ATi Catalyst v5.13 Beta Drivers
Posted by Steven Parker on 19 December 2005 - 10:46 · 19 comments & 6734 views
- Advertisement
-
-
#1 Posted by Coffeee on 19 Dec 2005 - 15:39
- Wow that review does a great job of showing how well the ATI drivers have come along =D
-
#2 Posted by travl0r on 19 Dec 2005 - 17:06
- Great that gives us more reasons to keep on supporting ATI
Good work, anyone tested these drivers? is the difference noticable on other cards than the Radeon X1800?
-
(3 replies)
#3 Posted by kebabi on 19 Dec 2005 - 19:58
- Dammit, ATI is really fast with these updates.
I'm still using Omegas based on 5.10a.
After waiting for 5.12 Omegas, there is already 5.13 Cats released.
Then waiting for 5.13 Omegas, there is 5.14 Cats released.
And so on... -
#3.1 Posted by MasterSpy on 19 Dec 2005 - 23:19
- Just to point out that the number revision represents a month, ie. 5.12 = December, 5.11 = November, so there will be no 5.13 or 5.14!
-
#3.2 Posted by DrIndianaJones on 19 Dec 2005 - 23:58
- Last I looked 13 didn't have a month associated with it.
-
(5 replies)
#4 Posted by Tungsten T on 19 Dec 2005 - 20:19
- I am on a 9550 (flashed to 9600) and it helps the video alot.
No joke, its really noticible how much it reduces compression artifacts -
#4.1 Posted by Angry_Badger on 19 Dec 2005 - 21:02
- Well since these enable AVIVO in the X1800 series cards,Im pretty sure the performance increase your seeing is pure placebo. 9600 have no kind of AVIVO support at all
-
#4.2 Posted by Tungsten T on 19 Dec 2005 - 21:53
- No way. Its it unbelivibly noticible and that site that did a review said they noticed a huge increse in quility on a X800
It does enable avivo but it does other video tweaks for non-avivo -
#4.3 Posted by Angry_Badger on 19 Dec 2005 - 22:30
- Perhaps Im blind but i cannot find any mention of the X800 series cards in that article
-
#4.4 Posted by Tungsten T on 20 Dec 2005 - 01:33
- How's bout you read the first paragraph of the second link in the artical. Doy!
-
#4.5 Posted by Angry_Badger on 20 Dec 2005 - 19:02
- "Exactly 10 days ago, we brought you a video quality comparison between the ATI Radeon X800 XL using Catalyst 5.12, the NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT, and the XGI Volari 8300. Using the HQV Benchmark DVD and true analog capture hardware, we showed you how ATI's legendary video quality was just that: a legend."
Heres the article that paragragh is refering to:
http://firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_nvidia...ity_comparison/
If you actually read that article youll find no mention of AVIVO because its NOT a feature on this card. Perhaps they might be improving the deinterlacer or something, which you might notice on you older card but AVIVO will have no affect at all
-
(1 reply)
#5 Posted by Croquant on 19 Dec 2005 - 21:27
- Um, the next driver from ATI is going to be called 6.1, not 5.13
That is, unless someone added a 13'th month to 2006 and didn't bother to tell me.
-
#6 Posted by miniM3 on 19 Dec 2005 - 21:49
- I have a 9600 pro (wish I knew better and got the 9800 pro instead)
Unless you have X1xxxx series then theres NO point whatsoever for updating your Cat drivers....
-
#7 Posted by macrosslover on 20 Dec 2005 - 01:33
- it's number of releases in a year. they've just always released them once a month but there was never anything stopping them from releasing a 13th or 14th driver.
-
#8 Posted by DKAngel on 20 Dec 2005 - 03:18
- woot
-
(1 reply)
#9 Posted by Ice Brewed Beer on 20 Dec 2005 - 06:52
- Anyone notice ANY difference in ATi's X8xx series of cards?
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
The 5.13 drivers are optimized for quality video playback, AVIVO, in othe words HDTV lovin Santa has brought the thirteenth Catalyst driver release of 2005. With this new version, ATI claims that they've raised the bar in video performance and set the stage for worldwide "video dominATIon." ATI considers Catalyst 5.13 as the first driver that unlocks the AVIVO technology present in the Radeon X1800, but it's more than that. Catalyst 5.13 represents the countless hours needed to understand the problems associated with deinterlacing and image enhancement as well as the time spent generating novel solutions.