software

Winamp 5.33 Build 1079 Beta

Mihai Asmanow   on 06 February 2007 - 19:13 · 18 comments & 3660 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Nullsoft Winamp is a fast, flexible, high-fidelity music player for Windows. Winamp supports MP3, CD, Audiosoft, Audio Explosion, MOD, WAV and other audio formats, custom appearances called skins, plus audio visualization and audio effect plug-ins.

What's new in Winamp 5.33 Beta

* Improved: [gen_ml] unicode tree item title support
* Improved: [NDE] speed optimizations
* Improved: [ml_history] localized dates
* Improved: [ml_local] Unicode media library support
* Improved: [ml_playlists] now uses m3u8 to retain unicode file info
* Improved: [ml_playlists] playlists in send-to submenu
* Improved: [ml_pmp] playback-from-device of unicode filenames
* Improved: [ml_wire] moved discover page to main page



* Improved: [pmp_p4s] auto-detection of supported file formats
* Fixed: playlist directory loading fix (again)
* Fixed: recursive playlist loading
* Fixed: video lockup when switching video display settings
* Fixed: HTML playlist generation
* Fixed: temp file cleanup after burning
* Fixed: Alt+L from video window
* Fixed: fullscreen video display drawing glitch
* Fixed: recursive shortcut loading
* Fixed ASX Loader not reading local relative paths correctly
* Fixed: [gen_ml] & needs expanding to && for any menu entries showing filenames
* Fixed: [in_flac] not saving genres.txt in multiuser directory
* Fixed: [in_mp3] create id3v2 tag when writing album artist
* Fixed: [in_mp3] workaround for id3v2.4 tags with badly formatted frame sizes
* Fixed: [in_vorbis] writing blank metadata instead of erasing
* Fixed: [in_wave] sometimes not remembering custom extensions
* Fixed: [in_wm] stack overflow on hi-def multichannel audio with replaygain enabled
* Fixed: [in_wm] File Info editor album artist not saving
* Fixed: [ml_local] Modern skin pledit winshade 'Manage Playlist' button bug
* Fixed: [ml_local] ignoring files with ellipsis (...)
* Fixed: [ml_local] editing disc via 'edit selected items'
* Fixed: [ml_local] sorting fix
* Fixed: [ml_local] ratings menu
* Fixed: [ml_local] crash when sorting by replaygain
* Fixed: [ml_local] deadlock when retrieving title to guess metadata
* Fixed: [ml_local] no longer causes unicode files in playlist to display ?????
* Fixed: [ml_playlists] time column and 'status' in statusbar
* Fixed: [ml_pmp]
* Fixed: [ml_rg] multi-channel files being calculated incorrectly
* Fixed: [ml_transcode] bad/missing metadata on transcoded files
* Fixed: [ml_transcode] error on overly long filenames "can't open destination file"
* Fixed: [ml_wire] podcasts that change titles not updating properly
* Updated: Coding Technologies aacPlus encoder 8.0.3
* Updated: [enc_flac] Flake SVN r114
* Updated: [gen_ff] Freetype 2.3.1
* Updated: [gen_jumpex] Jump To File Extra v0.97.11 (build 109)

IMPORTANT: If you upgrade on top of an already existing version then, unless you backup the media library database first, you cannot go back to 5.32 or earlier. This is because the media library database in 5.33 is now saved in a unicode compatible format.

Download: Winamp 5.33 Beta Full | Winamp 5.33 Beta Pro | Winamp 5.33 Beta Standard | Winamp 5.33 Beta Lite
News source: Winamp Forum
Link: Winamp Home Page

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
#1 JorgeIvan on 06 Feb 2007 - 19:21
hell yeah!
(4 replies) #2 Blindsleeper on 06 Feb 2007 - 19:38
i hate to be a troll, but winamp has been pretty sub par since sometime around 1.96
#2.1 ozzy76 on 06 Feb 2007 - 19:53
You're right, you are a troll.
#2.2 Typhon on 06 Feb 2007 - 20:33
Quote - (ozzy76 said @ #2.1)
You're right, you are a troll.


LOL That was funny.
#2.3 David3k on 06 Feb 2007 - 21:25
I disagree! Winamp updates were fine untill version 2.97. After that, it all went to hell.

Version 2.98 was when I switched to Windows Media Player, and I've never looked back.

