software
Report a problem

JkDefrag 3.26

Copernic   on 19 September 2007 - 10:58 · 5 comments & 4232 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Free (released under the GNU General Public License) disk defragment and optimize utility for Windows 2000/2003/XP/Vista/X64. Completely automatic and very easy to use, fast, low overhead, with two optimization strategies, and can handle floppies and USB disks/sticks. Included are a Windows version, a command line version (for scheduling by the task scheduler or for use from administrator scripts), a screensaver version, a DLL library (for use from programming languages), and versions for Windows X64. JkDefrag is based on the standard defragmentation API by Microsoft, a system library that is included in Windows 2000, 2003, XP, and Vista. All defragmenters are based on this API, including commercial defragmenters. JkDefrag is therefore very solid and there is no risk of losing data. You can stop the program at any time, it will finish the current file in the background. If your disks use NTFS then you're even safe when the computer crashes in the middle of defragging. Nevertheless, it's still a good idea to backup before defragmenting, just like with other defragmenters, because the heavy use of the harddisk may trigger a hardware fault.




Changes in
JkDefrag v3.26 (September 19, 2007)

- Undo of one of the changes in the graphics code of the screensaver. It showed a completely black screen..


Download:
JkDefrag 3.26
Download: JkDefrag 3.26 (Windows x64)
Screenshot: >> Click here <<
View: JkDefrag Home Page
Link: JkDefrag GUI | JkDefragTWGUI | JkDefragStarter

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 5 additional comments
#1 Diaboli on 19 Sep 2007 - 13:02
does this do a better job than diskeeper?
(3 replies) #2 hapbt on 19 Sep 2007 - 13:04
no
but its free
#2.1 Azmodan on 19 Sep 2007 - 14:09
Quote - (hapbt said @ #2)
no
but its free


cite your sources (why it is better than JkDefrag).
#2.2 hapbt on 19 Sep 2007 - 15:16
Quote - (Azmodan said @ #2.1)
Quote - (hapbt said @ #2)
no
but its free


cite your sources (why it is better than JkDefrag).


no, you explain why is jkdefrag as good as diskeeper
#2.3 Azmodan on 19 Sep 2007 - 16:02
Quote - (hapbt said @ #2.2)
no, you explain why is jkdefrag as good as diskeeper


I haven't mentioned that JkDefrag is better than Diskeeper (or good as), you're the one claiming that Diskeeper is better than JkDefrag!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)