Flock is a social-focused browser that is built around the Mozilla Firefox browser. As of lately, Flock has been talking about switching from running on Mozilla's Firefox browser to Google's Chrome browser because Mozilla is not listening to the needs of Flock to help improve itself.With a new upcoming release of Flock 2.1 is still apparently built on Mozilla's Firefox browser and not that of Google's Chrome. The web site of Flock's browser still says powered by Mozilla, leaving to believe the upcoming 2.1 release of Flock will not be run off of Google's Chrome browser.
The switch from Mozilla's Firefox browser to Google's Chrome leaves behind a lot of security patches, cross-platform support as well as a very large open source community, something Flock.com praises in its browser. As Flock still pushes for popularity, pushing to switch browser platforms now could set Flock back even further while Google still improves Chrome.
Flock's browser still maintains a less than a fraction of all web users, even less than Netscape, which discontinued its browser almost over a year ago. Flock has 6 million or so downloads so far, making it still an underdog in a race for the best browser with recent surprising releases from Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Chrome. Flock may find it hard to fit in, even running on Google's still new Chrome browser.
I agree, Mozilla has no obligation to help them, they chose to develop Flock using Mozilla's technology.
Better yet -- why would GOOGLE listen to them!?
Google has recently said that they developed Google Chrome to encourage innovation and put pressure on the competition to develop improved Javascript engines. I can't fathom supporting a third party like Flock, or ANY third party, would be part of their plans. Heck it's barely even a plan to do a strong feature rich web browser, but rather a fast browser that thereby support complex web services well. This seems like a major conflict of interests, with more chances to success if relying on the huge OSS community behind Firefox.
This all sounds very odd to me. Actually, it sounds more like a poorly thought out "threat" to Mozilla. It doesn't make sense.
Flock is so much faster than Firefox though. Flock is my main browser. If they do switch to chrome though, it's unlikely I'll follow. Then all my bars would disappear. And Roboform isn't compatible with Opera let alone Chrome
Who cares about what you care about what I care ;-)
Not to mention chrome doesn't have add-ons so who knows how they'd be able to get all their features jammed into it. Maybe would be more ideal just building their own based on webkit if they're so keen on it.
One day. Until then.
At the moment it does lack a lot of crucial things, e.g. Add-ons, Mac OS X Support, Linux Support, etc.
(Yes, I'm aware of the whole KHTML and such; it's not a literal question, calm down)
Mac OSX and Linux support arent really things it is "lacking" nor are they crucial.
+1
Or it's that Firefox users interested in e.g. better Facebook integration simply install the extension for that and are done with it... No need to switch and learn an entirely new browser, lose Mozilla's update schedule for Firefox and having to rely on a far smaller development team for slower security and feature updates, etc, etc.
afair there was also idea for adding support firefox addons in chrome, but thats extremly strange (and dangerous too imo, its like adding support for activex in firefox ) .
First, Chrome hasn't been around long enough for people to know what's going to happen with it. Google has a notorious track record of keeping things in "BETA" status indefinitely. The 'BETA' tag alone doesn't mean much to the average e-tard, but developers, I assume, would be a little reluctant to spend a lot of time on it. Especially on such an experimental project backed with financial investments.
Furthermore, I think this social networking nonsense is just a fad and will fizzle out sooner than later. MySpace admins and big-wigs are jumping ship, Facebook has come under scrutiny and backlash, and so on. These e-trends are just like trends in the real world - they'll come and go. Again, with so much money and time invested in such a fickle society, it's risky. But even if they stick to Firefox, there's no telling how much life is left in the project.
I say they just "wing it" by sticking to Firefox. Maybe introduce some new features here and there, but stop trying to be the next "big thing". It's just a damn browser.
But yeah, I don't know what "needs" they require, but it doesn't really make sense to say they'll be switching because firefox code doesn't suit them, when the code is open-source and they can fork it, pft.
I suppose we can forgive you. This time.
Are the silly Flockers who use Flock, referred to as 'sheep'?
I don't. But maybe thats just me.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.