Microsoft's plans for improving performance of SSD drives in Windows 7 are starting to emerge concrete with some solutions. Manufacturers like Seagate or Sandisk are working to finish their cut of the work as much as possible, and Microsoft is trying to make the Windows 7 fit as best as it can to the new storage technology. Microsoft stated that they are working with SSD manufacturers like Intel, Seagate, Sandisk and Samsung.
In an interview with Siobhan M. Lyons, from Seagate Consumer Solution division, that was confirmed.
As stated in the interview, there is very little chance that SSDs and HDDs can share the same solutions in the future, because they are completely different technology. Solutions that suit one, do not work that well on the other. For example, the NAND SSDs do not have requirements for a defrag option, but with that option on, the lifetime of an SSD is reduced. The lifetime of a SSD depends on the maximum number of reads and writes, so a defrag can only shorten the lifetime.
Nevertheless, Windows 7 promises three more optimization techniques. All three are tied to the reducing the number of reads and writes as much as possible. The first is disabling merging for deleted data blocks, second is early garbage collecting and the third, keeping the drive as clean as possible.
Microsoft Research has completed an analysis of the SSD drive work and technology. In this analysis, which is very useful literature if you want to research SSDs, there is discussion about trade offs that should be taken to improve performance. For example, if a large page size is used, then the page table will be smaller. However, then we get to an increased number of read-modify-writes. A large allocation pool gives us good load balancing, but needs more chip-ops. Of course, all of this also includes a brand new SSD drive hardware controller.
Unfortunately, the people behind the analysis cannot be sure that all of the measures will actually increase the performance or durability of SSD drives. The analysis was measured in laboratory conditions, not long-term use. Aside from that, flash-based drives are sure to be an important storage medium in the future.
















But the prices of SSDs are just too expensive right now..
I'll wait some more months or 2 years until the prices start to drop considerably!!
With good wearing (hardware or software counters), it is estimated that a typical SSD can last 10 years with extreme use. Moderate use and you aren't going to have it ever die on you. The only problems are things that write constantly to the SAME space. Example: Swap files. You can't have a swap file on a flash drive. This will kill it.
To quote someone:
I thought they were getting rid of the bloat?
What bloat? This is normal size and I believe OSX has a 10gb install size. Also, 8gb is nothing compared to the 15gb install of Vista. So they are reducing size
Yeah, sure, let's get rid of all the graphics, the dlls, the built-in drivers, the extensive legacy support. People would luuuurve that.
That's not something ANYONE should be worrying about except consumer electronics like an iPod or Zune - and they only need the bare minimums of services and a super-restricted driver set anyway.
Battery life...yeah, that's STILL an issue for everything under the Sun.
How about people buying SDDs?
Nothing is known yet, maybe they will release something like they are going to do with blueray support ...
Intel X-25M 80Gb SSD Drives can hit 206 MB/s Read Speed (currently the fastest SSDs)
Because they use cheaper Multi-level Chip (MLC) Technology they can only write at 65 MB/s (WD VelociRaptors read & write at ~100 MB/s)
Intel will soon release X-25E 80Gb Drives that uses Single-level Chips that can read at 250 MB/s and write at 170 MB/s but they will be very $$$
Intel 160GB Drives are planned for next year.
I also understand the Major HD Manufacturers are mad that the SSD Makers are not paying licensing fees to the SATA patent holders.
The problem is not the number of writes (by the time you wear out a drive, it will be long overdue for an upgrade), but cost per MB with acceptable write speeds.
As with all technology, eventually prices will drop, while performance and capacity will increase.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.