Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2
Posted by Emil Protalinski on 13 March 2007 - 18:36 · 23 comments & 12931 views
- Advertisement
-
-
#2 Posted by semifamous on 13 Mar 2007 - 18:43
- Except when I try, the x86 link results in a 404.
-
#4 Posted by +cheesegoduk on 13 Mar 2007 - 18:54
- yey! Been waiting for this for a while
-
#7 Posted by TenebraruM on 13 Mar 2007 - 19:34
- Best OS Microsoft has come up with so far. Will be keeping it listed in GRUB for a looong time.
-
#8 [Guest] Posted by Guest on 13 Mar 2007 - 19:54
- This should be front page

-
(2 replies)
#9 Posted by +Ficman on 13 Mar 2007 - 19:57
- Isn't this an RC though? SANS is reporting it as an RC
"Published: 2007-03-13,
Last Updated: 2007-03-13 20:18:44 UTC
by Kyle Haugsness (Version: 2)
Microsoft published a release candidate for Server 2003 SP2 today."
Last edited by Ficman on 13 Mar 2007 - 20:52 -
#9.1 Posted by Andy-Roo on 13 Mar 2007 - 20:18
- I don't think so. The release candidate was put out back in November, and this appears to be the final version. I'm going to wait until Microsoft updates its website before downloading it, though.
-
#9.2 Posted by
neufuse on 13 Mar 2007 - 23:25
- Quote - (Andy-Roo said @ #9.1)I don't think so. The release candidate was put out back in November, and this appears to be the final version. I'm going to wait until Microsoft updates its website before downloading it, though.
It already came down to our WSUS servers so its a RTM build
-
#10 Posted by ]SK[ on 13 Mar 2007 - 20:42
- Wow didn't expect this. I know what I will be doing with my time at work then.
*Edit*
Getting a 404 on the Win32 Version.
*Edit*
Working now.
Last edited by ]SK[ on 13 Mar 2007 - 20:59
-
#11 Posted by Budious on 13 Mar 2007 - 20:50
- Excellent, been using build 2845 on XP x64 for the past few months with no issues, downloading gold now.
-
#13 Posted by torrentthief on 13 Mar 2007 - 21:14
- 32bit is 372mb, it is final, it would say its RC on the ms page for the 32bit if it was and installer didnt say RC when i ran it.
very nice release!
-
#14 Posted by Phemo on 13 Mar 2007 - 21:15
- The x64 version has a digital signature but it seems that maybe MS forgot to digitally sign the 32-bit version. It's clearly not beta or RC and it's no big deal since it's straight from MS but just something I thought a little strange.
-
(1 reply)
#16 Posted by Adrilindozao on 13 Mar 2007 - 22:23
- What is the Build?
-
(3 replies)
#17 Posted by snuffy on 13 Mar 2007 - 23:59
- whats the deal with upgrading R2?
-
#17.1 Posted by Andy-Roo on 14 Mar 2007 - 00:09
- What do you mean? It should work just fine. R2 is essentially SP1 with extra crap on top, so now you'll have SP2 with extra crap on top.
-
#17.2 Posted by snuffy on 14 Mar 2007 - 09:30
- Quote - (Andy-Roo said @ #17.1)What do you mean? It should work just fine. R2 is essentially SP1 with extra crap on top, so now you'll have SP2 with extra crap on top.
I was just wondering whether there was going to be a R2 SP2 :p -
#17.3 Posted by happymonkey on 14 Mar 2007 - 09:46
- Quote - (snuffy said @ #17.2)Quote - (Andy-Roo said @ #17.1)What do you mean? It should work just fine. R2 is essentially SP1 with extra crap on top, so now you'll have SP2 with extra crap on top.
I was just wondering whether there was going to be a R2 SP2 :p
no, it's ONE update for all versions - the only variant is for different CPUs (x86, x64 or ia64).
see the FAQ for more, http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsserver/sp2/faq.mspx
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live

SP2 can be installed directly on the following operating systems: