like reading your e-mails
#20 soldier1st on 26 May 2005 - 18:40
bitcomet 0.58 works fine with all bt trackers,if azureus wasen't a memory hog i would switch but bitcomet is still the best to use.
#21 myxamatosis on 26 May 2005 - 18:40
I prefer BitComet much faster and lighter
#22 Ficman on 26 May 2005 - 20:48
Cool..
(1 reply) #23 modem on 27 May 2005 - 00:07
Has anyone had problems with 2.3.0.x causing massive DSL/Cable disconnections? For example any 2.3.0.x version works great, but other programs like mIRC, AIM, Yahoo, ICQ all disconnect every 60 seconds or so and reconnect. They continue this pattern and even HTTP based apps have timeout issues. The moment I shutdown Azureus, everything works! My connection is setup like this: DSL Line -> Speedstream 5200 modem -> Linksys BEFSR41 2.1 -> 8port Switch -> my PC.
#23.1 Nave on 27 May 2005 - 08:12
Limit the number of connections for each torrent and the total connections. Being connected to too many people does not necessarily mean faster download, but can crash your router. 10 connections per torrent/~200 total connections would be a good starting point. Try upgrading your firmware if all fails.
(1 reply) #24 RADicaLMMS on 27 May 2005 - 00:22
So are they going to run two DHT layers in future release? now that Bram Choen's BitTorret client has DHT as well.
#24.1 Nave on 27 May 2005 - 08:20
From the official bittorrent website:
"While it is called trackerless, in practice it makes every client a lightweight tracker. A clever protocol, based on a Kademlia distributed hash table or "DHT", allows clients to efficiently store and retrieve contact information for peers in a torrent."

Which is the same as the one Azureus is using. I would conclude that they would interoperate.
(1 reply) #25 dannymp3 on 27 May 2005 - 15:32
Still using 2.2.0.2

I find the new version to ... bloat?

Well, not bloat, but it's got a lot of fancy new extras I find unneccesary. I've been hearing people having too many problems with CPU usage, router/modem disconnections, etc.

Does anyone know of/have a guide that can make 3.2.0.2 just as good as 2.2.02 was? You know, with all the bug fixes, but no "fancy extras."
#25.1 s0wi on 28 May 2005 - 05:04
I feel the same.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)