I still have the latest non beta version of Winamp installed, but I use it now as a tool, not my media player of choice.
#2.4 Hitchhiker427 on 06 Feb 2007 - 22:24
I don't know what you guys are talking about. Winamp has continued to improve steadily ever since it's release and has never stopped. I can't think of a better media player (except maybe foobar, but I still prefer Winamp).
#3 Denver_80203 on 06 Feb 2007 - 21:30
I still love winamp 5.x vs media player or really anything I'm ever looked at. However I have very clean tags on my tunes so the library works like it should. people with messy files are up the creek no matter what they use.
#4 +Harlem39s Finest on 06 Feb 2007 - 21:49
i remember when i thought winamp was good...

now i use Foobar
#5 Copernic on 06 Feb 2007 - 22:10
Oh my gosh. We had this exact same discussion every time Winamp get updated; it's bloated, it's ugly, the old 2.95 version was the best, i use Foobar, the best is Foobar, Winamp is spyware, Winamp is dead.....but we forget a thing:

Actually there's nothing better than Winamp in terms of:

- size
- flexibility
- interface
- plugins
- frequent updates
- high audio quality output

And number of users :

Quote -
In 2005 Winamp grew from 33 million monthly users to over 52 million monthly users, making it by some counts the third most actively used media player globally


source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winamp


50 million users can't be wrong don't you think ?
(2 replies) #6 +Harlem39s Finest on 06 Feb 2007 - 23:47
Me and 4 of my friends (real life friends ) were wrong...




does high number of IE users make Internet Explorer good ?



"there's over 1.2 billion people smoking worldwide" 1.2 billion people eh ? they can't be wrong
#6.1 ozzy76 on 07 Feb 2007 - 03:44
Yes, because every installation of Windows comes preloaded with Winamp *rolls eyes*
#6.2 Herby on 07 Feb 2007 - 09:24
Quote - (Harlem39s Finest said @ #1)
Me and 4 of my friends (real life friends ) were wrong...

You and 4 of your friends are wrong...

It's a great player, if you want it to use less resources then use classic skins + uninstall plugins that you don't use.

Quote - (Harlem39s Finest said @ #1)
does high number of IE users make Internet Explorer good ?

It appears to be more vulnerable than other browsers because it is used so much more than other browsers.

Quote - (Harlem39s Finest said @ #1)
"there's over 1.2 billion people smoking worldwide" 1.2 billion people eh ? they can't be wrong

Did you ever hear a smoker say that it's good for your health?
It's an addiction and a habit!
#7 ThaCrip on 07 Feb 2007 - 06:28
winamp lite is the only "good" version of winamp left... the only thing i use winamp for is playing mp3 files... video wise i use "media player classic".

winamp "LITE", it just loads up fast and sounds real good with a solid interface and it's nice and compact and dont take up much of the screen + it has a equalizer .... cant really beat that ... foobar aint bad but it takes up to much of screen and it's interface is pretty dull looking the last i knew.... plus i dont think it "sounds" as good as winamp does either.
(2 replies) #8 jamesyfx on 07 Feb 2007 - 07:30
Foobar has a pretty ugly presentation. I don't use Winamp either, but from what I've used, it's a pleasant application to have sitting on your desktop.
#8.1 ThaCrip on 07 Feb 2007 - 10:00
well what do you use? ... cause for playing mp3 files i find standard windows media player 9/10/11 etc pretty slow compared to winamp lite ... plus it (windows media player) dont offer as much sound customization options (basically a equalizer) as winamp lite does.
#8.2 jamesyfx on 09 Feb 2007 - 15:25
Quote - (ThaCrip said @ #8.1)
well what do you use? ... cause for playing mp3 files i find standard windows media player 9/10/11 etc pretty slow compared to winamp lite ... plus it (windows media player) dont offer as much sound customization options (basically a equalizer) as winamp lite does.


I dont listen to music on my pc. I've got an mp3 player for that.
#9 Lawrens on 07 Feb 2007 - 07:32
It's nice that they're still improving winamp, it doesn't really run that slow on my computer, foobar still takes the least resources but I never liked the interface. So I still prefer winamp+mpc.
#10 +Harlem39s Finest on 07 Feb 2007 - 12:54
Quote - Herby
You and 4 of your friends are wrong...

It's a great player, if you want it to use less resources then use classic skins + uninstall plugins that you don't use.


Or i could still use foobar... or i could use install foobar and then install the plugins i need...

tbh i don't know why we're having this argument. people use winAmp because it does enough for their needs. i don't use it because it doesn't.



Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)